Interactive Fiat Objects
- Juan C. González
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The initial stage for the discussion is the distinction between bona fide and fiat objects drawn by Barry Smith and collaborators in the context of formal ontology. This paper aims at both producing a rationale for introducing a hitherto unrecognized kind of object—here called ‘Interactive Fiat Objects’ (IFOs)—into the ontology of objects, and casting light on the relationship between embodied cognition and interactive ontology with the aid of the concepts of affordance and ad hoc category. I conclude that IFOs are similar to fiat objects, affordances and ad hoc categories in a number of ways, yet they differ from these in important respects. Interaction is key to understanding the existence and peculiarities of IFOs. By adopting an embodied perspective on cognition, we can enrich our ontological typologies and highlight relevant features of our physical and symbolic environment that are otherwise overlooked. This should improve our understanding of object ontology and persuade us to include IFOs in our metaphysical inventories.
- Barsalou, L.W. 1983. Ad hoc categories. Memory & Cognition 11: 211–227. CrossRef
- Barsalou, L.W. 1987. The instability of graded structure in concepts. In Concepts and conceptual development: Ecological and intellectual factors in categorization, ed. U. Neisser, 101–140. New York: Cambridge University Press.
- Barsalou, L.W. 1991. Deriving categories to achieve goals. In The psychology of learning and motivation: Advances in research and theory, vol. 27, ed. G.H. Bower, 1–64. New York: Academic.
- Barsalou, L.W. 2009. Simulation, situated conceptualization, and prediction. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society 364: 1281–1289
- Bittner, Th, and B. Smith. 2003. A theory of granular partitions. In Foundations of geographic information science, ed. Matthew Duckham, Michael F. Goodchild, and Michael F. Worboys, 117–151. London: Taylor & Francis. CrossRef
- Chemero, A. 2003. An outline of a theory of affordances. Ecological Psychology 15(2): 181–195. CrossRef
- Clark, A. 1997. Being there: Putting brain body and world together again. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Clark, A. 1999. Embodied, situated, and distributed cognition. In A companion to cognitive science, ed. W. Betchel and G. Graham. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.
- Coventry, K.R., and S. Garrod. 2004. Saying, seeing and acting: The psychological semantics of spatial prepositions. Hove: Psychology Press.
- Gibson, J.J. 1979. The ecological approach to visual perception. Hillsdale: LEA.
- Gibson, E.J. 2000. Where is the information for affordances? Ecological Psychology 12(1): 53–56. CrossRef
- Hutchins, E. 1995. Cognition in the wild. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Noë, A. 2005. Action in perception. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Pylyshyn, Z. 1986. Computation and cognition: Toward a foundation for cognitive science. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Smith, B. 1999a. Truth and the visual field. In Naturalizing phenomenology, ed. J. Petitot et al. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Smith, B. 1999b. Agglomerations. In Spatial information theory. Cognitive and computational foundations of geographic information science (Springer Lecture Notes in Computer Science 1661), eds. C Freksa, and David M. Mark, 267–282.
- Smith, B. 2001. Fiat objects. Topoi 20(2): 131–148. CrossRef
- Smith, B., and D. Mark. 2003. Do mountains exist? Towards an ontology of landforms. Environment & Planning B (Planning and Design). 30(3): 411–427. CrossRef
- Smith, B., and A. Varzi. 2000. Fiat and bona fide boundaries. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 60: 401–420. CrossRef
- Thelen, E., G. Schoner, C. Scheier, and L.B. Smith. 2001. The dynamics of embodiment: A field theory of infant perservative reaching. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 24: 1–86. CrossRef
- Turvey, M.T. 1992. Affordances and prospective control: an outline of the ontology. Ecological Psychology 4(3): 173–187. CrossRef
- Varela, F., E. Thompson, and E. Rosch. 1991. The embodied mind. Cambridge: MIT Press.
- Wilson, M. 2002. Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 9(4): 625–636
- Xu, F. 1997. From lot’s wife to a pillar of salt: Evidence that Physical Object is a sortal concept. Mind and Language 12(3/4): 365–392. CrossRef
- Zhang, J, and Patel, V. 2006. Distributed cognition, representation, and affordance. In: Harnad, Stevan, and Itiel E. Dror (Eds), Distributed Cognition: Special issue of Pragmatics & Cognition 14:2.
- Interactive Fiat Objects
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Volume 4, Issue 2 , pp 205-217
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Juan C. González (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Filosofía y Ciencias Cognitivas, Facultad de Humanidades, Universidad Autónoma del Estado de Morelos, Av. Universidad 1001, Col. Chamilpa, Cuernavaca, CP 62210, Mexico