Abstract
The paper examines the connection between online security and the protection of civil rights from a legal viewpoint, that is, considering the different types of rights and interests that are at stake in national and international law and whether, and to what extent, they concern matters of balancing. Over the past years, the purpose of several laws, and legislative drafts such as ACTA, has been to impose “zero-sum games”. In light of current statutes, such as HADOPI in France, or Digital Economy Act in UK, the paper intends to illustrate how more satisfactory solutions are feasible in the field of online security, such as the new “Police and Criminal Justice Data Protection Directive” that the European Commission presented in January 2012. At least in Western legal systems, it should be clear that either civil rights prevail over security (no balancing), or such balance has to satisfactorily protect individual rights (proportionality).
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Burns, A., McDermid, J., & Dobson, J. (1992). On the meaning of safety and security. The Computer Journal, 35(1), 3–15.
Cavoukian, A. (2010). Privacy by design: the definitive workshop. Identity in the Information Society, 3(2), 247–251.
Dworkin, R. (1985). A matter of principle. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Etzioni, A. (2007). Security first: for a muscular, moral foreign policy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Habermas, J. (1996). Between facts and norms. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Hobbes, T. (1999). In R. Tuck (Ed.), Leviathan. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Jobs, S. (2007). Thoughts on music. http://www.apple.com/hotnews/thoughtsonmusic/. Accessed 22 August 2012
Lessig, L. (2004). Free culture: the nature and future of creativity. New York: Penguin.
Locke, J. (1988). In P. Laslett (Ed.), Two treatises of government. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pagallo, U. (2008). La tutela della privacy negli Stati Uniti d’America e in Europa. Milano: Giuffrè.
Pagallo, U. (2012a). Cracking down on autonomy: three challenges to design in IT law. Ethics and Information Technology, 14(4), 319–328.
Pagallo, U. (2012b). On the principle of privacy by design and its limits: technology, ethics, and the rule of law. In S. Gutwirth, R. Leenes, P. De Hert, & Y. Poullet (Eds.), European data protection: in good health? 331–346. Dordrecht: Springer.
Reed, C. (2012). Making laws for cyberspace. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Strauss, L. (1936). The political philosophy of Hobbes. Its basis and its genesis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Yeung, K. (2007). Towards an understanding of regulation by design. In R. Brownsword & K. Yeung (Eds.), Regulating technologies: legal futures, regulatory frames and technological fixes (pp. 79–108). London: Hart.
Zittrain, J. (2007). Perfect enforcement on tomorrow’s internet. In R. Brownsword & K. Yeung (Eds.), Regulating technologies: legal futures, regulatory frames and technological fixes (pp. 125–156). London: Hart.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Pagallo, U. Online Security and the Protection of Civil Rights: A Legal Overview. Philos. Technol. 26, 381–395 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-013-0119-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13347-013-0119-6