The development of Internet use for communication among undergraduate students: a multilevel analysis
- Chiungjung Huang
- … show all 1 hide
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
As few studies utilized longitudinal design to examine the development of Internet use for communication, the purpose of this study was to examine the effects of gender and initial Internet use for communication on subsequent use. The study sample was 280 undergraduate students who were assessed at five time points. Hierarchical linear models were used to analyze longitudinal data regarding the development of three Internet mediums, email, instant messaging, and chat. The negative correlation between initial status and growth rate demonstrated that students using one particular medium relatively heavily tended to grow slower, and thus students with low initial use of a medium increased their use of that medium faster and thus closed the gap between students with low and high initial status. Findings about the use of a certain medium on the use of others were mixed with four models supporting neither displacement nor augmentation hypothesis and two remaining models supporting the displacement hypothesis.
- Amiel, T., & Sargent, S. L. (2004). Individual differences in internet usage motives. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 711–726. CrossRef
- Anastasi, A., & Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
- Anolli, L., Villani, D., & Riva, G. (2005). Personality of people using chat: An on-line research. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 8, 89–95. CrossRef
- Arnett, J. (2000). Emerging adulthood: A theory of development from the late teens through the twenties. American Psychologist, 55, 469–480. CrossRef
- Baron, N. S. (2004). See you online: Gender issues in college student use of instant messaging. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 23, 397–423. CrossRef
- Boneva, B., Kraut, R., & Frohlich, D. (2001). Using email for personal relationships: The difference gender makes. American Behavioral Scientist, 45, 530–549. CrossRef
- Brenner, V. (1997). Psychology of computer use: XLVII. Parameters of internet use, abuse and addiction: The first 90 days of the internet usage survey. Psychological Reports, 80, 879–882.
- Caplan, S. E. (2003). Preference for online social interaction: A theory of problematic internet use and psychosocial well-being. Communication Research, 30, 625–648. CrossRef
- Copher, J. I., Kanfer, A. G., & Walker, M. B. (2002). Everyday communication patterns of heavy and light emails users. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 263–288). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossRef
- Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center. (1997a). GVU’s 6th WWW user survey. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech Research Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www.gatech.edu/user-surveys/survey-10-1996/.
- Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center. (1997b). GVU’s 7th WWW user survey. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech Research Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www.gatech.edu/user-surveys/survey-1997-04/.
- Graphics, Visualization and Usability Center. (1998). GVU’s 8th WWW user survey. Atlanta, GA: Georgia Tech Research Corporation. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www.gatech.edu/user-surveys/survey-1997-10/.
- GVU’s WWW User Surveys. (1998). Chat groups. Retrieved January 2, 2005, from http://www-static.cc.gatech.edu/gvu/user_surveys/survey-1998-10/graphs/use/q110.htm.
- Haworth, B. (1999). An analysis of the determinants of student email use. Journal of Education for Business, 75, 55–59. CrossRef
- Hu, Y., Smith, V., & Westbrook, N. (2004). Friendships through IM: Examining the relationship between instant messaging and intimacy. Journal of Computer-Mediate Communication, 10(1).
- Jackson, L. A., Ervin, K. S., Gardner, P. D., & Schmitt, N. (2001). Gender and the internet: Women communicating and men searching. Sex Roles, 44, 363–379. CrossRef
- Jones, S. (2002). The Internet goes to college: How students are living in the future with today’s technology. ERIC Document ED 472669.
- Katz, J. E., & Rice, R. E. (2002). Syntopia: Access, civic involvement, and social interaction on the Net. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 114–138). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossRef
- Kraut, R., Patterson, M., Lundmark, V., Kiesler, S., Mukopadhyay, T., & Scherlis, W. (1998). Internet paradox: A social technology that reduces social involvement and psychological well-being? American Psychologist, 53, 1017–1031. CrossRef
- Kraut, R., Scherlis, W., Mukhopadhyay, T., Manning, J., & Kiesler, S. (1996). The HomeNet field trial of residential Internet services. Communications of the ACM, 39, 55–63. CrossRef
- Kuenki, J. J. (1999–2000). Trends in college students’ computer use and ownership. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28, 21–31. CrossRef
- Lanthier, R. P., & Windham, R. C. (2004). Internet use and college adjustment: The moderating role of gender. Computers in Human Behavior, 20, 591–606. CrossRef
- Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2000). Tracking online life: How women use the internet to cultivate relationships with family and friends. Retrieved June 10, 2005, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/Report1.pdf.
