The corrosive influence of competition, growth, and accountability on institutions of higher education
- Richard A. Schwier
- … show all 1 hide
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Three agendas are at work in higher education that threaten the fundamental purposes and values of universities: competition, growth, and accountability. Instructional design and technology contributes to all three agendas through our emphasis on efficiency in teaching and learning, but could make a stronger contribution to the ideals of the university by attending to quality of teaching and learning and ways to merge research and teaching.
- Alon, S. (2009). The evolution of class inequality in higher education: Competition, exclusion, and adaptation. American Sociological Review, 74(5), 731–755. CrossRef
- Atwell, R. H. (1986). Competition and the commonweal. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED277299).
- Bok, D. (1986). Higher learning. Educational Resources Information Center #ED278312.
- Buckley, M. R., Novicevic, M. M., Halbesleben, J. R. B., & Harvey, M. (2004). Course management and students’ expectations: Theory-based considerations. International Journal of Educational Management, 18(2), 138–144. CrossRef
- Davis, J., & Ferreira, J. (2006). Higher education inc.: The personal and professional dilemmas of environmental educators undertaking research with/for private corporations. Australian Journal of Environmental Education, 22(1), 39–47.
- Greenough, W. T., McConnaughay, P. J., & Kesan, J. P. (2006). Defining values for research and technology: The university’s changing role. Lanham, Maryland: Rowman and Littlefield.
- Lippmann, S., Bulanda, R. E., & Wagenaar, T. C. (2009). Student entitlement: Issues and strategies for confronting entitlement in the classroom and beyond. College Teaching, 57(4), 197–204.
- Marginson, S. (2004). Competition and markets in higher education: a “glonacal” analysis. Policy Futures in Education, 2(2), 175–244. CrossRef
- McPherson, P., & Shulenburger, D. (2006). Toward a voluntary system of accountability program (VSA) for public universities and colleges. National Association of State Universities and Land-Grant Colleges. Retrieved from ERIC database (ED519715).
- Pratt, B. (2012). Academic freedom and targeted research. Vox, 3.
- Shah, M., Nair, S., & Wilson, M. (2011). Quality assurance in Australian higher education: Historical and future development. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(3), 475–483. CrossRef
- Springer, A. R. (2012). Suppressing the ideals of “the university”: A troubling realization for a new academic. Vox.
- Woodhouse, H. (2009). Selling out: Academic freedom and the corporate market. Montreal, PQ: McGill-Queens University Press.
- The corrosive influence of competition, growth, and accountability on institutions of higher education
Journal of Computing in Higher Education
Volume 24, Issue 2 , pp 96-103
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer US
- Additional Links
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Curriculum Studies, University of Saskatchewan, 28 Campus Drive, Saskatoon, SK, S7N 0X1, Canada