ISPs & Rowdy Web Sites Before the Law: Should We Change Today’s Safe Harbour Clauses?
- Ugo PagalloAffiliated withLaw School, University of Torino Email author
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The paper examines today’s debate on the new responsibilities of Internet service providers (ISPs) in connection with legal problems concerning jurisdiction, data processing, people’s privacy and education. The focus is foremost on the default rules and safe harbour clauses for ISPs liability, set up by the US and European legal systems. This framework is deepened in light of the different functions of the services provided on the Internet so as to highlight multiple levels of control over information and, correspondingly, different types of liability. The new responsibilities of ISPs concern the original “end-to-end” architecture of the medium and policies on design rather than responsibility for user content and individual messages.
KeywordsCopyright Data protection Internet service providers Jurisdiction Privacy by design Responsibility Safe harbour clauses Self-enforcement technologies
- ISPs & Rowdy Web Sites Before the Law: Should We Change Today’s Safe Harbour Clauses?
Philosophy & Technology
Volume 24, Issue 4 , pp 419-436
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Data protection
- Internet service providers
- Privacy by design
- Safe harbour clauses
- Self-enforcement technologies
- Ugo Pagallo (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Law School, University of Torino, via s. Ottavio 54, 10124, Turin, Italy