Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Sensitivity and specificity are two components that measure the inherent validity of a diagnostic test for dichotomous outcomes against a gold standard. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve is the plot that depicts the trade-off between the sensitivity and (1-specificity) across a series of cut-off points when the diagnostic test is continuous or on ordinal scale (minimum 5 categories). This is an effective method for assessing the performance of a diagnostic test. The aim of this article is to provide basic conceptual framework and interpretation of ROC analysis to help medical researchers to use it effectively. ROC curve and its important components like area under the curve, sensitivity at specified specificity and vice versa, and partial area under the curve are discussed. Various other issues such as choice between parametric and non-parametric methods, biases that affect the performance of a diagnostic test, sample size for estimating the sensitivity, specificity, and area under ROC curve, and details of commonly used softwares in ROC analysis are also presented.
- Reddy S, Dutta S, Narang A. Evaluation of lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase and hepatic enzymes for the retrospective diagnosis of perinatal asphyxia among sick neonates. Indian Pediatr. 2008;45:144–147.
- Sood SL, Saiprasad GS, Wilson CG. Mid-arm circumference at birth: A screening method for detection of low birth weight. Indian Pediatr. 2002;39:838–842.
- Randev S, Grover N. Predicting neonatal hyperbilirubinemia using first day serum bilirubin levels. Indian J Pediatr. 2010;77:147–150. CrossRef
- Vasudevan A, Malhotra A, Lodha R, Kabra SK. Profile of neonates admitted in pediatric ICU and validation of score for neonatal acute physiology (SNAP). Indian Pediatr. 2006;43:344–348.
- Khanna R, Taneja V, Singh SK, Kumar N, Sreenivas V, Puliyel JM. The clinical risk index of babies (CRIB) score in India. Indian J Pediatr. 2002;69:957–960. CrossRef
- Indrayan A. Medical Biostatistics (Second Edition). Boca Raton: Chapman & Hall/CRC Press; 2008. p. 263–267.
- Hanley JA, McNeil BJ. The meaning and use of the area under a receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Radiology. 1982;143:29–36.
- Campbell G. Advances in statistical methodology for evaluation of diagnostic and laboratory tests. Stat Med. 1994;13:499–508. CrossRef
- Bamber D. The area above the ordinal dominance graph and area below the receiver operating characteristic graph. J Math Psychol. 1975;12:387–415. CrossRef
- DeLong ER, DeLong DM, Clarke-Pearson DL. Comparing the area under two or more correlated receiver operating characteristic curves: a nonparametric approach. Biometrics. 1988;44:837–845. CrossRef
- Cleves MA. Comparative assessment of three common algorithms for estimating the variance of the area under the nonparametric receiver operating characteristic curve. Stata J. 2002;3:280–289.
- Box GEP, Cox DR. An analysis of transformation. J Royal Statistical Society, Series B. 1964;26:211–252.
- Zhou Xh, Obuchowski NA, McClish DK. Statistical Methods in Diagnostic Medicine. New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc; 2002. CrossRef
- Metz CE, Herman BA, Shen JH. Maximum likelihood estimation of receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve from continuously distributed data. Stat Med. 1998;17:1033–1053. CrossRef
- ROCKIT [Computer program]. Chicago: University of Chicago. Available from: www-radiology.uchicago. edu/krl/KRL_ROC/software_index6.htm. Accessed on February 27, 2007.
- Faraggi D, Reiser B. Estimating of area under the ROC curve. Stat Med. 2002;21:3093–3106. CrossRef
- Hajian Tilaki KO, Hanley JA, Joseph L, Collet JP. A comparison of parametric and nonparametric approaches to ROC analysis of quantitative diagnosis tests. Med Decis Making. 1997;17:94–102. CrossRef
- Pepe M, Longton G, Janes H. Estimation and comparison of receiver operating characteristic curves. Stata J. 2009;9:1.
- Jiang Y, Metz CE, Nishikawa RM. A receiver operating characteristic partial area index for highly sensitive diagnostic test. Radiology. 1996;201:745–750.
- Youden WJ. An index for rating diagnostic test. Cancer. 1950;3:32–35. CrossRef
- Perkins NJ, Schisterman EF. The inconsistency of ‘optimal’ cut points obtained using two criteria based on the receiver operating characteristic curve. Am J Epidemiol. 2006;163:670–675. CrossRef
- Whiting P, Ruljes AW, Reitsma JB, Glas AS, Bossuyt PM, Kleijnen J. Sources of variation and bias in studies of diagnostic accuracy - a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2004;140:189–202.
- Kelly S, Berry E, Proderick P, Harris KM, Cullingworth J, Gathercale L, et al. The identification of bias in studies of the diagnostic performance of imaging modalities. Br J Radiol. 1997;70:1028–1035.
- Malaria Site. Peripheral smear study for malaria parasites - Available from: www.malariasite.com/malaria/DiagnosisOfMalaria.htm. Accessed on July 05, 2010.
- Thomas S, Srivastava A, Jeyaseelan L, Dennison D, Chandy M. NESTROFT as screening test for the detection of thalassaemia & common haemoglobinopathies - an evaluation against a high performance liquid chromatographic method. Indian J Med Res. 1996;104:194–197.
- Bachmann LM, Puhan MA, ter Riet G, Bossuyt PM. Sample sizes of studies on diagnostic accuracy: literature survey. BMJ. 2006;332:1127–1129. CrossRef
- Malhotra RK, Indrayan A. A simple nomogram for sample size for estimating the sensitivity and specificity of medical tests. Indion J Ophthalmol. 2010;58:519–522. CrossRef
- Kester AD, Buntinx F. Meta analysis of curves. Med Decis Making. 2000;20:430–439. CrossRef
- Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for medical researchers
Volume 48, Issue 4 , pp 277-287
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Receiver operating characteristic curve
- Sample size
- Optimal cut-off point
- Partial area under the curve