Aerobic Interval Training vs. Moderate Continuous Training in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Exercise training improves exercise capacity (peakVO2), which is closely related to long-term survival in cardiac patients. However, it remains unclear which type and intensity of exercise is most effective for improving exercise tolerance and body weight. Individual studies suggest that aerobic interval training (AIT) might increase peakVO2 more in this population.
We conducted a meta-analysis to summarize the effects of AIT compared with moderate continuous training (MCT) on peakVO2, submaximal exercise capacity, and body weight in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) with preserved and/or reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF).
Data sources and study selection
A systematic search was conducted and we included randomized trials comparing AIT and MCT in CAD patients lasting at least 4 weeks, reporting peakVO2 results, and published in a peer-reviewed journal up to May 2013. The primary outcome measure was peakVO2. Secondary outcomes were submaximal exercise capacity parameters and body weight.
Random- and fixed-effects models were used and data were reported as weighted means and 95 % confidence intervals (CIs).
Nine study groups were included, involving 206 patients (100 AIT, 106 MCT). Overall, AIT resulted in a significantly larger increase in peakVO2 [+1.60 mL/kg/min (95 % CI 0.18–3.02; p = 0.03)] compared with MCT. MCT seemed to be more effective in reducing body weight (−0.78 kg; 95 % CI −0.01 to 1.58; p = 0.05).
The small number of studies might have affected the power to reach significance for the secondary outcomes.
In CAD patients with preserved and/or reduced LVEF, AIT is superior to MCT for improving peakVO2, while MCT seems to be more effective in reducing body weight. However, large, well-designed, randomized controlled trials are warranted to confirm these findings.
- Nichols M, Townsend N, Scarborough P, et al. European cardiovascular disease statistics: Edition 2012. http://www.ehnheart.org/cvd-statistics/cvd-statistics-2012.html. Accessed 1 Nov 2012.
- Taylor, RS, Brown, A, Ebrahim, S (2004) Exercise-based rehabilitation for patients with coronary heart disease: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Am J Med 116: pp. 682-692 CrossRef
- Vanhees, L, Fagard, R, Thijs, L (1994) Prognostic significance of peak exercise capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. J Am Coll Cardiol 23: pp. 358-363 CrossRef
- Myers, J, Prakash, M, Froelicher, V (2002) Exercise capacity and mortality among men referred for exercise testing. N Engl J Med 346: pp. 793-801 CrossRef
- Shephard, CW, While, AE (2012) Cardiac rehabilitation and quality of life: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 49: pp. 755-771 CrossRef
- Oldridge, N (2012) Exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation in patients with coronary heart disease: meta-analysis outcomes revisited. Future Cardiol 8: pp. 729-751 CrossRef
- Cornelissen, VA, Fagard, RH (2005) Effects of endurance training on blood pressure, blood pressure-regulating mechanisms, and cardiovascular risk factors. Hypertension 46: pp. 667-675 CrossRef
- Vanhees, L, Rauch, B, Piepoli, M (2012) Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular disease (part III). Eur J Prev Cardiol 19: pp. 1333-1356 CrossRef
- Vanhees, L, Stevens, A, Schepers, D (2004) Determinants of the effects of physical training and of the complications requiring resuscitation during exercise in patients with cardiovascular disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 11: pp. 304-312 CrossRef
- Rankin, AJ, Rankin, AC, MacIntyre, P (2012) Walk or run? Is high-intensity exercise more effective than moderate-intensity exercise at reducing cardiovascular risk?. Scott Med J 57: pp. 99-102 CrossRef
- Arena, R, Myers, J, Forman, DE (2013) Should high-intensity-aerobic interval training become the clinical standard in heart failure. Heart Fail Rev 18: pp. 95-105 CrossRef
- Cornish, AK, Broadbent, S, Cheema, BS (2011) Interval training for patients with coronary artery disease: a systematic review. Eur J Appl Physiol 111: pp. 579-589 CrossRef
- O’Donovan, G, Owen, A, Bird, SR (2005) Changes in cardiorespiratory fitness and coronary heart disease risk factors following 24 wk of moderate- or high-intensity exercise of equal energy cost. J Appl Physiol 98: pp. 1619-1625 CrossRef
- Guiraud, T, Nigam, A, Gremeaux, V (2012) High-intensity interval training in cardiac rehabilitation. Sports Med 42: pp. 587-605 CrossRef
