Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Recycling of environmentally problematic plant wastes generated from greenhouse tomato crops through vermicomposting

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Environmental Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The enormous quantity of plant waste produced from greenhouse tomato crops is an environmental problem that should be solved by recycling that waste into valuable organic products through low-cost technologies, such as vermicomposting. Feasibility of vermicomposting greenhouse tomato-plant waste (P) using paper-mill sludge (S) as complementary waste was investigated by this study. Earthworm development in P, S, and two mixtures of both wastes was monitored over 24 weeks and compared with that in cow dung (D), an optimum organic-waste to be vermicomposted. The effectiveness of vermicomposting to biostabilize those wastes was assessed by analysing phospholipid fatty acid composition, chemical features, plant-nutrient content, metal concentration, enzyme activities, and germination index (GI). A commercial vermicompost was also analyzed and taken as a reference of vermicompost quality. Earthworms did not survive in P alone, but a mixture of P with S at a ratio of 2:1 or 1:1 resulted in earthworm development similar to that observed in D. Phospholipid fatty acid analysis revealed that earthworm activity strongly transformed initial microbiota inhabiting the wastes, giving rise to vermicompost microbial communities which were similar to that of a commercial vermicompost. Both mixtures of P and S were properly biostabilized through vermicomposting, as indicated by decreases in their C:N ratio and enzyme activities together with increases in their degree of maturity (GI ~ 100 %) after the process. This study demonstrates that the vermicomposting of tomato-plant waste together with paper-mill sludge allows the recycling of both wastes, thereby improving the environmental sustainability of greenhouse crops.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aira M, Monroy F, Domínguez J (2006) Changes in microbial biomass and microbial activity of pig slurry after the transit through the gut of the earthworm Eudrilus eugeniae (Kinberg, 1867). Biol Fertil Soils 42(4):371–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkoaik F, Ghaly AE (2005) Effect of inoculum size on the composting of greenhouse tomato plant trimmings. Compost Sci Util 13:262–273

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkoaik F, Ghaly AE (2006) Influence of dairy manure addition on the biological and thermal kinetics of composting of greenhouse tomato plant residues. Waste Manage 26(8):902–913

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Atiyeh RM, Domínguez J, Subler S, Edwards CA (2000) Changes in biochemical properties of cow manure during processing by earthworms (Eisenia andrei, Bouche) and the effects on seedling growth. Pedobiologia 44(6):709–724

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benítez E, Nogales R, Elvira C, Masciandaro G, Ceccanti B (1999) Enzyme activities as indicators of the stabilization of sewage sludges composting with Eisenia foetida. Bioresour Technol 67(3):297–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SS, Chattopadhyay GN (2004) Transformation of nitrogen during vermicomposting of fly ash. Waste Manage Res 22(6):488–491

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bicheldey TK, Latushkina EN (2010) Biogas emission prognosis at the landfills. Int J Environ Sci Technol 7(4):623–628

    Google Scholar 

  • Bonmatí M, Ceccanti B, Nannipieri P (1998) Protease extraction from soil by sodium pyrophosphate and chemical characterization of the extracts. Soil Biol Biochem 30(14):2113–2125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campitelli P, Ceppi S (2008) Chemical physical and biological compost and vermicompost characterization: a chemometric study. Chemometr Intell Lab 90(1):64–71

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Domínguez J, Aira M, Gómez-Brandón M (2010) Vermicomposting: earthworms enhance the work of microbes. In: Insam H, Franke-Whittle I, Goberna M (eds) Microbes at work. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Edwards CA (1988) Breakdown of animal, vegetable and industrial organic wastes by earthworms. In: Edwards CA, Neuhauser EF (eds) Earthworms in waste and environmental management. SPB Academic Publishing BV, The Hague

    Google Scholar 

  • Elvira C, Goicoechea M, Sampedro L, Mato S, Nogales R (1996) Bioconversion of solid paper-pulp mill sludge by earthworms. Bioresour Technol 57(2):173–177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Elvira C, Sampedro L, Domínguez J, Mato S (1997) Vermicomposting of wastewater sludge from paper-pulp industry with nitrogen rich materials. Soil Biol Biochem 29(3–4):759–762

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Fernández-Gómez MJ, Romero E, Nogales R (2010) Feasibility of vermicomposting for vegetable greenhouse waste recycling. Bioresour Technol 101(24):9654–9660

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fostergård A, Bååth E, Tunlio A (1993) Shifts in the structure of soil microbial communities in limed forests as revealed by phospholipid fatty acid analysis. Soil Biol Biochem 25(6):723–730

