Moving Forward with the Affordable Care Act: Trends in Self-sustained Obstetric Institution
- Naira R. Matevosyan
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
The economic burden of obstetric care is multifold and mordantly case-specific. Obstetrics is a huge cost to the U.S. healthcare system. Maternal-infant care represents the largest single category of hospital expenditures for most commercial health plans and state Medicaid programs. Reducing these costs provides a major opportunity to reduce insurance premiums for employers and to make Medicaid coverage more affordable. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (2012) encourages the State contracts with Accountable Care Organizations (ACO) by transforming traditional fee-for-service contracts into bundled contracts paying providers and facilities in a single fee. It is then the role of the physician, hospital, or institution to develop strategies to cut costs, improve outcomes, collect, tabulate and report results, and to be competitive within the new reality of the ACO. An attempt is made to develop a theoretical model to assist institutions in moving forward with the Affordable Care Act, by introducing strategies for a self-sustaining obstetric ACO in the following clusters: (1) cost containment, (2) combating stereotype, (3) medical recording, and (4) revenue enhancement. We conclude, that trends in relatively low costs care by both providers and patients are potent with hidden or adverse expenses and remedies. Self-sustained ACO in obstetrics are feasible when stemmed of well-developed patient-centered policies and screening protocols that balance the input–output ratio favoring the patient. Marketing and defense tactics are discussed.
- Berwick, DM (2011) Launching accountable care organizations—the proposed rule for the Medicare shared savings program. NEJM 364: pp. e32 CrossRef
- Kocher, R, Sahni, NR (2011) Hospitals race to employ physicians—the logic behind a money-losing proposition. NEJM 364: pp. 1790-1793 CrossRef
- Kolas, T, Saugstad, OD, Dalveit, AK (2006) Planned cesarean versus planned vaginal delivery at term: comparison of newborn infant outcomes. American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology 195: pp. 1538-1543 CrossRef
- Matevosyan N. R. (2010). Pregnancy and postpartum specifics in women with schizophrenia. Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 283(2), 141–147.
- Matevosyan N. R. (2011). Periodontal disease and perinatal outcomes. Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 283(4), 675–686.
- Matevosyan N. R. (2012). Court-visited obstetrical and fertility procedures. Archives of Gynecology & Obstetrics, 289(s5), 1195–1203.
- Matevosyan, N. R. (2013a). Principles of cesarean section. CreateSpace, Inc (Paperback).
- Matevosyan, NR (2013) The overuse of cesarean section: medical, research, and economic pitfalls. Journal of the Knowledge Economy.
- NIH Consensus Development Conference on Vaginal Birth After Cesarean. (2010). New insights. Final Panel Statement, March 8–10.
- Truven Health Analytics. (2013). The cost of having a baby in the United States. Ann Arbor, MI.
- Moving Forward with the Affordable Care Act: Trends in Self-sustained Obstetric Institution
Journal of the Knowledge Economy
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Accountable Care Organizations
- Affordable Care Act
- Cesarean section
- Cost containment
- Collaborative Practice Model
- Maternal identifier
- National Practitioner’s Data Bank
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Law, Emory University, 1301 Clifton Rd, Atlanta, GA, 30322, USA