Cost Effectiveness of Targeted High-dose Atorvastatin Therapy Following Genotype Testing in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Results from the PROVE IT trial suggest that patients with acute coronary syndrome (ACS) treated with atorvastatin 80 mg/day (A80) have significantly lower rates of cardiovascular events compared with patients treated with pravastatin 40 mg/day (P40). In a genetic post hoc substudy of the PROVE IT trial, the rate of event reduction was greater in carriers of the Trp719Arg variant in kinesin family member 6 protein (KIF6) than in noncarriers. We assessed the cost effectiveness of testing for the KIF6 variant followed by targeted statin therapy (KIF6 Testing) versus not testing patients (No Test) and treating them with P40 or A80 in the USA from a payer perspective.
A Markov model was developed in which 2-year event rates from PROVE IT were extrapolated over a lifetime horizon. Costs and utilities were derived from published literature. All costs were in 2010 US dollars except the cost of A80, which was in 2012 US dollars because the generic formulation was available in 2012. Expected costs and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were estimated for each strategy over a lifetime horizon.
Lifetime costs were US$31,700; US$37,100 and US$41,300 for No Test P40, KIF6 Testing and No Test A80 strategies, respectively. The No Test A80 strategy was associated with more QALYs (9.71) than the KIF6 Testing (9.69) and No Test P40 (9.57) strategies. No Test A80 had an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of US$232,100 per QALY gained compared with KIF6 Testing. KIF6 Testing had an ICER of US$45,300 per QALY compared with No Test P40.
Testing ACS patients for KIF6 carrier status may be a cost-effective strategy at commonly accepted thresholds. Treating all patients with A80 is more expensive than treating patients on the basis of KIF6 results, but the modest gain in QALYs is achieved at a cost/QALY that is generally considered unacceptable compared with the KIF6 Testing strategy. Compared with treating all patients with P40, the KIF6 Testing strategy had an ICER below US$50,000 per QALY. The conclusions from this study are sensitive to the price of generic A80 and the effect on adherence of knowing KIF6 carrier status. The results were based on a post hoc substudy of the PROVE IT trial, which was not designed to test the effectiveness of KIF6 testing.
- Roger, VL, Go, AS, Lloyd-Jones, DM (2011) Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 123: pp. e18-e209 CrossRef
- Schwartz, GG, Olsson, AG, Ezekowitz, MD (2001) Effects of atorvastatin on early recurrent ischemic events in acute coronary syndromes: the MIRACL study: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 285: pp. 1711-1718 CrossRef
- Heart Disease and Stroke Statistics, 2009 update at a glance. Dallas: American Heart Association; 2009.
- Kolansky, DM (2009) Acute coronary syndromes: morbidity, mortality, and pharmacoeconomic burden. Am J Manag Care. 15: pp. S36-S41
- Cannon, CP, Braunwald, E, McCabe, CH (2004) Intensive versus moderate lipid lowering with statins after acute coronary syndromes. N Engl J Med. 350: pp. 1495-1504 CrossRef
- Iakoubova, OA, Sabatine, MS, Rowland, CM (2008) Polymorphism in KIF6 gene and benefit from statins after acute coronary syndromes: results from the PROVE IT-TIMI 22 study. J Am Coll Cardiol 51: pp. 449-455 CrossRef
- Iakoubova, OA, Tong, CH, Rowland, CM (2008) Association of the Trp719Arg polymorphism in kinesin-like protein 6 with myocardial infarction and coronary disease in 2 prospective trials: the CARE and WOSCOPS trials. J Am Coll Cardiol 51: pp. 435-443 CrossRef
- Lemos, JA, Blazing, MA, Wiviott, SD (2004) Early intensive vs a delayed conservative simvastatin strategy in patients with acute coronary syndromes: phase Z of the A to Z trial. JAMA. 292: pp. 1307-1316 CrossRef
- Li, Y, Iakoubova, OA, Shiffman, D (2010) KIF6 polymorphism as a predictor of risk of coronary events and of clinical event reduction by statin therapy. Am J Cardiol. 106: pp. 994-998 CrossRef
- Shroufi, A, Powles, JW (2010) Adherence and chemoprevention in major cardiovascular disease: a simulation study of the benefits of additional use of statins. J Epidemiol Community Health. 64: pp. 109-113 CrossRef
- Taylor, DCA, Pandya, A, Thompson, D (2009) Cost-effectiveness of intensive atorvastatin therapy in secondary cardiovascular prevention in the United Kingdom, Spain and Germany, based on the Treating to New Targets study. Eur J Health Econ 10: pp. 255-265 CrossRef
- Lampe, FC, Whincup, PH, Wannamethee, SG (2000) The natural history of prevalent ischaemic heart disease in middle-aged men. Eur Heart J. 21: pp. 1052-1062 CrossRef
- Data on file. Celera, 2011.
