Different Reasons, Different Results: Implications of Migration by Gender and Family Status
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Previous research on migration and gendered career outcomes centers on couples and rarely examines the reason for the move. The implicit assumption is usually that households migrate in response to job opportunities. Based on a two-year panel from the Current Population Survey, this article uses stated reasons for geographic mobility to compare earnings outcomes among job migrants, family migrants, and quality-of-life migrants by gender and family status. We further assess the impact of migration on couples’ internal household economy. The effects of job-related moves that we find are reduced substantially in the fixed-effects models, indicating strong selection effects. Married women who moved for family reasons experience significant and substantial earnings declines. Consistent with conventional models of migration, we find that household earnings and income and gender specialization increase following job migration. Married women who are secondary earners have increased odds of reducing their labor supply following migration for job or family reasons. However, we also find that migrating women who contributed as equals to the household economy before the move are no more likely than nonmigrant women to exit work or to work part-time. Equal breadwinner status may protect women from becoming tied movers.
- Baldridge, D. C., Eddleston, K. A., & Veiga, J. F. (2006). Saying “no” to being uprooted: The impact of family and gender on willingness to relocate. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 79, 131–149. CrossRef
- Becker, G. (1973). A theory of marriage: Part I. Journal of Political Economy, 81, 813–846. CrossRef
- Becker, G. (1974). A theory of marriage: Part II. Journal of Political Economy, 82(2), S11–S26. CrossRef
- Bielby, D. D., & Bielby, W. T. (1992). I will follow him: Family ties, gender role beliefs and reluctance to relocate for a better job. American Journal of Sociology, 97, 1241–1267. CrossRef
- Bird, G. A., & Bird, G. W. (1985). Determinants of mobility in two-earner families: Does the wife’s income count. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 47, 753–758. CrossRef
- Blau, P. M., & Duncan, O. D. (1967). The American occupational structure. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
- Boyle, P., Cooke, T., Halfacree, K., & Smith, D. (2003). The effect of long-distance family migration and motherhood on partnered women’s labour-market activity rates in Great Britain and the USA. Environment and Planning A, 35, 2097–2114. CrossRef
- Büchel, F. (2000). Tied movers, tied stayers: The higher risk of overeducation among married women in West Germany. In S. Gustafsson & D. Meulder (Eds.), Gender and the market (pp. 133–146). London, UK: Macmillan.
- Büchel, F., & van Ham, M. (2003). Overeducation, regional labor markets, and spatial flexibility. Journal of Urban Economics, 53, 482–493. CrossRef
- Clark, W. A. V., & Withers, S. D. (2002). Disentangling the interaction of migration, mobility, and labor-force participation. Environment and Planning A, 34, 923–945. CrossRef
- Cooke, T. J. (2003). Family migration and the relative earnings of husbands and wives. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 93, 338–349. CrossRef
- Cooke, T. J., & Speirs, K. (2005). Migration and employment among the civilian spouses of military personnel. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 343–355. CrossRef
- Davis, K., & Moore, W. E. (1945). Some principles of stratification. American Sociological Review, 10, 242–249. CrossRef
- Duncan, P. R., & Perrucci, C. C. (1976). Dual occupation families and migration. American Sociolocial Review, 2, 335–362. CrossRef
- Greenwood, M. (1975). Research on internal migration in the United States: A survey. Journal of Economic Literature, 13, 397–433.
- King, M., Ruggles, S., Alexander, T., Leicach, D., & Sobek, M. (2004). Integrated Public Use Microdata Series, Current Population Survey: Version 2.0 [Machine-readable database]. Minneapolis: Minnesota Population Center [producer and distributor].
- Lichter, D. T. (1982). The migration of dual-worker families: Does the wife’s job matter? Social Science Quarterly, 63, 48–57.
- Long, L. H. (1974). Women’s labor force participation and the residential mobility of families. Social Forces, 52, 342–348.
- Madrian, B. C., & Lefgren, L. J. (2000). An approach to longitudinally matching Current Population Survey (CPS) respondents. Journal of Economic and Social Measurement, 26, 31–62.
- Markham, W. T., Macken, P. O., Bonjean, C. M., & Corder, J. (1983). A note on sex, geographic mobility, and career advancement. Social Forces, 61, 1138–1146.
- Maxwell, N. L. (1988). Economic returns to migration: Marital status and gender differences. Social Science Quarterly, 69, 109–121.
- McKinnish, T. (2008). Spousal mobility and earnings. Demography, 45, 829–849. CrossRef
- Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 86, 749–784. CrossRef
- Morrison, D. R., & Lichter, D. T. (1988). Family migration and female employment: The problem of underemployment among migrant married women. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 50, 161–172. CrossRef
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2008). Growing unequal? Income distribution and poverty in OECD countries. Paris, France: OECD.
- Rossi, P. H. (1955). Why families move. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Shachter, J. P., Franklin, R. S., & Perry, M. J. (2003). Migration and geographic mobility in metropolitan and nonmetropolitan America: 1995 to 2000 (Census 2000 Special Reports No. 9). Washington, DC: U.S. Census Bureau.
- Shihadeh, E. S. (1991). The prevalence of husband-centered migration: Employment consequences for married mothers. Journal of Marriage and the Family, 53, 432–444. CrossRef
- Sjaastad, L. A. (1962). The costs and returns of human migration. Journal of Political Economy, 70(5), 80–93. CrossRef
- Different Reasons, Different Results: Implications of Migration by Gender and Family Status
Volume 49, Issue 1 , pp 197-217
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Internal migration
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Sociology, University of Utah, 380 S 1530 E, Room 301, Salt Lake City, UT, 84112, USA
- 2. Department of Sociology, Indiana University, Ballantine Hall 744, 1020 East Kirkwood Avenue, Bloomington, IN, 47405-7103, USA