Measuring the Loss of Consumer Choice in Mandatory Health Programmes Using Discrete Choice Experiments
Purchase on Springer.com
$49.95 / €39.95 / £34.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Economic evaluation of mandatory health programmes generally do not consider the utility impact of a loss of consumer choice upon implementation, despite evidence suggesting that consumers do value having the ability to choose.
The primary aim of this study was to explore whether the utility impact of a loss of consumer choice from implementing mandatory health programmes can be measured using discrete choice experiments (DCEs).
Three case studies were used to test the methodology: fortification of bread-making flour with folate, mandatory influenza vaccination of children, and the banning of trans-fats. Attributes and levels were developed from a review of the literature. An orthogonal, fractional factorial design was used to select the profiles presented to respondents to allow estimation of main effects. Overall, each DCE consisted of 64 profiles which were allocated to four versions of 16 profiles. Each choice task compared two profiles, one being voluntary and the other being mandatory, plus a ‘no policy’ option, thus each respondent was presented with eight choice tasks. For each choice task, respondents were asked which health policy they most preferred and least preferred. Data was analysed using a mixed logit model with correlated coefficients (200 Halton draws). The compensating variation required for introducing a programme on a mandatory basis (versus achieving the same health impacts with a voluntary programme) that holds utility constant was estimated.
Responses were provided by 535 participants (a response rate of 83 %). For the influenza vaccination and folate fortification programmes, the results suggested that some level of compensation may be required for introducing the programme on a mandatory basis. Introducing a mandatory influenza vaccination programme required the highest compensation (Australian dollars [A$] 112.75, 95 % CI −60.89 to 286.39) compared with folate fortification (A$18.05, 95 % CI −3.71 to 39.80). No compensation was required for introducing the trans-fats programme (−A$0.22, 95 % CI −6.24 to 5.80) [year 2010 values]. In addition to the type of mandatory health programme, the compensation required was also found to be dependent on a number of other factors. In particular, the study found an association between the compensation required and stronger libertarian preferences.
DCEs can be used to measure the utility impact of a loss of consumer choice. Excluding the utility impact of a loss of consumer choice from an economic evaluation taking a societal perspective may result in a sub-optimal, or incorrect, funding decision.
- Productivity Commission. Impacts of advances in medical technology in Australia, Research Report. Melbourne: Productivity Commission; 2005.
- Banks G. Health costs and policy in an ageing Australia, Health Policy Oration 2008, Menzies Centre for Health Policy, John Curtin School of Medical Research, ANU, Canberra, 2008 Jun 26 [online]. http://www.pc.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0011/81758/cs20080701-agedhealthpolicy.pdf [Accessed 2012 Oct 10].
- Oakley G, Johnston R. Balancing benefits and harms in public health prevention programmes mandated by governments. BMJ. 2004;329:41–3. CrossRef
- Segal L, Dalziel K, Katz R. Informing a strategy for increasing folate levels to prevent neural tube defects: a cost-effectiveness analysis of options: a report for Food Standards Australia and New Zealand, Monash University and University of South Australia, ed. Food Standards Australia and New Zealand; 2007.
- Access Economics. Cost benefit analysis of fortifying the food supply with iodine: Report for Food Standards Australia and New Zealand. Canberra: Access Economics; 2006.
- Goodall S, Norman RP, Gallego G. Cost-effectiveness analysis of alternate strategies to address iodine deficiency in Australia, CHERE Project Report for the Department of Health and Ageing, Australian Government. Sydney: CHERE; 2007. p. 1–99.
- Parkinson B, Goodall S. Considering consumer choice in the economic evaluation of mandatory health programmes: a review. Health Policy. 2011;101(3):236–44. CrossRef
- Coughlin S. Ethical issues in epidemiologic research and public health practice. Emerg Themes Epidemiol. 2006;3:16. CrossRef
- Beauchamp T, Childress J. Principles of biomedical ethics. 4th ed. New York: Oxford University Press; 1996.
- Wagstaff A, van Doorslaer E. Equity in health care finance and delivery. In: Culyer A, Newhouse J, editors. Handbook of health economics. Oxford: Elsevier; 2000.
