Similarity and Induction
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
We advance a theory of inductive reasoning based on similarity, and test it on arguments involving mammal categories. To measure similarity, we quantified the overlap of neural activation in left Brodmann area 19 and the left ventral temporal cortex in response to pictures of different categories; the choice of of these regions is motivated by previous literature. The theory was tested against probability judgments for 40 arguments generated from 9 mammal categories and a common predicate. The results are interpreted in the context of Hume’s thesis relating similarity to inductive inference.
- Aguilar, C.M., and D.L. Medin. 1999. Asymmetries of comparison. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review 6: 328–337.
- Blok, S., D. Medin, and D. Osherson. 2007. From similarity to chance. In Inductive reasoning: experimental, developmental, and computational approaches, eds. Evan Heit and Aidan Feeney. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
- Bonini, N., K. Tentori, and D. Osherson. 2004. A different conjunction fallacy. Mind and Language 19(2): 199–210. CrossRef
- Capitani, E., M. Laiacona, B. Mahon, and A. Caramazza. 2003. What are the facts of semantic category-specific deficits? A critical review of the evidence. Cognitive Neuropsychology 20: 213–261. CrossRef
- Caramazza, A. 2000. The organization of conceptual knowledge in the brain. In The new cognitive neurosciences, ed. M.S. Gazzaniga, 1037–1046. Cambridge: MIT.
- Chao, L.L., J.V. Haxby, and A. Martin. 1999. Attribute-based neural substrates in temporal cortex for perceiving and knowing about objects. Nature Neuroscience 2: 913–919. CrossRef
- Cohen, L.J. 1980. Some historical remarks on the Baconian conception of probability. Journal of the History of Ideas 41(2): 219–231. CrossRef
- Cox, R.W. 1996. AFNI: Software for analysis and visualization of functional magnetic resonance neuroimages. Computers and Biomedical Research 29: 162–73. CrossRef
- Freedman, D.J., M. Riesenhuber, T. Poggio, and E.K. Miller. 2001. Categorical representation of visual stimuli in the primate prefrontal cortex. Science 291: 312–316. CrossRef
- Gainotti, G. 2000. What the locus of brain lesion tells us about the nature of the cognitive defect underlying category-specific disorders: A review. Cortex 36: 539–559. CrossRef
- Gerlach, C. 2007. A review of functional imaging studies on category specificity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 19(2): 296–314. CrossRef
- Gerlach, C., I. Law, and O.B. Paulson. 2002. When action turns into words. Activation of motor-based knowledge during categorization of manipulable objects. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 14(8): 1230–1239. CrossRef
- Hume, David. 2006 An enquiry concerning human understanding. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
- Joseph, J.E. 2001. Functional neuroimaging studies of category specificity in object recognition: A critical review and meta-analysis. Cognitive, Affective, and Behavioral Neuroscience 1: 119–136. CrossRef
- Kounios, J., P. Koenig, G. Glosser, C. DeVita, K. Dennis, P. Moore, and M. Grossman. 2003. Category-specific medial temporal lobe activation and the consolidation of semantic memory: evidence from fMRI. Cognitive Brain Research 17: 484–494. CrossRef
- Locke, John. 1689. An essay concerning human understanding. London: William Tegg.
- Martin, A. 2001. Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition, eds. R. Cabeza and A. Kingstone, 153–186. Cambridge: MIT.
- Martin, A. 2007. The representation of object concepts in the brain. Annual Review of Psychology 58: 25–45. CrossRef
- Martin, A., C.L. Wiggs, L.G. Ungerleider, and J.V. Haxby. 1996. Neural correlates of category specific behavior. Nature 379: 649–652. CrossRef
- Neapolitan, R. 1990. Probabilistic reasoning in expert systems: Theory and algorithms. New York: Wiley.
- Perani, D., T. Schnur, T. Tettamanti, M. Gorno-Tempini, S.F. Cappa, and F. Fazio. 1999. Word and print matching: A PET study of semantic category effects. Neuropsychologia 37: 293–306. CrossRef
- Saffran, E.M. and M.F. Schwartz. 1994. Of cabbages and things: Semantic memory from a neuropsychological perspective—a tutorial review. In Attention and performance, eds. C. Umilta and M. Moscovitch, vol XV, 507–536. Hove and London: Churchill Livingstone.
- Tentori, K., N. Bonini, and D. Osherson. 2004. The conjunction fallacy: a misunderstanding about conjunction? Cognitive Science 28: 467–477. CrossRef
- Thompson-Schill, S., I.P. Kan, and R.T. Oliver. 2006. Functional neuroimaging of semantic memory. In Handbook of functional neuroimaging of cognition, 2nd edn, 149–190. Cambridge: MIT.
- Tversky, A. 1977. Features of similarity. Psychological Review 84: 327–352. CrossRef
- Warrington, E.K., and T. Shallice. 1984. Category specific semantic impairments. Brain 107: 829–854. CrossRef
- Weber, M., S.L. Thompson-Schill, D. Osherson, J. Haxby, and L. Parsons. 2009. Predicting judged similarity of mammals from their neural representations. Neuropsychologia 47: 859–868. CrossRef
- Webster, M.J., J. Bachevalier, and L.G. Ungerleider. 1994. Connections of inferior temporal areas TEO and TE with parietal and frontal cortex in macaque monkeys. Cerebral Cortex 4: 470–483. CrossRef
- Zoccolan, D., M. Kouh, T. Poggio, and J.J. DiCarlo. 2007. Trade-off between object selectivity and tolerance in monkey inferotemporal cortex. Journal of Neuroscience 27(45): 12292–12307. CrossRef
- Similarity and Induction
Review of Philosophy and Psychology
Volume 1, Issue 2 , pp 245-264
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links