Abstract
The conservation of biodiversity in agro-ecosystems is closely related to land use. Intensive land use is considered to be a major cause of biodiversity loss. Most studies addressing the effect of land use intensity on biodiversity have compared organic and conventional systems. However, little is known about the heterogeneity of the management intensity within each farming system. We hypothesise that there is a gradient of land use between and within the farming systems and that an index of management intensity is more useful than the farming system for evaluating the effects of the management practices on weed flora. In this study, 18 pairs of organic and conventional cereal fields were selected in northeastern Spain. The farmers were interviewed to gather information on the management practices performed. We selected the five following variables from these interviews: nitrogen inputs, crop diversity, weed control, seed origin and cereal ratio. We used principal components analysis to create a new management index. Weed species richness was recorded in 10 field pairs before crop harvest. Our results showed that the index values displayed huge variation within each farming system. Index values of conventional fields varied between −0.01 and 1.00, whereas within organic ones the values ranged from −1.19 to 0.18. The index better explained weed species richness than did the farming system. The index values demonstrate the existence of a land use intensity gradient, which indicates that it is an over-simplification to always equate organic farming with low intensity management. Here, we also prove that this new index is more appropriate for evaluating the effects of management practices on weed species richness than the classical organic-conventional dichotomy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bates D, Maechler M, Dai B (2008) lme4: Linear mixed-effects models using S4 classes. Version 0.999375-26
Billeter R, Liira J, Bailey D et al (2008) Indicators for biodiversity in agricultural landscapes: a pan-European study. J Appl Ecol 45:141–150. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01393.x
Bockstaller C, Guichard L, Makowski D, Aveline A, Girardin P, Plantureux S (2008) Agri-environmental indicators to assess cropping and farming systems. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 28:139–149. doi:10.1051/agro:2007052
Burnham KP, Anderson DR (2002) Model selection and multimodel inference. A practical information-theoretic approach. Springer, New York
Clough Y, Holzschuh A, Gabriel D, Purtauf T, Kleijn D, Kruess A, Steffan-Dewenter I, Tscharntke T (2007) Alpha and beta diversity of arthropods and plants in organically and conventionally managed wheat fields. J Appl Ecol 44:804–812. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01294.x
Darnhofer I, Lindenthal T, Bartel-Kratochvil R, Zollitsch W (2010) Conventionalisation of organic farming practices: from structural criteria towards an assessment based on organic principles. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 30:67–81. doi:10.1051/agro/2009011
Decaëns T, Jiménez JJ (2002) Earthworm communities under an agricultural intensification gradient in Colombia. Plant Soil 240:133–143. doi:10.1023/A:1015844610604
R Development Core Team (2008) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria. ISBN 3-900051-07-0. Available from: http://www.R-project.org/
Firbank LG, Petit S, Smart S, Blain A, Fuller RJ (2008) Assessing the impacts of agricultural intensification on biodiversity: a British perspective. Phil Trans R Soc B 363:777–787. doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2183
Gibson RH, Pearce S, Morris RJ, Symondson WOC, Memmott J (2007) Plant diversity and land use under organic and conventional agriculture: a whole-farm approach. J Appl Ecol 44:792–803. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01292.x
Giller KE, Beare MH, Lavelle P, Izac AMN, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification, soil biodiversity and agroecosystem function. Appl Soil Ecol 6:3–16. doi:10.1016/S0929-1393(96)00149-7
Guerrero I, Martínez P, Morales MB, Oñate JJ (2010) Influence of agricultural factors on weed, carabid and bird richness in a Mediterranean cereal cropping system. Agric Ecosyst Environ 138:103–108. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2010.04.006
Herzog F, Steiner B, Bailey D et al (2006) Assessing the intensity of temperate European agriculture at the landscape scale. Eur J Agron 24:165–181. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2005.07.006
Hole DG, Perkins AJ, Wilson JD, Alexander IH, Grice PV, Evans AD (2005) Does organic farming benefit biodiversity? Biol Conserv 122:113–130. doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2004.07.018
Holzner W (1982) Concepts, categories and characteristics of weeds. In: Holzner W, Numata M (eds) Biology and ecology of weeds. Dr W. Junk Publishers, The Hague, pp 3–20
Idescat, Institut d’Estadística de Catalunya (2010) http://www.idescat.cat. Accessed 10 May 2011
Karlen DL, Varvel GE, Bullock DG, Cruse RM (1994) Crop rotations for the 21st century. Adv Agron 53:1–45. doi:10.1016/S0065-2113(08)60611-2
Kleijn D, Berendse F, Smit R, Gilissen N (2001) Agri-environment schemes do not effectively protect biodiversity in Dutch agricultural landscapes. Nature 413:723–725. doi:10.1038/35099540
Kleijn D, Kohler F, Báldi A et al (2009) On the relationship between farmland biodiversity and land-use intensity in Europe. P Roy Soc B-Biol Sci 276:903–909. doi:10.1098/rspb.2008.1509
Lundkvist A (2009) Effects of pre- and post-emergence weed harrowing on annual weeds in peas and spring cereals. Weed Res 49:409–416. doi:10.1016/j.eja.2008.01.001
Mas AH, Dietsch TV (2003) An index of management intensity for coffee agroecosystems to evaluate butterfly species richness. Ecol Appl 13:1491–1501
Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509. doi:0.1126/science.277.5325.504
Petit S, Boursault A, Le Guilloux M, Munier-Jolain N, Reboud X (2011) Weeds in agricultural landscapes. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 31:309–317. doi:10.1051/agro/2010020
Reidsma P, Tekelenburg T, van den Berg M, Alkemade R (2006) Impacts of land-use change on biodiversity: an assessment of agricultural biodiversity in the European Union. Agric Ecosyst Environ 114:86–102. doi:10.1016/j.agee.2005.11.026
Rigby D, Woodhouse P, Young T, Burton M (2001) Constructing a farm level indicator of sustainable agricultural practice. Ecol Econ 39:463–478. doi:10.1016/S0921-8009(01)00245-2
Robinson RA, Sutherland WJ (2002) Post-war changes in arable farming and biodiversity in Great Britain. J Appl Ecol 39:157–176. doi:10.1046/j.1365-2664.2002.00695.x
Shriar AJ (2000) Agricultural intensity and its measurement in frontier regions. Agrofor Syst 49:301–318. doi:10.1023/A:1006316131781
Stevenson FC, Légère A, Simard RR, Angers DA, Pageau D, Lafond J (1997) Weed species diversity in spring barley varies with crop rotation and tillage, but not with nutrient source. Weed Sci 45:798–806
Weibull AC, Östman Ö (2003) Species composition in agroecosystems: the effect of landscape, habitat, and farm management. Basic Appl Ecol 4:349–361. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01418.x
Winfree R, Williams NM, Gaines H, Ascher JS, Kremen C (2008) Wild bee pollinators provide the majority of crop visitation across land-use gradients in New Jersey and Pennsylvania, USA. J Appl Ecol 45:793–802. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2664.2007.01418.x
Acknowledgements
We thank the farmers for their collaboration and the members of the Department of Plant Biology (University of Barcelona), especially A. Romero for field and office assistance. We also thank J. Romanyà for his help with the nitrogen input calculations. This research was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Education and Science with a fellowship to the first author and the projects CGL2006-13190-C03-01and CGL2009-13497-C02-01.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
About this article
Cite this article
Armengot, L., José-María, L., Blanco-Moreno, J.M. et al. A novel index of land use intensity for organic and conventional farming of Mediterranean cereal fields. Agron. Sustain. Dev. 31, 699–707 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0042-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13593-011-0042-0