Age determination of large live trees with inner cavities: radiocarbon dating of Platland tree, a giant African baobab
Authors
 First Online:
 Received:
 Accepted:
DOI: 10.1007/s135950110107x
 Cite this article as:
 Patrut, A., von Reden, K.F., Van Pelt, R. et al. Annals of Forest Science (2011) 68: 993. doi:10.1007/s135950110107x
 7 Citations
 126 Views
Abstract
• Introduction
For large trees without a continuous sequence of growth rings in their trunk, such as the African baobab (Adansonia digitata L.), the only accurate method for age determination is radiocarbon dating. As of today, this method was limited to dating samples collected from the remains of dead specimens.
• Methods
Our research extends significantly the dating of such trees to large live specimens with inner cavities. The new approach is based on collecting samples from the cavities and their subsequent radiocarbon dating.
• Results
The giant twostemmed Platland tree, also known as Sunland baobab, was investigated by using this new approach. AMS radiocarbon dates of the oldest sample segments originating from the two inner cavities indicate that the large stem I (364.5 m^{3}) is 750 ± 75 years old, while the much smaller stem II (136.7 m^{3}) has 1,060 ± 75 years. Results also show that stem I is still growing very fast, while the older stem II slowed down consistently its growth over the past 250 years. The complete mapping of Platland tree determined an overall wood volume of 501.2 m^{3}.
• Conclusions
Dating results demonstrate that the size–age relation cannot be used for estimating accurately the age of African baobabs.
Keywords
Adansonia digitataRadiocarbon datingAge determinationGrowth rateAccelerator mass spectrometry1 Introduction
For trees which exhibit annual or seasonal growth rings, ring counting, possibly refined by crossdating, represents the most accurate and reproducible method for age and growth rate determination. Ring counting is typically performed on the remaining stumps of dead trees. Nevertheless, there are several cases in which this procedure cannot be utilized. Relevant examples are trees with growth rings that are not strictly annual or seasonal, with no welldefined rings or without a continuous sequence of rings, as a consequence of their hollow parts. In such cases, ring counting is replaced by alternative direct (radiocarbon dating) or indirect dating methods (relation size/diameterage, projections of shortterm growth data, projections based on mortality rates, etc.) (Worbes 2002; Patrut et al. 2010a). The most investigated species of this type is the African baobab (Adansonia digitata L.), the angiosperm with the stoutest trunk. For large and old baobabs, a hypothetically accurate ring counting is not possible, as growth rings may no longer be observed in certain areas of the trunk and they are also missing in the area of large cavities.
As indirect methods often provide questionable results, radiocarbon investigation represents the only alternative method for the accurate dating of such trees. Given its higher costs, so far, radiocarbon dating was not used on the large scale. Several noteworthy investigations were performed, however, on different tropical species, for determining the age of trees and/or growth rates, for accurately dating the observed growth rings, for checking and correcting ring counting, or for providing climate information (MartinezRamos and AlvarezBuylla 1998; Worbes and Junk 1999; Poussart et al. 2006). Traditionally, for large trees, such as the African baobab, this research was limited to dating wood samples collected from the remains of dead specimens, which decay very fast (Swart 1963; Patrut et al. 2007). Work reported here extends considerably the possibility of aging African baobabs, by introducing a methodology which allows, to date standing and live specimens. This new approach is based on radiocarbon dating of very small wood samples collected from the inner cavities of live baobabs. The first live specimen investigated by this methodology was the huge twostemmed Platland tree.
Dating results for segments extracted from samples originating from the two cavities of Platland tree, which correspond to a depth of over 20 cm in the wood, are presented and discussed. As these segments consist of the original old wood, dating results made it possible to determine the age of the two stems of Platland tree, which was the main goal of our research. We also present for the first time results of the complete mapping of a large African baobab. The age difference of the two stems is discussed in the framework of the questionable size–age relation.
2 Materials and methods
2.1 Dating live African baobabs
 1.
Collection of samples from inner cavities through cavity walls and subsequent radiocarbon dating of these samples define the new methodology.
 2.
The extant wood collected with an increment borer from cavities, at depth values exceeding 20 cm, is the original old wood which corresponds to the respective positions. Such a depth is needed for excluding successive regrowth layers triggered by cavity fires and also by a somewhat limited ability of the baobab of repairing its wounds, i.e., for closing its cavity. A 60cm increment borer is more than sufficient for reaching the original old wood and preventing collection of any regrowth layer.
 3.
The age of an investigated baobab is calculated by extrapolating age values of the oldest radiocarbondated samples to the symmetry/geometric center of the trunk at that height. Extrapolation is done by using growth rate values of the trunk, calculated from different sample ages, as well by considering growth rate values reported in the literature.
 4.
The symmetry center at a certain height above ground level can be accurately determined from a crosssection of the trunk at this height.
 5.
In order to evaluate more accurately both the age and the growth rate dynamics, one collects additional (younger) samples from the exterior (through the bark); these samples are also radiocarbon dated.
 6.
Usually, the pith of a tree, including the African baobab, is not perfectly centered. However, with the exception of certain individuals with a highly irregular trunk, it is reasonable to assume that in singlestemmed baobabs, the pith is relatively close to the symmetry center of the trunk. If one assigns the symmetry center to the pith and one considers the fast growth rate of young baobabs, an additional error of ±50 years for the final age value would cover for all these assumptions.
 7.
In the case of baobabs with a multistemmed trunk, the current symmetry center of a stem cannot be assigned to its pith. One should consider that, after fusion, the growth of stems continued only in directions where there was room for accommodating their growth. Thus, one must calculate the symmetry center of a stem prior to fusion, which can be reasonably approximated by the pith. The moment of fusion must be estimated from the age of samples collected from the fusion area.
2.2 The study area
2.3 Measurements
The common external measurements of the Platland tree and the measurements inside the two inner cavities were performed by using a Bosch DLE 70 Professional laser rangefinder (Robert Bosch GmbH, Stuttgart, Germany) and graduated tapes.
Crosssections of the Platland tree at ground level, 1, 2, 2.5, and 5 m were mapped by setting up a frame around the tree with a graduated tape. A compass and an Impulse 200 laser rangefinder (Laser Technology, Inc., Centennial, CO, U.S.A.) were used to map the crosssections. Additional crosssections on the largest section were mapped at 6.5 and 8 m. All of the mostly round branch and stem sections above or around this had their basal diameters estimated by using a Criterion 400 survey laser (Laser Technology, Inc., Centennial, CO, U.S.A.). System lengths were either measured directly or interpreted from detailed photos of the tree structure without leaves. Parabolic or conic equations were used for these smaller systems based on how robust and foliated each system was.
2.4 Sample collection
Seven wood samples (numbered 1 to 7) were collected from different positions of the walls of the two cavities of Platland tree, according to the previously described methodology. Due to the irregular profile of the cavities' walls, the inner samples originate from heights of 0.40–1.70 m above cavity level. A number of three additional samples (numbered 11 to 13) were collected from the exterior of the two stems through the bark. The sampling was performed at heights of 1.20–2.75 m above ground level. All samples were obtained by using a Haglöf CO600 increment borer (60 cm long, 0.43 cm inner diameter) (Haglöf Sweden AB, Langsele, Sweden).
2.5 Sample/segment preparation
The standard acid–base–acid pretreatment method (Olsson 1986) was used to remove soluble and mobile organic components. The resulting cellulose samples were combusted to CO_{2} by using the closed tube combustion method (Sofer 1980). Then, CO_{2} was reduced to graphite on iron catalyst, under hydrogen atmosphere (Vogel et al. 1984). Eventually, the resulting graphite samples were analyzed by AMS.