- DrugReimbursement.com (online database). Eden Prairie (MN): Optum; 2012. http://www.drugreimbursement.com/drc/. Accessed 2 Jun 2012.
- Drug topics red book 2010. Montvale (NJ): Thomson PDR; 2010.
- O’Sullivan, AK, Rubin, J, Nyambose, J (2011) Cost estimation of cardiovascular disease events in the US. Pharmacoeconomics. 29: pp. 693-704 CrossRef
- Arias, E (2010) United States life tables 2006. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 58: pp. 1-40
- Sullivan, PW, Lawrence, WF, Ghushchyan, V (2005) A national catalog of preference-based scores for chronic conditions in the United States. Med Care. 43: pp. 736-749 CrossRef
- Kalia, NK, Miller, LG, Nasir, K (2006) Visualizing coronary calcium is associated with improvements in adherence to statin therapy. Atherosclerosis. 185: pp. 394-399 CrossRef
- Charland, SL, Agatep, BC, Epstein, RS (2012) Patient knowledge of pharmacogenetic information improves adherence to statin therapy: results of the additional KIF6 risk offers better adherence to statins (AKROBATS) trial. J Am Coll Cardiol 59: pp. E1848 CrossRef
- Nelson, AL, Cohen, JT, Greenberg, D (2009) Much cheaper, almost as good: decrementally cost-effective medical innovation. Ann Intern Med. 151: pp. 662-667 CrossRef
- Parris, ES, Lawrence, DB, Mohn, LA (2005) Adherence to statin therapy and LDL cholesterol goal attainment by patients with diabetes and dyslipidemia. Diabetes Care. 28: pp. 595-599 CrossRef
- Assimes, TL, Hólm, H, Kathiresan, S (2011) Lack of association between the Trp719Arg polymorphism in kinesin-like protein-6 and coronary artery disease in 19 case-control studies. (J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010 Nov 2, 56(19), pp. 1552–63. Erratum in). J Am Coll Cardiol. 57: pp. 520 CrossRef
- Fung, G, Aparicio, AF, Wu, A, Smith, A, Wong, I (2012) KIF6 carrier status in Asians predicts beneficial response to statins. Circulation. 125: pp. AP327
- Ridker, PM, MacFadyen, JG, Glynn, RJ (2011) Kinesin-like protein 6 (KIF6) polymorphism and the efficacy of rosuvastatin in primary prevention. Circ Cardiovasc Genet. 4: pp. 312-317 CrossRef
- Hopewell, JC, Parish, S, Clarke, R (2011) No impact of KIF6 genotype on vascular risk and statin response among 18,348 randomized patients in the Heart Protection Study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 57: pp. 2000-2007 CrossRef
- Ford, I, Murray, H, Packard, CJ (2007) Long-term follow-up of the West of Scotland coronary prevention study. N Engl J Med. 357: pp. 1477-1486 CrossRef
- Ference, BA, Yoo, W, Flack, JM, Clarke, M (2011) A common KIF6 polymorphism increases vulnerability to low-density lipoprotein cholesterol: two meta-analyses and a meta-regression analysis. PLoS ONE. 6: pp. e28834 CrossRef
- Iakoubova, OA, Robertson, M, Tong, CH (2010) KIF6 Trp719Arg polymorphism and the effect of statin therapy in elderly patients: results from the PROSPER study. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 17: pp. 455-461 CrossRef
- Cost Effectiveness of Targeted High-dose Atorvastatin Therapy Following Genotype Testing in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome
Volume 31, Issue 6 , pp 519-531
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer International Publishing AG
- Additional Links
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. OptumInsight, One Main Street, Suite 1040, Cambridge, MA, 02142, USA
- 2. Celera Corporation, Alameda, CA, USA
- 3. Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA