Teriflunomide and Its Mechanism of Action in Multiple Sclerosis
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Bar-Or, A., Pachner, A., Menguy-Vacheron, F. et al. Drugs (2014) 74: 659. doi:10.1007/s40265-014-0212-x
- 2.4k Downloads
Treatment of multiple sclerosis (MS) is challenging: disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) must both limit unwanted immune responses associated with disease initiation and propagation (as T and B lymphocytes are critical cellular mediators in the pathophysiology of relapsing MS), and also have minimal adverse impact on normal protective immune responses. In this review, we summarize key preclinical and clinical data relating to the proposed mechanism of action of the recently approved DMT teriflunomide in MS. Teriflunomide selectively and reversibly inhibits dihydro-orotate dehydrogenase, a key mitochondrial enzyme in the de novo pyrimidine synthesis pathway, leading to a reduction in proliferation of activated T and B lymphocytes without causing cell death. Results from animal experiments modelling the immune activation implicated in MS demonstrate reductions in disease symptoms with teriflunomide treatment, accompanied by reduced central nervous system lymphocyte infiltration, reduced axonal loss, and preserved neurological functioning. In agreement with the results obtained in these model systems, phase 3 clinical trials of teriflunomide in patients with MS have consistently shown that teriflunomide provides a therapeutic benefit, and importantly, does not cause clinical immune suppression. Taken together, these data demonstrate how teriflunomide acts as a selective immune therapy for patients with MS.
Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a chronic, progressive demyelinating disease of the central nervous system (CNS). MS typically emerges in young adulthood, and its incidence is highest in Northern Europe and North America, where it occurs in up to 1 in 1,000 individuals [1, 2]. In approximately 85 % of cases, MS initially manifests as a relapsing–remitting form (RRMS), which is characterized by episodes of neurological worsening followed by at least partial recovery .
Disease-modifying treatments (DMTs) that reduce damage to the CNS are being investigated for the treatment of patients with MS. CNS damage is assumed to result from disturbances in immune tolerance networks . Multiple perivascular inflammatory foci are seen in the CNS of patients with MS, and these become sites of demyelination and axonal injury . The lesions are associated with infiltrating T cells and monocytes, and occasional B cells and plasma cells: T cells may target neurons directly [5, 6]. Additionally, there is evidence for subpial cortical injury, which appears not to be in perivascular distribution [7, 8], implicating further as yet unidentified mechanism(s).
Given the dominant role of abnormal immune activation in MS pathogenesis, DMTs must limit MS-associated immune responses to be effective. On the other hand, in order not to compromise responses to pathogens, DMTs should have minimal effects on normal protective immune responses.
Teriflunomide, a once-daily oral immunomodulatory DMT, is approved in several regions, including the United States and the European Union, for the treatment of RRMS; further regulatory reviews are on-going in several other territories. Approvals were supported by placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trials of teriflunomide that have demonstrated a favourable benefit/risk profile in this disease [9, 10]. In this review, we describe the hypothesized primary mechanism of action (MoA) of teriflunomide together with the preclinical evidence supporting this hypothesis in the context of MS pathogenesis. We also discuss the clinical evidence supporting preservation of protective immunity during teriflunomide treatment. Finally, we consider the place of teriflunomide in an expanding armamentarium of MS therapies.
2 MS Immunopathogenesis
MS is hypothesized to be primarily a T-helper cell-mediated autoimmune disease. Mounting evidence also supports the involvement of various other cells of the immune system. Immune cells cause demyelination and axonal/neuronal injury, and MS disease progression is considered to result partly from degenerative mechanisms as well as from ongoing (CNS-compartmentalized) inflammatory activity likely involving both T and B cells [6, 11–13].
2.1 T Cells
Early evidence supporting CD4+ T-cell involvement in MS came from experimental autoimmune encephalomyelitis (EAE) rodent models. EAE is induced by immunization with CNS-derived proteins or peptides, such as MBP [20, 21]. Transfer of MBP-specific CD4+ T cells from EAE animals can be sufficient to induce EAE in recipient animals, so long as the transferred cells are activated . Transfer of T cells reactive to a mycobacterium derivative, which is used as an adjuvant, did not induce EAE in this experiment . Further support for the involvement of CD4+ T cells in MS comes from the reported increased risk of MS associated with expression of specific major histocompatibility complex (MHC) class II alleles involved in antigen presentation to T lymphocytes .
Th1-type CD4+ T cells, characterized by production of interferon (IFN)γ, IL-2, and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNFα), were initially believed to be the main drivers of MS [24, 25]. More recently, the role of Th17 cells has been recognized . Interruption of Th17 differentiation using IL-23-blocking antibody in EAE mice restricts development of EAE , and IL-17 levels are elevated in blood and brain tissue of patients with MS . Abrogation of disease activity in patients with aggressive MS following ablative chemotherapy and hematopoietic stem cell transplantation was associated with a diminished Th17 response, despite the reemergence of myelin-reactive Th1 and Th2 cells .
Various lines of evidence also indicate a role for CD8+ T cells in MS pathogenesis [13, 16, 30]. CD8+ T cells are able to cause EAE  and are present in MS lesions in patients , and some patients with MS have increased numbers of circulating MBP-reactive CD8+ T cells [33, 34]. Dysfunction or impaired maturation of both natural and inducible regulatory T cells (Treg), a type of CD4+ T cell, have been described in MS. Because Treg are critical for the maintenance of immune tolerance, this dysfunction or impaired maturation could possibly contribute to the disrupted tolerance found in patients with MS [35, 36].
2.2 B Cells
B-cell numbers are increased within the CNS of patients with MS , and B cells are considered to play an important role in MS pathogenesis through both antibody-dependent and antibody-independent functions. Antibody abnormalities within the CNS of patients include increased levels of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) immunoglobulin (Ig) and Ig synthesis rates, as well as the presence of CSF-restricted oligoclonal bands. The target(s) of such antibodies have not been fully characterized, although several antigens have been suggested [38, 39].
B cells described within the MS brain appear to have undergone maturation within the CNS, possibly within specialized tertiary lymphoid tissue described in the pia/meninges of patients [40, 41]. Lineage analysis has shown that B cells from patients with MS can mature on either side of the BBB and traffic across it .
Independently of their antibody-producing capability, B cells may also affect T-cell activity in MS through cytokine production. Aberrant profiles of both pro-inflammatory (lymphotoxin, TNFα, IL-6) and anti-inflammatory (IL-10) cytokine responses have been observed in B cells from patients with MS . B-cell activation in patients with MS can thus drive a pro-inflammatory T cell response, potentially resulting in new disease activity . This hypothesis is supported by the observation that following B-cell depletion with the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab, pro-inflammatory T-cell responses in patients with MS are diminished .
Regulatory B cells (Breg) have been shown to inhibit the progression of EAE in mice . Evidence from patients also supports a role for Breg in MS, or an effect of MS on Breg. Increased numbers of Breg have been reported in patients with MS [47, 48], as have deficiencies in Breg functions, such as in IL-10 secretion [43, 44, 49].
2.3 Other Cells of the Immune System
Myeloid cells such as dendritic cells (DCs), either through their cytokine-secreting capacity or through their antigen-presenting or cell contact-mediated properties, are also likely involved in MS. In patients with MS, myeloid cells (both resident microglia and infiltrating macrophage/DCs) are abundant in CNS lesions and exhibit alterations in phenotype and function (expressing more activation markers and producing greater amounts of pro-inflammatory cytokines), supportive of a role in MS pathogenesis .
Roles in MS for other regulatory immune cells, including subsets of natural killer (NK) cells and resident CNS cells, such as astrocytes, have been proposed because their numbers or functions are altered in patients with MS or in response to immunomodulatory therapy. For example, NK cell cytolytic activity is reduced in patients with MS, and the DMT fingolimod is believed to influence the balance of NK cell subsets . Astrocytes perform multiple roles in the evolution of changes encountered in MS depending upon the stage of development of their associated lesion , while microglia, also found in MS lesions, support the activity of CNS-reactive T cells .
3 Teriflunomide Proposed MoA: Overview of Current Hypothesis
Cells that do not proliferate in response to activation, such as resting lymphocytes, can self-renew through homeostatic proliferation , in which pyrimidine requirements are met through the salvage pathway . Thus, teriflunomide inhibition of DHODH only affects activated, rapidly proliferating lymphocytes (Fig. 2). Rapid, antigen-induced proliferative expansion is unique to lymphocytes . Other proliferating cells, such as gastrointestinal mucosal cells, express lower levels of DHODH  and are not specifically stimulated for rapid expansion; therefore, teriflunomide is far less able to inhibit their proliferation.
Reported MoA of MS therapiesa
MoA (included in labelb)
MoA (evidence for additional mechanisms)
Binds CD52, expressed at high levels on the surface of T and B cells, to cause their depletion from circulation 
Repopulation of lymphocytes rebalances the immune system to reduce MS disease activity 
Dimethyl fumarate (BG-12) 
Protects against oxidative stress-induced cellular injury and loss in neurons and astrocytes via up-regulation of an Nrf2-dependent antioxidant response 
Neuroprotective effects are immune mediated 
Induces apoptosis in polyclonally activated T cells 
Promotes a Th1–Th2 shift in cytokine response 
Modulates DC differentiation 
Down-regulates lymphocyte adhesion 
Impairs macrophage infiltration into the CNS 
Alters the balance of NK-cell subsets 
Protects oligodendrocytes from insult 
Increases astrocyte migration 
Antigen-experienced and naïve T cells are sequestered 
Glatiramer acetate (GA) 
Modifies many immune processes 
Induces suppressor T cells 
Promiscuous high-affinity binding to MHC to prevent presentation of CNS antigens 
Induces a Th1–Th2 shift in T-cell responses through effects on DCs 
Promotes migration of Th2 cells into the CNS 
Inhibits MBP-specific T-cell responses 
May exert direct neurotrophic effects and promote remyelination through induction of BDNF 
Decreases T-cell activation through binding to IFN receptors 
Enhances suppressor T-cell activity 
Modulates MHC expression 
Pleiotropic effects on immune system function 
Promotes a Th1–Th2 shift in cytokine response 
Modulates co-stimulatory molecules on APCs 
Decreases T-cell migration 
Intercalates with DNA and causes single- and double-strand breaks, and inhibits DNA repair through inhibition of DNA topoisomerase II 
Cytotoxic to stimulated T and B lymphocytes 
Modulates astrocyte activity 
Induces suppressive T cells 
May down-modulate VLA-4 ligand VCAM-1 
Mild pro-inflammatory stimulatory effect on CD4+ helper T cells, leading to increases in IL-2, IFN-γ, and IL-17 expression 
Increases effector-memory T-cell pool 
Reduces the ability of DCs to stimulate antigen-specific T-cell responses 
Inhibits proliferation of activated T and B lymphocytes through inhibition of DHODH 
Impairs formation of immunological synapse 
Decreases release of IL-6, IL-8, and MCP-1 from monocytes 
Preferentially affects proliferation of high-avidity T cells 
Therapies in phase 3 developmentc
Promotes differentiation and expansion of CD56 (bright) immunoregulatory NK cells 
Blocks activation and expansion of autoreactive T cells through binding to CD25 
Reduces numbers of Treg and lymphoid tissue-inducer cells 
Impedes T-cell transactivation by DCs 
Decreases Treg numbers in the CNS 
Decreases IL-17 production 
Increases B-cell expression of markers of regulatory activity, such as CD25, IL-10, and CD86 
Increases IL-10 and TGFβ production by T cells (B-cell mediated) 
Augments BDNF expression 
Induces type II monocytes 
Causes a Th1–Th2 shift in CD4+ T cells 
Binds CD20 to cause complement-dependent lysis
of and/or antibody-dependent cytotoxicity towards
MoA of immunosuppressive therapies occasionally or historically used off-label in patients with MSa
MoA (included in labelb)
MoA (evidence for additional mechanisms)
A purine analogue that is incorporated into DNA and blocks the de novo purine synthesis pathway 
Induces apoptosis in stimulated T cells 
Over 10 % of patients experience leukopenia, cancer risk increases with treatment duration and cumulative dose 
Active metabolites of cyclophosphamide alkylate DNA during cell division, impairing DNA synthesis and leading to apoptosis in actively proliferating cells 
Inhibits the suppressive capability of Treg (at low doses) 
Suppresses Th1/enhances Th2 T-cell responses 
Side effects include risk of malignancy 
Competitive inhibitor of DHFR, leading to a deficiency of nucleic acid precursors and impaired DNA synthesis 
Impairs lymphocyte activation and adhesion 
Increases sensitivity to apoptosis 
Rare cases of severe pancytopenia 
Mycophenolate mofetil 
Reversible inhibitor of IMD type II, an enzyme mainly found in lymphocytes and responsible for de novo synthesis of the purine nucleotide guanine 
Impairs DNA synthesis and increases apoptosis in activated T cells and impairs proliferation in B and T cells 
Inhibits antigen presentation by DCs 
Impairs recruitment of lymphocytes and monocytes to sites of inflammation 
Risk of transitory leukopenia, digestive disorders, and benign infections 
4 Supportive In Vitro Evidence
4.1 Lymphocyte Proliferation
In B cells, decreased proliferation in the presence of teriflunomide was associated with a decrease in levels of cyclin-dependent kinase 2 (cdk2), which is required for S phase [67, 68]. These observations are consistent with reports that pyrimidine availability controls progression from early to intermediate S phase .