2.6 AMS measurements
Radiocarbon measurements were carried out at the National Ocean Sciences AMS Facility of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution with the Pelletron ® Tandem 500 kV AMS system (Roberts et al. 2010) and the Tandetron 3MV AMS system (von Reden et al. 1994). The surface of the graphite samples was sputtered with cesium ions, and the secondary negative ions were extracted and accelerated in the AMS system. ^{12}C and ^{13}C ions were measured in Faraday cups, where a ratio of their currents was recorded. Simultaneously, ^{14}C ions were recorded in a particle detector, so that instantaneous ratios of ^{14}C to ^{12}C were also recorded. These raw signals were compared to ratios obtained with a known standard material (Oxalic Acid I, NISTSRM4990) and converted to a fraction modern value, which was corrected for isotopic fractionation with the normalized δ^{13}C value of −25^{0}/_{00}. Fraction modern values were ultimately converted to a radiocarbon date.
2.7 Calibration
3 Results
3.1 Mapping results
The trunk of Platland tree, which consists of two stems (I and II), has a total circumference at breast height (cbh; 1.30 m above ground level) of 34.11 m and a footprint of 67.9 m^{2}, which corresponds to a functional diameter of 9.30 m at ground level. It is to mention that the huge trunk is covered by a very thin silver colored bark, which is less than 1 mm thick. The canopy dimensions are of 37.7 m (in direction NS) and 32.4 m (in direction WE).
The larger stem I has a height of 18.9 m, a cbh value of 24.20 m, a footprint of 43.9 m^{2}, and a crosssectional area at bh of 42.7 m^{2}. The formal diameter at bh calculated from the cbh value in circular approximation is 7.70 m, while the much more accurate functional dbh derived from the crosssectional area at bh is of 7.37 m. The smaller stem II has the height of 15.8 m, a cbh value of 18.34 m, a footprint of 24.0 m^{2}, and the crosssectional area at bh of 23.3 m^{2}. In this case, the formal dbh is 5.84 m, while the functional dbh becomes 5.45 m.
The two stems are connected by a fused section, which covers a shared cbh of 4.10 m and has a maximum height of 2.20 m. The trunk comprises two interleading cavities on either side of the fused section, connected by a small opening/doorway. The very large cavity inside stem I has a maximum length of 4.60 m, a width of 4.81 m, and a height of 4.88 m. The irregular cavity inside stem II has a maximum length of 1.67 m, a maximum width of 2.50 m, and a height of 2.47 m; it also has an elevated extension towards the north, with a length of 2.24 m. The basal surface of cavity inside stem I is 15.9 m^{2}, while the cavity inside stem II has the surface of 2.8 m^{2}. There is also an elevated cavity located inside stem I, at the height of 5.80 m. This cavity with two entrances, which is visited and used by birds as a night shelter, has the maximum dimensions of ca. 2 × 2 × 1.5 m.
For hollow baobabs, the large cavities are located at ground level or, more seldom, at a certain height above ground. However, for the Platland tree, the level of cavities is at 0.78 m below the current ground level, suggesting that the inside level corresponds to the original ground level. The increase of the ground level over the past centuries is very probably the result of mud and sediment left behind by several flood episodes of a creek located in the close proximity of the tree. One can state that today, the trunk/base of the Platland tree is buried in the soil up to the height of 0.78 m. After 1990, the new owners of the Platland farm opened a pub in the very large cavity inside stem I. Consequently, the tree has become heavily promoted as the Sunland “pub” baobab.
Formally, one can consider the Platland tree composed of two sections: Platland I (stem I and the corresponding branches) and Platland II (stem II and the corresponding branches). The total wood volume of the Platland tree above the present ground level was found to be 448.2 m^{3}, i.e., 273.1 m^{3} below 5 m and 175.1 m^{3} over 5 m. This total volume of 448.2 m^{3} above ground level consists of the volume of Platland I, which is 330.2 m^{3}, and the volume of Platland II, which measures 118.0 m^{3}. Nevertheless, the overall wood volume of stems and branches should be calculated above the cavities level, which is the initial ground level. Thus, the overall wood volume of the Platland tree becomes 501.2 m^{3}, out of which 364.5 m^{3} for stem I and 136.7 m^{3} for stem II.
