Evidence of Molecular Fragmentation inside the Charged Droplets Produced by Electrospray Process

  • Shibdas Banerjee
  • Halan Prakash
  • Shyamalava Mazumdar
Research Article

DOI: 10.1007/s13361-011-0188-7

Cite this article as:
Banerjee, S., Prakash, H. & Mazumdar, S. J. Am. Soc. Mass Spectrom. (2011) 22: 1707. doi:10.1007/s13361-011-0188-7

Abstract

The behavior of the analyte molecules inside the neutral core of the charged droplet produced by the electrospray (ES) process is not unambiguously known to date. We have identified interesting molecular transformations of two suitably chosen analytes inside the ES droplets. The highly stable Ni(II) complex of 1,8-dimethyl-1,3,6,8,10,13-hexaazacyclotetradecane (1) that consists of a positive charge at the metal center, and the allyl pendant armed tertiary amine containing macrocycle 3,4,5:12,13,14-dipyridine-2,6,11,15-tetramethyl-1,7,10,16-tetraallyl-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaazacyclooctadeca-3,13-diene (M4p) have been studied by ESI mass spectrometry as the model analytes. We have shown that these two molecules are not representatively transferred from solution to gas phase by ESI; rather, they undergo fragmentation inside the charged droplets. The results indicated that a charged analyte such as 1 was possibly unstable inside the neutral core of the ES droplet and undergoes fragmentation due to the Coulombic repulsion imparted by the surface protons. Brownian motion of the neutral analyte such as M4p inside the droplet, on the other hand, may lead to proton attachment on interaction with the charged surface causing destabilization that leads to fragmentation of M4p and release of resonance stabilized allyl cations from the core of the droplet. Detailed solvent dependence and collision-induced dissociation (CID) studies provided compelling evidences that the fragmentation of the analytes indeed occurs inside the charged ES droplets. A viable model of molecular transformations inside the ES droplet was proposed based on these results to rationalize the behavior of the analyte molecules inside the charged ES droplets.

Key words

ESI-MS Fragmentation Charged droplet Coulomb repulsion Nickel complex Pendant armed macrocycle 

1 Introduction

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) [1, 2, 3, 4] has evolved into one of the most versatile and widely used analytical technique to study weak noncovalent interactions like intermolecular hydrogen bonding [5, 6, 7], protein–protein complexation [8], enzyme-substrate interaction [9] etc. since ESI can representatively transfer those interactions from solution to the gas phase.

Although different mechanisms have been proposed for the formation of gas-phase ions by ESI method [10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16], several aspects of the ionization are still not fully understood. One such issue is the conformational and other subtle chemical properties of the analyte during the transfer from solution to gas phase. Some recent works [17, 18] suggested dramatic structural alteration of the proteins after electrospray ionization leading to formation of different conformations [18] of the macromolecules in the gaseous phase. However, the exact reason of the existence of different conformations of the same molecule in the gas phase (unlike in the solvent) is not known.

It is argued that the charges on an ES droplet are distributed over its surface with equidistant spacing and they are locked into this pattern by the forces of Coulomb repulsion [19], and the bulk or core of the liquid droplet essentially remains free of charge to minimize the potential energy of the droplet [20]. Therefore, the neutral solute molecules residing at the core of the droplet were assumed to remain unaffected by the charged environment at the droplet surface. The ESI-MS studies on this aspect have mainly been directed to the biologically important macromolecules like proteins, peptides, and nucleic acids in the last few decades. The charged jet-breakup and subsequent Coulombic explosion of the ES droplets encapsulating the proteins have earlier been assumed to cause repacking of the supramolecular assemblies, forcing them to hold a minimal volume [21, 22]. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no direct experimental evidence to support this assumption. The molecular behavior inside the charged ES droplets still remains far from understood.

As discussed above, the charges (protons) reside on the surface of the electrospray droplets and the bulk or core of the droplet remains charge free in order to minimize the potential energy of the droplet [19]. This leads to the hypothesis that if we put a molecule with certain positive charge, which is not contributed by protons, inside the charged droplet, that molecule might be destabilized by huge Coulomb force of repulsion imparted by the surface protons on the droplets. To test this, we have studied two specifically designed molecules (1 and M4p, Figure 1) by ESI-MS. Molecule 1 is a very stable cationic (di-positive) chelate complex, Ni(II) complex of 1,8-dimethyl-1,3,6,8,10,13-hexaazacyclotetradecane (1, Figure 1) [23, 24]. This square planar complex is highly stable in the acidic solution, and the charge is contributed solely by the central metal ion (Ni2+) [23, 24]. The counter anion of 1 is ClO4, which has very weak interaction with the complex cation in the solution owing to its stable π-delocalization [25]. Molecule M4p is an allyl pendant armed macrocyclic molecule 3,4,5:12,13,14-dipyridine-2,6,11,15-tetramethyl-1,7,10,16-tetraallyl-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaazacyclooctadeca-3,13-diene (M4p, Figure 1). These molecules (1 and M4p, Figure 1) could undergo fragmentation inside the charged droplet due to the Coulomb repulsion by the surface protons on the droplets. The results of the ESI-MS studies on these two compounds provided clear evidence that the analyte molecules undergo transformations or change of their structure or even the fragmentation inside the core of the charged droplets depending on their chemical nature.
Figure 1