Intriguingly, the anti-proliferative effects of teriflunomide appear to be most pronounced in T cells bearing T-cell receptors (TCRs) with a high affinity for a presented peptide antigen . Individual T cells each express a unique TCR, assembled by recombination at multiple TCR-encoding loci. Each TCR has a different affinity for a peptide antigen, and the mature T cell repertoire is selected on the basis of T-cell avidity for a peptide antigen . Thus, this repertoire includes T cells with a range of avidities for a peptide antigen. In an in vitro setting, using CD4+ T cells specific for an ovalbumin peptide as a model, proliferation of high-avidity T cells was strongly inhibited by teriflunomide, whereas proliferation of low-avidity T cells was less affected . This is of particular interest because high-avidity T cells are thought to mediate many autoimmune diseases, including MS . A selective effect of teriflunomide on autoreactive high-avidity T cells would leave lower-avidity T cells available for normal responses to pathogens.
4.2 Immune Cell Function
In vitro studies have suggested that teriflunomide treatment can impede formation of the immune synapse (necessary for activation of T cells) via impaired integrin activation through a DHODH-independent mechanism . Decreased protein aggregation caused by teriflunomide may further weaken the interaction between T cells and antigen-presenting cells .
Teriflunomide treatment significantly decreased release of IL-6, IL-8, and monocyte chemotactic protein-1 (MCP-1) from lipopolysaccharide (LPS)-stimulated human PBMCs, attributed to the monocyte compartment. These effects were not reversible by uridine and therefore unlikely to be DHODH-dependent . This decrease in pro-inflammatory cytokine release is consistent with earlier reports from rodent studies of impaired Th1 differentiation and enhanced Th2 differentiation in the presence of teriflunomide [75, 76]. Li et al. also showed that teriflunomide did not impair LPS-induced maturation of monocyte-derived DCs and had no impact on the ability of LPS-matured DCs to induce allogeneic T-cell responses, suggesting that teriflunomide does not broadly impair the capacity of DCs to regulate adaptive immunity .
Of note, many of the earlier studies reporting DHODH-independent effects of teriflunomide used relatively high in vitro concentrations of the drug (~100 μM) when the half maximal concentration for inhibition of DHODH was in the high nanomolar range (657 nM in human splenocytes) . Thus, some of the phenomena observed in these studies, such as modulation of tyrosine kinase activity (reviewed in Claussen MC, Korn T ), may not be pertinent to teriflunomide’s in vivo activity in patients with MS.
5 In Vivo (Preclinical) Evidence to Support Current Hypothesis of Teriflunomide MoA
5.1 Rat EAE Model
The Dark Agouti (DA) rat EAE model mimics the inflammatory features of RRMS  and has been used in several studies to elucidate the actions of teriflunomide. DA rats develop EAE after immunization with a syngeneic spinal cord homogenate and Freund’s adjuvant. Immunization induces a range of neurological symptoms progressing from tail paralysis, disturbed gait, and paresis to paralysis. These defects are accompanied by demyelinating inflammatory lesions in the spinal cord with infiltrating immune cells.
Administration of either prophylactic or therapeutic (post-disease onset) teriflunomide to DA EAE rats improved disease outcomes, delayed disease onset, and reduced maximal and cumulative disease scores . Histopathology of teriflunomide-treated DA EAE rat spinal cord demonstrated a reduction in demyelination and axonal loss of up to 90 %, with a decrease in inflammation of up to 70 % . Treatment with teriflunomide also attenuated levels of spinal cord-infiltrating T cells (Fig. 3d), NK cells, macrophages, and neutrophils . It is worth noting that in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) treated with leflunomide (the parent compound of teriflunomide), infiltration of macrophages and T cells into the synovial tissue was reduced, and expression patterns of lymphocyte adhesion molecules and matrix metalloproteinase were altered, suggesting an effect of teriflunomide on lymphocyte migration . Teriflunomide treatment also appeared to protect against oligodendrocyte cell death in the CNS of DA EAE rats .
