Date: 15 May 2014
Involving Patients in Their Care
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
There has been growing interest internationally in how health services might more actively involve—and support the involvement of—patients in deciding about their treatments and in the delivery of their own care. Patient involvement can take diverse forms, and can be valued for a range of reasons. There has been a strong tendency for policies and service development initiatives to emphasize the need for health professionals to communicate to inform patients’ choice-making and to encourage patients to make particular practical contributions to their care. Recent studies of patients’ experiences, however, particularly in the context of breast cancer, have highlighted the additional significance of the relational aspects of involvement and the social factors (including those operating within healthcare settings) that influence patients’ potential to contribute. Further research and debate is needed to illuminate the ethical as well as the practical aspects of involving patients in their care.
Papers of particular interest, published recently, have been highlighted as: • Of importance
Lee EO, Emmanuel EJ. Shared decision making to improve care and reduce costs. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:6–8.CrossRef
Härter M, van der Weijden T, Elwyn G. Policy and practice developments in the implementation of shared decision-making: an international perspective. Z Evid Fortbild Qual Gesundh Wesen. 2011;105:229–33.CrossRef
Alambuya RN, Ali S, Apostolidis K, et al. Salzburg statement on shared decision-making. BMJ. 2011;342:d1745.CrossRef
Stiggelbout AM, van der Weijden T, de Wit MPT. Shared decision-making: really putting patients at the centre of healthcare. BMJ. 2012;354:e256.CrossRef
King E, Taylor J, Williams R, et al. The MAGIC programme evaluation. London: The Health Foundation; 2013.
Elwyn G, Frosch D, Thomson R, et al. Shared decision-making: a model for clinical practice. J Gen Int Med. 2012;27:1361–7. A summary for clinicians that outlines 3 key steps in shared decision making.CrossRef
Sepucha KR, Borkhoff CM, Lally J, et al. Establishing the effectiveness of decision aids: key constructs and measurement instruments. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13(Suppl2):S12.CrossRef
Brown R, Butow P, Wilson-Genderson M, et al. Meeting the decision-making preferences of patients with breast cancer in oncology consultations: impact on decision-related outcomes. J Clin Oncol. 2012;30:857–62. An international study showing that people’s preferences for involvement can shift during consultations and that people who are at least as involved as they prefer have better decision-related outcomes.PubMedCrossRef
Patient decision aids (Ottawa Health Research Institute), Available at: https://decisionaid.ohri.ca/.
Fagerlin A, Pignone M, Abhyankar P, et al. Clarifying values: an updated review. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S8.CrossRef
Bekker HL, Winterbottom AE, Butow P, et al. Do personal stories make patient decision aids more effective: a critical review of evidence and theory? BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13(Suppl2):S9.CrossRef
Elwyn G, Caldron L, Rosenkranz K, et al. Breast cancer surgery option grid, 2013. Available at: http://www.optiongrid.org/resources/breastcancersurgery_grid_USA.pdf.
McCaffery KJ, Holmes-Rovner M, Smith SK. Addressing health literacy in patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S10.CrossRef
Volk R, Llewellyn-Thomas H, Stacey D, et al. Ten years of the International Patient Decision Aid Standards Collaboration: evolution of the core dimensions for assessing the quality of patient decision aids. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S1. An overview of a major international effort to develop evidence-based standards for decision support materials for patients.CrossRef
Elwyn G, Scholl I, Tietbohl C, et al. Many miles to go…” a systematic review of the implementation of patient decision support interventions into routine clinical practice. BMC Med Inform Dec Making. 2013;13 Suppl 2:S14.CrossRef
Entwistle VA, Cribb A. Enabling people to live well: fresh thinking about collaborative approaches to care for people with long term conditions. London: The Health Foundation; 2013.
Frosch DL, May SG, Rendle KA, et al. Authoritarian physicians and patients’ fear of being labelled ‘difficult’ among key obstacles to shared decision-making. Health Aff. 2012;31:1030–8.CrossRef
Pieters HC, Heilemann MV, Maliski S, et al. Instrumental relating and treatment decision-making among older women with early stage breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 2011;39:E10–9.CrossRef
Mendick N, Young B, Holcombe C, et al. The ethics of responsibility and ownership in decision-making about treatment for breast cancer: triangulation of consultation with patient and surgeon perspectives. Soc Sci Med. 2010;70:904–11.CrossRef
Swainston K, Campbell C, van Wersche, et al. Treatment decision-making in breast cancer: a longitudinal exploration of women’s experiences. Br J Health Psychol. 2012;17:155–70. A recent example of a qualitative study illustrating women’s appreciation of treatment recommendations from multidisciplinary teams when these are given with explanations and scope for discussion.PubMedCrossRef
Entwistle VA, Carter SM, Cribb A, McCaffery KM. Supporting patient autonomy: the importance of clinical relationships. J Gen Int Med. 2010;25:741–5.CrossRef
Wyatt KD, Branda ME, Anderson RT, et al. Peering into the black box: a meta-analysis of how clinicians use decision aids during clinical encounters. Implement. 2014;9:26.CrossRef
Patel RA, Klasnja P, Hartzler A, et al. Probing the benefits of real-time tracking during cancer care. AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings. 2012;1340–9.
Van den Berg SW, Gielissen MFM, Ottevanger PB, et al. Rationale of the BREAst cancer e-healTH [BREATH] multicentre randomised controlled trial: an internet-based self-management intervention to foster adjustment after curative breast cancer by decreasing distress and increasing empowerment. BMC Cancer. 2012;12:394.PubMedCrossRefPubMedCentral
Ruland CM, Maffei RM, Borosund E, et al. Evaluation of an eHealth application for personalized illness management support: cancer patients’ use and appraisal of usefulness. Int J Med Inform. 2013;82:593–603. A description and initial evaluation of a comprehensive intervention to support women’s ongoing management of their symptoms.PubMedCrossRef
Greene J, Hibbard JH. Why does patient activation matter? An examination of the relationships between patient activation and health-related outcomes. J Gen Int Med. 2012;27:520–6.CrossRef
Fouquet C, Bredart A, Boueuc C. French adaptation of a question prompt list for cancer patients and their careers in supportive and palliative care. Bull Cancer. 2012;99:693–701.PubMed
Sinding C, Miller P, Hudak P, et al. Of time and troubles: patient involvement and the production of health care disparities. Health. 2011;16:400–17. A careful qualitative investigation that highlights the social and material resources patients need to engage effectively in the management of their care.PubMed
Entwistle VA, Entwistle VA, McCaughan D, et al. Speaking up about safety concerns: a qualitative study of patients’ views and experiences. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19:e33.PubMed
- Involving Patients in Their Care
Current Breast Cancer Reports
Volume 6, Issue 3 , pp 211-218
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Patient participation
- Breast cancer
- Treatment decision-making
- Shared decision-making
- Professional-patient relations
- Patient activation