Structure of the Complex 1 [Ni(II) complex of 1,8-dimethyl-1,3,6,8,10,13-hexaazacyclotetradecane] and the macrocycle M4p [3,4,5:12,13,14-dipyridine-2,6,11,15- tetramethyl-1,7,10,16-tetraallyl-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaazacyclooctadeca-4,13-diene] (subscript 4p represents four pendant arms)

2 Experimental

2.1 Materials

Nickel(II) chloride hexahydrate, 99% ethylenediamine, 36% formaldehyde, 40% methylamine, perchloric acid, 2,6-diacetylpyridine, barium chloride dihydrate, sodium borohydride, anhydrous sodium sulphate, anhydrous potassium carbonate, sodium hydroxide and 3-nitrobenzyl alcohol were provided by Sigma-Aldrich Co. Ltd. AR grade methanol, chloroform, hydrobromic acid were purchased from S. D. Fite Chemicals Ltd. Mumbai, India. Allylbromide was obtained from M/s. Loba Chemie (P) Ltd. Mumbai, India. HPLC grade acetic acid and methanol were purchased from Spectrochem Pvt. Ltd. India. All chemicals were used without further purification.

2.2 Synthesis of Ni(II) Complex of 1,8-dimethyl-1,3,6,8,10,13-hexaazacyclotetradecane (1)

The Complex 1 was synthesized by the template condensation of ethylenediamine, formaldehyde and methylamine in presence of Ni2+ as the templating cation as reported earlier [23, 26].

2.3 Synthesis of Pendant Armed Macrocycle 3,4,5:12,13,14-dipyridine-2,6,11,15-tetramethyl-1,7,10,16-tetraallyl-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaazacyclooctadeca-3,13-diene (M4p)

Macrocycle M4p containing four pendant arms was synthesized using the earlier reported method [27] for analogous compounds. The precursor macrocycle 3,4,5:12,13,14-dipyridine-2,6,11,15-tetramethyl-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaazacyclooctadeca-3,13-diene, synthesized by reduction of the Schiff base formed on reaction of 2,6 diacetyl pyridine and ethylene diamine [27]. This was treated with allylbromide to prepare the macrocycle M4p (isolated yield: 19%). The macrocycle M4p is sparingly soluble in methanol and soluble in dimethylformamide (DMF) but insoluble in all other common organic solvents. M.P: > 250 °C . Elemental analysis: observed 75.45% C, 9.30% H, and 15.25% N against calculated: 75.23% C, 9.28% H, and 15.48% N. 1H NMR (DMF-d6, 500 MHz) δppm: 9.76 (m, H-Ar, 4H), 9.48 (m, H-Ar, 2H), 5.6–5.2 (m, aliphatic –CH2-N, –CH=, –CH-N, 24H), 4.47 and 4.64 (m, =CH2, 8H), 3.5 (m, –CH3, 12H). FT-IR (KBr, cm−1): 3052 (aromatic C–H str.), 2986 (asymmetric –CH3 str.), 2802, 2730 (asymmetric –CH2- str.), 1632 (alkene str.), 1599–1446 (aromatic C = N, C = C str.), 1385 (in plane C–H bending of alkene),1167 (C–N str. in t-amine), 1082, 1022 (in plane aromatic ring C–H bending), 823/754/674 (out plane bending of aromatic ring C–H). The spectroscopic characterization of the macrocycle M4p confirmed the presence of four allyl pendant arms attached to the hexaaza macrocycle.

2.4 Mass Spectrometry

Electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and collision induced dissociation (ESI-MS/CID) studies were carried out using a Thermo Finnigan LCQ Deca Electrospray quadrupole ion trap mass spectrometer [5, 28, 29, 30]. All the experiments were done under identical conditions unless otherwise stated. The flow rate of the analyte solution of concentration ~10 μM was maintained at 5 μL/min, and the solutions were directly injected through the ion source kept in positive ion mode [31]. Nitrogen was used as the sheath and auxiliary gas. The ion source conditions were: sheath gas flow rate ~7.5 L/min, with no auxiliary gas flow. Capillary temperature (for desolvation) was maintained at approximately 200 °C and capillary voltage was kept at 15 V. The ion-spray voltage and tube lens offset were maintained at +4.5 kV and −7 V, respectively. Low-energy CID product ion spectra were acquired using an isolation width of 6 m/z (to select all isotopically distributed peaks of the same species/all neighboring isotopic peaks) for 1. The isolation width was 2 m/z for M4p. The activation Q (related to the parameter qz in the Mathieu equation [32] for the precursor ions) of 0.250 with an activation time 30 ms were used for CID studies. The normalized collision energy was varied from 0% to 45% for the dissociation profile (breakdown) study. The maximum supplementary AC voltage applied to the end caps of the ion trap mass analyzer was ~4 V (for m/z 500). Helium was used as the buffer gas in the collision cell (ion trap). Data acquisition was performed for 1 min using XCalibur software (Thermo Fisher Scientific).

