Functional analysis of the acetylation of human p53 in DNA damage responses
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Chung, SK., Zhu, S., Xu, Y. et al. Protein Cell (2014) 5: 544. doi:10.1007/s13238-014-0048-x
- 846 Views
As a critical tumor suppressor, p53 is inactivated in human cancer cells by somatic gene mutation or disruption of pathways required for its activation. Therefore, it is critical to elucidate the mechanism underlying p53 activation after genotoxic and cellular stresses. Accumulating evidence has indicated the importance of posttranslational modifications such as acetylation in regulating p53 stability and activity. However, the physiological roles of the eight identified acetylation events in regulating p53 responses remain to be fully understood. By employing homologous recombination, we introduced various combinations of missense mutations (lysine to arginine) into eight acetylation sites of the endogenous p53 gene in human embryonic stem cells (hESCs). By determining the p53 responses to DNA damage in the p53 knock-in mutant hESCs and their derivatives, we demonstrate physiological importance of the acetylation events within the core domain (K120 and K164) and at the C-terminus (K370/372/373/381/382/386) in regulating human p53 responses to DNA damage.
Keywordshuman embryonic stem cells (hESCs)p53acetylationhomologous recombinationDNA damagecancer
Tumor suppressor p53 is a transcription factor that directly activates the transcription of hundreds of genes, including p21, Mdm-2, noxa, and puma that are mediating p53-dependent functions (Vousden and Prives, 2009). In addition, p53 also directly suppresses the expression of a number of genes, such as Nanog (Lin et al., 2005). While p53 remains in an unstable and inactive state in normal cells in the absence of exogenous stresses, its protein level and transcription activity are significantly induced in response to DNA damage and other cellular stresses (Vousden and Prives, 2009). The interaction between p53 and E3 ligases such as MDM2, all transcription targets of p53, leads to the ubiquitination and rapid degradation of p53. In addition, the interaction between p53 and Mdm2 or MdmX suppresses the transcriptional activities of p53. These negative regulatory pathways are critical to prevent the hyperactivation of p53 that can have devastating effects on organismal survival and aging (Campisi, 2005; Liu et al., 2010).
p53 is critical to suppress cancer development in humans, and the loss of wild-type p53 activity through direct somatic gene mutation or disruption of pathways important for p53 activation is required for cancer progression (Vousden and Prives, 2009). Therefore, it is critical to elucidate the pathways that activate p53. Accumulating evidence indicates that posttranslational modifications of p53, including phosphorylation and acetylation, are involved in regulating p53 stability and activity. While phosphorylation of p53 at N-terminus is important to activate some of p53-dependent functions, none of the phosphorylation events are critical for p53 activation (Chao et al., 2003; Chao et al., 2006). Recent studies indicate that human p53 can be acetylated at multiple lysine residues by Tip60 and CBP, including K120, K164, K320, and the C-terminal K370/372/373/381/382/386 (Brooks and Gu, 2011). Using human cancer cell lines expressing p53 with various lysine to arginine mutations, these studies indicate that K120R, K164R as well as K120/164R double mutations partially impaired the p53-dependent functions (Sykes et al., 2006; Tang et al., 2006; Tang et al., 2008). In addition, mutation of the eight acetylation sites to arginine abolishes the p53-dependent functions, suggesting that these acetylation events play synergistic and critical roles in activating p53 (Sykes et al., 2006; Tang et al., 2006, 2008).
The roles of acetylation have also been examined by knock-in studies in mouse and ESCs. Employing p53 K3R knock-in mouse, Li and colleagues demonstrate that acetylation of mouse p53 at K117/161/162 (corresponding to human K120/164) is required for activating p53-dependent transcription but dispensable for p53 stabilization (Li et al., 2012). By generating p53 K120/164R knock-in hESCs, we demonstrate that these two acetylation events are required for p53-dependent transcription and stabilization (Zhang et al., 2014). These findings demonstrate that acetylation might have distinct impact on p53 stability and activity in mouse and human cells.
Generation of K6R and K8R knock-in hESCs
p53 stabilization is abolished in K8R hESCs and fibroblasts after DNA damage
Our previous studies have shown that K120/164R (K2R) mutation is important for p53 stabilization and activation in hESCs after DNA damage (Zhang et al., 2014). Cell lines studies indicate that the acetylation at K120/164 works synergistically with acetylation at the C-terminus (Tang et al., 2008). To determine the physiological roles of the acetylation of p53, we examined the impact of K8R mutations on the p53 stability and activity in hESCs after DNA damage. Consistent data were obtained from both K8R knock-in hESC lines (HUES8 and HUES9), and the representative data are presented.
