Date: 24 Sep 2011
A Cognitive Theory of Empty Names
- Eduardo García-Ramírez
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Ordinary use of empty names encompasses a variety of different phenomena, including issues in semantics, mental content, fiction, pretense, and linguistic practice. In this paper I offer a novel account of empty names, the cognitive theory, and show how it offers a satisfactory account of the phenomena. The virtues of this theory are based on its strength and parsimony. It allows for a fully homogeneous semantic treatment of names coped with ontological frugality and empirical and psychological adequacy.
The author would like to thank Marilyn Shatz, Kirareset Barrera, Ángeles Eraña, Axel Barceló, Claudia Lorena García, and two anonymous referees of this journal for substantially improving this paper with their comments. Thanks also to Agustín Rayo, Ricardo Mena, Raúl Saucedo and the attendants at the 2nd meeting of the AAMPh at CUNY, the associate students at my empty names seminar, as well as to the members of the Thursdays’ Seminar at the Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, UNAM. The author was supported by the research projects: CONACYT-083004, PAPIIT-IN401611, and PAPIIT-IN401411.
Adams, F., and R. Stecker. 1994. Vacuous singular terms. Mind & Language 9(4): 387–401.CrossRef
Anscombe 1957, G.E.M., Intention. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
Baron-Cohen, S., A.M. Leslie, and U. Frith. 1985. Does the autistic child have a “theory of mind”? Cognition 21: 37–46.CrossRef
Bosco, F.M., O. Friedman, and A.M. Leslie. 2006. Recognition of pretend and real actions in play by 1- and 2-year-olds: Early success and why they fail. Cognitive Development 21: 3–10.CrossRef
Braun, D. 2005. Empty names, fictional names, mythical names. Nous 39(4): 596–631.CrossRef
Brentano, F. 1874. Psychology from an empirical standpoint. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
Brock, S. 2004. The ubiquitous problem of empty names. Journal of Philosophy 101(6): 277–298.
Byrne, A. 2009. Experience and content. The Philosophical Quarterly 59(236): 429–451.CrossRef
Clapp, L. 2008. The problem of negative existentials doesn’t exist. Journal of Pragmatics 41: 1422–1434.CrossRef
Clapp, L., 2010. Is even thought compositional? Philosophical Studies, (online, October 2010).
Everett, A. 2000. Referentialism and empty names. In Empty names, fiction, and the puzzles of non-existence, eds. A. Everett, and T. Hofweber. CSLI: University of Chicago Press.
Fodor, J.A. 2001. Language, thought and compositionality. Mind & Language 16: 1–15.CrossRef
Fodor, J.A. 2008. LOT2 the language of thought revisited. Oxford: Clarendon.
Friedman, O., and A.M. Leslie. 2007. The conceptual underpinnings of pretense: Pretending is not ‘behaving as if’. Cognition 105: 103–124.CrossRef
Friend, S. 2009. The great beetle debate: A study in imagining with names. Philosophical Studies. Published online.
Garcia-Ramirez, E., and M. Shatz. 2011. On problems with descriptivism: Psychological assumptions and empirical evidence. Mind & Language 26(1): 53–77.CrossRef
Gómez, J.C. 2008. The evolution of pretence: From intentional availability to intentional non-existence. Mind & Language 23(5): 586–606.CrossRef
Heim, I. 1982. The semantics of definite and indefinite noun phrases. Ph.D. Thesis. Amherst: University of Massachussetts.
Humberstone, I.L. 1992. Direction of fit. Mind 101(401): 59–83.CrossRef
Jacob, P. 2003. Intentionality. In E. Zalta (ed.) Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy available online: http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/intentionality/.
Kriegel, U. 2007. Intentional inexistence and phenomenal intentionality. Philosophical Perspectives, 21, Philosophy of Mind 307–40.
Leslie, A.M. 1987. Pretense and representation: The origins of “theory of mind”. Psychological Review 94: 412–426.CrossRef
Leslie, A.M. 1994. Pretending and believing: Issues in the theory of ToMM. Cognition 50: 211–238.CrossRef
Leslie, A.M. 2002. Pretense and representation revisited. In Representation, memory and development: Essays in honor of Jean Mandler, ed. N.L. Stein, P.J. Bauer, and M. Rabinowitz. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Leslie, S.J. 2008. Generics: Cognition and acquisition. Philosophical Review 117(1): 1–47.CrossRef
Lillard, A.S. 1993. Pretend play skills and the child’s theory of mind. Child Development 64: 348–371.CrossRef
Lillard, A.S. 2001. Pretend play as twin earth: A social-cognitive analysis. Developmental Review 21: 495–531.CrossRef
Nichols, S., and S. Stich. 2000. A cognitive theory of pretense. Cognition 74: 115–147.CrossRef
Nichols, S., and S. Stich. 2003. Mindreading: An integrated account of pretense, self-awareness and understanding other minds. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Perner, J., B. Rendl, and A. Garnham. 2007. Objects of desire, thought, and reality: Problems of anchoring discourse referents in development. Mind & Language 22(5): 475–513.CrossRef
Perry, J. 2001. Reference and reflexivity. CSLI Publications.
Platts, M. 1979. Ways of meaning. London: Routledge and Keagan Paul.
Reimer, M. 2001a. The problem of empty names. Australasian Journal of Philosophy 79(4): 491–506.
Reimer, M. 2001b. A “Meinongian” solution to a Millian problem. American Philosophical Quarterly 38(3): 233–248.
Roberts, C. 1998. Information structure in discourse: Towards an integrated formal theory of pragmatics. Ohio State University: typescript.
Roberts, C. 2004. Context in dynamic interpretation. In The handbook of pragmatics, ed. L.R. Horn and G. Ward. Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
Russell, B. 1905. On denoting. Mind 14(56): 479–493.CrossRef
Sainsbury, M. 2005. Reference without referents. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sainsbury, M. 2010. Fiction and fictionalism. London: Routledge.
Salmon, N. 1998. Nonexistence. Nous 32(3): 277–319.CrossRef
Shatz, M. 1994. A Toddler’s life. New York: Oxford University Press.
Soames, S. 2002. Beyond rigidity. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Stalnaker, R. 1978. Assertion. In Stalnaker, R. 1999: Context and content. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Taylor, K. 2000. Empty names without compromise. In Empty names, fiction, and the puzzles of non-existence, eds. A. Everett, and T. Hofweber. CSLI Publications: University of Chicago Press.
Thomasson, A.L. 2003. Speaking of fictional characters. Dialectica 57(2): 207–226.CrossRef
Velleman, D.J. 1992. The guise of the good. Nous 26(1): 3–26.CrossRef
Walton, K. 1990. Mimesis as make-believe. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Walton, K. 2000. Existence as metaphor? In Empty names, fiction, and the puzzles of non-existence, eds. A. Everett, and T. Hofweber. CSLI Publications: University of Chicago Press.
Walton, K. 2003. Restricted quantification, negative existentials, and fiction. Dialectica 57(2): 239–242.CrossRef
Yablo, S. 2000. A paradox of existence. In Empty names, fiction, and the puzzles of nonexistence, eds. A. Everett, and T. Hofweber. CSLI Publications.
- A Cognitive Theory of Empty Names
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Volume 2, Issue 4 , pp 785-807
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Instituto de Investigaciones Filosóficas, Ciudad Universitaria, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cto. Mario de la Cueva S/N, Cd. Inv. en Humanidades, Coyoacán, C.P. 04510, México, DF, México