Influence of a National Cancer Institute transdisciplinary research and training initiative on trainees' transdisciplinary research competencies and scholarly productivity
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Over the past several decades, there has been burgeoning interest and investment in large transdisciplinary (TD) team science initiatives that aim to address complex societal problems. Despite this trend, TD training opportunities in the health sciences remain limited, and evaluations of these opportunities are even more uncommon due to funding constraints. We had the unique opportunity to conduct an exploratory study to examine the potential outcomes and impacts of TD training in a National Cancer Institute-supported initiative for TD research and training—the Transdisciplinary Research on Energetics and Cancer I (TREC I) initiative. This study used a retrospective mixed-methods approach leveraging secondary analysis of existing data sources to learn about TREC trainees' experiences with TREC training, TD research competencies, changes in scholarly productivity, and the associations among these domains. Results indicated that, on average, TREC trainees were satisfied with their TREC mentoring experiences and believed that TREC training processes were effective, in general. Participation in TREC training was associated with TD research competencies, including TD research orientation, positive general attitude toward TD training, development of scientific skills for TD research, and intrapersonal/interpersonal competencies for collaboration. There was also a significant increase in trainees' scholarly productivity from before to after starting in TREC training, as indicated by average annual number of publications and presentations and average number of coauthors per publication. Perceived effectiveness of TREC training was positively correlated with change in average annual number of research presentations from before to after starting in TREC training (r = 0.65, p < 0.05, N = 12), as well as TD research orientation (r = 0.36, p < 0.05), general attitude toward TD training (0.39, p < 0.05), scientific skills for TD research (r = 0.45–0.48, p < 0.05), and perceived collaborative productivity at one's TREC center (r = 0.47, p < 0.01). Finally, a significant positive correlation was observed between multi-mentoring experiences and both TD research orientation (r = 0.58, p < 0.05) and perceived collaborative productivity at one's TREC center (r = 0.44, p < 0.05). This exploratory study had methodological constraints including the absence of a comparison group and cross-sectional rather than longitudinal data related to TD research competencies. Despite these limitations, the study provided an opportunity to use existing data sources to explore potential outcomes and impacts of TD training and inform development of future rigorous evaluations of TD training. Overall, findings suggest that TD training in the context of a TD research initiative can provide satisfying training opportunities that support the development of TD research competencies and promote scholarly productivity.
- American Association of Medical Colleges (October 7, 2011). Re: Request for information to the Work Force Working Group, NOT-OD-11-106. Accessed August 13, 2012, at: https://www.aamc.org/download/262432/data/aamcrequestforinformationtotheworkforceworkinggroup.pdf.
- Chang S, Hursting S, Perkins SN, Dores GM, Weed DL. Adapting postdoctoral training to interdisciplinary science in the 21st century: The Cancer Prevention Fellowship Program at the National Cancer Institute. Acad Med. 2005;8(3):261-265. CrossRef
- Derry, S, Fischer, G. (2005). Toward a model and theory for transdisciplinary graduate education. Paper presentation at the 2005 American Educational Research Association Meeting, Montreal, Canada, April 12, 2005.
- Emans SJ, Austin SB, Goodman E, Orr DP, Freeman R, Stoff D, Litt IF, Schuster MA, Haggerty R, Granger R, Irwin CE, and the participants of the W. T. Grant Foundation conference on Training Physician Scientists. Improving adolescent and young adult health: training the next generation of physician scientists in transdisciplinary research. J Adolesc Health. 2010;46:100-109. CrossRef
- Gebbie KM, Meier BM, Bakken S, Carrasquillo O, Formicola A, Aboelela SW, et al. Training for interdisciplinary health research: defining the required competencies. J Allied Health. 2008;37(2):65-70.
- Hall KL, Stokols D, Moser RP, Taylor BK, Thornquist M, Nebeling L, et al. The collaboration readiness of transdisciplinary research teams and centers: findings from the National Cancer Institute's TREC year-one evaluation study. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2S):S161-S172. CrossRef
- Hall, K.L., Vogel, A.L., Stipelman, B., Stokols, D., Morgan, G., & Gehlert, S. (2012). A four-phase model of transdisciplinary team-based research: goals, team processes, and strategies. Translational Behavioral Medicine. (In press).
