Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Smart Specialisation in Croatia: Between the Cluster and Technological Specialisation

Journal of the Knowledge Economy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Summary

The paper discusses the particularities of the implementation of the concept of smart specialisation in the innovation follower countries using the example of Croatia. Croatian experience suggests that a level of economic and technological development enables the realisation of a reduced concept of smart specialisation that is focused on the development of existing business clusters, industries and ventures of lower technological complexity while technological specialisation through supporting frontier research and key enabling technologies (KETs) is difficult to attain. Therefore, there is a threat that KETs will be formally included in the strategy for smart specialisation but their development in practice may prove to be a failure. This narrow concept of smart specialisation is perceived as inferior to the smart specialisation which nurture fundamental and generic knowledge, education and skills needed for putting the key technologies into work since it keeps the regions/countries captured in uncompetitive industries with low profit and weak employment abilities. The reasons for such a limited realisation of smart specialisation in Croatia are numerous of which a long-term technological backwardness, excessive tertiarisation of economy in the low-profit/skills sectors, serious underinvestment in science and knowledge-based industries can be sorted out. From the innovation policy point of view, the neglect of research and technological specialisation is mostly a consequence of horizontal broad-based measures for fostering entrepreneurship, innovation and research without thematic prioritisation. In this context, the concept of smart specialisation is perceived as a useful tool for replacement of the current surplus of horizontal and mutually disconnected policy measures with a new policy mix build upon the concept of linking identified priority thematic areas with KETs and other cross-cutting themes such as tourism and information and communications technology (ICT).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Report, EUR 24047, http://ec.europa.eu/research/innovation-union/pdf/expert-groups/i4g-reports/i4g_policy_brief_8_-_smart_specialisation.pdf

  2. COM(2011) 615, http://www.ipex.eu/IPEXL-WEB/dossier/document/COM20110615.do

  3. Production is 10 % lower than before the crisis, and over 3 million industrial jobs have been lost

  4. According to NACE 2007 section (B, C and E)

  5. http://www.mingorp.hr/defaulteng.aspx?id=105

  6. The publications are not yet publicly available.

References

  • Athanasoglou, P. P., Backinezos, C., Georgiou, E. A. (2010). Export performance, competitiveness and commodity composition, Working Paper, No. 114, Bank of Greece.

  • Aiginger, K., & Sieber, S. (2006). The Matrix Approach to Industrial Policy. International Review of Applied Economics, Vol. 20, No. 5, 573–601, December 2006.

  • Bečić, E., & Švarc, J. (2010). Smart specialisation: some considerations of the Croatian practice. International Journal of Transitions and Innovation Systems, 1(1), 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bečić, E., & Dabić, M. (2012). An analysis of research and innovation in Croatia. In M. Dabic & V. Potocan (Eds.), Entrepreneurship and innovation (pp. 67–99). Maribor, Slovenia: University of Zagreb, Faculty of Economics and Business.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bečić, E., & Dabić, M. (2008). Analiza ulaganja poslovnog sektora Republike Hrvatske u istraživanje i razvoj. Revija za sociologiju, 39(2008), 1–2. 69–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Condron, B. (2012). Development of clusters. Presentation in Ministry of Economy of Croatia, February 2012.

  • Ćudina, A., Lukinić Čardić, G., & Sušić, G. (2012). Analiza relativnog položaja hrvatskog izvoza na tržište Europske unije. Ekonomski pregled, 63(5–6), 291–321.

    Google Scholar 

  • Erawatch (2013). Erawatch country report - Croatia 2013, European Commission, Brussels.

  • Etzkowitz, H. (1996). From knowledge flows to the triple helix: The transformation of academic-industry relations in the USA. Industry and Higher education, December 1996, 337 – 342.

  • European Commission (2000). Towards a European research area, Brussels, 18 January 2000. (COM (2000), (Lisbon agenda).

  • European Commission (2005). Implementing the Community Lisbon Programme: A Policy Framework to Strengthen EU Manufacturing – Towards a More Integrated Approach for Industrial Policy, Brussels, EC, 5.10.2005 COM(2005) 474 final.

  • European Commission (2009). Current situation of key enabling technologies in Europe, SEC(2009) 1257 final, Brussels, 30.09.2009.

  • European Commission (2010). EUROPE 2020 - A strategy for smart, sustainable and inclusive growth, COM(2010) 2020 final, Brussels, 3.3.2010, http://ec.europa.eu/europe2020/europe-2020-in-a-nutshell/flagship-initiatives/index_en.htm. Accessed 10 July 2013.