To confirm that the role of this acetylation in stabilizing p53 is not cell-type specific, we derived the fibroblasts from p53+/− and K8R hESCs, and determined the p53 protein levels in these cells after DNA damage. Our data confirmed that the basal levels of p53 protein were much lower in K8R fibroblasts than those in p53+/− fibroblasts and could not be induced by DNA damage (Fig. 3B). Therefore, we concluded that acetylation is required to stabilize p53. In further support of this conclusion, p53 was hyper-ubiquitinated in K8R hESCs and fibroblasts when compared with that in p53+/− cells (Fig. 3C). Consistent with the increased ubiquitination of p53 in K8R cells, the interaction between Mdm2 and p53 was significantly increased in K8R hESCs than in p53+/− hESCs when analyzed by co-immunoprecipitation (Fig. 3D). In addition, treatment with Nutlin-3, which specifically disrupts the interaction between Mdm2 and p53, significantly increases the protein levels of p53 in K8R hESCs, supporting the notion that the decreased protein levels of p53 in K8R hESCs are primarily due to the increased p53-Mdm2 interaction (Fig. 3E). In summary, these findings support the notion that acetylation is required for p53 stabilization by promoting p53-Mdm2 interaction.
p53-dependent functions are abolished in K8R hESCs and fibroblasts
Functional dissection of acetylation within the core domain and C-terminus
The p53-dependent functions in K6R hESCs and fibroblasts
By generating acetylation site mutant knock-in hESCs, we revealed the physiological roles of acetylation events within the core domain and C-terminus and their functional interaction in activating human p53. There are several distinctions between our conclusion and those reached in previous cell line and mouse studies (Tang et al., 2008; Li et al., 2012). First, while previous findings indicate that acetylation is required for p53-dependent activity but dispensable for p53 stabilization, our findings indicate that acetylation is required for p53 stabilization. Second, previous findings suggest that the acetylation at the core domain plays synergistic roles with the acetylation at the C-terminus in activating p53-dependent transcription. However, our findings indicate that the mutations of the acetylation sites within the core domain and at the C-terminus have opposite impact on p53 stability and activity. These discrepancies could be due to the intrinsic difference in the sequence of the mouse and human p53 gene. In addition, the overexpression of various p53 mutants in human cancer cell lines could also mask the important roles of acetylation in p53 stabilization.
Our findings indicate that acetylation within the core domain but not at the C-terminus plays a key role in the disruption of the interaction between p53 and its E3 ligase Mdm2. In this context, in addition to the N-terminus of p53, Mdm2 binds to other regions of p53, including the core domain (Vousden and Prives, 2009). Despite the finding that p53-Mdm2 interaction is modestly increased in K6R cells, p53 is more stable in K6R cells with reduced ubiquitination when compared to wild type p53, indicating that the C-terminal lysine residues are the preferential targets for ubiquitination. In addition, the increased stability of p53 in K6R cells after DNA damage leads to higher p53-dependent transcription and apoptosis after DNA damage. Together with previous findings, our data demonstrate the critical and complex roles of acetylation in activating human p53 response to DNA damage and could provide the foundation to develop novel strategies to activate p53 in human cancer cells harboring WT but dysfunctional p53.
Materials and methods
Generation of acetyl defective p53 mutants
RP11-199F11, BAC clone including human p53, was purchased from Invitrogen. The BAC based targeting vector was generated and modified by recombineering in the E. coli strain SW102. To obtain p53+/− hESCs, Neomycin marker was firstly used for selection (Song et al., 2010). Each of wild type, or mutant p53 BAC vector commonly had selection cassette (CAG-Neo-IRES-Puro-polyA) through insertion into intron 4 of p53. By targeting each BAC DNA into another allele of p53+/− hESCs through homologous recombination, each clone harboring wild type, or acetyl mutant of p53 was obtained from p53+/− hESCs. After transfecting FLP gene into each clone, cDNA sequence of each clone was confirmed to mutation sites.
Cell culture for hESCs
In the presence of feeder layer, the HUES cells were cultured on feeder layer in knockout DMEM supplemented with 10% knockout serum replacement (KSR), 10% plasmanate, 1% PenStrep, 1% Glutamine, 1% nonessential amino acids, 10 ng/mL bFGF, and 55 μmol/L β-mercaptoethanol as described (Cowan et al., 2004). In the absence of feeder layer, HUES cells were cultured on matrigel-coated plates in the mTeSR1 medium with 5× supplement. All tissue culture reagents were purchased from Invitrogen.