Measured and calculated main parameters of the Platland tree
Parameter (unit)  Platland tree  Platland I  Platland II 

Height (m)  18.9  18.9  15.8 
Circumference at bh (m)  34.11  24.20  18.34 
Formal diameter at bh (m)  10.86  7.70  5.84 
Footprint (m^{2})  67.9  43.9  24.0 
Basal functional diameter (m)  9.30  7.48  5.43 
Crosssectional area at 1 m (m^{2})  66.8  43.2  23.6 
Crosssectional area at bh (m)  66.0  42.7  23.3 
Functional diameter at bh (m)  9.17  7.37  5.45 
Crosssectional area at 2 m (m^{2})  63.2  40.4  22.9 
Crosssectional area at 2.5 m (m^{2})  57.3  36.2  21.1 
Crosssectional area at 5 m (m^{2})  39.7  29.7  10.0 
Wood volume below 5 m (m^{3})  273.1  186.8  86.3 
Wood volume over 5 m (m^{3})  175.1  143.4  31.7 
Total wood volume above ground level (m^{3})  448.2  330.2  118.0 
Overall wood volume above cavities level (m^{3})  501.2  364.5  136.7 
Cavity/cavities area (m^{2})  18.7  15.9  2.8 
3.2 AMS results and calibrated ages
AMS radiocarbon dating results and calibrated calendar ages of the oldest segments of samples collected from the cavities
Segment code [stem]  Depth^{a} [height^{b}] (10^{−2} m)  Fraction modern [error]  Radiocarbon date [error] (^{14}C years bp)  Cal ad range(s) 1σ [confidence interval]  Segment age [error] (calendar years) 

1x [I]  23 [148]  0.9401 [±0.0034]  496 [±27]  1415–1438 [68.2 %]  585 [±10] 






2x [I]  21 [145]  0.9316 [±0.0036]  569 [±29]  1320–1350 [39.8 %]  675 [±15] 
1391–1412 [28.4%]  






3x [I]  25 [90]  0.9501 [±0.0034]  411 [±27]  1441–1485 [68.2%]  545 [±20] 






4x [I]  48 [50]  0.9601 [±0.0022]  327 [±18]  1515–1529 [10.4%]  440 [±20] 
1542–1599 [44.8%]  
1618–1634 [13.0%]  






5x [II]  45 [102]  0.9597 [±0.0033]  330 [±27]  1495–1529 [18.2%]  440 [±30] 
1541–1602 [38.2%]  
1616–1634 [11.8%]  






6x [II]  21 [170]  0.8930 [±0.0029]  909 [±23]  1045–1095 [39.6%]  940 [±25] 
1120–1142 [16.0%]  
1147–1164 [12.6%]  






7x [II]  23 [40]  0.9003 [±0.0030]  845 [±24]  1168–1221 [68.2%]  815 [±25] 
AMS radiocarbon dating results and calibrated calendar ages of the oldest segments of samples collected from the exterior
Segment code [stem]  Depth^{a} [height^{b}] (10^{−2} m)  Fraction modern [error]  Radiocarbon date [error] (^{14}C years bp)  Cal ad range(s) 1σ [confidence interval]  Segment age [error] (calendar years) 

11x [I]  45 [134]  0.9939 [±0.0034]  49 [±27]  1706–1720 [12.1 %]  120 [±25] 
1819–1833 [10.4%]  
1862–1915 [45.7%]  






12x [I]  51 [275]  0.9849 [±0.0031]  122 [±25]  1685–1707 [12.1%]  150 [±25] 
1719–1732 [7.1%]  
1808–1826 [9.2%]  
1833–1885 [31.5%]  
1913–1928 [8.2%]  






13x [II]  20 [120]  0.9791 [±0.0028]  170 [±22]  1669–1682 [11.6%]  250 [±25] 
1736–1781 [40.1%]  
1799–1805 [5.5%]  
1931–1945 [11.0%] 
For calibration, we used the general IntCal09 data set (Reimer et al. 2009), rather than the SHCal04 data set for the Southern Hemisphere (McCormack et al. 2004). Our choice is justified by the fact that the SHCal04 curve does not yet contain information for lower southern latitudes and does not include results from Africa for the time frame corresponding to our sample ages. The offset between calibrated ages obtained when using the two calibration data sets is of several decades.
