Excess travelling—what does it mean? New definition and a case study of excess commuters in Tyne and Wear, UK
This paper has four main aims. Firstly, to undertake a critical review of existing definitions of excess travel focused on travel to work and hence to present a new definition which takes account of important developments in the public transport literature. This is used as the basis to identify whether excess travellers exist in the journey to work context and to identify differences between excess commuters and non-excess travellers.
This is undertaken using two different methodologies of sample selection and analysis: innovative sample selection using GIS to identify hotspots is compared with destination sampling and for analysis the use of time and cost calculations are compared with generalised cost.
The results show that a small number of excess commuters do exist and that whilst these travellers admit to a variety of benefits they can get from travel, most of them are excess travelling voluntarily with many factors are influencing their travel choices.
Application of this research is that the better understanding of excess travel phenomenon in daily commute will allow for exploring public transport providers’ (PTP) policy to encourage sustainable transport patterns of commuting by meeting travellers’ expectations and, in the long run, marketing excess travel time into activity time what potentially might create extra revenue for PTP.
- Frost M et al (1998) Excess or wasteful commuting in a selection of British cities. Transp Res Part A Policy Pract 32(7):529–538 CrossRef
- Hamilton BW (1982) Wasteful commuting. J Polit Econ 90(5):1035–1053 CrossRef
- Horner MW, O’Kelly ME (2007) Is non-work travel excessive? J Transp Geogr 15:411–416 CrossRef
- Jain J, Lyons G (2007) The gift of travel time. J Transp Geogr. doi:10.1016/j.trangeo.2007.05.001
- King GF, Mast TM (1987) Excess travel: causes, extent, and consequences. Transport Research Record 1111:126–134
- Ma K, Banister D (2006) Excess commuting: a critical review. Transp Rev 26(6):749–767 CrossRef
- Merriman D et al (1995) Excess commuting in the Tokyo metropolitan area: measurement and policy simulations. Urban Stud 32(1):69–85 CrossRef
- Mokhtarian P, Salomon I (2001) How derived is the demand for travel? Some conceptual and measurement considerations. Transp Res A 35(8):695–719
- Pickett MW, Gray SM (1996) The effectiveness of bus-based park & ride. TRL Report 207, Transport Research Laboratory. Crowthorne, Berkshire
- Rodriguez DA (2003) Spatial choices and excess commuting: a case study of bank tellers in Bogota, Colombia. J Transp Geogr 12:49–61, 2004 CrossRef
- Stradling SG (2002) Transport user needs and marketing public transport. Munic Eng 151(1):23–28
- UK Department for Transport (2006) http://www.webtag.org.uk Accessed in May 2007
- UK National Statistics (2001) Census 2001, http://neighbourhood.statistics.gov.uk. Accessed May 2007
- Excess travelling—what does it mean? New definition and a case study of excess commuters in Tyne and Wear, UK
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
European Transport Research Review
Volume 2, Issue 2 , pp 69-83
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Excess travelling
- Generalised cost
- Excess traveller
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. School of Civil Engineering and Geosciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle Upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
- 2. Institute of Transport and Logistics Studies (ITLS), Faculty of Economics and Business, The University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia, 2006