June 2013, Volume 26, Issue 2, pp 187-202,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 14 Nov 2012
The Ontological Force of Technicity: Reading Cassirer and Simondon Diffractively
This article contributes to contemporary philosophy of technology by carrying out a diffractive reading of Ernst Cassirer’s “Form und Technik” (1930) and Gilbert Simondon’s Du mode d’existence des objets techniques (1958). Both thinkers, who are here brought together for the first time, stood on the brink of the defining bifurcations of twentieth-century philosophy. However, in their endeavor to come to grips with the “being” of technology, Cassirer and Simondon, each in their own way, were prompted to develop an ontology of emergence that gives ontological priority to “technicity,” that is, to technology considered in its efficacy or operative functioning. By reading Cassirer’s and Simondon’s insights through one another, we aim to further develop this ontology of emergence, and, simultaneously, to demonstrate the relevance of these thinkers for present-day theorizing. As we hope to show, the insistence on the ontological force of technological apparatuses transverses received philosophical and ontological divides and revitalizes the notions of “nature” and “the human,” which are now understood as coevolving with technology.
This article was written when the two authors were both visiting scholars in the Department of the History of Science, Harvard University. The authors wish to thank Prof. Janet Browne and Prof. Peter Galison for their hospitality and stimulating discussions. Furthermore, we wish to thank the three anonymous reviewers of Philosophy & Technology for their valuable feedback as well as our colleagues Annamaria Carusi, Christine Quinan, and Marta Zarzycka for their careful engagement with the text. Open Access has been made possible by the Incentive Fund Open Access (036.001.148) of the the Netherlands Orgnisation for Scientific Research (NWO).
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Cassirer, E. ( 1953). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. 1: Language (trans: Manheim, R.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cassirer, E. ( 1955). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. 2: Mythical Thought (trans: Manheim, R.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cassirer, E. ( 1957). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms, vol. 3: The Phenomenology of Knowledge (trans: Manheim, R.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
Cassirer, E. ( 2004). Form und Technik. In Gesammelte Werke. Hamburger Ausgabe, Band 17: Aufsätze und kleine Schriften (1927–1931). Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag.
Cassirer, E. ( 2012). Form and Technology. In A. S. Hoel and I. Folkvord (Eds.), Ernst Cassirer on Form and Technology: Contemporary Readings (pp. 15–53). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Cassirer, E. ( 1996). The Philosophy of Symbolic Forms. vol. 4: The Metaphysics of Symbolic Forms (trans: Krois, J.M. and Verene, D.P.). New Haven: Yale University Press.
De Boever, A., Murray, A., & Roffe, J. (2009). ‘Technical Mentality’ revisited: Brian Massumi on Gilbert Simondon. Parrhesia: A Journal of Critical Philosophy, 7, 36–45.
Dolphijn, R., & van der Tuin, I. (2011). Pushing dualism to an extreme: on the philosophical impetus of a New materialism. Continental Philosophy Review, 44(4), 383–400.CrossRef
Friedman, M. (2000). A parting of the ways: Carnap, Cassirer, Heidegger. Chicago: Open Court.
Gordon, P. (2012). Continental divide: Heidegger, Cassirer, Davos. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Grosz, E. (2012). Identity and Individuation. In A. de Boever, A. Murray, J. Roffe, & A. Woodward (Eds.), Gilbert Simondon: being and Technology (pp. 37–56). Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness@Second_Millennium.FemaleMan©_Meets_ OncoMouse™. London and New York: Routledge.
Hoel, A. S. (2011). Thinking ‘Difference’ differently: Cassirer versus Derrida on symbolic mediation. Synthese, 179(1), 75–91.CrossRef
Hoel, A. S. (2012). Technics of Thinking. In A. S. Hoel & I. Folkvord (Eds.), Ernst Cassirer on form and technology: contemporary readings (pp. 65–91). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Hoel, A. S., & Folkvord, I. (Eds.). (2012). Ernst Cassirer on form and technology: contemporary readings. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Kirby, V. (2011). Quantum anthropologies: life at large. Durham and London: Duke University Press.
Krois, J. M. (1983). Cassirer’s unpublished critique of Heidegger. Philosophy and Rhetoric, 16(3), 147–159.
Ruin, H. (2012). Technology as destiny in Cassirer and Heidegger: continuing the Davos debate. In A. S. Hoel & I. Folkvord (Eds.), Ernst Cassirer on Form and technology: contemporary readings (pp. 113–138). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
Simondon, G. (1958). Du mode d’existence des objets techniques. Paris: Aubier.
Simondon, G. ( 1980). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects (trans: Mellamphy, N.). University of Western Ontario. http://dephasage.ocular-witness.com/pdf/SimondonGilbert.OnTheModeOfExistence.pdf Accessed March 13, 2011.
Simondon, G. ( 2011). On the Mode of Existence of Technical Objects (trans: Mellamphy, N., Mellamphy, D. and Biswas Mellamphy, N.). Deleuze Studies 5(3), 407–424.
van der Tuin, I. (2011). ‘A different starting point, a different metaphysics’: reading Bergson and Barad diffractively. Hypatia: A Journal of Feminist Philosophy, 26(1), 22–42.CrossRef
- The Ontological Force of Technicity: Reading Cassirer and Simondon Diffractively
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Philosophy & Technology
Volume 26, Issue 2 , pp 187-202
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Philosophy of technology
- Technological in(ter)vention
- Performative correspondence
- Facile humanism
- Positive difference