- Wisløff, U, Støylen, A, Loennechen, JP (2007) Superior cardiovascular effect of aerobic interval training versus moderate continuous training in heart failure patients: a randomized study. Circulation 115: pp. 3086-3094 CrossRef
- Smart, NA, Dieberg, G, Giallauria, F (2013) Intermittent versus continuous exercise training in chronic heart failure: a meta-analysis. Int J Cardiol 166: pp. 352-358 CrossRef
- Haykowsky, MJ, Timmons, MP, Kruger, C (2013) Meta-analysis of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and systolic function in patients with heart failure and reduced ejection fractions. Am J Cardiol 111: pp. 1466-1469 CrossRef
- Rognmo, Ø, Hetland, E, Helgerud, J (2004) High intensity aerobic interval exercise is superior to moderate intensity exercise for increasing aerobic capacity in patients with coronary artery disease. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 11: pp. 216-222 CrossRef
- Warburton, DE, McKenzie, DC, Haykowsky, MJ (2005) Effectiveness of high-intensity interval training for the rehabilitation of patients with coronary artery disease. Am J Cardiol 95: pp. 1080-1084 CrossRef
- Rocco, EA, Prado, DM, Silva, AG (2012) Effect of continuous and interval exercise training on the PETCO2 response during a graded exercise test in patients with coronary artery disease. Clinics 67: pp. 623-627 CrossRef
- Moholdt, TT, Amundsen, BH, Rustad, LA (2009) Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise after coronary artery bypass surgery: a randomized study of cardiovascular effects and quality of life. Am Heart J 158: pp. 1031-1037 CrossRef
- Dimopoulos, S, Anastatiou-Nana, M, Sakellariou, D (2006) Effects of exercise rehabilitation program on heart rate recovery in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 13: pp. 67-73
- Vanhees, L, Geladas, N, Hansen, D (2012) Importance of characteristics and modalities of physical activity and exercise in the management of cardiovascular health in individuals with cardiovascular risk factors: recommendations from the EACPR (part II). Eur J Prev Cardiol 19: pp. 1005-1033 CrossRef
- The George Institute for Global Health and the University of Sydney. Physiotherapy Evidence Database; 2012. http://www.pedro.org.au/english/downloads/pedro-scale/. Accessed 18 Oct 2012.
- Morton, NA (2009) The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother 55: pp. 129-133 CrossRef
- Maher, CG, Sherrington, C, Herbert, RD (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83: pp. 713-721
- Follman, D, Elliott, P, Suh, I (1992) Variance imputation for overviews of clinical trials with continuous response. Clin Epidemiol 45: pp. 769-773 CrossRef
- Moholdt, T, Aamot, IL, Granøien, I (2012) Aerobic interval training increases peak oxygen uptake more than usual care exercise training in myocardial infarction patients: a randomized controlled study. Clin Rehabil 26: pp. 33-44 CrossRef
- Dersimonian, R, Laird, N (1986) Meta-analysis in clinical trials. Control Clin Trials 7: pp. 177-188 CrossRef
- Hunter, JE, Schmidt, FL (2000) Fixed effects vs. random effects meta-analysis models: implications for cumulative research knowledge. Int J Sel Assess 8: pp. 275-292 CrossRef
- Roditis, P, Dimopoulos, S, Sakellariou, D (2007) The effects of exercise training on the kinetics of oxygen uptake in patients with chronic heart failure. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 14: pp. 304-311
- Amundsen, BH, Rognmo, Ø, Hatlen-Rebhan, G (2008) High-intensity aerobic exercise improves diastolic function in coronary artery disease. Scand Cardiovasc J 42: pp. 110-117 CrossRef
- Fu, TC, Wang, CH, Lin, PS (2013) Aerobic interval training improves oxygen uptake efficiency by enhancing cerebral and muscular hemodynamics in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol 167: pp. 41-50 CrossRef
- Iellamo, F, Manzi, V, Caminiti, G (2013) Dose–response relationship of baroreflex sensitivity and heart rate variability to individually-tailored exercise training in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol 166: pp. 334-339 CrossRef
- Freyssin, C, Verkindt, C, Prieur, F (2012) Cardiac rehabilitation in chronic heart failure: effect of an 8-week, high intensity interval training versus continuous training. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 93: pp. 1359-1364 CrossRef
- Iellamo, F, Manzi, V, Caminiti, G (2013) Matched dose interval and continuous exercise training induce similar cardiorespiratory and metabolic adaptations in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol 167: pp. 2561-2565 CrossRef
