Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Public-Private Partnership Models for Science, Technology, and Innovation Cooperation

  • Published:
Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The paper looks at cooperation models for science, technology, and innovation with clear aims at delivering value and progress in these fields. Such cooperation models have been established in various forms in many countries. One special form of cooperation is the public-private partnership which also comes in many different forms. The article is based on the analysis of 20 public-private partnerships located in Austria, Australia, Belgium, Germany, Ireland, Japan, New Zealand, Sweden, and The Netherlands. Public-private partnerships for science, technology, and innovation have various institutional and organizational models. The common central issue of all different models is an interdisciplinary management committee consisting of both academic and industrial representatives which is responsible for the alignment of all partners’ interests. In addition, public-private partnerships need carefully developed strategies and well-thought-out contractual basis in line with respective stakeholder communication. Frequently, public-private partnerships are established by a small number of partners but extended at later development stages requiring a seamless and transparent partner selection procedure. Equally important is a sustainable financial agreement which allows mid-term and long-term work by the public-private partnerships. Moreover, in the course of globalization, the regulatory requirements for public-private partnerships in countries and regions are becoming increasingly important. Therefore, in addition to statutory regulations, human resources, scientific excellence, and infrastructure are important determinants for locations which aim at providing attractive framework conditions for public-private partnerships. Finally, it must be noted that two different research cultures meet in public-private partnerships: Synergies have to be found between basic academic research and applied industrial research, and they have to be used for mutual added value. Before establishing public-private partnerships formally, particular attention must be paid to so-called competing values. These must be regulated in a contract, and transparent control and sanction mechanisms must be introduced. In so doing, the mistrust associated with divergent interests (for example in relation to intellectual property rights) can be effectively prevented from the outset.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adams, J. D., & Jaffe, A. B. (1996). Bounding the effects of R&D: an investigation using matched establishment-firm data. RAND Journal of Economics, 27(4), 700–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Advisory Council for Science, Technology and Innovation Ireland/Forfàs (2007): promoting enterprise-higher education relationships

  • Asakawa, K., & Som, A. (2008). Internationalization of R&D in China and India: conventional wisdom versus reality. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 25, 375–394. doi:10.1007/s10490-007-9082-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Bozeman, B., Combs, K. L., Feldman, M., Link, A. N., Siegel, D. S., Stephan, P., Tassey, G., & Wessner, C. (2002a). The economics of science and technology. Journal of Technology Transfer, 27, 155–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audretsch, D. B., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2002b). Public/private technology partnerships: evaluating SBIR-supported research. Research Policy, 31(1), 145–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baskaran, A., Muchie, M. (2008). Foreign Direct Investment and Internationalization of R&D: The Case of BRICS Economics. Development, Innovation and International Political Economy Research (DIIPER), Aalborg University Denmark, DIIPER Research Series, Working Paper No. 7.

  • Becker, R. (2004). Gemeinsamen Nutzen sichern Steuerung von Public Private Partnership in der Forschung. Wissenschaftsmanagement, 2, 26–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bingisser, S., Bolz, U., Cathomen, I., Oehry W. (2005). Public Private Partnership – ein neuer Lösungsansatz für die Schweiz. Zürich.

  • Carlsson, B. (2006). Internationalization of innovation systems: a survey of the literature. Research Policy, 35(2006), 56–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiesa, V. (2000). Global R&D project management and organization: a taxonomy. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 2000(17), 341–359.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dearing, A. (2007). Enabling Europe to innovate. Science, 315(19), 344–347.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Demirbag, M., & Glaister, K. (2010). W (2010): factors determining offshore location choice for R&D projects: a comparative study of developed and emerging regions. Journal of Management Studies, 47, 8. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6486.2010.00948.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edler, J., Meyer-Krahmer, F., & Reger, G. (2002). Changes in the strategic management of technology. R&D Management, 32(2002), 149–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • EU. (2005). Responsible partnering: joining forces in a world of open innovation. A Guide to Better Practices for Collaborative Research between Science and Industry. Brussels: European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gackstatter, S., Kotsemir, M., & Meissner, D. (2014). Building an innovation-driven economy—the case of BRIC and GCC countries. Foresight, 16(4), 293–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gassmann, O., & von Zedtwitz, M. (2003). Trends and developments of managing virtual R&D teams. R&D Management, 33(2003), 243–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gokhberg, L., Meissner, D. (2013). Innovation: Superpowered invention. Nature 501, 313–314, doi:10.1038/501313a, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v501/n7467/full/501313a.html.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hall, B., Link, A. N., & Scott, J. N. (2003). Universities as research partners. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(2), 458–491.

    Google Scholar 

  • IBM (2006). Innovation und Kooperationsmanagement im Blick. Global CEO Study 2006.

  • Li, J., & Yue, D. R. (2005). Managing global research and development in China: patterns of R&D configuration and evolution. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 17(3), 317–338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N. (2006). Public/private partnerships: innovation strategies and policy alternatives. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Scott, J. N. (2001). Public/private partnerships: stimulating competition in a dynamic market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19, 763–794.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Scott, J. N. (2005). Universities as partners in U.S. research joint ventures. Research Policy, 34(3), 385–393.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, D. (2007). Forschungskooperationen mittels Public Private Partnership - Argumente und Beispiele. Bern: Center for Science and Technology Studies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, D. (2014). Approaches for developing national STI strategies. STI Policy Review, 5(1), 34–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meissner, D., Gokhberg, L., & Sokolov, A. (Eds.). (2013). Science, technology and innovation policy for the future—potentials and limits of foresight studies. Heidelberg: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moncada-Paterno-Castello, P., Vivarelli, M., & Voigt, P. (2011). Drivers and impacts in the globalization of corporate R&D: an introduction based on the European experience. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(2), 585–603. doi:10.1093/icc/dtr005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mrinalini, N., & Wakdikar, S. (2008). Foreign R&D Centers in India: is there a positive Impact. Current Science, 94(5), 452–458.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muldur, U., Corvers, F., Delanghe, H., Dratwa, J., Heimberger, D., Sloan, B., Vanslembrouck, S. (2006). A new deal for an effective european research policy: the design and impacts of the 7th framework programme. Springer: European Communities.

  • OECD, Eurostat (2005). Oslo Manual—guidelines for collecting and interpreting innovation data. Third edition; Paris 2005.

  • Proskuryakova L. N., Meissner D., Rudnik P. B. (2015). The use of technology platforms as a policy tool to address research challenges and technology transfer, The Journal of Technology Transfer. 2015.

  • Shin-Horng, C. (2004). Taiwanese IT firms’ offshore R&D in China and the connection with the global innovation network. Research Policy, 33(2004), 337–349.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2005): World Investment Report 2005. United Nations New York and Geneva.

  • van Beers, C., Berghall, E., & Poot, T. (2008). R&D internationalization: R&D collaboration and public knowledge institutions in small economies: evidence from Finland and the Netherlands. Research Policy, 37, 294–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vishnevskiy, K., Karasev, O., & Meissner, D. (2015). Integrated roadmaps and corporate foresight as tools of innovation management: the case of Russian companies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90(B), 433–443. No. January.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, Bernd; Stratmann, Bernhard (2000): Public Private Partnership in der Forschung. Neue Formen der Kooperation zwischen Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft. Hochschulplanung, Band 146. HIS GmbH, Hannover.

  • von Zedtwitz, M., & Gassmann, O. (2002). Market versus technology drive in R&D internationalization: four different patterns of managing research and development. Research Policy, 31, 569–588.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wissenschaftsrat (2007a). Empfehlungen zu Public Private Partnerships (PPP) in der universitätsmedizinischen Forschung. Drs. 7695–07; Berlin.

  • Wissenschaftsrat (2007b). Empfehlungen zu Interaktion von Wissenschaft und Wirtschaft. Drs. 7865–07, Berlin.

Download references

Acknowledgments

The article was prepared within the framework of the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (HSE) and supported within the framework of the subsidy granted to the HSE by the Government of the Russian Federation for the implementation of the Global Competitiveness Program.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dirk Meissner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Meissner, D. Public-Private Partnership Models for Science, Technology, and Innovation Cooperation. J Knowl Econ 10, 1341–1361 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0310-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0310-3

Keywords

Navigation