Skip to main content
Log in

What Effect Does an Animal Robot Called CuDDler Have on the Engagement and Emotional Response of Older People with Dementia? A Pilot Feasibility Study

  • Published:
International Journal of Social Robotics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of companion animal robots is of growing interest. These robots have recently been marketed to older adults with dementia as a means of encouraging social engagement and reducing behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia. This paper outlines the results of a pilot study that sought to assess the feasibility and effect of using a robotic companion animal called CuDDler on engagement and emotional states of five older adults with dementia living in nursing home care. CuDDler is a prototype robot developed in Singapore. Despite their cognitive decline, the study participants raised a number of concerns regarding the feasibility and tolerability of CuDDler. The effectiveness of CuDDler was also limited in these participants, although one participant with visual agnosia benefited greatly from the one-on-one experience. The findings demonstrate the importance of companion robots being developed that are of an appropriate size, weight and shape for older people, including those with dementia, and a realistic animal shape that does not encourage thoughts of it being a toy. Our conclusions indicate the need for further studies on the development and use of companion robots, and investigation of the comparative benefits of social robots both compared to and in association with human interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. World Health Organisation (WHO), Alzheimer’s Disease International (2012) Dementia. A public health priority. World Health Organisation, Geneva

  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare (2012) Dementia in Australia. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Canberra

  3. Draper B (2011) Understanding Alzheimer’s & other dementias. Longueville Books, Woollahra

    Google Scholar 

  4. Brodaty H, Draper BM, Low LF (2003) Behavioural and psychological symptoms of dementia: a seven-tiered model of service delivery. Med J Aust 178:231–234

    Google Scholar 

  5. Moyle W, Venturato L, Griffiths S, Grimbeek P, McAllister M, Oxlade D, Murfield J (2011) Factors influencing quality of life for people with dementia: a qualitative perspective. Aging Ment Health 15:970–977

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hwang SS, Kim Y, da Yun Y, Kim YS, Jung HYJ (2012) Exploration of the associations between neurocognitive function and neuroleptics side effects. Psychiatr Res 46:913–919

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Vickland V, Werner J, Morris T, McDonnell D, Draper B, Low LF, Brodaty H (2011) Who pays and who benefits. How different models of shared responsibilities between formal and informal carers influence projections of costs of dementia management. BMC Pub Health 11:793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vernooiji-Dassen M, Vasse E, Zuidema S, Cohen-Mansfield J, Moyle W (2010) Psychosocial interventions for dementia patients in long-term care. Int Psychogeriatr 22(7):1121–1128

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Harmer BJ, Orrell M (2008) What is meaningful activity for people with dementia living in care homes? A comparison of the views of older people with dementia, staff and family carers. Aging Ment Health 12:548–558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brooker D (2008) What makes a life worth living? Aging Ment Hlth 12:525–527

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Libin A, Cohen-Mansfield J (2004) Therapeutic robocat for nursing home residents with dementia: preliminary inquiry. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis Other Demen 19:111–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Moyle W, Cooke M, Beattie E, Jones C, Klein B, Cook G, Gray C (2013) Exploring the effect of companion robots on emotional expression in older people with dementia: a pilot RCT. J Gerontol Nurs 39:46–53. doi:10.3928/00989134-20130313-03

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wada K, Shibata T (2007) Living with seal robots: its sociopsychological and physiological influences on the elderly at a care house. IEEE Trans Robot 23:972–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fluffy baby robot helps keep you company. http://www.newscientist.com/blogs/onepercent/2011/12/baby-robot.html. Accessed 11 April 2015

  15. Frennert S, Ostlund B (2014) Review: seven matters of concern of social robots and older people. Int J Soc Robot 6:299–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Sellers DM (2006) The evaluation of an animal-assisted therapy intervention for elders with dementia in long-term care. Act Adapt Aging 30:61–77

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kanamori M, Suzuki M, Tanaka M (2002) Maintenance and improvement of quality of life among elderly patients using a pet-type robot. Nippon Ronen Igakkai Zasshi 39:214–218

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Limbu DK, Anthony WCY, Adrian THJ, Tran AD, Kee CT, Tran HD, Alvin WHY, Terence NWZ, Jiang R, Li J (2013) Affective social interaction with CuDDler robot. In: 6th IEEE conference on robotics, automation and mechatronics (RAM), pp 179–184

  19. Yin RK (2008) Case study research. Design and methods, 4th edn. Sage Publications, Los Angeles

    Google Scholar 

  20. de Jonghe SE, Korevaar AJC, Van Munster BC, de Rooij SE (2010) Effectiveness of melatonin treatment on circadian rhythm disturbances in dementia. Are there implications for delirium? A systematic review. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry 25:1201–1208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Folstein MF, Folstein SE, McHugh PR (1975) Mini-mental state: a practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. J Psychiatr Res 12:189–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. O’Bryant SE, Humphreys JD, Smith GE, Lynik RJ, Graff-Radford NR, Petersen RC, Lucas JA (2008) Detecting dementia with the mini-mental state examination in highly educated individuals. Arch Neurol 65:963–967

    Google Scholar 

  23. Lawton MP, Van Haitsma K, Klapper J (1996) Observed affect in nursing home residents with Alzheimer’s disease. J Gerontol Ser B 51B:3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Cohen-Mansfield J, Dakheel-Ali M, Marx MS (2009) Engagement in persons with dementia: the concept and its measurement. Am J Geriatr Psychiatry 17:299–307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Clair AA (2002) The effects of music therapy on engagement in family caregiver and care receiver couples with dementia. Am J Alzheimer’s Dis Demen 17:286–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Cohen-Mansfield J, Werner P (1998) Predictors of aggressive behaviour: a longitudinal study in senior day-care centres. J Gerontol 53B:300–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Heerink M, Kröse B, Evers V, Wielinga B (2010) Assessing acceptance of assistive social agent technology by older adults: the almere model. Int J Soc Robot 2:361–375

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Salvini P, Laschi C, Dario P (2010) Design for acceptability: improving robots’ coexistence in human society. Int J Soc Robot 2:451–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Kanda T, Miyashita T, Osada T, Haikawa Y, Ishiguro H (2008) Analysis of humanoid appearances in human–robot interaction. IEEE Trans Robot 24:725–735

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Goetz J, Kiesler S, Powers A (2003) Matching robot appearance and behavior to tasks to improve human-robot cooperation. In: Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international workshop on robot and human interaction communication. Millbrae, CA, pp 55–60

  31. Bartlett B, Estivill-Castro V, Seymon S (2004) Dogs or robots: why do children see them as robotic pets rather than canine machines? In: Proceedings of the fifth conference on Australasian user interface, vol 28. Australian User-Interface Conference AUIC ’04, Dunedin, New Zealand, Australian Computer Society, Inc., pp 7–14

  32. Dunn J, Balfour M, Moyle W, Cooke M, Martin K, Crystal C, Yen A (2013) Playfully engaging people living with dementia: searching for Yum Cha moments. Int J Play 2:174–186. doi:10.1080/21594937.2013.852052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Lin P, Abney K, Bekey GA (2011) Robot ethics: the ethical and social implications of robotics. MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2012) Granny and the robots: ethical issues in robot care for the elderly. Ethics Inf Technol 14:27–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Sharkey A, Sharkey N (2011) Children, the elderly, and interactive robots. IEEE Robot Autom Mag 18:32–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Moyle, W, Beattie E, Draper B, Shum D, Thalib L (2014) Effect of an interactive therapeutic robotic animal on engagement, mood states, agitation and antipsychotic drug use. NHMRC Project Grant APP1065320, 2014-2017

  37. Moyle W, Cooke ML, Beattie E, Shum DHK, O’Dwyer S, Barrett S, Sung B (2014) Foot massage and physiological stress in people with dementia: a randomized controlled trial. J Altern Complementary Med 20:305–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank Pam Scherman Carr, staff and residents of RSL Care Pinjarra Hills, Brisbane, Australia for their participation in this project, Dr Tan for giving us CuDDler to trial and Dr Rene Hexel and Carl Lusty from IIIS at Griffith University for undertaking maintenance of CuDDler. The Dementia Collaborative Research Centre – Carers and Consumers, Australia, funded this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wendy Moyle.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

No conflict of interest declared.

Ethical Statement

The study received ethical approval from Griffith University Human Research Ethics Committee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moyle, W., Jones, C., Sung, B. et al. What Effect Does an Animal Robot Called CuDDler Have on the Engagement and Emotional Response of Older People with Dementia? A Pilot Feasibility Study. Int J of Soc Robotics 8, 145–156 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0326-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12369-015-0326-7

Keywords

Navigation