- Moholdt, T, Aamot, IL, Granøien, I (2011) Long-term follow-up after cardiac rehabilitation: a randomized study of usual care exercise training versus aerobic interval training after myocardial infarction. Int J Cardiol 152: pp. 388-390 CrossRef
- Smart, NA, Steele, M (2012) A comparison of 16 weeks of continuous vs intermittent exercise training in chronic heart failure patients. Congest Heart Fail 18: pp. 205-211 CrossRef
- Currie, KD, Dubberley, JB, McKelvie, RS (2013) Low-volume, high-intensity interval training in patients with coronary artery disease. Med Sci Sports Exerc 45: pp. 1436-1442 CrossRef
- Fletcher, GF, Balady, GJ, Amsterdam, EA (2001) Exercise standards for testing and training: a statement for healthcare professionals from the American Heart Association. Circulation 104: pp. 1694-1740 CrossRef
- Mezzani, A, Agostoni, P, Cohen-Solal, A (2009) Standards for the use of cardiopulmonary exercise testing for the functional evaluation of cardiac patients: a report from the Exercise Physiology Section of the European Association for Cardiovascular Prevention and Rehabilitation. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 16: pp. 249-267 CrossRef
- Keteyian, SJ, Brawner, CA, Savage, PD (2008) Peak aerobic capacity predicts prognosis in patients with coronary heart disease. Am Heart J 156: pp. 292-300 CrossRef
- Hwang, CL, Wu, YT, Chou, CH (2011) Effect of aerobic interval training on exercise capacity and metabolic risk factors in people with cardiometabolic disorders: a meta-analysis. J Cardiopulm Rehabil Prev 31: pp. 378-385 CrossRef
- Tomczak, CR, Thompson, RB, Paterson, I (2011) Effect of acute high-intensity interval exercise on postexercise biventricular function in mild heart failure. J Appl Physiol 110: pp. 398-406 CrossRef
- Nechwatal, RM, Duck, C, Gruber, G (2002) Physical training as interval or continuous training in chronic heart failure for improving functional capacity, hemodynamics and quality of life: a controlled study. Z Kardiol 91: pp. 328-337 CrossRef
- Tjønna, AE, Lee, SJ, Rognmo, Ø (2008) Aerobic interval training versus continuous moderate exercise as a treatment for the metabolic syndrome: a pilot study. Circulation 118: pp. 346-354 CrossRef
- Guazzi, M, Vitelli, A, Arena, R (2012) The effect of exercise training on plasma NT-pro-BNP levels and its correlation with improved exercise ventilator efficiency in patients with heart failure. Int J Cardiol 158: pp. 290-291 CrossRef
- Veire, NR, Laethem, C, Philippé, J (2006) VE/VCO2 slope and oxygen uptake efficiency slope in patients with coronary artery disease and intermediate peakVO2. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil 13: pp. 916-923 CrossRef
- Sarullo, FM, Fazio, G, Brusca, I (2010) Cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with chronic heart failure: prognostic comparison from peak VO2 and VE/VCO2 slope. Open Cardiovasc Med J 26: pp. 127-134 CrossRef
- Cahalin, LP, Chase, P, Arena, R (2013) A meta-analysis of the prognostic significance of cardiopulmonary exercise testing in patients with heart failure. Heart Fail Rev 18: pp. 79-94 CrossRef
- Guazzi, M, Adams, V, Conraads, V (2012) EACPR/AHA Scientific Statement: clinical recommendations for cardiopulmonary exercise testing data assessment in specific patient populations. Eur Heart J 33: pp. 2917-2927
- Hansen, D, Dendale, P, Loon, LJ, Meeusen, R (2010) The impact of training modalities on the clinical benefits of exercise intervention in patients with cardiovascular disease or type 2 diabetes mellitus. Sports Med 40: pp. 921-940 CrossRef
- Thompson, PD, Franklin, BA, Balady, GJ (2007) Exercise and acute cardiovascular events placing the risks into perspective: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association Council on Nutrition, Physical Activity, and Metabolism and the Council on Clinical Cardiology. Circulation 115: pp. 2358-2368 CrossRef
- Rognmo, Ø, Moholdt, T, Bakken, H (2012) Cardiovascular risk of high- versus moderate intensity aerobic exercise in coronary heart disease patients. Circulation 126: pp. 1436-1440 CrossRef
- Fagard, RH, Staessen, JA, Thijs, L (1996) Advantages and disadvantages of the meta-analysis approach. J Hypertens Suppl 14: pp. S9-S12 CrossRef
- Aerobic Interval Training vs. Moderate Continuous Training in Coronary Artery Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Volume 44, Issue 5 , pp 687-700
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer International Publishing
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors