Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Bridging the gap between research and agile practice: an evolutionary model

  • Original Article
  • Published:
International Journal of System Assurance Engineering and Management Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is wide acceptance in the software engineering field that industry and research can gain significantly from each other and there have been several initiatives to encourage collaboration between the two. However there are some often-quoted challenges in this kind of collaboration. For example, that the timescales of research and practice are incompatible, that research is not seen as relevant for practice, and that research demands a different kind of rigour than practice supports. These are complex challenges that are not always easy to overcome. Since the beginning of 2013 we have been using an approach designed to address some of these challenges and to bridge the gap between research and practice, specifically in the agile software development arena. So far we have collaborated successfully with three partners and have investigated three practitioner-driven challenges with agile. The model of collaboration that we adopted has evolved with the lessons learned in the first two collaborations and been modified for the third. In this paper we introduce the collaboration model, discuss how it addresses the collaboration challenges between research and practice and how it has evolved, and describe the lessons learned from our experience.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abrahamsson P, Conboy K, Wang X (2009) Lots done, more to do: the current state of agile. Eur J Inf Syst 18:281–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Agerfalk P, Fitzgerald B (2006) Flexible and distributed software processes: old petunias in new bowls? Commun ACM 10(49):27–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Arisholm E, Gallis H, Dyba T (2007) Evaluating pair programming with respect to system complexity and programmer expertise. IEEE Trans Softw Eng 33(2):65–86

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Avison DE, Lau F, Myers MD, Nielsen PA (1999) Action research. Commun ACM 42(1):94–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R, Myers MD (2004) Special issue on action research in information systems: making is research relevant to practice—forward. MIS Quart 28(3):329–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskerville R, Pries-Heje J, Madsen S (2011) Post-agility: what follows a decade of agility? Information and software technology. 53(5):543–555. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950584910001953. Accessed 30 June 2014

  • Baskerville R, Wood-Harper T (1996) A critical perspective on action research as a method for information systems research. J Inf Tech 11(3):235–246

  • Beck K (2000) Extreme programming explained: embrace change. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Checkland P, Holwell S (2007) Action research. In: Kock N (ed) Information systems action research. Springer, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockburn A (2004) Crystal clear: a human-powered methodology for small teams. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • DSDM Consortium (2012) The DSDM agile project framework pocketbook. DSDM Consortium

  • DSDM Consortium (2015) The DSDM UX pocketbook. DSDM Consortium

  • Dingsøyr T, Dyba T, Abrahamsson P (2008) A preliminary roadmap for empirical research on agile software development. Agile 2008. IEEE Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Dingsøyr T, Nerur S, Balijepally V, Moe NB (2012) A decade of agile methodologies: towards explaining agile software development. J Syst Softw 85:1213–1221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dittrich Y, Rönkkö K, Eriksson J, Hansson C Lindeberg, Olle L (2007) Cooperative method development. Empir Softw Eng 13(3):231–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyle M, Williams L, Conh M, Rubin K (2014) Agile Software development in practice. In: Cantone G, Marchesi M (eds) XP, Springer, Switzerland, p 32–45, http://collaboration.csc.ncsu.edu/laurie/Papers/xp2014_submission_51.pdf. Accessed 13 Oct 2014

  • Dybå T, Dingsøyr T (2008) Empirical studies of agile software development: a systematic review. Inf Softw Technol 50:833–859

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson J, Lyytinen K, Siau K (2005) Agile modeling, agile software development, and extreme programming: the state of research. J Database Manag 16(4):88–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons M, Limoges C, Nowotony H, Schwartzman S, Scott P, Trow M (1994) The new production of know-ledge: the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. Sage Publications, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray D, Illes P, Watson S (2011) Spanning the HRD academic practitioner divide—bridging the gap through mode 2 Research. J Eur Ind Train 35(3):247–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gregory P, Plonka L, Sharp H, Taylor KJ (2014) Bridging the gap between research and practice: the Agile Research Network. In: Proceedings of European conference on research methodology (ECRM), June, London

  • Hanly S, Waite L, Meadows L, Leaton R (2006) Agile coaching in British telecom: making strawberry jam. In: Proceedings of agile 2006 conference

  • Hartley J, Benington J (2006) Copy and paste, or graft and transplant? Knowledge sharing through inter-organizational networks. Public Money Manag 26(2):101–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Highsmith J (2002) Agile software development ecosystems. Addison Wesley Professional, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Huff AS, Huff JO (2001) Re-focusing the business school agenda. Br J Manag 12:S49–S54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kieser A, Leiner L (2012) Collaborate with practitioners: but beaware of collaborative research. J Manag Inq 21:14–28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laanti M, Salo O, Abrahamsson P (2011) Agile methods rapidly replacing traditional methods at Nokia: a survey of opinions on agile transformation. Inf Softw Technol 53(3):276–290. http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0950584910002119. Accessed 11 June 2014

