The Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: Racial Proxy Revisited
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Understanding the factors that drive individuals’ residential preferences is a critical issue in the study of racial segregation. An important debate within this field is whether individuals—especially whites—prefer to live in predominantly white neighborhoods because they wish to avoid the social problems that may be more likely to occur in predominantly black neighborhoods (i.e., the racial proxy hypothesis) or because of racial factors that go beyond these social class–related characteristics. Through a multilevel analysis of data from the 2004–2005 Chicago Area Study and several administrative sources, we assess the extent to which the racial proxy hypothesis describes neighborhood satisfaction among whites, African Americans, and Latinos living across a broad range of neighborhood contexts. The racial proxy perspective applies weakly to whites’ satisfaction: whites report less satisfaction in neighborhoods with more minority residents, and only some of their dissatisfaction can be attributed to local social characteristics. The racial proxy hypothesis applies more strongly to blacks’ and Latinos’ satisfaction. In some cases, especially for Latinos, higher levels of satisfaction in integrated neighborhoods can largely be attributed to the fact that these places have better socioeconomic conditions and fewer social problems than predominantly minority communities. At the same time, effects of racial/ethnic composition persist in unique and somewhat divergent ways for blacks and Latinos, supporting the assertion that racial composition matters, above and beyond its relation to social class. Taken together, these findings suggest that individuals balance both socioeconomic and race-related concerns in their residential preferences.
- Almaguer, T. (1994). Racial fault lines: The historical origins of white supremacy in California. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Baybeck, B. (2006). Sorting out the competing effects of racial context. Journal of Politics, 68, 386–396.
- Bobo, L., & Hutchings, V. L. (1996). Perceptions of racial group competition: Extending Blumer’s theory of group position to a multiracial social context. American Sociological Review, 61, 951–972. CrossRef
- Bobo, L., & Zubrinsky, C. L. (1996). Attitudes on residential integration: Perceived status differences, mere in-group preference, or racial prejudice? Social Forces, 74, 883–909. CrossRef
- Bonilla-Silva, E. (2004). From bi-racial to tri-racial: Towards a new system of racial stratification in the USA. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 27, 931–950. CrossRef
- Charles, C. Z. (2000). Neighborhood racial composition preferences: Evidence from a multiethnic metropolis. Social Problems, 47, 379–407. CrossRef
- Charles, C. Z. (2001). Processes of residential segregation. In A. O’Connor, C. Tilly, & L. D. Bobo (Eds.), Urban inequality: Evidence from four cities (pp. 217–271). New York: Russell Sage.
- Charles, C. Z. (2003). The dynamics of racial residential segregation. Annual Review of Sociology, 29, 167–207. CrossRef
- Charles, C. Z. (2006). Won’t you be my neighbor? Race, class and residence in Los Angeles. New York: Russell Sage.
- Chicago Public Schools Office of Performance. (2002). School & citywide report cards. Retrieved from http://research.cps.k12.il.us/cps/accountweb/Reports/allschools.html
- Clark, W. A. (1991). Residential preferences and neighborhood racial segregation: A test of the Schelling segregation model. Demography, 28, 1–19. CrossRef
- Clark, W. A. (1992). Residential preferences and residential choices in a multiethnic context. Demography, 29, 451–466. CrossRef
- Crowder, K. D. (2000). The racial context of white mobility: An individual-level assessment of the white flight hypothesis. Social Science Research, 29, 223–257. CrossRef
- Ellen, I. G. (2000). Sharing America’s neighborhoods: The prospects for stable racial integration. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- Emerson, M. O., Yancey, G., & Chai, K. J. (2001). Does race matter in residential segregation? Exploring the preferences of white Americans. American Sociological Review, 66, 922–935. CrossRef
- Farley, R., Steeh, C., Krysan, M., Jackson, T., & Reeves, K. (1994). Stereotypes and segregation: Neighborhoods in the Detroit area. American Journal of Sociology, 100, 750–780. CrossRef
- Farley, R., Fielding, E., & Krysan, M. (1997). The residential preferences of blacks and whites: A four metropolis analysis. Housing Policy Debate, 8, 763–800.
- Feagin, J. R. (2000). Racist America: Roots, current realities, and future reparations. New York: Routledge.
- Feagin, J. R., & Sikes, M. P. (1994). Living with racism: The black middle-class experience. Boston, MA: Beacon Press.
- Flippen, C. (2001). Neighborhood transition and social organization: The white to Hispanic case. Social Problems, 48, 299–321. CrossRef
- Glenn, E. N. (1986). Issei, nisei, warbride: Three generations of Japanese American women in domestic service. Philadelphia, PA: Temple University Press.