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García C, Hernández T, Costa F (1997) Potential use of dehydrogenase activity as an index of microbial activity in degraded soils. Commun Soil Sci Plan 28(1–2):123–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gobierno de España (2005) Real Decreto 824/2005 sobre productos fertilizantes. BOE, Gobierno de España, Madrid

    Google Scholar 

  • Gómez-Brandón M, Lazcano C, Lores M, Domínguez J (2010) Detritivorous earthworms modify microbial community structure and accelerate plant residue decomposition. Appl Soil Ecol 44(3):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta R, Garg VK (2009) Vermiremediation and nutrient recovery of non-recyclable paper waste employing Eisenia fetida. J Hazard Mater 162(1):430–439

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kandeler E, Gerber H (1988) Short-term assay of soil urease activity using colorimetric determination of ammonium. Biol Fertil Soils 6(1):68–72

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kaur A, Singh J, Vig AP, Dhaliwal SS, Rup PJ (2010) Cocomposting with and without Eisenia fetida for conversion of toxic paper mill sludge to a soil conditioner. Bioresour Technol 101(21):8192–8198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lasaridi K, Protopapa I, Kotsou M, Pilidis G, Manios T, Kyriacou A (2006) Quality assessment of composts in the Greek market: the need for standards and quality assurance. J Environ Manage 80(1):58–65

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Manzano-Agugliaro F (2007) Gasificación de residuos de invernadero para la obtención de energía eléctrica en el sur de España: ubicación mediante SIG. Interciencia 32(2):131–136

    Google Scholar 

  • Marschner P (2007) Soil microbial community structure and function assessed by FAME, PLFA and DGGE—Advantages and limitations. In: Varma A, Oelmüller R (eds) Advanced techniques in soil microbiology. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore-Kucera J, Dick RP (2008) PLFA profiling of microbial community structure and seasonal shifts in soils of a Douglas-fir chronosequence. Microb Ecol 55(3):500–511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pardossi A, Tognoni F, Incrocci L (2004) Mediterranean greenhouse technology. Chron Hort 44:28–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Parra S, Aguilar FJ, Calatrava J (2008) Decision modelling for environmental protection: the contingent valuation method applied to greenhouse waste management. Biosyst Eng 99(4):469–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schönholzer F, Hahn D, Zeyer J (1999) Origins and fate of fungi and bacteria in the gut of Lumbricus terrestris L. studied by image analysis. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 28(3):235–248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senesi N (1989) Composted materials as organic fertilizers. Sci Total Environ 81–82(C):521–542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Speir TW, Ross DJ (1978) Soil phosphatase and sulphatase. In: Burns RG (ed) Soil enzymes. Academic Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Suthar S, Singh S (2008) Vermicomposting of domestic waste by using two epigeic earthworms (Perionyx excavatus and Perionyx sansibaricus). Int J Environ Sci Technol 5(1):99–106

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA (1982) Soil enzymes. In: Page AL, Miller EM, Keeney DR (eds) Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 2, Chemical and Microbiological Properties. ASA and SSSA, Madison

    Google Scholar 

  • Tabatabai MA, Bremner JM (1969) Use of p-nitrophenyl phosphate for assay of soil phosphatase activity. Soil Biol Biochem 1(4):301–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Williams S (1984) Official methods of analysis of the Association of Official Analytical Chemists 14th Ed. Association of Official Analytical Chemists, Arlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Zdruli P, Jones RJA, Montanarella L (2004) Organic matter in the soils of southern Europe, European Soil Bureau Research Report, EUR 21083 EN. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg

    Google Scholar 

  • Zucconi F, Forte M, Monaco A, De Bertoldi M (1981) Biological evaluation of compost maturity. BioCycle 22(4):27–29

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was financed by “Junta de Andalucía” project P05-AGR-00408. M. J. Fernández-Gómez thanks the Science and Innovation Ministry for their FPU doctoral grant (AP2006-03452). The authors also thank C. Cifuentes, A. Martín and J. Benitez for technical support and D. Nesbitt for assisting in the translation of the manuscript into English.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Environmental Protection, Estación Experimental del Zaidín (EEZ-CSIC), Profesor Albareda 1, 18008, Granada, Spain

    M. J. Fernández-Gómez, E. Romero & R. Nogales

  2. Department of Soil Biochemistry, Instituto de Investigaciones Agrobiológicas de Galicia, Galicia, Spain

    M. Díaz-Raviña

Authors
  1. M. J. Fernández-Gómez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. M. Díaz-Raviña
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Romero
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. R. Nogales
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. J. Fernández-Gómez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fernández-Gómez, M.J., Díaz-Raviña, M., Romero, E. et al. Recycling of environmentally problematic plant wastes generated from greenhouse tomato crops through vermicomposting. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Technol. 10, 697–708 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0239-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13762-013-0239-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation