Skip to main content
Log in

A Non-Uniform Predictor-Observer for a Networked Control System

  • Published:
International Journal of Control, Automation and Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a Non-Uniform Predictor-Observer (NUPO) based control approach in order to deal with two of the main problems related to Networked Control Systems (NCS) or Sensor Networks (SN): time-varying delays and packet loss. In addition, if these delays are longer than the sampling period, the packet disordering phenomenon can appear. Due to these issues, a (scarce) nonuniform, delayed measurement signal could be received by the controller. But including the NUPO proposal in the control system, the delay will be compensated by the prediction stage, and the nonavailable data will be reconstructed by the observer stage. So, a delay-free, uniformly sampled controller design can be adopted. To ensure stability, the predictor must satisfy a feasibility problem based on a time-varying delay-dependent condition expressed in terms of Linear Matrix Inequalities (LMI). Some aspects like the relation between network delay and robustness/performance trade-off are empirically studied. A simulation example shows the benefits (robustness and control performance improvement) of the NUPO approach by comparison to another similar proposal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. K. Ogata, Discrete-time Control Systems, Prentice-Hall, Inc., Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA, 1987.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Y. Tipsuwan and M. Chow, “Control methodologies in networked control systems,” Control Eng. Practice, vol. 11, no. 10, pp. 1099–1111, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. T. Jia, Y. Niu, and X. Wang, “H control for networked systems with data packet dropout,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 198–203, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Y. Wang and G. Yang, “Robust H model reference tracking control for networked control systems with communication constraints,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 992–1000, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. H. Gao and T. Chen, “Network-based H output tracking control,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 53, no. 3, pp. 655–667, 2008.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. H. Karimi, “Robust H filter design for uncertain linear systems over network with network-induced delays and output quantization,” Modeling, Identification and Control, vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 27–37, 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. H. R. Karimi, “Delay-range-dependent linear matrix inequality approach to quantized H control of linear systems with network-induced delays and norm-bounded uncertainties,” Proc. of the Inst. of Mech. Eng., Part I: J. of Syst. and Control Eng., vol. 224, no. 6, pp. 689–700, 2010.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  8. K. Lee, S. Lee, and M. Lee, “Remote fuzzy logic control of networked control system via Profibus-DP,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron., vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 784–792, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Y. Tipsuwan and M.-Y. Chow, “Gain scheduler middleware: a methodology to enable existing controllers for networked control and teleoperationpart I: networked Control,” IEEE Trans. on Industrial Electronics, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1218–1227, December 2004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. A. Sala, A. Cuenca, and J. Salt, “A retunable PID multi-rate controller for a networked control system,” Inform. Sci., vol. 179, no. 14, pp. 2390–2402, June 2009.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. A. Cuenca, J. Salt, V. Casanova, and R. Piza, “An approach based on an adaptive multi-rate Smith predictor and gain scheduling for a networked control system: implementation over Profibus-DP,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 473–481, April 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. A. Cuenca, J. Salt, A. Sala, and R. Piza, “A delay-dependent dual-rate PID controller over an Ethernet network,” IEEE Trans. Ind. Informat., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 18–29, Feb. 2011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Y. Tian and D. Levy, “Compensation for control packet dropout in networked control systems,” Inform. Sci., vol. 178, no. 5, pp. 1263–1278, 2008.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Zhao, G. Liu, and D. Rees, “Modeling and stabilization of continuous-time packet-based networked control systems.” IEEE Trans. Syst., Man, Cybern. B, vol. 39, no. 6, pp. 1646–1652, Dec. 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. X. Zhao, S. Fei, and C. Sun, “Impulsive controller design for singular networked control systems with packet dropouts,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 7, no. 6, pp. 1020–1025, 2009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. H. Gao and T. Chen, “H estimation for uncertain systems with limited communication capacity,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 52, no. 11, pp. 2070–2084, 2007.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  17. S. Oh, L. Schenato, P. Chen, and S. Sastry, “Tracking and coordination of multiple agents using sensor networks: System design, algorithms and experiments,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 234–254, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. M. Moayedi, Y. Foo, and Y. Soh, “Optimal and suboptimal minimum-variance filtering in networked systems with mixed uncertainties of random sensor delays, packet dropouts and missing measurements,” Int. J. Control, Autom., and Syst., vol. 8, no. 6, pp. 1179–1188, 2010.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. W. Zhang, M. Branicky, and S. Phillips, “Stability of networked control systems,” IEEE Control Syst. Mag., vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 84–99, 2001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. J. Hespanha, P. Naghshtabrizi, and Y. Xu, “A survey of recent results in networked control systems,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 138–162, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. J. Baillieul and P. Antsaklis, “Control and communication challenges in networked real-time systems,” Proc. of the IEEE, vol. 95, no. 1, pp. 9–28, 2007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Garcia, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and P. Albertos, “Robustness with respect to delay uncertainties of a predictor-observer based discrete-time controller,” Proc. of the 45th IEEE Conf. on Decision and Control, pp. 199–204, 2006.

  23. C. Lien, “Robust observer-based control of systems with state perturbations via LMI approach,” IEEE Trans. Autom. Control, vol. 49, no. 8, pp. 1365–1370, 2004.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  24. A. Sala, “Computer control under time-varying sampling period: an LMI gridding approach,” Automatica, vol. 41, no. 12, pp. 2077–2082, Dec. 2005.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. J. Li, Q. Zhang, Y. Wang, and M. Cai, “H control of networked control systems with packet disordering,” IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 1463–1475, March 2009.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  26. Y. Zhao, G. Liu, and D. Rees, “Improved predictive control approach to networked control systems,” IET Control Theory Appl., vol. 2, no. 8, pp. 675–681, Aug. 2008.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. K. Astrom, “Event based control,” Analysis and Design of Nonlinear Control Systems, pp. 127–147, 2007.

  28. A. Cuenca, P. García, K. Arzén, and P. Albertos, “A predictor-observer for a networked control system with time-varying delays and non-uniform sampling,” Proc. Eur. Control Conf., pp. 946–951, 2009.

  29. J. Xiong and J. Lam, “Stabilization of linear systems over networks with bounded packet loss,” Automatica, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 80–87, 2007.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  30. H. Song, L. Yu, and A. Liu, “H filtering for network-based systems with communication constraints and packet dropouts,” Proc. of the 7th Asian Control Conf., pp. 220–225, 2009.

  31. P. Garcia, A. Gonzalez, P. Castillo, R. Lozano, and P. Albertos, “Robustness of a discrete-time predictor-based controller for time-varying measurement delay,” Proc. of the 9th IFAC Workshop on Time Delay Systems, 2010.

  32. J. Sturm, “Using SeDuMi 1.02, a MATLAB toolbox for optimization over symmetric cones,” Optimization methods and software, vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 625–653, 1999.

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  33. T. Henningsson and K. Astrom, “Log-concave observers,” Proc. of the 17th Int. Symp. on Mathematical Theory of Networks and Systems, pp. 2163–2170, 2006.

  34. D. Davison and E. Hwang, “Automating radiotherapy cancer treatment: use of multirate observer-based control,” Proc. of American Control Conf., vol. 2, pp. 1194–1199, 2003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Angel Cuenca.

Additional information

Recommended by Editorial Board member Hamid Reza Karimi under the direction of Editor Shuzhi Sam Ge.

This work was supported by the Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología Projects DPI2008-06737-C02-01 and DPI2009-14744-C03-03, by Generalitat Valenciana Project GV/2010/018, by Universidad Politécnica de Valencia Project PAID06-08.

Angel Cuenca received his M.Sc. degree in Computer Science in 1998 and his Ph.D. in Control Engineering in 2004, from the Technical University of Valencia. Since 2000, he is an Assistant Professor with the Systems Engineering and Control Dept. at the Technical University of Valencia, Spain. He has co-authored over 30 papers in congress communications and journals. His research interests include multi-rate control systems, networked control systems, and event-based control systems.

Pedro García was born in Requena, Spain. In 2007 he obtained his Ph.D. in Control Systems and Industrial Computing from Technical University of Valencia, Spain. He is currently an Assistant Professor of Automatic Control at the Technical University of Valencia. He has co-authored more than ten papers in middle or top impact journals. His research interests are within the broad area of time delay systems and real time control.

Pedro Albertos is the past president of IFAC (the International Federation of Automatic Control) in 1999–2002, IFAC Fellow, IFAC Advisor and Senior Member of IEEE, is a world recognized expert in real-time control, leading several projects in the field. Since 1975, he is currently a Full Professor at Systems Engineering and Control Dept. UPV, Spain. He is Doctor Honoris-Causa from Oulu University (Finland) and Bucharest Polytechnic (Rumania). Invited Professor in more than 20 Universities, he delivered seminars in more than 30 universities and research centres. Authored over 300 papers, book chapters and congress communications, co-editor of 7 books and co-author of “Multivariable Control Systems” (Springer 2004) and “Feedback and Control for Everyone” (Springer 2010), he is also associated editor of Control Engineering Practice and Automatica and Editor in Chief of the Spanish journal RIAI. His research interest includes multivariable control and non-conventional sampling control systems, with focus on time delays and multirate sampling patterns.

Julián Salt received his M.Sc. degree in Industrial Engineering in 1986 and his Ph.D. degree in Control Engineering in 1992, from the Technical University of Valencia. His current position is as Full Professor at the Technical University of Valencia. Recently he was Head of the Department of Systems Engineering and Control at the Technical University of Valencia. He has been Director of nine PhD theses and coauthor of about 70 papers in journals and technical meetings. His research interests include non-conventionally sampled control and networked control systems.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Cuenca, A., García, P., Albertos, P. et al. A Non-Uniform Predictor-Observer for a Networked Control System. Int. J. Control Autom. Syst. 9, 1194–1202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-011-0621-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12555-011-0621-5

Keywords

Navigation