Teriflunomide treatment also improved sensory and motor functional outcomes in DA EAE rats. Studies of electrophysiological somatosensory-evoked potential showed that prophylactic teriflunomide treatment prevented both a decrease in waveform amplitude and an increase in the latency to waveform initiation in EAE animals. Therapeutic dosing had similar effects . Measurement of transcranial magnetic motor-evoked potentials showed that teriflunomide prevented a delay in waveform latency and a decrease in waveform amplitude .
It is likely that observed reductions in maximal disease scores, decreased axonal loss, and decreased loss of nerve function in teriflunomide-treated DA EAE rats can be attributed to reduced inflammation in these animals, as a consequence of the direct effects of teriflunomide on immune cells. It remains to be determined whether local CNS effects may also contribute to the activity of teriflunomide.
Additional observations made in teriflunomide-treated DA EAE rats indicate that teriflunomide treatment at disease onset reversed immunopathological changes associated with the disease, including mitigation of reductions in spleen weight (spleen weights in teriflunomide-treated animals were only slightly lower than those observed in disease-free animals and significantly higher than those observed in untreated EAE animals), of increased levels of circulating monocytes at acute attack and relapse, and of increased ratios of CD4+/CD8+ T cells in the spleen at acute attack and remission .
5.2 Mouse Theiler’s Murine Encephalomyelitis Virus (TMEV) Model
Teriflunomide also showed efficacy in a mouse TMEV infection model used to simulate several pathophysiologic features of MS. In susceptible mouse strains, TMEV induces biphasic disease. A week after infection, TMEV causes polioencephalomyelitis characterized by apoptosis of gray matter neurons. During the chronic phase, approximately 1 month after infection, the virus infects glial cells and macrophages and induces inflammatory demyelination with oligodendrocyte apoptosis and axonal degeneration in the white matter of the spinal cord . Progression of neurological deficits in TMEV-infected mice is mitigated by therapeutic teriflunomide treatment, as shown by a higher neurological function index in teriflunomide-treated TMEV-induced demyelinating disease mice than in vehicle-treated mice .
Importantly, teriflunomide treatment in this viral model of MS only resulted in a mild delay in the production of antiviral antibodies and was associated with a transient, non-significant increase in viral load in the CNS 30 days post-infection. This finding supports the concept that protective immunity is maintained in the presence of teriflunomide, and also suggests that a significant increase in viral infections would not be expected in teriflunomide-treated patients with MS .
6 Clinical Evidence of Immune Competence and Protective Immunity in Patients Treated with Teriflunomide
Clinical data are consistent with evidence from preclinical in vivo studies suggesting that teriflunomide treatment does not significantly disrupt protective immunity, and its anti-inflammatory activity primarily affects the pathogenic immune processes associated with disease activity.
Pooled data from placebo-controlled studies of teriflunomide, including over 2400 patients from two phase 3 studies (TEMSO [NCT00134563]  and TOWER [NCT00751881] ) and one phase 2 study (NCT01487096) , showed that teriflunomide treatment was associated with a mean decrease in leucocyte counts of approximately 15 % from baseline (Fig. 3e) . However, mean absolute counts remained within the normal range, decreases occurred within the first 3 months of treatment, and levels did not change further with continuing treatment. In the groups treated with teriflunomide from this analysis, a low incidence of serious infections that was not significantly different from placebo was observed, and the relative risk of any infection was not increased with teriflunomide treatment. There were four serious infections considered opportunistic (opportunistic infections were broadly defined in this analysis, and generally considered to be infections that are only pathogenic in immunocompromised individuals); two in patients receiving placebo (one patient developed herpes zoster infection that resolved following treatment discontinuation, and another patient developed hepatitis C and cytomegalovirus [CMV] infection leading to permanent treatment discontinuation), and two in patients treated with teriflunomide 14 mg (one patient with a case of gastrointestinal tuberculosis who recovered following study drug discontinuation and anti-tuberculosis therapy, and a second patient who developed hepatitis with CMV who recovered after treatment discontinuation [discontinuation was protocol mandated due to increased alanine aminotransferase]) . In long-term extensions of the phase 2 and TEMSO studies (up to 9 years of teriflunomide treatment) and consistent with the double-blind phases of the studies, there was no signal for increased malignancies or serious opportunistic infections [90, 91]. Taken together, these findings provide evidence that teriflunomide does not have a negative impact on protective immunity over the observed treatment period.