Calibrated (cal) ages are also displayed in Tables 2 and 3. The 1σ probability distribution was chosen to derive calibrated age ranges. For three segments (1x, 3x, 7x), the 1σ distribution is consistent with only one range of calendar years (marked in italics), while for the other seven segments (2x, 4x, 5x, 6x, 11x, 12x, 13x), the 1σ distribution corresponds to several ranges of calendar years. For these segments, the confidence interval of one range (marked in italics) is much greater than of the others; therefore, it was selected as the cal ad range of the segment for the purpose of this discussion.
For obtaining single calendar age values of segments, we derived a mean calendar age of each segment from the 1σ range with the highest probability. Calendar ages of segments represent the difference between ad 2010 and the mean value of the selected 1σ range, with the corresponding error. Calendar ages and errors were rounded to the nearest 5 years.
3.3 Dating results of samples collected from the cavities
The segments of samples collected from the cavities of Platland tree, which correspond to a depth in the wood up to 15–20 cm, consisted exclusively of new growth layers triggered by successive fires. The dating results revealed six major fire events that affected the cavities of the Platland tree, which were dated around ad 1550, 1650, 1780, 1900, 1955, and 1990 (as established by using the general IntCal04 or IntCal09 calibration); however, this investigation did not enable to determine the age of the two stems (Patrut et al. 2010a).
Here, we present dating results of the oldest segment of each of the seven cavity samples, labeled by an additional index x. For a given sample, the oldest segment corresponds to depths in the wood from 21 to 48 cm. The AMS results and calibrated ages are listed in Table 2. The results are in good agreement with the original positions of the respective segments/samples in the two stems, showing that these segments consist of the original old wood. The sequence of segment ages demonstrates that the trunk of Platland tree comprises two stems which fused partially some time ago.
The radiocarbon date of the oldest segment 2x originating from the cavity inside stem I was of 569 ± 29 bp (before present, i.e., before ad 1950), which corresponds to a calibrated age of 675 ± 15 years. However, the oldest dated segment 6x originates from the cavity inside stem II; its radiocarbon date was of 909 ± 23 bp, corresponding to a calibrated age of 940 ± 25 years.
The radiocarbon dates of the deepest segments collected from the two cavities toward the fusion/common area, i.e., 4x and 5x, were 327 ± 18 and 330 ± 27 bp, respectively. These values correspond to calibrated ages of 440 ± 20 and 440 ± 30 years. The practically identical values indicate that the two stems of Platland tree fused partially at least 440 years ago. Consequently, one can consider that the stems of Platland tree fused ca. 450 years ago, around ad 1560.
3.4 Dating results of samples collected from the exterior
The dating results and calibrated ages of the deepest and oldest segments of the three samples collected from the exterior of stems are shown in Table 3. The two deepest segments (45 and 51 cm) originating from stem I, i.e., 11x and 12x, at different heights above ground (1.34 and 2.75 m), were radiocarbon dated to 49 ± 27 and 122 ± 25 bp. The corresponding calibrated ages are 120 ± 25 and 150 ± 25 years.