3 Results and Discussion

3.1 ESI-MS Study on Ni(II) Complex of 1,8-dimethyl-1,3,6,8,10,13-hexaazacyclotetradecane (1)

Synthesis and the solution chemistry of the Complex 1 were reported earlier by Suh et al. [23] They showed that the complex [Ni(L)](ClO4)2 (L = 1,8-dimethyl-1,3,6,8,10,13-hexaazacyclotetradecane) is square-planar and is extremely stable in the crystalline state [24] as well as in solution. They also reported that [23] the metal ion (Ni2+) was not released from Complex (1) even on treatment with strong demetalating agents such as NaCN, H2S gas, or strong acid, and Complex 1 showed 35% decomposition on incubation for 10 h at 25 °C in 0.3 M HNO3 (pH ~ 0.52).

Since the Complex 1 is intrinsically di-positive and its molecular weight (without considering the perchlorate counter anion) is ~288, the expected molecular cation peak in the ESI-MS (MS1) should appear at m/z ~144. But when we electrosprayed the aqueous solution of the Complex 1 in positive ion mode, the observed mass spectrum (Figure 2a) was complicated and consisted of total 10 peaks, including the peak at m/z 144.2 (relative abundance ~3%). After close inspection of the spectrum and keeping apart the peak at m/z 144.2 (see later), we grouped the remaining nine peaks into three sets (A0, B0, C0), (A1, B1, C1), and (A2, B2, C2) as shown in the Figure 2a. Two successive peaks in a set (i.e., Ax-Bx and Bx-Cx, x = 0, 1, 2) differ by m/z 43 ± 0.5 and the same type of peak in two successive sets (i.e., Y0- Y1 and Y1-Y2, Y = A, B, C) are separated by m/z 100 ± 0.5.
Figure 2

Representative mass spectra (MS1) of 1 (10 μM) electrosprayed from the solution of (a) water, (b) methanol, and (c) 1% (vol/vol) m-NBA in water

The observation of these peaks (Figure 2) cannot be interpreted by considering the ion pair formation of the Complex 1 with ClO4‾ or by the axial addition of water molecules to the square-planar Complex 1 converting it into the octahedral complex (report of Suh et al. showed that some of the square planar species are converted to the octahedral species in water [23, 26]) and/or by protonation of the uncoordinated tertiary nitrogen atoms in the macrocyclic framework (Figure 1). The observation of the three sets of A, B, and C ions could thus only be rationalized by the consideration that the Complex 1 undergoes transformation/fragmentation along with ion pair formation with the ClO4 anions. The m/z difference of 100 ± 0.5 between the same type of peak in two successive sets supports the formation of ion pairs between ClO4 (average molecular weight 99.5) and the protonated molecular fragment of Complex 1. Each observed peak in the spectrum (Figure 2a) showed characteristic isotopic distribution (Figure 1S in the Supporting Information) corresponding to the natural abundances [33] of nickel isotopes. The first two most abundant isotopes (58Ni: abundance ~68% and 60Ni: abundance ~26%) of nickel differ by 2 Da in mass [33] (Table 1S in the Supporting Information), which is equal to the separation between two most intense isotopic peaks in the mass spectrum (Figure 1S in the Supporting Information), support that these ions are indeed singly charged and the ions contain one nickel atom in the structure.

Several instrumental factors such as spray voltage, capillary temperature, capillary voltage and tube lens voltage etc. have earlier been shown to influence the analyte response in ESI-MS in certain systems [34]. The effects of these instrumental parameters were assessed by varying the capillary temperature from 100 to 300 °C, capillary voltage from −30 V to 30 V and tube lens offset from −30 V to 30 V (see Figure 2S (a)–(c) in the Supporting Information). The results remained almost independent of these instrumental parameters, indicating absence of thermal dissociation [35, 36, 37] in the heated capillary region or absence of fragmentation in the capillary-skimmer region (nozzle-skimmer dissociation [38]). Fragmentation of the Complex 1 in the corona discharge is unlikely in the positive ion mode as the electrical discharge takes place mainly in negative ion mode [32]. Moreover, no change of the spectral quality was observed when the sheath gas was changed to air (containing oxygen) instead of pure nitrogen, supporting that corona discharge [3, 32] does not affect the fate of the analyte in the present case.