To investigate whether the generation of recall antigen responses was preserved under teriflunomide treatment, immune responses to the 2011–2012 seasonal influenza vaccination (including strains H1N1, H3N2, and B) were measured in patients with MS treated with IFNβ and in patients exposed to teriflunomide for at least 6 months (TERIVA, NCT014033760) . Most patients had antibodies against each strain detectable at baseline, which was attributed to the 2011–2012 vaccine containing the same strains as the 2010–2011 vaccine. More than 90 % of patients achieved post-vaccination antibody titres ≥40 for H1N1 and B in all groups. For H3N2, titres ≥40 were achieved in ≥90 % of patients in the teriflunomide 7-mg and IFNβ groups, and in 77 % of the teriflunomide 14-mg group, respectively (Fig. 3f). Geometric mean titre ratios (post-/pre-vaccination) were ≥2.5 for all groups and strains, except for H1N1 in the 14-mg group (2.3), confirming vaccine efficacy as per European guidelines [92, 93]. Therefore, the mild quantitative and qualitative change in the immune response to vaccination induced with teriflunomide was not clinically significant, and the ability of patients to mount protective vaccine responses to recall antigens while receiving teriflunomide was considered to be preserved .
Rabies vaccination was used as a tool to assess the impact of teriflunomide on the immune responses to a neoantigen. Healthy volunteers who had never been vaccinated before with rabies vaccine received teriflunomide or placebo for 1 month prior to vaccination; a slightly lower mean antibody response in the teriflunomide group than in the placebo group was observed. However, adequate seroprotection (antibody titre >0.5 IU/mL) was achieved in all subjects .
In summary, data on the clinical consequences of treatment indicate that teriflunomide-while slightly reducing peripheral leucocyte counts-does not compromise clinically relevant immune competence. In keeping with this, responses to both recall and neoantigen vaccinations, though mildly reduced, remained sufficient to afford seroprotection.
7 Safety Considerations with Teriflunomide
Overview of the safety profile of teriflunomide in three placebo-controlled studies 
Teriflunomide (7 mg)
Teriflunomide (14 mg)
Number (%) of patients
n = 806
n = 838
n = 786
Any serious TEAE
Any TEAE leading to study discontinuation
Maximum intensity of TEAEs
Most common TEAEa
Alanine aminotransferase increased
Common side effects of treatment with teriflunomide include hair thinning, diarrhea, alanine aminotransferase elevation, nausea, and headache. The hair thinning sometimes reported in patients receiving teriflunomide is typically limited and diffuse and best described as telogen effluvium. It is distinct from the anagen effluvium complete hair loss observed in patients undergoing chemotherapy  and is not a sign of immune suppression. Hair thinning events mainly resolved on-treatment  and only led to treatment discontinuation in ≤2 % of patients [9, 10]. Teriflunomide is the active metabolite of leflunomide, approved for the treatment of RA since 1998 . Elevations of serum aminotransferases in clinical trials and rare cases of liver injury in the post-marketing setting have been documented in patients treated with leflunomide  so as a precaution, patients receiving teriflunomide are subject to regular hepatic monitoring during the first 6 months of treatment [101, 102]. In some locations, less frequent monitoring continues throughout subsequent treatment .
Leflunomide is associated with embryo-lethality and teratogenicity in rats and rabbits, and therefore is contraindicated in women of childbearing potential not using reliable contraception . However, two prospective studies conducted by the Organization of Teratology Information Specialists (OTIS), have found no increase in the rate of major structural defects in newborns of women with RA exposed to leflunomide [103, 104]. Additionally, in the period 2001–2013, there were more than 2.3 million patient years of leflunomide use without any signal for teratogenicity (Genzyme, data on file). Based on the occurrence of teratogenicity and embryo-lethality in the offspring of teriflunomide-treated rats and rabbits, teriflunomide is also contraindicated in pregnant women, or women of childbearing potential not using reliable contraception . Preclinical teriflunomide studies showed no evidence for mutagenicity or clastogenicity  and consistent with the OTIS findings for leflunomide, all newborns born to mothers or fathers who received teriflunomide had no structural or functional abnormalities at birth . In the event of pregnancy, patients receiving teriflunomide must undergo an accelerated elimination procedure until teriflunomide plasma concentrations fall below 0.02 mg/L, a level predicted to have minimal risk to the fetus .
