Date: 09 Nov 2012
Evolution, Genetic Engineering, and Human Enhancement
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There are many ways that biological theory can inform ethical discussions of genetic engineering and biomedical enhancement. In this essay, we highlight some of these potential contributions, and along the way provide a synthetic overview of the papers that comprise this special issue. We begin by comparing and contrasting genetic engineering with programs of selective breeding that led to the domestication of plants and animals, and we consider how genetic engineering differs from other contemporary biotechnologies such as embryo selection. We go on to consider the implications of genetic engineering for human nature, human evolution, and persistence of the human species. Finally, we question whether genetic interventions warrant the extraordinary ethical scrutiny they are often given, and we show how the misleading “genetic blueprint” metaphor has imposed a faulty structure on the enhancement debate. We conclude by considering the nature of biological development and the sobering limits it places on what genetic engineering can reasonably hope to achieve
Agar, N. (2004). Liberal eugenics: In defence of human enhancement. Blackwell.
Agar, N. (2010). Humanity’s end: Why we should reject radical enhancement. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Bouchard, T. J., & Loehlin, J. C. (2001). Genes, evolution, and personality. Behavior Genetics, 31(3), 243–273.CrossRef
Buchanan, A. (2011). Beyond humanity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRef
Buchanan, A., Brock, D., Daniels, N., & Wikler, D. (2001). From chance to choice: Genetics and justice. Cambridge University Press.
Clarke, S., & Roache, R. (2009). Bioconservatism, bioliberalism and the wisdom of reflecting on repugnance. Monash Bioethics Review, 28, 4.1–4.21.
Cooke, S. F., & Bliss, T. V. P. (2003). The genetic enhancement of memory. Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 60, 1–5.CrossRef
Darwin, C. (1859/1964). On the origin of species by means of natural selection. Harvard University Press
Edgerton R. (1992). Sick Societies: Challenging the Myth of Primitive Harmony. The Free Press.
Fukuyama, F. (2002). Our posthuman future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Fukuyama, F. (2003). Our posthuman future. New York: Farrar, Straus and Giroux.
Godfrey-Smith, P. (2000). Explanatory symmetries, preformation, and developmental systems theory. Philosophy of Science, 67, S322–S331.CrossRef
Griffiths, P. E. (2001). Genetic information: a metaphor in search of a theory. Philosophy of Science, 68(3), 394–412.CrossRef
Griffiths, P. E. (2006). The fearless vampire conservator: Philip Kitcher, genetic determinism and the informational gene. In: C. Rehmann-Sutter, & E. M. Neumann-Held (Eds.) Genes in development: Rethinking the molecular paradigm (pp. 175–198). Duke University Press.
Griffiths, P. E., & Gray, R. D. (2005). Three ways to misunderstand developmental systems theory. Biology and Philosophy, 20, 417–425.CrossRef
Habermas, J. (2003). The Future of Human Nature. Polity.
Harris, J. (1993). Is gene therapy a form of eugenics? Bioethics, 7(1–2), 178–187.CrossRef
Kass, L. (2000). The wisdom of repugnance: Why we should ban the cloning of humans. In: reprinted in G. McGee (Ed.) The human cloning debate. Berkeley Hills Press.
Kass, L. (2003). Ageless bodies, happy souls: biotechnology and the pursuit of perfection. The New Atlantis 9–28.
Kitcher, P. S. (2001). Battling the undead: How (and how not) to resist genetic determinism. In R. Singh, C. Krimbas, D. Paul, & J. Beatty (Eds.), Thinking about evolution. Historical, philosophical and political perspectives. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Machery, E. (2008). A plea for human nature. Philosophical Psychology, 21, 321–329.CrossRef
Oyama, S. (2000 ). The ontogeny of information. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Parens, E. (1995). Should we hold the (germ) line. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 173, 173–176.
Persson, I., & Savulescu, J. (2012). Moral enhancement, freedom, and the god machine. The Monist, 95(3), 399–421.
Pigliucci, M. (2010). Genotype-phenotype mapping and the end of the “genes as blueprint” metaphor. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society B, 365, 557–566.CrossRef
Porteus, M. H., Connelly, J. P., & Pruett, S. M. (2006). A look to future directions in gene therapy research for monogenic diseases. PLoS Genetics, 2(9), 1285–1292.CrossRef
Powell, R. (2010). What’s the harm? An evolutionary theoretical critique of the precautionary principle. Kennedy Institute of Ethics Journal, 20(2), 181–206.CrossRef
Powell, R. (2012). The evolutionary biological implications of human genetic engineering. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 37(3), 204–226.CrossRef
Powell, R., & Buchanan, A. (2011). Breaking evolution's chains: the prospect of deliberate genetic modification in humans. The Journal of Medicine and Philosophy, 36(1), 6–27.CrossRef
Richards, R. A. (1997). Darwin and the inefficacy of artificial selection. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science C, 28(1), 75–97.CrossRef
Robert, J. S. (2004). Embryology, epigenesis, and evolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRef
Roberts, N. J., Vogelstein, J. T., Parmigiani, G., Kinzler, K. W., Vogelstein, B., & Velculescu, V. E. (2012). The predictive capacity of personal genome sequencing. Science Translational Medicine. doi:10.1126/scitranslmed.3003380.
Sandel, M. (2007). The Case Against Perfection: Ethics in the Age of Genetic Engineering. Harvard University Press.
Sarkar, S. (1996). Biological information: A sceptical look at some central dogmas of molecular biology. In S. Sarkar (Ed.), The philosophy and history of molecular biology: New perspectives (pp. 187–232). Dordrecht: Kluwer.
Savulescu, J. (2001). Procreative beneficence: why we should select the best children. Bioethics, 15, 413–426.CrossRef
Savulescu, J., & Bostrom, N. (Eds.). (2009). Human enhancement. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Savulescu, J., & Kahane, G. (2009). The moral obligation to create children with the best chance of the best life. Bioethics, 23(5), 274–290.CrossRef
Savulescu, J., & Persson, I. (2008). The perils of cognitive enhancement and the urgent imperative to enhance the moral character of humanity. Journal of Applied Philosophy, 25(3), 162–177.CrossRef
Savulescu, J., ter Meulen, R., & Kahane, G. (Eds.) (2011). Enhancing human capabilities. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.
Shea, N. (2012). Representation in the genome and in other inheritance systems. Biology and Philosophy.
Sterelny, K., & Griffiths, P. E. (1999). Sex and death: an introduction to the philosophy of biology. Chicago: University of Chicago.
Sterrett, S. G. (2002). Darwin’s analogy between artificial and natural selection: how does it go? Studies in the History and Philosophy of Science C, 33, 151–168.CrossRef
van Heyningen, V., & Yeyati, P. L. (2004). Mechanisms of non-Mendelian inheritance in genetic disease. Human Molecular Genetics, 13(2), R225–R233.CrossRef
Varner, G. (1998). In nature’s interests? Interests, animal rights and environmental ethics. Oxford: Oxford University.
Williams, G. C. (1957). Pleiotropy, natural selection, and the evolution of senescence. Evolution, 11(4), 398–411.
Williams, G. C., & Nesse, R. M. (1991). The dawn of Darwinian medicine. Quarterly Review of Biology, 66(1), 1–22.
- Evolution, Genetic Engineering, and Human Enhancement
Philosophy & Technology
Volume 25, Issue 4 , pp 439-458
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Genetic engineering
- Human nature