Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Patient-Reported Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes: a Longitudinal Study

  • Published:
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Gestational Diabetes Mellitus (GDM) is a common health problem among pregnant women and may be associated with distress.

Purpose

The purpose of the study was to describe changes in patient-reported outcomes in women with GDM and identify factors associated with increased distress in these patients.

Research Design

The study was conducted in 205 women diagnosed with GDM. Study participants underwent a physical examination and completed a questionnaire two times during pregnancy. On average, the questionnaire was completed at 27 weeks of gestation at baseline and 36 weeks at follow-up. The questionnaire included socio-demographic and clinical variables, standardized patient-reported outcome measures, and questions about the impact of GDM on daily life, satisfaction with care, knowledge about GDM, and social and professional support. Our main outcome of interest was diabetes-related distress, measured by the Problem Areas in Diabetes (PAID) questionnaire. Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics and multivariable regression models.

Results

At baseline, 80 % of the women were satisfied with their diabetes care and 58 % said they managed their diabetes well. The proportion reporting little or no knowledge of GDM dropped from almost 50 % at baseline to 14 % at follow-up. However, the proportion reporting that GDM affected their social life increased from 26 to 35 %, and the proportion reporting interference with family life increased from 14 to 26 %. Insulin treatment, frequency of blood glucose measurements, lack of knowledge about GDM, and lack of support from family and health care providers were strongly and significantly associated with distress.

Conclusion

In women with GDM, intensified treatment and lack of informational and social support are associated with distress. These aspects of GDM care appear to be appropriate targets for future research and interventions aimed at reducing the level of distress in these patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buckley BS, Harreiter J, Damm P, Core Investigator Group DALI, et al. Gestational diabetes mellitus in Europe: prevalence, current screening practice and barriers to screening. A review. Diabet Med. 2012;29:844–54.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Reece EA, Leguizamón G, Wiznitzer A. Gestational diabetes: the need for a common ground. Lancet. 2009;373:1789–97.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. The HAPO Study Research Group. Hyperglycemia and adverse pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1991–2002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2013. Diabetes Care. 2013;36(Supplement 1):S11–66.

    Article  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Clinical recommendations (2012) Polish Diabetes Association (PDA). Available from: http://www.cukrzyca.info.pl/zalecenia_kliniczne_ptd, accessed on 28 Jan, 2013

  6. Daniells S, Grenyer BF, Davis WS, Coleman KJ, Burgess JA, Moses RG. Gestational diabetes mellitus: is a diagnosis associated with an increase in maternal anxiety and stress in the short and intermediate term? Diabetes Care. 2003;26:385–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Devsam BU, Bogossian FE, Peacock AS (2013). An interpretive review of women’s experiences of gestational diabetes mellitus: proposing a framework to enhance midwifery assessment. Women Birth S1871-5192(12)00103-5

  8. Neufeld HT. Food perceptions and concerns of aboriginal women coping with gestational diabetes in Winnipeg Manitoba. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2011;43(6):482–91.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans MK, O’Brien B. Gestational diabetes: the meaning of an at-risk pregnancy. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(1):66–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Persson M, Winkvist A, Mogren I. ‘From stun to gradual balance’—women’s experiences of living with gestational diabetes mellitus. Scand J Caring Sci. 2010;24(3):454–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lawson EJ, Rajaram S. A transformed pregnancy: the psychosocial consequences of gestational diabetes. Sociolf Health Illn. 1994;16(4):536–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nolan JA, McCrone S, Chertok IR. The maternal experience of having diabetes in pregnancy. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2011;23:611–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Carolan M (2012) Women's experiences of gestational diabetes self-management: a qualitative study. Midwifery S0266-6138(12)00048-4 (e-pub)

  14. Spirito A, Williams C, Ruggiero L, Bond A, McGarvey ST, Coustan D. Psychological impact of the diagnosis of gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 1989;73:562–6.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Langer N, Langer O. Emotional adjustment to diagnosis and intensified treatment of gestational diabetes. Obstet Gynecol. 1994;84:329–34.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lapolla A, Di Cianni G, Di Benedetto A, et al. Quality of life, wishes, and needs in women with gestational diabetes: Italian DAWN Pregnancy Study. Int J Endocrinol. 2012;2012:784726.

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Trutnovsky G, Panzitt T, Magnet E, Stern C, Lang U, Dorfer M. Gestational diabetes: women’s concerns, mood state, quality of life and treatment satisfaction. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2012;25:2464–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. WHO Consultation. Definition, diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus and its complications. Report of a WHO Consultation. Part 1: Diagnosis and classification of diabetes mellitus. Geneva: WHO/NSD/NCS/99.2, World Health Organization; 1999.

    Google Scholar 

  19. Zigmond AS, Snaith RP. The Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 1983;67:361–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Turner-Bowker DM, Bayliss MS, Ware Jr JE, Kosinski M. Usefulness of the SF-8 Health Survey for comparing the impact of migraine and other conditions. Qual Life Res. 2003;12:1003–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Polonsky WH, Anderson BJ, Lohrer PA, et al. Assessment of diabetes-related distress. Diabetes Care. 1995;18:754–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Bland M. An introduction to medical statistics. 3rd ed. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2000.

    Google Scholar 

  23. SAS Institute Inc (2008) SAS/STAT® 9.2 User’s Guide: Cary, NC

  24. Ogonowski J, Miazgowski T, Kuczyńska M, Krzyżanowska-Świniarska B, Celewicz Z. Pregravid body mass index as a predictor of gestational diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med. 2009;26:334–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Crowther CA, Hiller JE, Moss JR, McPhee AJ, Jeffries WS, Robinson JS, et al. Effect of treatment of gestational diabetes mellitus on pregnancy outcomes. N Engl J Med. 2005;352:2477–86.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups. International Association of Diabetes and Pregnancy Study Groups recommendations on the diagnosis and classification of hyperglycemia in pregnancy. Diabetes Care. 2010;33(3):676–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Shang M, Lin L. IADPSG criteria for diagnosing gestational diabetes mellitus and predicting adverse pregnancy outcomes. J Perinatol. 2014;34(2):100–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Population and Public Health, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada

    J. A. Kopec

  2. Arthritis Research Centre of Canada, 5591 No. 3 Road, Richmond, BC, V6X 2C7, Canada

    J. A. Kopec & Md. M. Rahman

  3. Outpatient Clinic for Diabetic Pregnant Women, District Hospital, Szczecin, Poland

    J. Ogonowski

  4. Pomeranian Medical University, Szczecin, Poland

    J. Ogonowski & T. Miazgowski

Authors
  1. J. A. Kopec
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Ogonowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Md. M. Rahman
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. T. Miazgowski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. A. Kopec.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kopec, J.A., Ogonowski, J., Rahman, M.M. et al. Patient-Reported Outcomes in Women with Gestational Diabetes: a Longitudinal Study. Int.J. Behav. Med. 22, 206–213 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9428-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12529-014-9428-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation