The Epigenetics of Stroke Recovery and Rehabilitation: From Polycomb to Histone Deacetylases
First Online: 04 October 2013 DOI:
10.1007/s13311-013-0224-3 Cite this article as: Elder, J., Cortes, M., Rykman, A. et al. Neurotherapeutics (2013) 10: 808. doi:10.1007/s13311-013-0224-3 Abstract
Classical de-afferentation studies, as well as experience-dependent visual plasticity paradigms, have confirmed that both the developing and adult nervous system are capable of unexpected levels of plasticity. This capacity is underscored by the significant spontaneous recovery that can occur in patients with mild-to-moderate impairment following stroke. An evolving model is that an interaction of biological and environmental factors during all epochs post-stroke influences the extent and quality of this plasticity. Here, we discuss data that have implicated specific epigenetic proteins as integrators of environmental influences in 3 aspects of stroke recovery: spontaneous impairment reduction in humans; peri-infarct rewiring in animals as a paradigm for developing therapeutically-driven impairment reduction beyond natural spontaneous recovery; and, finally, classical hippocampal learning and memory paradigms that are theoretically important in skill acquisition for both impairment reduction and compensatory strategies in the rehabilitation setting. Our discussion focuses primarily on B lymphoma Mo-MLV1 insertion region proteins of the polycomb repressive complex, alpha thalassemia/mental retardation syndrome X-linked chromatin remodeling factors, and the best known and most dynamic gene repressors, histone deacetylases. We will highlight exciting current data associated with these proteins and provide promising speculation about how they can be manipulated by drugs, biologics, or noninvasive stimulation for stroke recovery.
Keywords Stroke Recovery Rehabilitation Epigenetics Plasticity Polycomb ATRX HDAC Electronic supplementary material
The online version of this article (doi:
) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. 10.1007/s13311-013-0224-3 References
Roger VL, Go AS, Lloyd-Jones DM, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics—2011 update: a report from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2011;123:e18-e209.
Floel A, Cohen LG. Translational studies in neurorehabilitation: from bench to bedside. Cogn Behav Neurol 2006;19:1-10.
Saver JL. Targeting the brain: neuroprotection and neurorestoration in ischemic stroke. Pharmacotherapy 2010;30:62S-9S.
Floel A, Cohen LG. Strategies in motor stroke rehabilitation. Stroke 2005;36:530.
Carmichael ST. Rodent models of focal stroke: size, mechanism, and purpose. NeuroRx 2005;2:396-409.
Del Zoppo GJ, Saver JL, et al. Expansion of the time window for treatment of acute ischemic stroke with intravenous tissue plasminogen activator: a science advisory from the American Heart Association/American Stroke Association. Stroke 2009;40:2945-2948.
Langley B, Brochier C, Rivieccio MA. Targeting histone deacetylases as a multifaceted approach to treat the diverse outcomes of stroke. Stroke 2009;40:2899-2905.
Sahota P, Savitz SI. Investigational therapies for ischemic stroke: neuroprotection and neurorecovery. Neurotherapeutics 2011;8:434-451.
World Health Organization. Towards a common language for functioning, disability and health. Geneva, Switzerland: World Health Organization; 2002.
Shen LH, Li Y, Gao Q, Savant-Bhonsale S, Chopp M. Down-regulation of neurocan expression in reactive astrocytes promotes axonal regeneration and facilitates the neurorestorative effects of bone marrow stromal cells in the ischemic rat brain. Glia 2008;56:1747-1754.
Bush TG, Puvanachandra N, Horner CH, et al. Leukocyte infiltration, neuronal degeneration, and neurite outgrowth after ablation of scar-forming, reactive astrocytes in adult transgenic mice. Neuron 1999;23:297-308.
Hill JJ, Jin K, Mao XO, Xie L, Greenberg DA. Intracerebral chondroitinase ABC and heparan sulfate proteoglycan glypican improve outcome from chronic stroke in rats. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 2012;109:9155-9160.
Goldfine AM, Schiff ND. What is the role of brain mechanisms underlying arousal in recovery of motor function after structural brain injuries? Curr Opin Neurol 2011;24:564-569.
Adkins DL, Schallert T, Goldstein LB. Poststroke treatment: lost in translation. Stroke 2009;40:8-9.
Krakauer JW, Carmichael ST, Corbett D, Wittenberg GF. Getting neurorehabilitation right: what can be learned from animal models? Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2012;26:923-931.
Lazar RM, Minzer B, Antoniello D, Festa JR, Krakauer JW, Marshall RS. Improvement in aphasia scores after stroke is well predicted by initial severity. Stroke 2010;41:1485-1488.
Prabhakaran S, Zarahn E, Riley C, et al. Inter-individual variability in the capacity for motor recovery after ischemic stroke. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2008;22:64-71.
Zarahn E, Alon L, Ryan SL, et al. Prediction of motor recovery using initial impairment and fMRI 48 h poststroke. Cereb Cortex 2011;21:2712-2721.
Ronan JL, Wu W, Crabtree GR. From neural development to cognition: unexpected roles for chromatin. Nat Rev Genet 2013;14:347-359.
Stapels M, Piper C, Yang T, et al. Polycomb group proteins as epigenetic mediators of neuroprotection in ischemic tolerance. Sci Signal 2010;3:ra15.
Wei L, Yu SP, Gottron F, Snider BJ, Zipfel GJ, Choi DW. Potassium channel blockers attenuate hypoxia- and ischemia-induced neuronal death in vitro and in vivo. Stroke 2003;34:1281-1286.
Iaci JF, Parry TJ, Huang Z, et al. Dalfampridine improves sensorimotor function in rats with chronic deficits after middle cerebral artery occlusion. Stroke 2013;44:1942-1950.
Abdouh M, Chatoo W, El Hajjar J, David J, Ferreira J, Bernier G. Bmi1 is down-regulated in the aging brain and displays antioxidant and protective activities in neurons. PLoS One 2012;7:e31870.
Ma DK, Marchetto MC, Guo JU, Ming GL, Gage FH, Song H. Epigenetic choreographers of neurogenesis in the adult mammalian brain. Nat Neurosci 2010;13:1338-1344.
Stowe AM, Altay T, Freie AB, Gidday JM. Repetitive hypoxia extends endogenous neurovascular protection for stroke. Ann Neurol 2011;69:975-985.
Dromerick AW, Lang CE, Birkenmeier RL, et al. Very Early Constraint-Induced Movement during Stroke Rehabilitation (VECTORS): A single-center RCT. Neurology 2009;73:195-201.
Donoghue JP. Plasticity of adult sensorimotor representations. Curr Opin Neurobiol 1995;5:749-754.
Murphy TH, Corbett D. Plasticity during stroke recovery: from synapse to behaviour. Nat Rev Neurosci 2009;10:861-872.
Xu T, Yu X, Perlik AJ, et al. Rapid formation and selective stabilization of synapses for enduring motor memories. Nature 2009;462:915-919.
Nudo RJ, Milliken GW. Reorganization of movement representations in primary motor cortex following focal ischemic infarcts in adult squirrel monkeys. J Neurophysiol 1996;75:2144-2149.
Eisner-Janowicz I, Barbay S, Hoover E, et al. Early and late changes in the distal forelimb representation of the supplementary motor area after injury to frontal motor areas in the squirrel monkey. J Neurophysiol 2008;100:1498-1512.
Thickbroom GW, Byrnes ML, Archer SA, Mastaglia FL. Motor outcome after subcortical stroke correlates with the degree of cortical reorganization. Clin Neurophysiol 2004;115:2144-2150.
Byrnes ML, Thickbroom GW, Phillips BA, Wilson SA, Mastaglia FL. Physiological studies of the corticomotor projection to the hand after subcortical stroke. Clin Neurophysiol 1999;110:487-498.
Dum RP, Strick PL. The origin of corticospinal projections from the premotor areas in the frontal lobe. J Neurosci 1991;11:667-689.
He SQ, Dum RP, Strick PL. Topographic organization of corticospinal projections from the frontal lobe: motor areas on the lateral surface of the hemisphere. J Neurosci 1993;13:952-980.
Dijkhuizen RM. Imaging neuronal loss and recovery in compromised but viable brain tissue. Brain 2013;136:1689-1691.
Dijkhuizen RM, van der Marel K, Otte WM, et al. Functional MRI and diffusion tensor imaging of brain reorganization after experimental stroke. Transl Stroke Res 2012;3:36-43.
McVea DA, Mohajerani MH, Murphy TH. Voltage-sensitive dye imaging reveals dynamic spatiotemporal properties of cortical activity after spontaneous muscle twitches in the newborn rat. J Neurosci 2012;32:10982-10994.
Li S, Overman JJ, Katsman D, et al. An age-related sprouting transcriptome provides molecular control of axonal sprouting after stroke. Nat Neurosci 2010;13:1496-1504.
Clynes D, Gibbons RJ. ATRX and the replication of structured DNA. Curr Opin Genet Dev 2013;23:289-294.
Clynes D, Higgs DR, Gibbons RJ. The chromatin remodeller ATRX: a repeat offender in human disease. Trends Biochem Sci 2013;38:461-466.
Tang P, Frankenberg S, Argentaro A, Graves JM, Familari M. Comparative analysis of the ATRX promoter and 5' regulatory region reveals conserved regulatory elements which are linked to roles in neurodevelopment, alpha-globin regulation and testicular function. BMC Res Notes 2011;4:200-0500-4-200.
