Skip to main content
Log in

A Spatio-Temporal Downscaler for Output From Numerical Models

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Often, in environmental data collection, data arise from two sources: numerical models and monitoring networks. The first source provides predictions at the level of grid cells, while the second source gives measurements at points. The first is characterized by full spatial coverage of the region of interest, high temporal resolution, no missing data but consequential calibration concerns. The second tends to be sparsely collected in space with coarser temporal resolution, often with missing data but, where recorded, provides, essentially, the true value. Accommodating the spatial misalignment between the two types of data is of fundamental importance for both improved predictions of exposure as well as for evaluation and calibration of the numerical model. In this article we propose a simple, fully model-based strategy to downscale the output from numerical models to point level. The static spatial model, specified within a Bayesian framework, regresses the observed data on the numerical model output using spatially-varying coefficients which are specified through a correlated spatial Gaussian process.

As an example, we apply our method to ozone concentration data for the eastern U.S. and compare it to Bayesian melding (Fuentes and Raftery 2005) and ordinary kriging (Cressie 1993; Chilès and Delfiner 1999). Our results show that our method outperforms Bayesian melding in terms of computing speed and it is superior to both Bayesian melding and ordinary kriging in terms of predictive performance; predictions obtained with our method are better calibrated and predictive intervals have empirical coverage closer to the nominal values. Moreover, our model can be easily extended to accommodate for the temporal dimension. In this regard, we consider several spatio-temporal versions of the static model. We compare them using out-of-sample predictions of ozone concentration for the eastern U.S. for the period May 1–October 15, 2001. For the best choice, we present a summary of the analysis. Supplemental material, including color versions of Figures 4, 5, 6, 7, and 8, and MCMC diagnostic plots, are available online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Banerjee, S., Carlin, B. P., and Gelfand, A. E. (2004), Hierarchical Modeling and Analysis for Spatial Data, Boca Raton, FL: Chapman & Hall/CRC.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Carroll, S. S., Day, G., Cressie, N., and Carroll, T. R. (1995), “Spatial Modeling of Snow Water Equivalent Using Airborne and Ground-Based Snow Data,” Environmetrics, 6, 127–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, C., and Kohn, R. (1994), “On Gibbs Sampling for State Space Models,” Biometrika, 81, 541–553.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Chilès, J.-P., and Delfiner, P. (1999), Geostatistics: Modeling Spatial Uncertainty, New York: Wiley.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, M. K., and Zimmerman, D. L. (2003), “A Bayesian Space-Time Analysis of Acid Deposition Data Combined From Two Monitoring Networks,” Journal of Geophysical Research, 108 (D24), 9006, doi: 10.1029/2003JD004001 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cowles, M. K., Zimmerman, D. L., Christ, A., and McGinnis, D. L. (2002), “Combining Snow Water Equivalent Data From Multiple Sources to Estimate Spatio-Temporal Trends and Compare Measurement Systems,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 7, 536–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie, N. A. C. (1993), Statistics for Spatial Data, New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Denison, D. G. T., Mallick, B. K., and Smith, A. G. M. (1998), “Automatic Bayesian Curve Fitting,” Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Ser. B, 60, 333–350.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Diggle, P. J., Moyeed, R. A., and Tawn, J. A. (1998), “Model-Based Geostatistics (with discussion),” Applied Statistics, 47, 299–350.

    MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Dominici, F., Daniels, M., Zeger, S. L., and Samet, J. M. (2002), “Air Pollution and Mortality: Estimating Regional and National Dose-Response Relationships,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 100–111.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Foley, K. M., and Fuentes, M. (2008), “A Statistical Framework to Combine Multivariate Spatial Data and Physical Models for Hurricane Wind Prediction,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 13, 37–59.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, M., and Raftery, A. E. (2005), “Model Evaluation and Spatial Interpolation by Bayesian Combination of Observations With Outputs From Numerical Models,” Biometrics, 61, 36–45.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes, M., Song, H.-R., Ghosh, S. K., Holland, D. M., and Davis, J. M. (2006), “Spatial Association Between Speciated Fine Particles and Mortality,” Biometrics, 62, 855–863.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., Banerjee, S., and Gamerman, D. (2005), “Spatial Process Modelling for Univariate and Multivariate Dynamic Spatial Data,” Environmetrics, 16, 465–479.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., Kim, H.-J., Sirmans, C. F., and Banerjee, S. (2003), “Spatial Modeling With Spatially Varying Coefficient Processes,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 98, 387–396.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gelfand, A. E., Schmidt, A. M., Banerjee, S., and Sirmans, C. F. (2004), “Nonstationary Multivariate Process Modeling Through Spatially Varying Coregionalization,” TEST, 13, 263–312.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Gotway, C. A., and Young, L. J. (2002), “Combining Incompatible Spatial Data,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97, 632–648.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • — (2007), “A Geostatistical Approach to Linking Geographically Aggregated Data From Different Sources,” Journal of Computational and Graphical Statistics, 16, 115–135.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Green, P. J. (1995), “Reversible Jump Markov Chain Monte Carlo Computation and Bayesian Model Determination,” Biometrika, 82, 711–732.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • McMillan, N., Holland, D. M., Morara, M., and Feng, J. (2009), “Combining Numerical Model Output and Particulate Data Using Bayesian Space-Time Modeling,” Environmetrics, to appear.

  • Poole, D., and Raftery, A. E. (2000), “Inference for Deterministic Simulation Models: The Bayesian Melding Approach,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 95, 1244–1255.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Sahu, S. K., Gelfand, A. E., and Holland, D. M. (2006), “Spatio-Temporal Modeling of Fine Particulate Matter,” Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics, 11, 61–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt, A. M., and Gelfand, A. E. (2003), “A Bayesian Coregionalization Approach for Multivariate Pollutant Data,” Journal of the Geophysical Research, 108 (D24), 8783, doi: 10.1029/2002JD002905 .

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, B. J., and Cowles, M. K. (2007), “Correlating Point-Referenced Radon and Areal Uranium Data Arising From a Common Spatial Process,” Applied Statistics, 56, 313–326.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tolbert, P., Mulholland, J., MacIntosh, D., Xu, F., Daniels, D., Devine, O., Carlin, B. P., Klein, M., Dorley, J., Butler, A., Nordenberg, D., Frumkin, H., Ryan, P. B., and White, M. (2000), “Air Pollution and Pediatric Emergency Room Visits for Asthma in Atlanta,” American Journal of Epidemiology, 151, 798–810.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wackernagel, H. (1998), Multivariate Geostatistics (2nd ed.), Berlin: Springer.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • West, M., and Harrison, J. (1999), Bayesian Forecasting and Dynamic Models (2nd ed.), New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikle, C. K., and Berliner, L. M. (2005), “Combining Information Across Spatial Scales,” Technometrics, 47, 80–91.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang, H. (2004), “Inconsistent Estimation and Asymptotically Equal Interpolations in Model-Based Geostatistics,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 99, 250–261.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L., Carlin, B. P., and Gelfand, A. E. (2003), “Hierarchical Regression With Misaligned Spatial Data: Relating Ambient Ozone and Pediatric Asthma ER Visits in Atlanta,” Environmetrics, 14, 537–557.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Veronica J. Berrocal.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Berrocal, V.J., Gelfand, A.E. & Holland, D.M. A Spatio-Temporal Downscaler for Output From Numerical Models. JABES 15, 176–197 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-009-0004-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-009-0004-z

Key Words

Navigation