- Hirsch Hadorn G, Hoffman-Riem H, Biber-Klemm S, Grossenbacher-Mansuy W, Joye D, Wiesmann U, Zemp E, eds. Handbook of transdisciplinary research. Dordrecht. London: Springer; 2008.
- Kahn RL, Prager DJ. Interdisciplinary collaborations are scientific and social imperative. Scientist. 1994;17:11-12.
- Klein JT. A taxonomy of interdisciplinarity. In: Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C, eds. Oxford handbook of interdisciplinarity. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2010:15-30.
- Lawrence R, Despres C. Introduction: futures of transdisciplinarity. Futures. 2004;36(4):397-405. CrossRef
- McGee R, DeLong MJ. Collaborative co-mentored dissertations spanning institutions: influences on student development. CBE-Life Sci Educ. 2007;6:119-131. CrossRef
- Milner RJ, Gusic ME, Thorndyke LE. Perspective: toward a competency framework for faculty. Acad Med. 2011;86:1204-1210. CrossRef
- Nash JM. Transdisciplinary training programs: key components and prerequisites for success. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2S):S133-S140. CrossRef
- Neuhauser L, Richardson D, Mackenzie S, Minkler M. Advancing transdisciplinary and translational research practice: issues and models of doctoral education in public health. J Res Pract. 2007;3:1-24.
- Pellegrini EK, Scandura TA. Construct equivalence across groups: an unexplored issue in mentoring research. Educ Psychol Meas. 2005;37:264-279.
- Pohl, C. & Hirsch Hadorn, G. (2007). Principles for designing transdisciplinary research. F. Oekolog: Munich, Germany.
- Rosenfield PL. The potential of transdisciplinary research for sustaining and extending linkages between the health and social sciences. Soc Sci Med. 1992;35:1343-1357. CrossRef
- Stokols, D. (1998). The future of interdisciplinarity in the School of Social Ecology. Paper presented at the Social Ecology Associates Annual Awards Reception, School of Social Ecology, University of California-Irvine, May 21, 1998. Retrieved June 5, 2012, from https://eee.uci.edu/98f/50990/Readings/stokols.html
- Stokols D, Hall KL, Moer RP, Feng A, Misra 5, Taylor BK. (2010) Cross-disciplinary team science initiatives: research, training and translation. In Frodeman R, Klein JT, Mitcham C. (Eds.), Oxford Handbook of lnterdiscipinariry (pp. 476-487). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
- Stokols D, Hall KL, Taylor B, Moser RP. The science of team science: overview of the field and introduction to the supplement. Am J Prev Med. 2008;35(2S):S77-S89. CrossRef
- Stokols, D., Hall, K.L., & Vogel, A.L. 2012. Transdisciplinary Public Health: Definitions, Core Characteristics, and Strategies for Success. In D. Haire-Joshu, &. McBride, T.D. (Eds.), Transdisciplinary public health: Research, methods, and practice. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass (in press).
- Sung NS, Gordon JI, Rose GD, Getzoff ED, Kron SJ, Mumford D, Onuchic JN, Scherer NF, Sumners D, Kopell NJ. Educating future scientists. Science. 2003;301:1485-1486. CrossRef
- Wickson F, Carew A, Russell A. Transdisciplinary research: characteristics, quandaries and quality. Futures. 2006;38(9):1046-1059. CrossRef
- Influence of a National Cancer Institute transdisciplinary research and training initiative on trainees' transdisciplinary research competencies and scholarly productivity
Translational Behavioral Medicine
Volume 2, Issue 4 , pp 459-468
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Clinical Research Directorate/CMRP, SAIC-Frederick, Inc., NCI-Frederick, Frederick, MD, 21702, USA
- 5. 6130 Executive Blvd., Room 4083B, Rockville, MD, 20850, USA
- 2. Feng Consulting, Livingston, NJ, USA
- 3. Division of Cancer Control and Population Sciences, National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, 20850, USA
- 4. School of Social Ecology, University of California-Irvine, Irvine, CA, 92697, USA