Journal of Cancer Education

, 26:420

First online:

The International Core Literature Consensus (ICLC): an Alternative Curriculum for Oncologists

  • Shilpen PatelAffiliated withUniversity of Washington Email author 
  • , Reshma JagsiAffiliated withUniversity of Michigan
  • , Natalie CookAffiliated withAddenbrooke’s Hospital
  • , Luke Hughes-DaviesAffiliated withAddenbrooke’s Hospital
  • , Christine ParkinsonAffiliated withAddenbrooke’s Hospital

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


Oncologists must familiarize themselves with a complex evidence base. Several curricula have been devised, but it is not clear how these are used. We chose breast cancer, since this has a large literature base. Of the 285 radiation and medical oncology trainees in the USA and UK responding to our survey, over 90% reported knowledge of the literature was essential. Just over half of respondents had actually read the ASCO or ESMO curricula, with only 23% reporting that the curricula were important in their learning. Our survey revealed dissatisfaction with current curricula and a demand for more pragmatic literature guidance. We designed an alternative curriculum by using a 21-member peer review group to validate a list of key papers in breast oncology. Oncologists in training need guidance to direct their study. A curriculum based on an International Core Literature Consensus might match the needs of trainees more closely.


Breast cancer Evidence base Curriculum