  • European Commission (2010a). Regional Policy contributing to smart growth in Europe 2020, COM(2010)553 final, http://ec.europa.eu/prelex/detail_dossier_real.cfm?CL=en&DosId=199722. Accessed 25 June 2013.

  • European Commission (2011). Cohesion policy 214–2020: Research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation, European Commission.

  • European Commission (2012a). A Stronger European Industry for Growth and Economic Recovery, COM(2012) 582 final, European Commission, Brussels, 10.10.2012.

  • European Commission (2012b). A European strategy for Key Enabling Technologies – A bridge to growth and jobs, COM (2012), 341 Final, Brussels, 26.6.2012.

  • Filippetti, A., & Archibugi, D. (2011). Innovation in times of crisis: national systems of innovation, structure, and demand. Research policy, 40(2011), 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foray, D., Goddard, J., Goenaga Beldarrain, X., Landabaso, M., McCann, P., Morgan, K., Nauwelaers, C., Ortega-Argilés, R. (2012). Guide to Research and Innovation Strategies for Smart Specialisation (RIS 3), Smart Specialisation Platform. http://s3platform.jrc.ec.europa.eu.

  • Freeman, C. (1988). Japan: a new national system of innovation? In G. Dosi, C. H. Freeman, R. Nelson, G. Gerarld Silverberg, & L. Soete (Eds.), Technical change and economic theory (pp. 330–349). London: Pinter Publisher Limited.

    Google Scholar 

  • GRC (2013). 2013 Economic Programme of Croatia, Government of the Republic of Croatia, April 2013.

  • Kline, S. J., & Rosenberg,N. (1986). An overview of innovation. In R. Landau & N. Rosenberg (Eds.), The positive sum strategy, harnessing technology for economic growth (pp. 275–306). Washington, DC: National Academy press.

  • Lundvall, B. A. (1992). National system of innovations, towards theory of innovation and interactive learning. London: Pinter Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mahr, A. (2013). European Politics of Smart Specialisation. Training Workshop on Smart Specialisation for South East European countries, Belgrade, Serbia 11–12 April 2013.

  • MEC. (2013). The Croatian SME observatory report 2013. Zagreb: The Ministry of Entrepreneurship and Crafts (MEC).

    Google Scholar 

  • MIT (2013). Innovation and production, Report of the MIT Task Force. MIT Press, February 22, 2013.

  • MOE (2013). Sectoral technology platforms and centers of competences, presentation of the Ministry of Economy at the Conference: “Croatian Clusters for Innovation and Growth”, Ministry of Economy (MOE), Zagreb 18.4.2013.

  • Mytelka, L. K., & Smith,K. (2002). Policy learning and innovation theory: an interactive and co-evolving process. Research Policy, 31, 1567–1479.

  • Nelson, R. (Ed.). (1993). National innovation systems. A comparative analysis. New York/Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2000). The service economy. Paris: OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2012). Science, technology and innovation outlook in 2012. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2013). Innovation-driven growth in regions: the role of smart specialisation. Paris: OECD.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Owen, G. (2012). Industrial policy in Europe since the Second World War: what has been learnt? Department of Management, London School of Economics. ECIPE Occasional paper, No. 1/2012.

  • PA (2014). The Partnership Agreement for the European Structural and Investment Funds in the EU Financial Period2014-2020, Officialproposal_En_2014hr16m8pa001.1.1, the Ministry of Regional Development and EU Funds, Zagreb, April 2014.

  • Radošević, D. (2013). Development strategy for Croatia 2014 – 2020. Ekonomski Pregled, 64(3), 187–212. In Croatian.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rajaković, M. (2014). CROATIA- Prioritisation, Entrepreneurial Discovery and Policy mix in the RIS3 process, Smart Specialisation Platform, Ljubljana (SI), 15–16 May 2014.

  • Rodrik, D. (2004). Industrial policy for the twenty first centuries. Paper prepared for UNIDOK September, 2004.

  • Švarc, J. (2011). Does Croatian national innovation system (NIS) follow the path towards knowledge economy? International Journal of Technology Transfer and Commercialisation, 10(2), 131–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Bank (2014). Croatia Partnership Country Program Snapshot, World Bank Group, April 2014.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Emira Bečić.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bečić, E., Švarc, J. Smart Specialisation in Croatia: Between the Cluster and Technological Specialisation. J Knowl Econ 6, 270–295 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0238-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13132-015-0238-7

Keywords

Navigation