The deepest segment 13x (20 cm) originating from stem II, at a height of 1.20 m above ground, had a radiocarbon date of 170 ± 22 bp, with a corresponding calibrated age of 250 ± 25 years.
3.5 Growth rates of the stems
Calibrated ages and positions of segments 11x and 12x, which originate from samples collected from the exterior of stem I, were used to derive the mean radial increase. Thus, stem I had grown by 3.75 × 10^{−3} m year^{−1} over the past ca. 120 years to the height of 1.34 m, and by 3.40 × 10^{−3} m year^{−1} over the past ca. 150 years to the height of 2.75 m. Such high values indicate that the very large stem I is still growing very fast.
However, as reported elsewhere (Patrut et al. 2010b), the mean radial increase expresses only an apparent growth rate of trunk/stems. Trees grow in three dimensions and their size is accurately expressed by the wood volume of the trunk/stems, which is in proportion to the crosssectional areas at different heights. Consequently, the area increase and volume increase are much better estimates of the growth rate than the radial increase. If one considers in this respect the dating results and positions of all six samples/segments collected from the cavity and the exterior of stem I, one can state that stem I accelerated its growth over the past ca. 150 years. This result corresponds to our previous research on African baobabs (Patrut et al. 2010b), as well to other research done on giant tree species (Sillett et al.2010).
The calibrated age and position of segment 13x, which originates from the sample collected from the exterior of stem II, shows that this stem had grown by only 0.80 × 10^{−3} m year^{−1} over the past ca. 250 years to the height of 1.20 m. This low value demonstrates that the smaller and older stem II slowed down its growth considerably and that it could be close to the final stage of the African baobab's life cycle, when trees almost stop growing.
3.6 Ages of the stems
The oldest segments 2x and 6x from the cavities inside stem I and stem II consist of the original old wood, which corresponds to the respective positions in the stems. The extrapolation of their calibrated ages to the presumptive center/pith of each stem enabled us for determining the ages of the two stems of Platland tree.
The crosssections at ground level and at 1 m show that both stems of the Platland tree have relatively symmetrical transversal sections, with quasiellipsoidal shapes. In this case, for determining the presumptive center/pith of each stem, i.e., the symmetry center, it is sufficient using the axes which touch the center of the fusion section.
Age of stem I
In the crosssection of stem I, we displayed the minor axis of the ellipse, from an external point Y to the fusion point O, which is the conjugate diameter from SE to NW. Its length is YO = 7.40 m. The present center of stem I can be approximated with the midpoint of the axis YO, denoted as C_{I}. In this case, the two minor semiaxes/minor radii are YC_{I} = C_{I}O = 3.70 m.
It is mandatory, however, to determine the presumptive position of the original center/pith of stem I, labeled C_{I(o)}, which can be approximated by the midpoint of the conjugate diameter at the fusion moment, that occurred ca. 450 years ago. After fusion, stem I had no more room for growing in direction NW. Therefore, the original center C_{I(o)} is shifted toward NW relative to the present center C_{I}. Therefore, we calculated the linear increase in radius of stem I over the past 450 years, in direction SE. The age of segment 11x indicates that stem I had grown toward SE by 0.45 m over the past ca. 120 years. In a very conservative estimate, if we consider that this relatively large mean radial increase was constant over the past 450 years, the radial increase toward SE over this period was of ca. 1.70 m. In this case, the corresponding axis/diameter of stem I was of 7.40 − 1.70 = 5.70 m at the fusion time, with the two semiaxis/radii, including C_{I(o)} − O, of 2.85 m. Thus, the distance between the present center C_{I} and the original center C_{I(o)} becomes C_{I} − C_{I(o)} = 0.85 m. The point 2xʹ, which represents the intercept with the YO axis of the virtual annual ring corresponding to the position of segment 2x, is located at 3.75 m from the external point Y and at 0.80 m from the original center C_{I(o)}, i.e., Y − 2xʹ = 3.75 m and 2xʹ − C_{I(o)} = 0.80 m.
