Framing Joint Action
- Elisabeth Pacherie
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Many philosophers have offered accounts of shared actions aimed at capturing what makes joint actions intentionally joint. I first discuss two leading accounts of shared intentions, proposed by Michael Bratman and Margaret Gilbert. I argue that Gilbert’s account imposes more normativity on shared intentions than is strictly needed and that Bratman’s account requires too much cognitive sophistication on the part of agents. I then turn to the team-agency theory developed by economists that I see as offering an alternative route to shared intention. I concentrate on Michael Bacharach’s version of team-agency theory, according to which shared agency is a matter of team-reasoning, team-reasoning depends on group identification and group identification is the result of processes of self-framing. I argue that it can yield an account of shared intention that is less normatively loaded and less cognitively demanding.
- Astington, J. 1991. Intention in the child’s theory of mind. In Children’s theories of mind: Mental states and social understanding, ed. D. Frye and C. Moore. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Astington, J. 1994. The child’s discovery of the mind. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
- Bacharach, M. 2006. Beyond individual choice, ed. N. Gold and R. Sugden. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
- Bardsley, N. 2007. On collective intentions: Collective action in economics and philosophy. Synthese 157: 141–159. CrossRef
- Baron-Cohen, S. 1993. From attention-goal psychology to belief-desire psychology. In Understanding other minds: Perspectives from autism, ed. S. Baron-Cohen, H. Tager-Flusberg, and D.J. Cohen, 59–82. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Bartsch, K., and H.M. Wellman. 1995. Children talk about the mind. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Bratman, M.E. 1992. Shared cooperative activity. The Philosophical Review 101(2): 327–341. CrossRef
- Bratman, M.E. 2009a. Shared agency. In Philosophy of the social sciences: Philosophical theory and scientific practice, ed. C. Mantzavinos, 41–59. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bratman, M.E. 2009b. Modest sociality and the distinctiveness of intention. Philosophical Studies 144: 149–165. CrossRef
- Brewer, M., and R.M. Gardner. 1996. Who is this “we”? Levels of collective identity and self-representations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 50(3): 543–549. CrossRef
- Butterfill, S. 2010. Joint action without shared intention. Manuscript.
- Colman, A., B. Pulford, and J. Rose. 2008. Collective rationality in interactive decisions: Evidence for team reasoning. Acta Psychologica 128: 387–397. CrossRef
- Csibra, G. 2008. Goal attribution to inanimate agents by 6.5-month-old infants. Cognition 107(2): 705–717. CrossRef
- Davidson, D. 1980. Essays on actions and events. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Gergely, G., Z. Nadasky, G. Csibra, and S. Biro. 1995. Taking the intentional stance at 12 months of age. Cognition 56: 165–193. CrossRef
- Gilbert, M. 1997. What is it for us to intend? In Contemporary action theory, vol. 2, ed. G. Holmstrom-Hintikka and R. Tuomela, 65–85. Dordrecht: Springer.
- Gilbert, M. 2007. Searle and collective intentions. In Intentional acts and institutional facts, ed. S. Tsohatzidis, 31–48. Dordrecht: Springer. CrossRef
- Gilbert, M. 2009. Shared intention and personal intentions. Philosophical Studies 144: 167–187. CrossRef
- Gold, N., and R. Sugden. 2007. Collective intentions and team agency. Journal of Philosophy 104(3): 109–137.
- Gold, N., and R. Sugden. 2008. Theories of team agency. In Rationality and commitment, ed. F. Peter and S. Schmidt. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Hakli, R., K. Miller, and R. Tuomela. 2010. Two kinds of we-reasoning. Economics and Philosophy 26: 291–320. CrossRef
- Ostrom, E. 1990. Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Ostrom, E., J. Walker, and R. Gardner. 1992. Covenants with and without a sword: Self-governance is possible. American Political Science Review 86: 404–417. CrossRef
- Pacherie, E., and J. Dokic. 2006. From mirror neurons to joint actions. Journal of Cognitive Systems Research 7: 101–112. CrossRef
- Perner, J. 1991. On representing that: The asymmetry between belief and desire in children’s theory of mind. In Children’s theories of mind: Mental states and social understanding, ed. D. Frye and C. Moore. Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
- Rakoczy, H. 2006. Pretend play and the development of collective intentionality. Cognitive Systems Research 7: 113–127. CrossRef
- Rakoczy, H. 2007. Play, games, and the development of collective intentionality. In Conventionality in cognitive development: How children acquire representations in language, thought and action. New directions in child and adolescent development. No. 115, ed. C. Kalish and M. Sabbagh, 53–67. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
- Sally, D. 1995. Conversation and cooperation in social dilemmas: A meta-analysis of experiments from 1958 to 1992. Rationality and Society 7: 58–92. CrossRef
- Searle, J. 1990. Collective intentions and actions. In Intentions in communication, ed. P. Cohen, J. Morgan, and M.E. Pollack, 401–416. Cambridge: Bradford Books, MIT Press.
- Sebanz, N., and G. Knoblich. 2009. Prediction in joint action: What, when, and where. Topics in Cognitive Science 1: 353–367. CrossRef
- Sebanz, N., H. Bekkering, and G. Knoblich. 2006. Joint action: Bodies and minds moving together. Trends in Cognitive Science 10: 70–76. CrossRef
- Sugden, R. 1993. Thinking as a team: Toward an explanation of nonselfish behavior. Social Philosophy and Policy 10: 69–89. CrossRef
- Sugden, R. 2003. The logic of team reasoning. Philosophical Explorations 6: 165–181. CrossRef
- Tollefsen, D. 2005. Let’s pretend! Children and joint action. Philosophy of the Social Sciences 35(1): 75–97. CrossRef
- Tomasello, M., and M. Carpenter. 2007. Shared intentionality. Developmental Science 10: 121–125. CrossRef
- Tomasello, M., and H. Rakoczy. 2003. What makes human cognition unique? From individual to shared to collective intentionality. Mind and Language 18(2): 121–147. CrossRef
- Tomasello, M., M. Carpenter, J. Call, T. Behne, and H. Moll. 2005. Understanding and sharing intentions: The origins of cultural cognition. The Behavioral and Brain Sciences 28: 675–691.
- Tuomela, R. 2005. We-intentions revisited. Philosophical Studies 125: 327–369. CrossRef
- Tuomela, R. 2006. Joint intention, the We-mode and the I-mode. Midwest Studies in Philosophy XXX: 35–58. CrossRef
- Tuomela, R. 2007. The philosophy of sociality: The shared point of view. New York: Oxford University Press.
- Tuomela, R., and K. Miller. 1988. We-intentions. Philosophical Studies 53: 367–389. CrossRef
- Warneken, F., and M. Tomasello. 2007. Helping and cooperation at 14 months of age. Infancy 11: 271–294. CrossRef
- Warneken, F., F. Chen, and M. Tomasello. 2006. Cooperative activities in young children and chimpanzees. Child Development 77(3): 640–663. CrossRef
- Woodward, A.L. 1998. Infants selectively encode the goal object of an actor’s reach. Cognition 69: 1–34. CrossRef
- Woodward, A.L., and J.A. Sommerville. 2000. Twelve-month-old infants interpret action in context. Psychological Science 11(1): 73–77. CrossRef
- Framing Joint Action
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Volume 2, Issue 2 , pp 173-192
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Institut Jean-Nicod, UMR CNRS 8129 (ENS, EHESS), Ecole Normale Supérieure, 29 rue d’Ulm, 75005, Paris, France