Considering the structure of the Complex 1 and the results shown in Figure 2, a viable pathway for the possible molecular transformation and fragmentation of Complex 1 is proposed (Scheme 1). Scheme 1 shows that the first step involves simultaneous or consecutive loss of two protons from two secondary amine moieties coordinated to the nickel (II) to form a neutral species A (an inner metallic complex of first order [25]). Then A can successively release two neutral molecules (2-azaprop-1-ene; molecular weight 43) to produce species B and finally C. The sequential protonation and ion-pair formation (Table 1) with ClO4‾ of A, B, and C result in formation of singly positive molecular ions An, Bn, and Cn (n = 0, 1, 2) corresponding to peaks An, Bn, and Cn, (n = 0–2) depicted in the Figure 2a. Table 1 shows the m/z values of the fragmented molecular ions and their ClO4 adducts based on the Scheme 1. The first set of peaks (A0, B0, C0) as discussed earlier thus actually corresponds to singly protonated molecular species of A, B, and C. It is important to note that the singly charged species A0 may have the protonation either at one of the coordinated basic amine site (i.e., equivalent to the species formed by one proton loss from Complex 1) or at an uncoordinated amine site (1 or 8 positions) and these isomeric structures cannot be distinguished in the present experiment. The singly charged ion-pairs of multiply protonated A, B, and C with ClO4 ions (molecular weight 95.5) give rise to the observation of the peaks An, Bn, and Cn (n = 1 and 2) shown in the Figure 2a. The theoretical isotope profiles of the molecular ion species An, Bn and Cn (n = 0, 1, 2) calculated using Isopro 3.1 (http://sites.google.com/site/isoproms/home) closely matched (Figure 3S in the Supporting Information) with the experimentally observed isotopic distribution (Figure 1S in the Supporting Information) of the molecular ion species.
Scheme 1

The proposed fragmentation pathway of the Complex 1

Table 1

The List of Molecular Ions Showing their Abbreviations Used in this Report and their Observed m/z Values

Observed molecular ions

Molecular fragments (M)

A

B

C

Abbreviation useda

Observed m/zb

Abbreviation useda

Observed m/zb

Abbreviation useda

Observed m/zb

[M + 2H]2+

-

144.2 ± 0.3

-

122.4 ± 0.3c

-

101.1 ± 0.3c

[M + H]+

A0

287.0 ± 0.3

B0

244.0 ± 0.3

C0

201.1 ± 0.3

[M + 2H + ClO4]+

A1

387.1 ± 0.3

B1

344.1 ± 0.3

C1

301.1 ± 0.3

[M + 3H + 2ClO4]+

A2

488.1 ± 0.3

B2

444.1 ± 0.3

C2

401.1 ± 0.3

a The abbreviation contains a capital letter representing the molecular fragment as shown in Scheme 1 and a digit representing the number of perchlorate ions forming the ion pair with the protonated molecular fragment ion.

b Each peak observed in the mass spectra is basically a set of a number of isotopic peaks corresponding to the molecular ion. Here we report the m/z of the most intense isotopic peak of each set with the standard error corresponding to the half width of the most intense isotopic peak taken into account. For convenience the nearest integer value of m/z from the mean was considered in the discussion of this report.

c Only observed in the mass spectrum of the complex 1 electrosprayed from 1% m-NBA solution.

The oxidation state of the nickel (+2) was assumed to remain unchanged during the molecular transformations of Complex 1 proposed in the Scheme 1. A close inspection of the experimental isotopic distribution of the molecular ion species An, Bn, and Cn (n = 0, 1, 2) (Figure 1S in the Supporting Information) agrees with our assumption that the central nickel ion exists in +2 oxidation state. If nickel were in +3 oxidation state in the molecular species A, B, and C, they would hold a net positive charge (+1) and would appear at m/z 286, 243, and 200 respectively, which were not observed. On the other hand, we observed ion signals at m/z 287, 244 and 201 (Figure 1S (g), (h), (i) in the Supporting Information), which actually correspond to the singly protonated molecular species A0, B0, and C0 respectively (see Table 1) containing Ni(II) at the center.

The observed deprotonation and fragmentation of the Complex 1 happen only during the electrospray ionization process in the positive ion mode as the Complex 1 is stable in the aspirating solution [23]. The positive ion mode of the electrospray ionization conventionally allows protonation of the analytes but not deprotonation, thus the proposed deprotonation phenomenon (Scheme 1) is not anticipated in conventional ESI process.

3.2 Rationalization of the Deprotonation and Fragmentation of Complex 1

In the electrospray process, the charged droplets are produced by the electrochemical reactions at the emitter surface [39]. This electrochemical reaction is assumed to be the oxidation of solvents [40] (in positive ion mode) producing protons in absence of any other redox active species in the solution [32, 40]. Thus, in general, the main source of the excess positive charges produced in the droplet by ESI is the protons formed from the solvent electrolysis. The oxidation of the counter anion in the positive ion mode may be ruled out in the present case as the chlorine in ClO4‾ exists in its highest oxidation state (+7) [25]. The excess protons produced in the electrospray would lower the pH of the droplets. The lowest pH of the droplet estimated by considering the Rayleigh limit [41] of the positively charged droplet (see Supporting information) was ~1.3, which is much higher than the decomposition pH (pH ~0.52) of Complex 1 reported earlier [23], and thus any pH induced decomposition of Complex 1 in the droplet under the present situation may not be possible.

The ion evaporation model (IEM) proposed by Fenn [19] suggested that the neutral analyte molecule undergoes Brownian motion inside the droplet leading it to encounter with the charged surface of the droplet. This may cause protonation of the analyte by association with the charge at the surface of the droplet. The thermal activation (kT) and Coulomb repulsion may subsequently provide sufficient energy to desorb the protonated molecular species from the highly charged droplet surface. However, the ability of the formation of neutral ion-pair between Complex 1 with its counter ion (ClO4) would be very low in the present case because of the stable π-delocalization of the counter anion ClO4 [25]. Moreover, the interaction between Complex 1 and its counter anion would be shielded in the aqueous solution owing to solvation of the ions in the high dielectric solvent. The ClO4 ion might thus form neutral HClO4 inside the charged droplet by abstraction of a proton from the surface of the droplet. The positively charged Complex 1 may then be left without any counter ion for ion-pair formation and become destabilized inside the droplet due to Coulombic repulsion by the protons from the surface. This might lead to deprotonation of Complex 1 forming the neutral species (A), which is free from Coulomb repulsion, inside the core of the charged droplet. The neutral inner metallic Complex A would be distinctly different in structure and stability [25] compared with that of the charged non-inner metallic Complex 1. The removal of protons from the secondary amine group might introduce strain in the six-membered chelate ring of the metal complex, which causes the molecule A to undergo further fragmentation inside the charged droplet as depicted in the Scheme 1. The elimination of two neutral molecules (2-azaprop-1-ene) from the six-membered chelate rings of A would possibly remove the strain in the complex stabilizing the resulting neutral species B and C as has been shown in the Scheme 1. This scheme of reactions also agrees with the earlier reports [23, 26], which proposed that small changes in the bonding of the nitrogen atoms in the chelate rings of Complex 1 (e.g., replacement of the methyl groups by hydrogens in 1,8-position) could increase the strain in the chelate rings (Figure 1).

In order to assess the implications of the weak ion-pair forming ability of ClO4 as discussed above, we carried out the experiments in presence of excess (100 folds) NH4Cl in the solution of Complex 1. Unlike the ClO4, the chloride ion makes tight neutral ion-pairs with the complex cation (1) inside the charged droplet that was clearly supported in the ESI-MS (Figure 4S in the Supporting Information), which showed significantly reduced fragmentation efficiency of the Complex 1 in presence of NH4Cl.

3.3 Effect of Solvents on the Fragmentation of the Complex 1 During ESI-MS

In order to investigate the role of the solvent on the nature of ESI-MS spectra, we electrosprayed the Complex 1 from different solvents like water, methanol and 1% (vol/vol) m-NBA in water (Figure 2). We observed that the most intense peak (base peak) in the mass spectrum of Complex 1 in methanol was A1 while that in water was C0 (Figure 2b). As discussed above, the peak C0 corresponds to the protonated end product C (C0; see Table 1, Scheme 1), but the peak A1 corresponds to the charged ion pair (A1; see Table 1). We calculated the fractional abundance of the individual ion-pair (An, Bn, Cn where n = 1, 2; see Table 1) over the total ion abundance from both spectra (Figure 2a and b) obtained by electrospray from the aqueous and from the alcoholic solution of Complex 1. The results shown in Table 2 indicate enhanced ion pair formation ability of all the fragments (A, B, and C) when Complex 1 was electrosprayed from methanol solution instead of water because of low dielectric constant of the former solvent. These results thus support that the fragmentation indeed occurs inside the charged droplets. The protonated molecular fragments (the protonation is supposed to occur in the basic amine sites) A, B, and C may form ion-pairs with ClO4‾ while ejecting from the charged surface of the droplet and the tendency for ion-pair formation was directly dependent on the dielectric constant of the solvent. The propensity of ion-pair formation of the fragment species (A, B, and C) would not have been dependent on the dielectric constant of the solvent, if the fragmentation occurred outside the droplet (in gas phase) such as in the heated capillary and/or in the capillary skimmer region.
Table 2

Percentage of the Total Ion Abundance for Different Charged Ion Pairs in the Mass Spectra (MS1) of the Complex 1 Electrosprayed from Water and from Methanol

Charged ion pair

Percentage of the total ion abundance

Solvent: water

Solvent: methanol

C1

1.00 ± 0.05

2.00 ± 0.05

B1

6.00 ± 0.05

7.00 ± 0.05

A1

17.00 ± 0.05

37.00 ± 0.05

C2

2.00 ± 0.05

4.00 ± 0.05

B2

1.00 ± 0.05

3.00 ± 0.05

A2

1.00 ± 0.05

2.00 ± 0.05

Figure 2a shows a peak at m/z 144.2 with ~3% relative abundance in the ESI-MS of Complex 1 electrosprayed from water. As mentioned above, this peak could arise from the bare doubly charged cationic Complex 1 (di-positive and molecular weight 288). However, there is another possible ion (doubly protonated A) formed from Complex 1 that may also contribute to this peak. The doubly protonated A (Scheme 1) may be different from the original complex cation 1 as protonation could occur at the uncoordinated tertiary amine moieties at 1- and/or 8-positions in the neutral A.

We also examined the multiprotonation (supercharging) effect of the solvent on the analyte by addition of m-NBA (m-nitrobenzyl alcohol) to the aqueous electrospray solution [42]. Electrospray of Complex 1 from an aqueous solution containing 1% m-NBA showed two additional peaks at m/z 122.5 and m/z 101.1 (Figure 2c) corresponding to the doubly protonated B and C, respectively, apart from all the peaks that were observed in the ESI-MS of Complex 1 in water (Figure 2a). Moreover, the relative abundance of the peak at m/z 144.2 that was suggested to have contributions from a doubly protonated form of A increases from 3% to 14% on addition of m-NBA. The Figure 2c also shows that the propensity of multiple charging of all the molecular fragments (A, B, and C) increases in presence of 1% m-NBA in the electrospray solution. If the fragmentation of Complex 1 (Scheme 1) had occurred in the gas-phase (i.e., outside the droplet) then the molecular fragments A, B, and C could not have sensed this multiple charging phenomenon leading to the formation of doubly protonated species in presence of m-NBA in the aqueous solution. This result thus supports that all the fragments A, B, and C are produced inside the charged droplet.

3.4 Collision-Induced Dissociation Experiments on the Ions Derived from the Complex 1

The molecular fragments (An, Bn, and Cn where n = 0, 1, 2) was further characterized by collision-induced dissociation (CID-MS/MS) experiments. All the ions observed in the MS1 spectrum of the Complex 1 (Figure 2a) were individually mass-selected and then allowed to undergo collisional activation with an inert gas (He) in the ion-trap (collision cell). Low energy collisional activation of the precursor ions (An, Bn, Cn, n = 0–2) gave peaks (Figure 5S in the Supporting Information) that were already observed in the MS1 of the Complex 1 (Figure 2a). The product ions formed by CID of the precursor ions are depicted in the MS1 spectrum by horizontal arrows between the precursor and the corresponding product ion peaks in Figure 3. The Figure 3 shows that if the precursor ion is An (n = 0, 1, 2; see Table 1) then it gives rise to the product ions A(n- 1), Bn, and Cn. Similarly if the precursor ion is Bn (n = 0, 1, 2; see Table 1), then it produces the product ions B(n- 1) or Cn only. But if the precursor is Cn (n = 1, 2; see Table 1), then it only produce the C(n- 1) ions. This result clearly suggests that A is the precursor of B, and B is the precursor of C, and thus supports the fragmentation of the Complex 1 proposed in Scheme 1.
Figure 3

Mass spectrum (MS1) of the Complex 1 electrosprayed from the solution of 1% (vol/vol) m-NBA in water (same as Figure 2c). CID-MS/MS on each ion (peak) produced the product ions that were also observed in MS1 spectrum. Each precursor ion peak is connected by particular color arrows to the corresponding product (fragment) ion peaks obtained from CID. The individual MS2 spectrum is shown in the Figure 5S of the Supporting Information

In order to assess the relative stability of the singly protonated species (A0, B0, and C0), we performed energy resolved CID on them. Figure 6S in the Supporting Information shows the dissociation profile of these molecular ions at different collision energies. The breakdown curves (Figure 6S) for the singly protonated species show the stability order A0 < B0 < C0 suggesting that conversion of A to B and C by sequential release of 2-azaprop-1-ene as proposed in Scheme 1 is also energetically favorable.

Figure 3 shows that the m/z 201.1 (C0) is the common peak in the MS2 of all mass-selected ions An, Bn, Cn (n = 0–2). In order to ascertain whether this peak indeed corresponds to one specific molecular ion (C0), as proposed in Scheme 1 or not, we performed MS3 of the m/z 201.1 (Figure 7S in the Supporting Information) derived from each MS2 spectrum (Figure 5S in the Supporting Information). The MS3 spectra in all cases were identical to each other (data not shown). Moreover, the pattern of the MS3 spectra of the m/z 201.1, matched with the MS2 spectra of C0 (m/z 201.1) shown in Figure 7S in the Supporting Information. This result suggests that the m/z 201.1 corresponds to the same ionic species C0 as proposed in Scheme 1. The assignments of the peaks observed in the CID of m/z 201.1 are shown in Figure 6S in the Supporting Information and the possible fragmentation pathway of C0 based on the mobile proton model [43] is given in Scheme 1S.

The m/z 144.2 that originated from the dicationic Complex 1 and/or from the doubly protonated A was further investigated by CID. The molecular ion corresponding to the m/z 144.2 was mass selected from ESI-MS of the Complex 1 in 1% aqueous m-NBA (Figure 2c) and CID was performed. The results showed three product ions at m/z 122.5, m/z 201.1, and m/z 244.0 (Figure 5S (i) in the Supporting Information). Observation of MS2 fragment ions (product ions) having higher m/z than the precursor ions (m/z 144.2) confirms presence of doubly-protonated charge-state of the precursor ion.

3.5 ESI-MS Study on 3,4,5:12,13,14-dipyridine-2,6,11,15-tetramethyl-1,7,10,16-tetraallyl-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaazacyclooctadeca-3,13-diene [macrocycle M4p]

We designed [27] the macrocycle M4p with four allyl pendant arms (designated by subscript 4p) to the peripheral amines in the macrocyclic framework that may produce a resonance stabilized allyl cation (CH2 = CH-CH2+) on fragmentation at the protonated form in the electrospray droplet. Such a macrocycle should have strong proton affinity due to the presence of four tertiary amine groups in the periphery. Earlier work on similar pyridine containing amine macrocycle showed that protonation in acidic solution only occurs at the amine nitrogens, not at the pyridyl nitrogens [44].

