Abstract
Research concerning the relationship between female status and demographic behaviour has largely concluded that community level influences are most important, while status and autonomy at the individual level are far less so. This consensus, however, rests on an untested a priori typology of women’s status and tenuous assumptions about the measurement of defined status dimensions on the individual level. To better understand the potential influences of both community and individual elements it is necessary to take a step back and assess the validity of the constructs of autonomy used. This work uses a latent variable measurement modelling framework to test both the dimensionality of women’s status and the appropriateness of using simple additive index scaling in constructing measures of women’s status on the individual level using questions from the Demographic and Health Surveys status-of-women module in India for 1998/1999.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The AIC presented here is often referred to as AIC*n. Additionally, the BIC is calculated in a non-conventional way that is more faithful, however, to its initial formulation (Muthén 1998–2000). In each case however, interpretation is the same. Lower information criteria indicate better fitting models.
References
Cain, M. (1981). Risk and insurance: Perspectives on fertility and agrarian change in India and Bangladesh. Population and Development Review, 7(3), 435–471.
Caldwell, J. (1976). Toward a restatement of demographic transition theory. Population and Development Review, 2(3/4), 321–366.
Das Gupta, M. (1995). Lifecourse perspectives on women’s autonomy and health outcomes. American Anthropologist, 97(3), 481–491.
Dharmalingam, A., & Morgan, S. P. (1996). Women’s work, autonomy, and birth control: Evidence from two South India villages. Population Studies, 50(2), 187–201.
Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.
Ghuman, S. J. (2003). Women’s autonomy and child survival: A comparison of Muslims and non-Muslims in four Asian countries. Demography, 40, 419–436.
Ghuman, S. J., Lee, H. J., & Smith, H. L. (2006). Measurement of women’s autonomy according to women and their husbands. Social Science Research, 35(1), 1–28.
Hagenaars, J. A. (1990). Categorical longitudinal data: Log-linear panel, trend, and cohort analysis. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Hagenaars, J. A. (1993). Log-linear models with latent variables. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
Heinen, T. (1996). Latent class and discrete latent trait models: Similarities and differences. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
Jejeebhoy, S. J. (1998). Associations between wife-beating and fetal and infant death: Impressions from a survey in rural India. Studies in Family Planning, 29(3), 300–308.
Jejeebhoy, S. J., Acharya, R., Alexander, M., Garda, L., & Kanade, S. (2010). Measuring agency among unmarried young men and women. Economic and Political Weekly, 45(30), 56–64.
Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Sathar, Z. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27, 687–712.
Maddala, G. S. (1983). Limited-dependent and qualitative variables in econometrics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2003). Comparing latent class factor analysis with traditional factor analysis for data mining. In H. Bozdogan (Ed.), Statistical data mining and knowledge discovery (pp. 373–383). Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.
Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Female autonomy and fertility in five Asian countries. Paper presented at the Annual Meetings of the Population Association of America, New York, 25–27 March.
Mason, K. O., & Smith, H. L. (2001). Thinking about, measuring, and analyzing women’s empowerment/autonomy: Lessons from cross-country comparative studies. Presentation at the Annual Meeting of the Population Association of America, Washington, DC, 29–31 March.
Morgan, P. S., & Niraula, B. B. (1995). Gender inequality in two Nepali villages. Population and Development Review, 21(3), 541–561.
Morgan, S. P., Stash, S., Smith, H. L., & Mason, K. O. (2002). Muslim and non-Muslim differences in female autonomy and fertility: Evidence from four Asian countries. Population and Development Review, 28(3), 515–537.
Muthén, B. O. (1998–2004). Mplus technical appendices. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.
Niraula, B. B., & Morgan, P. S. (1996). Marriage formation, post-marital contact with natal kin and autonomy of women: Evidence from two Nepali settings. Population Studies, 50, 35–50.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sandberg, J., Rafail, P. Measurement models of women’s autonomy using the 1998/1999 India DHS. J Pop Research 30, 367–381 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-013-9117-x
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12546-013-9117-x