Western blotting and immunoprecipitation analysis
Protein extracts from hESCs or fibroblasts derived from teratoma were loaded on 6%–10% SDS-PAGE gel and transferred to nitrocellulose membrane, which was probed with a monoclonal antibody against p53 (pAb1801; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), monoclonal antibody against Mdm2 (Ab-2; Oncogene Research), polyclonal antibody against p21 or β-actin (Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The membrane was subsequently probed with a horseradish peroxidase-conjugated secondary antibody and developed with ECL PLUS (Amersham, Piscataway, NJ). For co-immunoprecipitation analysis, 1–2 mg of whole cell protein extracts was immunoprecipitated with anti-p53 antibody (FL393; Santa Cruz Biotechnology). The amount of p53 and Mdm2 in the immunoprecipitate was analyzed by Western blotting using monoclonal antibody against p53 (pAb1801; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA), monoclonal antibody against Mdm2 (SMP-14; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA).
Quantitative real-time PCR
Real-time PCR was performed as previously described (Song et al., 2010). The sequence of the primers was as follows: p21, 5′-ACCTGGAGACTCTCAGGGTCG-3′ for forward primer, 5′-TTAGGGCTTCCTCTTGGAGAAGAT-3′ for reverse primer; Mdm2, 5′-ATCGGACTCAGGTACATCTGTGAG-3′ for forward primer, 5′-AGGTTTCTCTTCCTGAAGCTCTTG-3′ for reverse primer; Puma, 5′-GACGACCTCAACGCACAG-3′ for forward primer, 5′-CTAATTGGGCTCCATCTCG-3′ for reverse primer; Noxa, 5′-TCCAGTTGGAGGCTGAGGTT-3′ for forward primer, 5′-CACTCGACTTCCAGCTCTGC-3′ for reverse primer; Killer5, 5′-CTCCTGCAAATATGGACAGGACTA-3′ for forward primer, 5′-TTAGCTCCACTTCACCTGAATCAC-3′ for reverse primer.
hESCs were cultured onto matrigel-coated plates in mTeSR1 medium with 5× supplement (Invitrogen). hESCs were treated with doxorubicin (0.2 μmol/L), or irradiated with γ-irradiation (5 Gy), and harvested 8 and 16 h after treatment. Apoptotic cells were identified by staining with Annexin V as previously described (Chao et al., 2003).
In vivo ubiquitylation assays
For in vivo ubiquitylation assays, prior to cell collection, cells were treated with Alln (25 μmol/L), or MG132 (25 μmol/L) for 4 h, and then cells were lysed in modified RIPA buffer (1% Nonidet P-40, 0.1% sodium dodecyl sulfate [SDS], Tris-HCl [pH 7.8], 150 mmol/L NaCl, 1 mmol/L dithiothreitol, 0.5 mmol/L EDTA, 25 μmol/L Alln, 25 μmol/L MG132, 5 mmol/L N-ethylmaleimide, and fresh proteinase inhibitors) with mild sonication. Cell lysates were immunoprecipitated with anti-p53 antibody (FL393 AC; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) and analysed by Western blotting using anti-ubiquitin antibody (P4D1; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA) or anti-p53 antibody (pAb1801; Santa Cruz Biotechnology) (Feng et al., 2005).
Analysis of p53 stability
For in vivo p53 degradation assays, hESCs were incubated with cycloheximide (100 μg/mL). Cells were harvested at 20, 40, and 80 min later, subjected to Western blotting using anti-p53 antibody (pAb1801; Santa Cruz Biotechnology, Santa Cruz, CA). The intensity of bands was measured by densitometry.
Karyotyping of the mutant hESC clones was carried out by Cell Line Genetics (Madison, WI).
This work was supported by grants from California Institute for Regenerative Medicine (RC1-00148) to Y.X. and grants from the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 81172828 and 81373166) to X.F.
COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICS GUIDELINES
Sun-Ku Chung, Shengyun Zhu, Yang Xu, and Xuemei Fu declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All hESC work in this study has been approved by the Institutional Embryonic Stem Cell Research Oversight Committee (ESCRO). All institutional and national guidelines for the care and use of laboratory animals were followed.
Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.