Stag Hunts and Committee Work: Cooperation and the Mutualistic Paradigm
- Jay R. Elliott
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Contemporary philosophers and psychologists seek the roots of ethically sound forms of behavior, including altruism and a sense of fairness, in the basic structure of cooperative action. I argue that recent work on cooperation in both philosophy and psychology has been hampered by what I call “the mutualistic paradigm.” The mutualistic paradigm treats one kind of cooperative situation—what I call a “mutualistic situation”—as paradigmatic of cooperation in general. In mutualistic situations, such as the primeval stag hunt described by Brian Skyrms, every partner in a cooperative action has to do his part in order for the action as a whole to succeed. But many familiar cooperative situations—for example, serving on an academic committee—do not have this structure. Contemporary philosophers and psychologists are right that thinking about cooperation can shed light on how and why ethically sound behavior happens in human beings. But the deep connections between ethics and cooperation only come into view once we have a richer conception of our capacities for cooperation than the mutualistic paradigm provides.
- Bratman, Michael. 1999a. Shared intention. In Faces of intention: selected essays on intention and agency, 109–129. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Bratman, Michael. 1999b. I intend that we J. In faces of intention: Selected essays on intention and agency, 142–161. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
- Gilbert, Margaret. 2000. What is it for us to intend?. In Sociality and responsibility: New essays in plural subject theory, 14–36. Lanham, Md.: Rowman and Littlefield
- Rawls, J. 1999. Two concepts of rules. In John Rawls: Collected papers, ed. S. Freeman, 20–46. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Skyrms, B. 2004. The stag hunt and the evolution of social structure. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Thompson, M. 2008. Life and action: Elementary structures of practice and practical thought. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Tomasello, M., C. Dweck, J. Silk, B. Skyrms, and E. Spelke. 2009. Why we cooperate. Cambridge: MIT.
- Velleman, David. 1999. How to share an intention. In The possibility of practical reason, 200–220. Oxford: Oxford University Press
- Warneken, F., and M. Tomasello. 2006. Altruistic helping in young infants and chimpanzees. Science 311: 1301–1303. CrossRef
- Warneken, F., and M. Tomasello. 2007. Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy 11(3): 271–294. CrossRef
- Warneken, F., F. Chen, and M. Tomasello. 2006. Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. Child Development 77(3): 640–663. CrossRef
- Stag Hunts and Committee Work: Cooperation and the Mutualistic Paradigm
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Volume 2, Issue 2 , pp 245-260
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Jay R. Elliott (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Whitney Humanities Center, Yale University, 53 Wall Street, New Haven, CT, 06511, USA