In order to determine the age of stem I, one should add to the age of the oldest segment 2x (675 ± 25 years) the time needed by stem I for growing from 0 to a radius of 0.80 m. The growth rate of African baobabs, especially during their early life stage, is very different. However, if we consider that the stem I of Platland tree had grown fast and it is still fast growing, then, based on its current dimensions, sample ages and also our previous research (Patrut et al. 2010b), one can estimate that the time needed to stem I for reaching a radius of 0.80 m was of ca. 75 years. All these approximations sum to a maximum error of ±75 years for the final age of stem I, including the age error of segment 2x. Hence, the calculated final age of stem I is 750 ± 75 years. One can state that it started growing around ad 1260.
Age of stem II
In this case, we showed in the crosssection of stem II the major axis of the ellipse, from an external point Z to the fusion point O. This is also the transverse diameter from NW to SE, with a length ZO = 6.44 m. The present center of stem II can be approximated by the midpoint of the axis ZO, marked as C_{II}. The two major semiaxes/major radii are ZC_{II} = C_{II}O = 3.22 m.
The original center/pith of stem II, labeled C_{II(o)}, can be approximated by the midpoint of the transverse diameter at the fusion moment. After fusion, stem II had no more room for growing in direction SE. Consequently, the original center C_{II(o)} is shifted toward SE relative to the present center C_{II}. For calculating the increase in radius of stem II over the past 450 years toward NW, we used the age of sample 13x, which indicates a growth of 0.20 m over the past 250 years. As stated, this low value indicates that the growth of stem II slowed down considerably over this time frame. If one considers that the mean radial increase was around twice faster from the fusion moment up to 250 years ago, the linear increase toward NW over the past 450 years was of ca. 0.52 m. Thus, the corresponding axis/diameter of stem II was of 6.44 − 0.52 = 5.92 m at the fusion time, with the two semiaxis/radii, including C_{II(o)} − O of 2.96 m. The distance between the present center C_{II} and the original center C_{II(o)} becomes C_{II} − C_{II(o)} = 0.26 m. The segment 6x was practically positioned on the axis ZO, at 2.02 m from the fusion point O and at 0.94 m from the original center C_{II(o)}, i.e., O − 6x = 2.02 m and 6x − C_{II(o)} = 0.94 m.
For determining the age of the stem II, one should add to the age of the oldest segment 6x (940 ± 25 years) the time needed to stem II for growing from 0 to a radius of 0.94 m. If we consider that the stem II of Platland tree has grown much slower than stem I, its smaller dimensions, the older sample ages and also our previous research, we can estimate that the time needed to stem II for reaching a radius of 0.94 m was of ca. 120 years. All approximations are within the final error of ± 75 years. The calculated final age of stem II becomes 1,060 ± 75 years, indicating that it started growing around ad 950.
4 Discussion
4.1 The size of Platland tree
The Platland tree is listed in the South African National Register of Big Trees and is included in the South African List of Champion Trees (Esterhuyse et al. 2001; Department of Water Affairs and Forestry 2008). The only accurate parameter of the true size of a tree is the wood volume. The overall wood volume of Platland tree (501.2 m^{3}) is considerably larger than that of the Sagole tree (414.1 m^{3}), which is generally considered to be the biggest baobab (Van Pelt, unpublished results). Therefore, according to the volume values reported here, the Platland tree becomes the largest known African baobab.
4.2 The relation size–age in the case of Platland tree's stems
Commonly, one considers that the life span/longevity of a tree specimen, in our case of an African baobab, depends on several factors: (1) its genetic potential; (2) the environment (including mean annual rainfall, altitude, mean annual temperature, number of rainy seasons per year, number of frosty days per year, nature of the soil, slope of the land, availability to underground water sources, etc.); (3) the number and severity of dangerous events and disease episodes during its life cycle (fire episodes, fungi attack, insects, baobab disease, elephant damage, human damage, drought periods, flood, frost episodes, etc.).
