, Volume 2, Issue 3, pp 519-540
Date: 06 Aug 2011

The Direct-Perception Model of Empathy: a Critique

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access

Abstract

This paper assesses the so-called “direct-perception” model of empathy. This model draws much of its inspiration from the Phenomenological tradition: it is offered as an account free from the assumption that most, if not all, of another’s psychological states and experiences are unobservable and that one’s understanding of another’s psychological states and experiences are based on inferential processes. Advocates of this model also reject the simulation-based approach to empathy. I first argue that most of their criticisms miss their target because they are directed against the simulation-based approach to mindreading. Advocates of this model further subscribe to an expressivist conception of human behavior and assume that some of an individual’s psychological states (e.g. her goals and emotions, not her beliefs) can be directly perceived in the individual’s expressive behavior. I argue that advocates of the direct-perception model face the following dilemma: either they embrace behaviorism or else they must recognize that one could not understand another’s goal or emotion from her behavior alone without making contextual assumptions. Finally, advocates of the direct-perception model endorse the narrative competency hypothesis, according to which the ability to ascribe beliefs to another is grounded in the ability to understand narratives. I argue that this hypothesis is hard to reconcile with recent results in developmental psychology showing that preverbal human infants seem able to ascribe false beliefs to others.

I am grateful to Gyury Gergely for inviting me to the International Conference on Intersubjectivity and the Self, Marie Curie DISCOS Project, in Budapest (June 2010), where a version of this paper was presented. I am grateful to Shaun Gallagher and Dan Zahavi for their oral and written responses to the paper and to Dan Hutto for inviting me to contribute a paper to the present special issue of RPP and for his own comments on the paper. Thanks also to Frédérique de Vignemont for numerous discussions on this topic. I gratefully acknowledge support of a grant from the French ministry of research (ANR-BLAN SOCODEV). I dedicate this paper to the memory of my friend Marc Jeannerod, who died on July 1st, 2011.