- Harris, D. R. (1999). “Property values drop when blacks move in, because...”: Racial and socioeconomic determinants of neighborhood desirability. American Sociological Review, 64, 461–479. CrossRef
- Harris, D. R. (2001). Why are whites and blacks averse to black neighbors? Social Science Research, 30, 100–116. CrossRef
- Iceland, J., Weinberg, D. H., & Steinmetz, E. (2002). Racial and ethnic residential segregation in the United States: 1980–2000. Washington: U.S. Census Bureau.
- Kefalas, M. (2003). Working-class heroes: Protecting home, community, and nation in a Chicago neighborhood. Berkeley: University of California Press.
- Krysan, M. (2002a). Community undesirability in black and white: Examining racial residential preferences through community perceptions. Social Problems, 49, 521–543. CrossRef
- Krysan, M. (2002b). Whites who say they’d flee: Who are they and why would they leave? Demography, 39, 675–696. CrossRef
- Krysan, M., & Bader, M. (2007). Perceiving the metropolis: Seeing the city through a prism of race. Social Forces, 49, 531–543.
- Krysan, M., & Farley, R. (2002). The residential preferences of blacks: Do they explain persistent segregation? Social Forces, 80, 937–980. CrossRef
- Krysan, M., Couper, M. P., Farley, R., & Forman, T. A. (2009). Does race matter in neighborhood preferences? Results from a video experiment. American Journal of Sociology, 115, 527–559. CrossRef
- Lee, B. A., Salvador Oropesa, R., & Kanan, J. W. (1994). Neighborhood context and residential mobility. Demography, 31, 249–270. CrossRef
- Logan, J. R. (2001). Ethnic diversity grows, neighborhood diversity lags behind (report). Albany, NY: Lewis Mumford Center for Comparative Urban and Regional Research.
- Massey, D. S., & Denton, N. A. (1993). American apartheid: Segregation and the making of the underclass. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
- O’Brien, D. J., & Clough, L. (1982). The future of urban neighborhoods. In G. Gappert & R. V. Knight (Eds.), Cities in the 21st century (pp. 232–248). Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.
- Oliver, J. E., & Wong, J. (2003). Intergroup prejudice in multiethnic settings. American Journal of Political Science, 47, 567–582. CrossRef
- Park, R. E. (1924). The concept of social distance as applied to the study of racial attitudes and racial relations. Journal of Applied Sociology, 8, 339–344.
- Patterson, O. (1997). The ordeal of integration: Progress and resentment in Americas’ “racial” crisis. New York: Citivas/Counterpoint.
- Peterson, R. D., & Krivo, L. J. (2006). The national neighborhood crime study [data set]. Columbus: Ohio State University, Criminal Justice Research Center.
- Quillian, L., & Pager, D. (2001). Black neighbors, higher crime? The role of racial stereotypes in evaluations of neighborhood crime. American Journal of Sociology, 107, 717–767. CrossRef
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. S. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Applications and data analysis methods. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
- Sampson, R. J., & Raudenbush, S. W. (2004). Seeing disorder: Neighborhood stigma and the social construction of “broken windows.” Social Psychology Quarterly, 67, 319–342. CrossRef
- Stipak, B., & Hensler, C. (1983). Effect of neighborhood racial and socioeconomic composition on urban residents’ evaluations of their neighborhoods. Social Indicators Research, 12, 311–320. CrossRef
- St. John, C., & Bates, N. A. (1990). Racial composition and neighborhood evaluation. Social Science Research, 19, 47–61. CrossRef
- Taub, R. P., Garth Taylor, D., & Dunham, J. D. (1984). Paths of neighborhood change: Race and crime in urban America. Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
- Thernstrom, S., & Thernstrom, A. (1997). America in black and white: One nation, indivisible. New York: Simon and Schuster.
- Timberlake, J. M. (2000). Still life in black and white: Effects of racial and class attitudes on prospects for residential integration in Atlanta. Sociological Inquiry, 70, 420–445. CrossRef
- U.S. Census Bureau. (1990). Table P009. Hispanic origin—universe: Persons. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov
- U.S. Census Bureau. (2000). Table QT-P9. Hispanic or Latino by type: 2000. Retrieved from http://factfinder.census.gov
- Zubrinsky, C. L., & Bobo, L. (1996). Prismatic metropolis: Race and residential segregation in the City of Angels. Social Science Research, 25, 335–374. CrossRef
- The Determinants of Neighborhood Satisfaction: Racial Proxy Revisited
Volume 48, Issue 3 , pp 1203-1229
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Residential preferences
- Neighborhood satisfaction
- Industry Sectors