September 2013, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 337-343,
Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
Date: 25 May 2012
Possibilities and Hindrances for Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence: Perceptions Among Professionals and Decision Makers in a Swedish Medium-Sized Town
Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a major public health problem, but few evidence-based prevention programs have yet been implemented.
This study explored the perceptions and beliefs of local-level decision makers, social and health-care professionals, and representatives from the police force regarding the possibilities and hindrances for prevention of IPV.
An explorative qualitative approach was used, and participants were strategically selected for focus group discussions. The participants, 19 men and 23 women, were professionals or decision makers within health-care services, social welfare, municipal administration, the police force, local industry, and local politicians in a Swedish town of 54,000 inhabitants. The focus group discussions were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and thematically analyzed. A manifest content analysis was performed on the text.
Preschools, schools, sports associations, workplaces, and the mass media were suggested as possible arenas for prevention measures. The proposed activities included norm building and improved social support structures. Hindrances were conceptualized as societal beliefs and attitudes, shame, silence, gender inequality, the counteracting influence of the media, and lack of resources. The participants demonstrated closeness and distance to IPV, expressed as acceptance or referral of responsibility to others regarding where and by whom prevention measures should be executed.
This study gave new insights in the prevailing perceptions of professionals and decision makers of a medium-sized Swedish town, which can be a useful knowledge in future preventive work and contribute to bridge the gap between research and practice.
Krug EG, Mercy JA, Dahlberg LL, Zwi AB. World report on violence and health. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2002.
Graffunder CM, Noonan RK, Cox P, Wheaton J. Through a public health lens. Preventing violence against women: an update from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2004;13(1):5–16.CrossRef
Casteel C, Sandowski L. Intimate partner violence towards women. Clin Evid. 2010;pii:1013 [serial on the Internet].
Gottlieb AS. Intimate partner violence: a clinical review of screening and intervention. Womens Health (Lond Engl). 2008;4(5):529–39.CrossRef
Ronnberg AK, Hammarstrom A. Barriers within the health care system to dealing with sexualized violence: a literature review. Scand J Public Health. 2000;28(3):222–9.PubMed
Holmberg C, Bender C. Det är något speciellt med den här frågan - om det lokalpolitiska samtalet om mäns våld mot kvinnor. (There is something special about this question - about the local political discourse on men's violence against women). Umeå Brottsoffermyndigheten. (The Crime Victim Compensation and Support Authority) 2003.
Wibeck V, Abrandt Dahlgren M, Oberg G. Learning in focus-groups: an analytic dimension for enhancing focus group research. Qual Res. 2007;7(2):249–67.CrossRef
Kitzinger J. The methodology of focus groups: the importance of interactions between research participants. Sociol Health Illn. 1994;16:103–21.CrossRef
Klevens J, Saltzman LE. The Controversy on screening for intimate partner violence: a question of semantics? J Womens Health. 2009;18(2):143–5.CrossRef
Babor T. Alcohol: No ordinary commodity—research and public policy. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2003.
Miller D, Prentice D. The construction of social norms and standards. In: Higgins E, Kruglanski A, editors. Social psychology: Handbook of basic principles. New York: Guilford; 1996.
Fiske S. Social beings: A core motives approach to social psychology. New York: Wiley; 2004.
Coleman J. Foundation of social theory. Cambridge: Harvard University Press; 1990.
Kerr N. Norms in social dilemmas. In: Schroeder D, editor. Social dilemmas: Social psychological perspectives. New York: Pergamon; 1995.
Hamilton LV. Who is responsible? Toward a social psychology of responsibility attribution. Soc Psychol. 1978;41:316–28.CrossRef
Kelman HC, Hamilton VL. Crimes of obedience: Toward a social psychology of authority and responsibility. New Haven: Yale University Press; 1989.
Wolf M, Ly U, Hobart M, Kernic M. Barriers to seeking police help for intimate partner violence. J Fam Viol. 2003;18(3):121–9.CrossRef
- Possibilities and Hindrances for Prevention of Intimate Partner Violence: Perceptions Among Professionals and Decision Makers in a Swedish Medium-Sized Town
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
International Journal of Behavioral Medicine
Volume 20, Issue 3 , pp 337-343
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Intimate partner violence
- Domestic violence
- Shared responsibility
- Qualitative method
- Author Affiliations
- 2. Department of Public Health and Community Medicine/Social Medicine, The Sahlgrenska Academy at University of Gothenburg, Box 453, 405 30, Gothenburg, Sweden
- 1. Department of Psychology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden