Current Cardiovascular Imaging Reports

, Volume 6, Issue 2, pp 117–127

A Critical Review of Different Imaging Methods for the Assessment of Myocardial Ischemia

Authors

    • Department of CardiologyMaastricht University Medical Center
    • Department of RadiologyMaastricht University Medical Center
    • Cardiovascular Research Institute
  • Eike Nagel
    • Division of Imaging Sciences and Medical Engineering, King’s College London, The Rayne InstituteSt. Thomas’ Hospital
  • Simon Schalla
    • Department of CardiologyMaastricht University Medical Center
    • Department of RadiologyMaastricht University Medical Center
    • Cardiovascular Research Institute
Cardiac Magnetic Resonance (E Nagel, Section Editor)

DOI: 10.1007/s12410-012-9185-x

Cite this article as:
Jaarsma, C., Nagel, E. & Schalla, S. Curr Cardiovasc Imaging Rep (2013) 6: 117. doi:10.1007/s12410-012-9185-x

Abstract

Coronary artery disease (CAD) continues to be a major cause of morbidity and mortality in industrialized countries. Myocardial ischemia imaging is increasingly being performed to detect obstructive CAD, guide therapy, and provide prognostic information. There are several imaging modalities available to assess the presence and extent of myocardial ischemia, such as single-photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron emission tomography (PET), stress echocardiography, and cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (CMR). This review discusses the various imaging methods, providing an overview of the specific benefits and drawbacks, and reviews recent literature on the diagnostic and prognostic value of each technique.

Keywords

Coronary artery diseaseMyocardial ischemiaNon-invasive imagingSingle-photon emission computed tomographyPositron emission tomographyEchocardiographyCardiovascular magnetic resonance imagingComputed tomographyFractional flow reserveDiagnostic accuracyPrognosis

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013