Shioda N, Beppu H, Fukuda T, Li E, Kitajima I, Fukunaga K. Aberrant calcium/calmodulin-dependent protein kinase II (CaMKII) activity is associated with abnormal dendritic spine morphology in the ATRX mutant mouse brain. J Neurosci 2011;31:346-358.
Kernohan KD, Berube NG. Genetic and epigenetic dysregulation of imprinted genes in the brain. Epigenomics 2010;2:743-763.
Kernohan KD, Jiang Y, Tremblay DC, et al. ATRX partners with cohesin and MeCP2 and contributes to developmental silencing of imprinted genes in the brain. Dev Cell 2010;18:191-202.
Sleiman SF, Basso M, Mahishi L, et al. Putting the 'HAT' back on survival signalling: the promises and challenges of HDAC inhibition in the treatment of neurological conditions. Expert Opin Investig Drugs 2009;18:573-584.
Ratan RR. Epigenetics and the nervous system: epiphenomenon or missing piece of the neurotherapeutic puzzle? Lancet Neurol 2009;8:975-977.
Schneider A, Chatterjee S, Bousiges O, Selvi BR, Swaminathan A, Cassel R, Blanc F, Kundu TK, Boutillier AL. Acetyltransferases (HATs) as targets for neurological therapeutics. Neurotherapeutics 2013.
Lindner R, Puttagunta R, Di Giovanni S. Epigenetic regulation of axon outgrowth and regeneration in CNS injury: the first steps forward. Neurotherapeutics 2013.
Wagner FF, Weïwer M, Lewis MC, Edward Holson EB. Small molecule inhibitors of zinc-dependent histone deacetylses (HDACs). Neurotherapeutics 2013.
York EM, Petit A, Roskams AJI. Epigenetics of Neural Repair Following Spinal Cord Injury. Neurotherapeutics 2013.
Liu XS, Chopp M, Zhang RL, Zhang ZG. MicroRNAs in Cerebral Ischemia-Induced Neurogenesis. J Neuropathol Exp Neurol 2013;72:718-722.
Pribiag H, Stellwagen D. Neuroimmune regulation of homeostatic synaptic plasticity. Neuropharmacology 2013 Jun 15.
Ploughman M, Windle V, MacLellan CL, White N, Dore JJ, Corbett D. Brain-derived neurotrophic factor contributes to recovery of skilled reaching after focal ischemia in rats. Stroke 2009;40:1490-1495.
MacLellan CL, Keough MB, Granter-Button S, Chernenko GA, Butt S, Corbett D. A critical threshold of rehabilitation involving brain-derived neurotrophic factor is required for poststroke recovery. Neurorehabil Neural Repair 2011;25:740-748.
Guan JS, Haggarty SJ, Giacometti E, et al. HDAC2 negatively regulates memory formation and synaptic plasticity. Nature 2009;459:55-60.
Bilek E, Schafer A, Ochs E, et al. Application of high-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation to the DLPFC alters human prefrontal-hippocampal functional interaction. J Neurosci 2013;33:7050-7056.
Ruohonen J, Karhu J. Navigated transcranial magnetic stimulation. Neurophysiol Clin 2010;40:7-17.
Cortes M, Black-Schaffer RM, Edwards DJ. Transcranial magnetic stimulation as an investigative tool for motor dysfunction and recovery in stroke: an overview for neurorehabilitation clinicians. Neuromodulation 2012;15:316-325.
Takeuchi N, Tada T, Toshima M, Chuma T, Matsuo Y, Ikoma K. Inhibition of the unaffected motor cortex by 1 Hz repetitive transcranical magnetic stimulation enhances motor performance and training effect of the paretic hand in patients with chronic stroke. J Rehabil Med 2008;40:298-303.
Hummel F, Celnik P, Giraux P, et al. Effects of non-invasive cortical stimulation on skilled motor function in chronic stroke. Brain 2005;128:490-499.
Siebner HR, Lang N, Rizzo V, et al. Preconditioning of low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation with transcranial direct current stimulation: evidence for homeostatic plasticity in the human motor cortex. J Neurosci 2004;24:3379-3385.
Buch ER, Johnen VM, Nelissen N, O'Shea J, Rushworth MF. Noninvasive associative plasticity induction in a corticocortical pathway of the human brain. J Neurosci 2011;31:17669-17679.
Stefan K, Kunesch E, Cohen LG, Benecke R, Classen J. Induction of plasticity in the human motor cortex by paired associative stimulation. Brain 2000;123:572-584.
PubMed CrossRef Copyright information
© The American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics, Inc. 2013