- Nozick R. Anarchy, state, and utopia. New York: Basic Books; 1975.
- Williams A, Cookson R. Equity in Health. In: Culyer A, Newhouse J, editors. Handbook of health economics. Oxford: Elsevier; 2000.
- Brouwer W, van Exel N, van den Berg B, van den Bos G, Koopmanschap M. Process utility from providing informal care: the benefit of caring. Health Policy. 2005;74(1):85–99. CrossRef
- Sen A. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 1999.
- Thaler R, Shefrin H. An economic theory of self-control. J Polit Econ. 1981;89(2):392–406. CrossRef
- Lancaster K. A new approach to consumer theory. J Polit Econ. 1966;74(2):132. CrossRef
- Ryan M, Gerard K, Currie G. Using discrete choice experiments in health economics. In: Jones A, editor. The Elgar companion to health economics. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd; 2006. p. 405–14.
- Ryan M, Gerard K. Using discrete choice experiments to value health care programmes: current practice and future research reflections. Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2003;2(1):55–64.
- Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: inconsistency between current methods and random utility and welfare theory. Health Econ. 2004;13(9):901–7. CrossRef
- Ryan M. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lanscar and Savage (I). Health Econ. 2004;13:909–12. CrossRef
- Santos Silva J. Deriving welfare measures in discrete choice experiments: a comment to Lancsar and Savage (2). Health Econ. 2004;13(9):913–8 (discussion 9–24).
- Lancsar E, Savage E. Deriving welfare measures from discrete choice experiments: a response to Ryan and Santos Silva. Health Econ. 2004;13(9):919–24. CrossRef
- Mark T, Swait J. Using stated preference and revealed preference modeling to evaluate prescribing decisions. Health Econ. 2004;13:563–73. CrossRef
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, Occasional paper: Measuring dietary habits in the 2001 National Health Survey, 4814.0.55.001. Canberra: ABS; 2003.
- Abeywardana S, Sullivan E. Neural tube defects in Australia: an epidemiological report. Cat. no. PER 45. Sydney: AIHW National Perinatal Statistics Unit; 2008.
- Heikkinen T, Silvennoinen H, Peltola V, et al. Burden of influenza in children in the community. J Infect Dis. 2004;190:1369–73. CrossRef
- Piedra P, Gaglani M, Kozinetz C, et al. Herd immunity in adults against influenza-related illnesses with use of the trivalent-live attenuated influenza vaccine (CAIV-T) in children. Vaccine. 2005;23(13):1540–8. CrossRef
- Tuckerman J, Rajesh S, Oeppen C, et al. Review of the evidence of the effectiveness and cost effectiveness of interventions to address differences in the uptake of immunisations (including targeted vaccines) in people younger than 19 years: synopsis for consultation 24 September–22 October 2008. London: National Collaborating Centre for Women’s and Children’s Health; 2008.
- Hall J, Kenny P, King M, Louvier J, Viney R, Yeoh A. Using stated preference discrete choice modelling to evaluate the introduction of varicella vaccination. Health Econ. 2002;2002(11):457–65. CrossRef
- Bentley T, Weinstein M, Willett W, Kuntz K. A cost-effectiveness analysis of folic acid fortification policy in the United States. Public Health Nutr. 2009;12(4):455–67. CrossRef
- Romano P, Waitzman N, Scheffler R, Pi R. Folic acid fortification of grain: an economic analysis. Am J Public Health. 1995;85(5):667–76. CrossRef
- Jefferson T, Smith S, Demicheli V, Harnden A, Rivetti A, Di Pietrantonj C. Assessment of the efficacy and effectiveness of influenza vaccines in healthy children: systematic review. Lancet. 2005;365(9461):773–80.
- ATAGI. Influenza. In: The Australian immunisation handbook. Canberra: Department of Health and National Health and Medical Research Council; 2008. p. 184–94.
- Vynnycky E, Pitman R, Siddiqui R, Gay N, Edmunds W. Estimating the impact of childhood influenza vaccination programmes in England and Wales. Vaccine. 2008;26:5321–30. CrossRef
- Brotherton J, Wang H, Schaffer A, et al. Vaccine preventable diseases and vaccination coverage in Australia, 2003 to 2005. Communicable Diseases Intelligence, Australian Department of Health and Ageing. 2007;31(Suppl.):viii-S152.
- Mozaffarian D, Katan M, Ascherio A, Stampfer M, Willett W. Trans fatty acids and cardiovascular disease. New Eng J Med. 2006;354(15):1601. CrossRef
- Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. AIHW National Mortality Database. 2006 [online] http://www.aihw.gov.au/aihw-national-mortality-database/ [cited 2010 8 March 2010].
- Dixon S, Shackley P. Estimating the benefits of community water fluoridation using the willingness-to-pay technique: results of a pilot study. Commun Dent Oral Epidemiol. 1999;27:124–9. CrossRef
- Dixon S, Shackley P. The use of willingness to pay to assess public preferences towards the fortification of foodstuffs with folic acid. Health Expect. 2003;6:140–8. CrossRef
- Kuhfeld W. Orthogonal arrays. 2010 [online]. http://support.sas.com/techsup/technote/ts723.html [Accessed 2010 Feb 23].
- Burgess L. Discrete choice experiments [computer software], 2007 [online]. http://crsu.science.uts.edu.au/choice/ [Accessed 2010 Feb 23].
- McFadden D. Conditional logit analysis of qualitative choice behaviour. In: Zarembka P, editor. Frontiers in econometrics. New York: Academic Press; 1974. p. 105–42.
- McFadden D, Train K. Mixed MNL models for discrete response. J Appl Econ. 2000;15:447–70. CrossRef
- Fiebig D, Keane M, Louvier J, Wasi N. The generalized multinomial logit model: accounting for scale and coefficient heterogeneity. Market Sci. 2010;29(3):393–421. CrossRef
- Train K. Discrete choice methods with simulation. 2nd ed. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press; 2009. CrossRef
- Lancsar E, Louviere J. Deleting ‘irrational’ responses from discrete choice experiments: a case of investigating or imposing preferences? Health Econ. 2006;15(8):797–811. CrossRef
- Flynn T. Using conjoint analysis and choice experiments to estimate QALY values: issues to consider. Pharmacoeconomics. 2010;28(9):711–22. CrossRef
- Baker R, Bateman I, Donaldson C, et al. Weighting and valuing quality adjusted life years: preliminary results from the Social Value of a QALY Project. Newcastle: Institute of Health and Society, Newcastle University; 2008.
- Shackley P, Dixon S. Using contingent valuation to elicit public preferences for water fluoridation. Appl Econ. 2000;32:777–87. CrossRef
- Claxton K, Walker S, Palmer S, Sculpher M. Appropriate perspectives for health care decisions. In: CHE Research Paper 54. York: The University of York, Centre for Health Economics; 2010.
- Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee, Guidelines for preparing submissions to the Pharmaceutical Benefits Advisory Committee (Version 4.3). Canberra: Australian Government, Department of Health and Ageing; 2008.
- National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence. Guide to the methods of technology appraisal. London: NICE; 2008.
- HM Treasury. The green book: appraisal and evaluation in central government. London: TSO; 2003.
- Office of Best Practice Regulation (OBPR). Best practice regulation handbook. Canberra: Australian Government; 2007.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics. Population by age and sex, Australian states and territories, 3201.0. Canberra: ABS; 2009.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, Aspects of social capital, 4911.0. Canberra: ABS; 2006.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, Labour force, 6202.0. Canberra: ABS; 2010.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, Family characteristics and transitions, 4442.0 Canberra: ABS; 2006–2007.
- Australian Bureau of Statistics, Education and work, Australia, 6227.0. Canberra: ABS; 2008.
- Lumley J, Watson L, Watson M, Bower C. Periconceptional supplementation with folate and/or multivitamins for preventing neural tube defects. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001(3).
- Food Standards Australia New Zealand. Intakes of trans fatty acids in New Zealand and Australia: Review Report, Item 3.6. Canberra: FSANZ; 2008.
- Measuring the Loss of Consumer Choice in Mandatory Health Programmes Using Discrete Choice Experiments
Applied Health Economics and Health Policy
Volume 11, Issue 2 , pp 139-150
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer International Publishing AG
- Additional Links