It was interesting to note that the methanolic solution of M4p, showed multiple peaks in the ESI-mass spectrum (MS1) as shown in the Figure 4a. Analogous to Complex 1, we also observed that the small variations of instrumental parameters did not have any major effect on the mass spectrum of M4p. A close inspection of Figure 4a shows peaks at m/z 543.5 and m/z 272.3, respectively, for the mono- and di-protonation of the original macrocycle M4p. Figure 4a also shows peaks at m/z 503.5, 463.5, 423.5, and 383.5, corresponding to singly charged species with successive m/z difference of 40, and peaks at m/z 252.3, 232.3, 212.3, and 192.3 corresponding to doubly charged species with successive m/z difference of 20. These results indicate that the protonated macrocycle M4p might undergo fragmentation reaction by sequentially releasing allyl cations (m/z 41) in the electrospray process producing the macrocycles M3p, M2p, M1p, and M0p, respectively, with 3, 2, 1, and 0 pendent arms as shown in the Scheme 2.
Figure 4

Representative mass spectra (MS1) of the allyl pendant armed macrocycle M4p (10 μM) electrosprayed from the solution of (a) methanol, (b) 5% (vol/vol) acetic acid in methanol and (c) 5% (vol/vol) m-NBA in methanol. Here the macrocycle containing ‘n’ number of allyl pendant arm is represented as Mn [n = 4, 3, 2, 1, 0]

Scheme 2

The pathway of the successive acid cleavage of M4p into the resonance stabilized allyl cations and M3p, M2p, M1p, M0p in the electrospray process

The propensity of protonation of the amines in these macrocycles was found to depend on nature of the solvent. The ESI-mass spectra (MS1) of the macrocycle M4p from the solution of 5% (vol/vol) acetic acid in methanol is shown in Figure 4b and that from 5% (vol/vol) m-NBA in methanol is shown in Figure 4c. Although the basic pattern of the spectra remains the same, the intensity ratios of diprotonated to monoprotonated molecular fragment ions (Int.[Mnp + 2H]2+/Int.[Mnp + H]+, n = 0–4) were found to increase in the following order: methanol < 5% acetic acid in methanol <5% m-NBA in methanol. Earlier reports proposed that the ejection of the charged (protonated) analyte molecule from the electrospray droplet takes place from the least volatile component of the droplet [45]. Thus, methanol would be preferentially evaporated from the electrospray droplets [4] of the mixed solvents because of its higher vapor pressure compared to acetic acid or m-NBA (Table 2S in the Supporting Information). This would eventually result in ejection of the analytes from the nano-droplets enriched with acetic acid or with m-NBA [45]. The surface tension of methanol < acetic acid < m-NBA (surface tension data are shown in Table 2S in the Supporting Information). The charging of the analyte at the time of ejection would depend the number of charges ZR, that can be sustained by a spherical droplet of radius, R, and surface tension, γ given by the Rayleigh’s equation (Equation 1) [41].
$$ {Z_R}.e = 8\pi {\left( {{ \in_0}\gamma {R^3}} \right)^{{1/2}}} $$
(1)
Where e is the elementary charge, and ϵ0 is the permittivity of the surrounding medium. So the droplet composed of liquid with high surface tension (γ) would give rise to the enhanced charging in the gaseous analyte. If the fragmentation of the macrocycle M4p had occurred in the gas-phase (i.e., outside the droplet) then we would not have observed the solvent dependence in the charging (protonation) of the fragmented molecules as shown in Table 3.
Table 3

Intensity Ratio of Diprotonated to Monoprotonated Molecular Fragment Ions in the Mass Spectra (MS1) of M4P Electrosprayed from Different Solvents

Molecular fragments

Percentage ratio of intensity of diprotonated to that of monoprotonated species

(\( {{{{I_{{{{\left[ {M + 2H} \right]}^{{2 + }}}}}}}} \left/ {{{I_{{{{\left[ {M + H} \right]}^{ + }}}}}}} \right.} \)) × 100

Solvent: methanol

Solvent: 5% acetic acid (vol/vol)

Solvent: 5% m-NBA (vol/vol)

M0p

11.9 ± 0.6

17.0 ± 0.9

67.7 ± 2.3

M1p

5.6 ± 0.3

8.7 ± 0.4

63.5 ± 2.1

M2p

10.0 ± 0.5

12.5 ± 0.6

69.2 ± 2.3

M3p

3.0 ± 0.2

5.4 ± 0.3

38.0 ± 1.3

M4p

22.5 ± 1.1

33.3 ± 1.7

66.7 ± 2.2

The maximum protonation sites of the macrocycle M4p was earlier shown to be four [44]. Hence it can form a quadruply-protonated state [M4p + 4H]4+ along with singly-, doubly-, and triply-protonated states. If the protonated molecules were first desolvated from the electrospray droplets and subsequently fragmented (losing the allyl pendant arms) outside the droplet, the hypothetical gas-phase fragmentation pattern would have followed Scheme 3. Scheme 3 shows that sequential removal of the allyl cation from the protonated M4p can never lead to formation of protonated M0p, e.g., [M0p + H]+ or [M0p + 2H]2+ and only the protonated forms of M1p, M2p, M3p along with neutral M0p would have formed. But the mass spectrum of M4p clearly shows the peaks corresponding to the singly- and doubly-protonated M0p at m/z 192.3 and 383.5, respectively (Figure 4), contrary to that expected from the Scheme 3. So this result supports that the fragmentation of M4p indeed occurs inside the electrospray droplets.
Scheme 3