Theoretically, individuals having all these factors identical should grow over time at the same rate. Consequently, under identical conditions, the biggest/largest trees may also be the oldest. Such considerations justify the common fallacy about trees that size is in direct proportion to their age. Certain baobab researchers noted, however, considerable size differences between individuals of identical age, which were attributed to site differences. Moreover, important size differences between specimens growing on the same site were reported; these dissimilarities were considered to be mainly of genetic origin (Breitenbach 1985; Wickens and Lowe 2008).
Our study on the Platland tree demonstrates, once again, how questionable the size–age relation is and the large errors it can generate. According to complete measurements and dating results, the very large stem I is considerably younger than the smaller stem II (overall wood volume 364.5 vs. 136.7 m^{3}; age 750 vs. 1,060 years). A preliminary genetic research (Catana and Patrut, unpublished results) suggested that the two stems of Platland tree possess identical DNA and belong to a single individual. The two stems have also grown on the same site. In this case, we need an explanation for the unexpected finding that a stem which is almost three times bigger is, however, over 300 years younger than the smaller stem of the same tree.
Researchers of tall and large tree species around the world learned from their field experience that the largest specimens are usually not also the oldest. Typically, the largest specimens are those which had grown very fast when they were young and, eventually, continued their rapid growth (Hartesveldt et al. 1975). The research reported here demonstrates that such statements might be also valid for the African baobab. Our research on radiocarbon dating of baobabs (Patrut et al. 2010c), as well dating results presented by other researchers (Swart 1963; Woodborne et al. 2010) show that very large specimens are not necessarily among the oldest trees and that mediumsized individuals can also be very old. If one considers that the largest baobabs are those which grew very fast over their first ca. 100 years of life and maintained their rapid growth, we may have an explanation for our results on the two stems of Platland tree. In this case, stem I had probably grown much faster and is also considerably bigger, as the climate conditions in the area over its first century of life (ca. ad 1260–1360) were probably much more favorable for baobabs than over the first century of stem II (ca. ad 950–1050).
4.3 The Platland tree system
According to dating results, the present trunk of the Platland tree comprises two stems of different ages. Therefore, morphologically, it can be considered a double tree. On the other hand, according to the preliminary genetic analysis, the Platland tree is a single individual. Both stems sprouted very probably from the same rootstock at different times and, therefore, they have identical DNA.
However, in the case of multistemmed and multigeneration baobabs, such as the Platland tree, it is a difficult to state whether they are single or multiple trees. They should be rather considered “tree systems”, with a complex development over a long life cycle. Over time, stems might die and collapse, while new stems can sprout at any moment from the roots or from the other broken or unbroken stems.
Based on the dating results, stem II of Platland tree had grown over 300 years without being disturbed by the presence of another stem. Nevertheless, it has an important lean toward NW (up to 40°) and the crosssections show an obvious miss in its ellipsoidal shape in the present fusion area. These aspects suggest that stem II could have been pushed constantly toward NW after it started growing, possibly by a larger and older stem 0, located approximately on the site of stem I. In this hypothetical scenario, stem 0 died and collapsed at a certain moment and was “replaced” by the present stem I, which might have emerged from its remains. However, it is improbable that stem I would still comprise somewhere old wood traces originating from stem 0. If this scenario had happened, then the multistemmed and multigeneration Platland tree system should be much older than the age we derived from radiocarbon dating.
Acknowledgements
This work was fully funded by the Romanian Authority CNCSISUEFISCDI under grant PN IIIDEI 2354, Nr. 1092. AMS radiocarbon dating at the NOSAMS Facility is supported by the U.S. National Science Foundation under Cooperative Agreement OCE0753487. We would like to thank Heather and Doug van Heerden, the owners of Sunland Nursery, for granting permission for onsite investigation and also for sampling the Platland tree.