- Lenhart, A., Rainie, L., & Lewis, O. (2001). Teenage life online: The rise of the instant message generation and the Internet’s impact on friendships and family relationships. Retrieved August 13, 2006, from http://www.pewinternet.org/pdfs/PIP_Teens_Report.pdf.
- Morahan-Martin, J. (1998). Males, females, and the internet. In J. Gackenbach (Ed.), Psychology and the internet (pp. 169–197). San Diego: Academic Press.
- Morahan-Martin, J., & Schumacher, P. (2003). Loneliness and social uses of the internet. Computers and Human Behavior, 19, 659–671. CrossRef
- Nie, N. H. (2001). Sociability, interpersonal relations, and the internet. American Behaviorist Scientist, 45, 420–435. CrossRef
- Nie, N. H., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet and society: A preliminary report. IT & Society, 1, 275–283.
- Nie, N. H., Hillygus, D. S., & Erbring, L. (2002). Internet use, interpersonal relations, and sociability. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 215–243). Malden, MA: Blackwell.
- Odell, P. M., Korgen, K. O., Schumacher, P., & Delucchi, M. (2000). Internet use among female and male college students. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 855–862. CrossRef
- Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 111–121. CrossRef
- Peris, R., Gimeno, M. A., Pinazo, D., Ortet, G., Carrero, V., Sanchiz, M., et al. (2002). Online chat rooms: Virtual spaces of interaction for socially oriented people. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 43–51. CrossRef
- Pitkow, J. E., & Kehoe, C. M. (1996). Emerging trends in the www user population. Communications of the ACM, 39, 106–108. CrossRef
- Raudenbush, S., Bryk, A., Cheong, Y. F., & du Toit, M. (2004). HLM 6: Hierarchical linear and nonlinear modeling. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.
- Raudenbush, S. W., & Bryk, A. (2002). Hierarchical linear models: Application and data analysis methods. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
- Robinson, J. P., Kestnbaum, M., Neustadtl, A., & Alvarez, A. S. (2002). The internet and other uses of time. In B. Wellman & C. Haythornthwaite (Eds.), The internet in everyday life (pp. 244–262). Malden, MA: Blackwell. CrossRef
- Rollman, J. B., Krug, K., & Parente, F. (2000). The chat room phenomenon: Reciprocal communication in cyberspace. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 161–166. CrossRef
- Savichi, V., & Kelley, M. (2000). Computer mediated communication: Gender and group composition. CyberPsychology and Behavior, 5, 817–826. CrossRef
- Sherman, R., End, C., Kraan, E., Cole, A., Campbell, J., Birchmeier, Z., et al. (2000). The internet gender gap among college students: Forgotten but not gone? CyberPsychology and Behavior, 3, 885–894. CrossRef
- Shklovski, I, Kraut, R., & Rainie, L. (2004). The internet and social participation: Contrasting cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 10(1).
- Sierpe, E. (2005). Gender distinctiveness, communicative competence, and the problem of gender adjustments in computer-mediated communication. Computers in Human Behaviors, 21, 127–145. CrossRef
- The Harris Poll # 40. (2005). May 12, 2005, Almost three-quarters of all US adults (An estimated 163 million) go online. Retrieved July 23, 2006, from http://www.harrisinteractive.com/harris_poll/index.asp?PID=569.
- UCLA Center for Communication Policy. (2000). The UCLA Internet report: “Surveying the digital future.” Retrieved August 12, 2006, from http://www.ccp.ucla.edu.
- Valkenburg, P. M., & Peter, J. (2007). Online communication and adolescent well-being: Testing the stimulation versus the displacement hypothesis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 12, 1169–1182. CrossRef
- Wasserman, I. M., & Richmond-Abbott, M. (2005). Gender and the internet: Causes of variation in access, level, and scope of use. Social Science Quarterly, 86, 252–270. CrossRef
- The development of Internet use for communication among undergraduate students: a multilevel analysis
Asia Pacific Education Review
Volume 12, Issue 2 , pp 215-226
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Netherlands
- Additional Links
- Hierarchical linear model
- Instant messaging
- Longitudinal design
- Unconditional model
- Intercepts-and-slopes-as-outcomes model
- Chiungjung Huang (1)
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Graduate Institute of Education, National Changhua University of Education, 1 Jinn Der Road, Changhua, 500, Taiwan