The hypothetical gas-phase fragmentation reaction of the protonated macrocycle M4p producing different charged as well as neutral macrocycle with different number of allyl pendant arms (p). AL+ represents the allyl cation

The other evidence that the fragmentation of macrocycle M4p occurs inside the charged droplets is the appearance of a weak ion signal at m/z 583.5 (Figure 4), which is higher than the m/z of the precursor molecular ion [M4p + H]+ (m/z 543.5). The following mechanism may be proposed in this case: the neutral analyte (M4p) encounters the surface protons during Brownian dynamics inside the charged droplet [19], forming quaternary ammonium cation containing four allyl pendant arms [M4p + nH]n+ (n =1–4). The Coulomb force of repulsion near the charged surface of the droplet would then lead the protonated M4p to loss the resonance stabilized allyl cation as shown in the Scheme 2. Thus, the droplet surface becomes enriched with the allyl cations along with the protons. When the macrocycles are desorbed from the charged droplet surface they would have chances to abstract either protons or allyl cations by the amine groups present in the macrocyclic framework. The small peak at m/z 583.5 suggests that M4p has accommodated one more allyl cation (molecular weight 41) from the surface of the droplet during its desorption into the gas phase. Formation of the allyl cation (m/z 41) as proposed in this mechanism was also detected at low mass range (see the inset of Figure 4c).

The allyl group has been frequently used in organic syntheses as a protecting group for amines due to its stability under both acidic and basic conditions [46]. Special synthetic efforts are required to deprotect these allyl protected amines. For example, Wilkinson’s catalyst or a strong base (KOtBu) causes the rearrangement of allyl amine to enamine, which then undergoes acid hydrolysis to liberate (deprotect) the amine [47, 48, 49]. Our results show that the electrospray ionization process may also act as an allyl scavenger to deprotect the amine group in the macrocycle M4p.

All these results provided compelling evidence to support that the environment around the analyte in the charged ES droplet can cause fragmentation of the analytes (Complex 1 and macrocycle M4p). It is important to note that the present experimental setup however cannot identify the stage of the electrospray ionization process at which the fragmentation reaction of the analyte is initiated. A charged droplet is formed from a Taylor cone (in the ES source), whose surface is also positively charged (under positive ion mode). So the fragmentation may also start at this zone and could continue in the droplet till the formation of the gas-phase ions. However, the Taylor cone is extremely short-lived, so the analyte would have too low of a residence time at this region to undergo significant fragmentation. Thus, most of the fragmentation processes possibly occur in the charged droplets.

4 Conclusions

The transformations of the analyte in the charged electrospray droplets have been studied by suitably choosing two analyte molecules viz. Ni(II) complex of 1,8-dimethyl-1,3,6,8,10,13-hexaazacyclotetradecane (1) and allyl pendant armed macrocycle, 3,4,5:12,13,14-dipyridine-2,6,11,15-tetramethyl-1,7,10,16-tetraallyl-1,4,7,10,13,16-hexaazacyclooctadeca-3,13-diene (M4p). Although we focused our study on the above two specific molecules, it provides an insight for the behavior of any electrosprayed molecule inside the charged droplet. Conventionally, electrospray ionization is considered as a soft-ionization technique, but the molecules may not always remain intact inside the electrospray droplet and they even may undergo transformations or fragmentations depending on their chemical nature and structure, as is evidenced in our present study. The tiny charged droplet produced by the electrospray process may thus be considered as a unique reaction vessel to induce a chemical reaction (charge induced chemical reaction) that may not be possible by conventional solution chemistry. The modifications and other transformations of proteins that are detected by ESI-MS may require a closer look in the future in the light of the results of the present studies.

5 Supporting Information

Different isotopic abundances of nickel, physical properties of different electrospray solvents, ESI-MS1, simulated mass spectra and CID-MS/MS spectra of the different molecule/fragment ions are shown in the Supporting Information.

Acknowledgment

The authors thank Mr. Bharat T. Kansara for his help. This work was supported by Tata Institute of Fundamental Research.

Supplementary material

13361_2011_188_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (271 kb)
ESM 1(PDF 270 kb)

Copyright information

© American Society for Mass Spectrometry 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Shibdas Banerjee
    • 1
  • Halan Prakash
    • 2
  • Shyamalava Mazumdar
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Chemical SciencesTata Institute of Fundamental ResearchMumbaiIndia
  2. 2.Department of ChemistryBirla Institute of Technology and SciencePilaniIndia

Personalised recommendations