Estimation of Covariate Effects With Current Status Data and Differential Mortality
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
The assessment of the impact that socioeconomic determinants have on the prevalence of certain chronic conditions reported by respondents in population surveys must confront two problems. First, the self-reports could be in error (false positives and false negatives). Second, those reporting are a selected sample of those who ever experience the problem, and this selection is heavily influenced by excess mortality attributable to the condition being reported. In this article, we use a combination of empirical data and microsimulation to (a) assess the magnitude of the bias attributable to the selection problem, and (b) suggest an adjustment procedure that corrects for this bias. We find that the proposed adjustment procedure considerably reduces the bias arising from differential mortality.
- Aguilar-Salinas, C. A., Rojas, R., Gόmez-Pérez, F. J., García, E., Valles, V., Ríos-Torres, J. M., . . . Rull, J. A. (2002). Prevalence and characteristics of early-onset type 2 diabetes in Mexico. American Journal of Medicine, 113, 569–574.
- Andersen, P. K., & Væth, M. (1989). Simple parametric and nonparametric models for excess and relative mortality. Biometrika, 45, 523–535.
- Berk, R. A. (1983). An introduction to sample selection bias in sociological data. American Review of Sociology, 48, 298–386.
- Bloom, D. E., & Killingsworth, M. R. (1985). Correcting for truncation bias caused by a latent truncation variable. Journal of Econometrics, 27, 131–135. CrossRef
- Coale, A. J., Demeny, P., & Vaughan, B. (1983). Regional model life tables in stable populations. New York: Academic Press.
- Coale, A. J., & McNeil, D. R. (1972). The distribution by age of the frequency of first marriage in female cohort. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 67, 743–749. CrossRef
- Dalstra, J. A. A., Kunst, A. E., Borrell, C., Breeze, E., Cambios, E., Costa, G., . . . Mackenbach, J. P. (2005). Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: An overview of eight European countries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 34, 316–326.
- Diamond, I. D., & McDonald, J. (1991). The analysis of current status data. In J. Trussell, R. Hankinson, & J. Tilton (Eds.), Demographic applications of event history analysis (pp. 231–252). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Ederer, F., Axtell, L. M., & Cutler, S. J. (1961). The relative survival rate: A statistical methodology. National Cancer Institute Monographs, 6, 101–121.
- Fligstein, N., & Wolf, W. (1978). Sex similarities in occupational status attainment: Are the results due to the restrictions on the sample to employed women? Social Science Research, 7, 197–212. CrossRef
- Goldman, N. (1993). Marriage selection and mortality patterns: Inferences and fallacies. Demography, 30, 189–208. CrossRef
- Greene, W. H. (1981). Sample selection bias as a specification error: A comment. Econometrica, 49, 795–798. CrossRef
- Hajnal, J. (1953). Age at marriage and proportions marrying. Population Studies, 72, 111–136.
- Hajnal, J. (1965). European marriage patterns in perspective. In D. V. Glass & D. E. C. Eversley (Eds.), Population in history: Essays in historical demography (pp. 101–143). London, UK: Edward Arnold.
- Heckman, J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica, 47, 153–161. CrossRef
- Heckman, J., & Singer, B. (1984). A method for minimizing the impact of distributional assumptions in econometric models of duration data. Econometrica, 52, 271–320. CrossRef
- Hougaard, P. (2000). Analysis of multivariate survival data. New York: Springer. CrossRef
- Hu, Y., & Goldman, N. (1990). Mortality differentials by marital status: An international comparison. Demography, 27, 233–250. CrossRef
- Jewell, N. P., & Van der Laan, M. J. (2004). Current status data: Review, recent developments and open problems. In N. Balakrishnan & C. R. Rao (Eds.), Handbook of statistics: Advances in survival analysis (pp. 625–643). Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier.
- Keiding, N. (1991). Age-specific incidence and prevalence: A statistical perspective. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society: Series A, 154, 342–371.
- Keiding, N. (2006). Event history analysis and the cross-section. Statistics in Medicine, 25, 2343–2364. CrossRef
- Keiding, N., Begtrup, K., Scheike, T. H., & Hasibeder, G. (1996). Estimation from current-status data in continuous time. Lifetime Data Analysis, 2, 119–129. CrossRef
- Keiding, N., Holst, C., & Green, A. (1989). Retrospective estimation of diabetes incidence from information in a prevalent population and historical mortality. American Journal of Epidemiology, 130, 588–600.
