Skip to main content
Log in

Reste-t-il des contre-indications à l’anesthésie locorégionale en obstétrique ?

Does it remain any contraindication to regional anaesthesia in obstetrics?

  • Article de Synthèse / Review Article
  • Published:
Revue de médecine périnatale

Résumé

L’anesthésie locorégionale périmédullaire (péridurale et rachianesthésie) représente la pierre angulaire de l’anesthésie et de l’analgésie obstétricale. En ce début de XXI e siècle, environ 80 % des parturientes bénéficient de ces techniques pour le travail et l’accouchement. Néanmoins, quelques rares situations représentent des contre-indications absolues ou relatives à la réalisation de ces techniques. Il convient de connaître ces situations afin non seulement de ne pas exposer nos patientes à un risque accru de complications mais également de ne pas les priver des bénéfices de ces techniques en élargissant indument le champ de ces contre-indications. Cet article passe en revue les problèmes liés au refus de la patiente, à l’infection localisée au site de ponction, à l’hypertension intracrânienne, à l’hypovolémie, aux troubles de l’hémostase héréditaires ou acquis, à l’allergie aux anesthésiques locaux, à l’hyperthermie, aux cardiopathies, aux affections neurologiques, aux anomalies du rachis, à la dilatation cervicale et aux tatouages lombaires.

Abstract

Regional anaesthesia (epidural and spinal) is the cornerstone of obstetric anaesthesia and analgesia. In the beginning of the 21st century, about 80% of the parturient take benefits from these techniques during labour and delivery. However, very few situations represent absolute or relative contraindications to regional anaesthesia. The adequate knowledge of these contraindications prevents to expose our patients to an increased risk of complications of regional techniques but also avoid depriving them of their benefits in the name of false contraindications. This paper reviews the problems of patient refusal, site of puncture’s infection, intracranial hypertension, hypovolemia, inherited and acquired coagulopathy, allergy to local anaesthetics, hyperthermia, cardiopathy, neurological diseases, spinal abnormalities, cervical dilation and lumbar tattoo. All together, it estimated that less than 0.5% of the parturient are contraindicated to regional anaesthesia in obstetrics.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Références

  1. Polley LS, Glosten B (2004) Epidural and spinal analgesia/anesthesia. In: Chestnut DH (ed) Obstetric anesthesia: Principles and practice. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, p 324–348

    Google Scholar 

  2. Brichant JF, Dewandre PY (2009) Analgésie péridurale pour le travail et l’accouchement. In: Diemunsch P, Samain E (ed) Anesthésie-réanimation obstétricale. Elsevier Masson S.A.S., Paris, p 37–54

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brichant JF, Dewandre PY (2009) Analgésie péridurale pour le travail et l’accouchement. In: Gauthier-Lafaye P (ed) Anesthésie locorégionale et traitement de la douleur. Elsevier Masson S.A.S. p 373–392

  4. Eltzschig HK, Lieberman ES, Camann WR (2003) Regional anesthesia and analgesia for labor and delivery. N Engl J Med 348:319–332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Anim-Somuah M, Smyth R, Howell C (2005) Epidural versus non-epidural or no analgesia in labour. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD000331

  6. Palot M, Leymarie F, Jolly DH, Visseaux H, et al (2006) Request of epidural analgesia by women and obstetrical teams in four French areas. Part II: Management of epidural analgesia. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 25:569–576

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Houwe P, Heytens L, Vercruysse P (2006) A survey of obstetric and anaesthesia practice in Flanders. Acta Anaesthesiol Belg 57:29–37

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Johnson M, Zavisca F (1998) Intracranial and spinal cord lesions. In: Gambling and Douglas (Ed) Obstetric Anesthesia and Uncommon Disorders. W.D. Saunders Company. Philadelphia, p 219–237

    Google Scholar 

  9. Moen V, Irestedt L (2008) Neurological complications following central neuraxial blockade in obstetrics. Cur Opin Anesthesiol 21:275–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ruppen W, Derry S, McQuay H, Moore A (2006) Incidence of epidural hematoma, infection and neurological injuryin obstetric patients with epidural analgesia/anesthesia. Anesthesiology 105:394–399

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee L, Posner K, Domino K, Caplan R, et al (2004) Injuries associated with regional anesthesia in the 1980s and 1990s. A closed claims analysis. Anesthesiology 101:143–152

    Google Scholar 

  12. Moen V, Dahlgren N, Irestedt L (2004) Severe neurological complications after central neuraxial blockade in Sweden 1990–1999. Anesthesiology 101:950–959

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. SFAR: Recommandations formalisées d’experts (2012) Examens pré-interventionnels systématiques. http://www.sfar.org/_docs/articles/v24-05-2012RFEExamenprinterventionnelstextecourt.pdf

  14. ASA (2007) Practice guidelines for obstetric anesthesia. An updated report of the American society of anesthesiologists task force on obstetric anesthesia. Anesthesiology 106:843–863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Belgian guidelines and recommendations for safe practice in obstetric anesthesia (2003) Acta anaesthesiol Belg 54:119–125

    Google Scholar 

  16. Breivik H, Bang U, Jalonen L, Vigfusson G, et al (2010) Nordic guideline for neiraxial blocksin disturbed hemostatsis from the Scandinavian society of anaesthesiology and intensive care medicine. Acta anaesthesiol Scand 54:16–41

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Tanaka M, Balki M, McLeod A, Carvalho J (2009) Regional anesthesia and non-preeclamptic thrombocytopenia: Time to rethink the safe platelet count. Rev Bras Anestesiol 59:142–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Thornton P, Doulas J (2010) Coagulation in pregnancy. Best pract res clin obstet gynaecol 24: 339–352

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Vandermeulen E, Decoster J, Dewandre PY, Ickx B, et al(2011) Central neural blockade in patients with drug-induced alteration of coagulation. Third edistion of the Belgian association for regional anesthesia (BARA) guidelines. ActaAnaesthesiol Belg 62:175–191

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Santos A, Finster M (2004) Local Anesthetics. In: Chestnut DH (ed) Obstetric anesthesia: Principles and practice. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, p 190–210

    Google Scholar 

  21. Bruyere M (2009) Cardiopathies. In: Diemunsch P, Samain E (ed) Anesthésie-réanimation obstétricale. Elsevier Masson S.A.S., Paris, p 195–207

    Google Scholar 

  22. The task force on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy of the European society of cardiology (ESC) (2011) ESC guidelines on the management of cardiovascular diseases during pregnancy. Eur Heart J 32:3147–3197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Elkayam U, Bitar F (2005) Valvular heart disease and pregnancy. Part 1: Natives valves. JACC 46:223–230

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Elkayam U, Bitar F (2005) Valvular heart disease and pregnancy. Part 2: Prosthetic valves. JACC 46:403–410

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Bader M (2004) Neurologic and Neuromuscular Disease. In: Chestnut DH (ed) Obstetric anesthesia: Principles and practice. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, p 872–891

    Google Scholar 

  26. Kuczkowski KM (2006) Labor analgesia for the parturient with neurological disease: what does an obstetrician need to know. Arch Gynecol Obstet 274:41–46

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Ducloy-Bouthors AS, Dalmas-Laurent AF, Richart P (2009) Maladies neurologiques. In: (ed) Anesthésie-réanimation obstétricale. Masson, Paris, p 219–227

    Google Scholar 

  28. Rezig K, Diar N, Benabidallah D, Khodja A, et al (2003) Paraplegia and pregnancy: anaesthetic management. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 22:238–241

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Powell HC, Kalichman MW, Garrett RS, Myers RR (1988) Selective vulnerability of unmyelinated fiber Schwann cells in nerves exposed to local anesthetics. Lab Invest 59:271–280

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Sakurai M, Mannen T, Kanazawa I, Tanabe H (1992) Lidocaine unmasks silent demyelinative lesions in multiple sclerosis. Neurology 42:2088–2093

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Crosby E (2004) Musculoskeletal Disorders. In: Chestnut DH (ed) Obstetric anesthesia: Principles and practice. Elsevier Mosby, Philadelphia, p 856–871

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kuczkowski KM (2007) Labor analgesia for pregnant women with spina bifida: what does an obstetrician need to know? Arch Gynecol Obstet 275:53–56

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Tidmarsh MD, May AE (1998) Epidural anaesthesia and neural tube defect. Int J Obstet Anesth 7:111–114

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Ko J, Leffert L (2009) Clinical implications of neuraxial anesthesia in parturients with scoliosis. Anesth Analg 109:1930–1934

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Wang F, Shen X, Guo X, Peng Y, et al (2009) Epidural analgesia in the latent phase of labor and the risk of caesarean delivery. Anesthesiology 111:871–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. HalpernS, Abdallah F (2010) Effect of labor analgesia on labor outcome. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 23:317–322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Sleth JC, Guillot B, Kluger N (2010) Lumbar tattoo and neuraxial anesthesia in obstetrics: Practice survey in Languedoc-Roussillon, France. Ann Fr Anesth Reanim 29:397–401

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mercier FJ, Bonnet MP (2009) Tatooing and various piercing: anesthetic considerations. Curr Opin Anesthesiol 22:436–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to P. -Y. Dewandre.

About this article

Cite this article

Dewandre, P.Y. Reste-t-il des contre-indications à l’anesthésie locorégionale en obstétrique ?. Rev. med. perinat. 4, 99–104 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12611-012-0194-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12611-012-0194-4

Mots clés

Keywords

Navigation