8 Teriflunomide as Part of the Growing MS Therapeutic Armamentarium
The MoAs of therapies in development or approved for use in RRMS are summarized in Table 1. Additional therapies are sometimes used off-label in patients with MS (Table 2), though it is important to note that use of these immunosuppressant medications may be associated with serious side effects such as leukopenia or increases in the risk of malignancy.
The immunomodulation exerted by teriflunomide is seemingly selective in a manner that is particularly useful in the treatment of RRMS, a disease mainly driven by activated T and B lymphocytes. Importantly, a specific cytostatic effect on proliferating lymphocytes as a primary MoA is unique to teriflunomide. None of the agents currently in clinical trials or being marketed for MS possess a similar specificity for activated lymphocytes inherent in their MoA. Other agents rely on mechanisms such as direct cytotoxicity , induction of apoptosis , or exclusion of lymphocytes from the CNS [108–110] to reduce the numbers of lymphocytes available to contribute to MS pathogenesis.
9 Summary and Conclusions
Teriflunomide is known to reversibly inhibit DHODH, a mitochondrial enzyme specifically required for de novo pyrimidine biosynthesis in activated lymphocytes, and as such has no direct effects on DNA. In keeping with this primary MoA, teriflunomide acts to impair the proliferation of activated T and B cells, and reduces their ability to participate in a potentially damaging immune attack on the CNS.
Emerging in vitro and in vivo experimental data increasingly support the view that teriflunomide exerts a selective effect on the immune system that strikes a favorable balance between efficacy and safety. This selectivity and balance is reinforced in observations from studies in patients with MS. Phase 3 studies showed that teriflunomide can restrict the type of limited immune activation relevant to MS disease activity; trial results showed significant reductions in disability progression, relapse rates, and magnetic resonance imaging measures of disease activity [9, 111]. At the same time, vaccination studies in patients with MS or healthy subjects have shown that teriflunomide treatment does not limit the immune activation required for maintaining immune competence: the capacity to mount functional vaccine responses (to both recall antigens and neoantigens) is preserved. In addition, the comparable incidence of infections and malignancies observed with teriflunomide and placebo also indicates maintenance of functional immune competence. Teriflunomide can be considered as an immune therapy targeting pathogenic inflammatory processes involved in the MS disease process without significant compromise of the patient’s protective immune functions. Given the selectivity of its effects on the immune system, teriflunomide represents a valuable addition to the list of approved therapies available to treat patients with MS.
Editorial support (assistance in drafting and editing of the manuscript text, figures, and tables, as directed by authors, data checking and incorporation of comments from reviewers, and assisting with the submission process) provided by V Lawson at Fishawack Communications Ltd, funded by Genzyme, a Sanofi company. This was the only funding provided for the development of this manuscript.
Disclosures and Conflicts of Interest
ABO has participated as a speaker at meetings sponsored by, received consulting fees and/or received grant support from: Amplimmune, Bayhill Therapeutics, Berlex/Bayer, Biogen Idec, BioMS, Diogenix, Eli-Lilly, Genentech, Genzyme, GlaxoSmithKline, Guthy-Jackson/GGF, Merck/EMD Serono, Medimmune, Mitsubishi Pharma, Novartis, Ono Pharma, Receptos, Roche, Sanofi, Teva Neuroscience, Wyeth. AP has received research support, consulting fees, and support for research-related travel from Sanofi/Genzyme. FMV is an employee of Sanofi. JK is an employee of Genzyme, a Sanofi company. HW has received honoraria and consulting fees from Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, Fresenius Medical Care, GlaxoSmithKline, Genzyme, Merck Serono, EMD Serono, Novartis Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva Pharma, and grants from Bayer Healthcare, Biogen Idec, The German Ministry for Education and Research (BHBF), Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG), Else Kroener-Fresenius-Stiftung, Fresenius Foundation, Genzyme, Hertie Foundation, Merck Serono, Novartis, NRW Ministry of Education and Research, Interdisciplinary Center for Clinical Research (IZKF) Muenster, RE children’s foundation, Sanofi-Aventis, and Teva Pharma.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.