- Kisker, E. E., & Goldman, N. (1987). Perils of single life and benefits of marriage. Social Biology, 34, 125–152.
- Lin, D. Y., Oakes, D., & Ying, Z. (1998). Additive hazards regression with current status data. Biometrika, 85, 289–298. CrossRef
- Little, R. J. A. (1995). Modeling the drop-out mechanism in repeated-measures studies. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 90, 1112–1121. CrossRef
- Livi-Bacci, M. (1985). Selectivity of marriage and mortality: Notes for future research. In N. Keyfitz (Ed.), Population and biology (pp. 99–108). Liege, Belgium: Ordina Editions.
- Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. CrossRef
- Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1981). Methods for evaluating the heterogeneity of aging processes in human populations using vital statistics data: Explaining the black/white mortality crossover by a model of mortality selection. Human Biology, 53, 47–67.
- McLaren, L. (2007). Socioeconomic status and obesity. Epidemiologic Reviews, 29, 29–48. CrossRef
- Monteiro, C. A., Conde, W. L., Lu, B., & Popkin, B. M. (2004). Obesity and inequities in health in the developing world. International Journal of Obesity, 28, 1181–1186. CrossRef
- Palloni, A., & Thomas, J. (2011). Estimation of health status inequalities from prevalence data: A risky business (CDE Working Paper No. 2011-09). Madison: Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin.
- Popkin, B. M. (1998). The nutrition transition and its health implications in lower-income countries. Public Health Nutrition, 1, 5–21. CrossRef
- Robbins, J. M., Vaccarino, V., Zhang, H., & Kasl, S. V. (2001). Socioeconomic status and type 2 diabetes in African American and non-Hispanic white women and men: Evidence from the third National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. American Journal of Public Health, 91, 76–83. CrossRef
- Robbins, J. M., Vaccarino, V., Zhang, H., & Kasl, S. V. (2005). Socioeconomic status and diagnosed diabetes incidence. Diabetes Research and Clinical Practice, 68, 230–236. CrossRef
- Smith, J. P. (2007). Nature and causes of trends in male diabetes prevalence, undiagnosed diabetes, and the socioeconomic status health gradient. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 104, 13225–13231. CrossRef
- Sun, J., & Kalbfleish, J. D. (1993). The analysis of current status data on point processes. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 88, 1449–1454. CrossRef
- Trussell, J., & Richards, T. (1985). Correcting for unmeasured heterogeneity in hazard models using the Heckman-Singer procedure. In N. Tuma (Ed.), Sociological methodology (pp. 242–276). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
- Trussell, J., & Rodríguez, G. (1990). Heterogeneity in demographic research. In J. Adams, D. Lam, A. Hermalin, & P. Smouse (Eds.), Convergent issues in genetics and demography (pp. 111–132). New York: Oxford University Press.
- Vaupel, J. W., Manton, K. G., & Stallard, E. (1979). The impact of heterogeneity in individual frailty on the dynamics of mortality. Demography, 16, 439–454. CrossRef
- Vaupel, J. W., & Yashin, A. I. (1985). Heterogeneity’s ruses: Some surprising effects of selection on population dynamics. The American Statistician, 39, 176–185.
- Weinberg, C., Baird, D. D., & Rowland, A. S. (1993). Pitfalls inherent in retrospective time-to-event studies: The example of time to pregnancy. Statistics in Medicine, 12, 867–879. CrossRef
- Weinberg, C., Baird, D. D., & Wilcox, A. J. (1994). Sources of bias in studies of time to pregnancy. Statistics in Medicine, 13, 671–681. CrossRef
- Wooldridge, J. M. (1995). Selection corrections for panel data models under conditional mean independence assumptions. Journal of Econometrics, 68, 115–132. CrossRef
- Estimation of Covariate Effects With Current Status Data and Differential Mortality
Volume 50, Issue 2 , pp 521-544
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Current status data
- Selection bias
- Health inequality
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Center for Demography and Ecology, University of Wisconsin–Madison, 1180 Observatory Drive, Madison, WI, 53706-1393, USA
- 2. Department of Sociology, The Pennsylvania State University, 211 Oswald Tower, University Park, PA, 16802, USA