  • Lagerberg L, Tor S, Emanuelsson P, Sandahl K, Sthahl D (2013) The impact of agile principles and practices on large-scale software development projects: a multiple-case study of two projects at Ericsson. 2013 ACM/IEEE International Symposium on Empirical Software Engineering and Measurement, p 348–356. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6681378. Accessed 27 May 2014

  • Lamprecht SJ, van Rooyen G-J (2012) Models for technology research collaboration between industry and academia in South Africa. In: Proceedings of the 2012 software engineering colloquium

  • Lockett N, Kerr R, Robinson S (2008) Multiple perspectives on the challenges for knowledge transfer between higher education insititutions and industry. Int Small Bus J 26:661–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MacLean D, MacIntosh R, Grant S (2002) Mode 2 management research. Br J Manag 13:189–207

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin A (2009) The role of customers in extreme programming projects, PhD thesis at Victoria University of Wellington

  • Mendes E, Al-Fakhri LB, Luxton-Reilly A (2004) Investigating pair-programming in a 2nd-year software development and design computer science course. ACM SIGCSE Bull 37(3):296–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy B, Bird C, Nagappan N, Zimmermann T, Williams L, Begel A (2013) Have Agile techniques been the silver bullet for software development at Microsoft? In: 2013 ACM/IEEE international symposium on empirical software engineering and measurement, p 75–84. http://ieeexplore.ieee.org/lpdocs/epic03/wrapper.htm?arnumber=6681340. Accessed 8 June 2014

  • Parker LE (1992) Industry–University collaboration in developed and developing countries, the World Bank, september

  • Perkmann M, Walsh K (2010) The two faces of collaboration: impacts of university industry relations on public research, industrial and corporate change 2009

  • Pertuze J, Calder E, Greitzer E, Lucas W (2010) Best practices for industry-university collaboration. MITS Loan Manag Rev 51(4):83–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Plonka L, Sharp H, Barroca L, Salah D, Gregory P, Taylor KJ (2014) Agile projects in a non-agile environment. http://agileresearchnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/07/Nonagile_environment_WhitePaper.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  • Plonka L, Sharp H, van der Linden J, Dittrich Y (2015) Knowledge transfer in pair programming: an in-depth analysis. Int J Human-Comput Stud 73. doi:10.1016/j.ijhcs.2014.09.001

  • Rieger C (2008) Models for academic/industry partnerships. A presentation made at the center for research on information technology and organisations, University of California at Irvine, 13 Feb 2008

  • Rosemann M, Vessey I (2008) Toward improving the relevance of information systems research to practice: the role of applicability checks. MIS Q 32(1):1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Santos V, Goldman A, DeSouza C, Sharp H (2013) A pattern language for inter-team knowledge sharing in agile software development. In: PLoP 2013

  • Schwaber K (2004) Agile software development with scrum. Microsoft Press, Redmond

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Shani A, Coghlan D (2014) Collaborate with practitioners: an alternative perspective a rejoinder to Kieser and Leiner (2012). J Manag Inq 23:433–437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp H, Robinson H (2004) An ethnographic study of XP practices. Empir Softw Eng 9(4):353–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharp H, Plonka L, Gregory P, Taylor KJ (2014a) Integrating UX design into a DSDM project: challenges, work practices and lessons learned. http://agileresearchnetwork.org/wp-content/uploads/2013/11/DSDM_UX_White_Paper-update-151113.pdf. Accessed 10 Oct 2014

  • Sharp H, Plonka L, Taylor KJ, Gregory AJ (2014b) Overcoming challenges in collaboration between research and practice: the Agile Research Network in proceedings of software engineering research and industrial practices (SER & IP), a workshop co-located at ICSE 2014, Hyderabad, 1 June 2014

  • Svejvig P, Fladkjær Nielsen A (2010) The Dilemma of High Level Planning in Distributed Agile Software Projects: An Action Research Study in a Danish Bank. In: Šmite D, Moe NB, Ågerfalk PJ (eds) Agility across time and space. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Waardenburg G, van Vliet H (2013) When agile meets the enterprise. Inf Softw Technol 55(12):2154–2171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vardiman P, Mhlanga F (2010) Conceptual models of collaborative partnerships and the infusion of knowledge workers in the local IT sector. In: Conference of information systems applied research, Nashville Tennessee, USA

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank our collaborators and the Dynamic Systems Development Method (DSDM) consortium.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Open University, Milton Keynes, Hertfordshire, MK7 6AA, UK

    Leonor Barroca, Helen Sharp & Dina Salah

  2. University of Central Lancashire, Preston, Lancashire, PR1 2HE, UK

    Katie Taylor & Peggy Gregory

Authors
  1. Leonor Barroca
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Helen Sharp
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Dina Salah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Katie Taylor
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Peggy Gregory
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonor Barroca.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Barroca, L., Sharp, H., Salah, D. et al. Bridging the gap between research and agile practice: an evolutionary model. Int J Syst Assur Eng Manag 9, 323–334 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0355-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-015-0355-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation