Date: 02 Nov 2011
Utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in two health care systems: Assessment with the 2009 ACCF/ASNC/AHA appropriateness use criteria
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Although differences in the rate of utilization of invasive cardiac procedures between Veterans Affairs (VA) hospitals and other health care systems are present, noninvasive cardiac imaging use pattern has not been well studied. We evaluated the ability of the updated appropriateness use criteria (AUC) to determine utilization patterns of myocardial perfusion imaging (MPI) and compare use between an academic practice and a VA.
One-hundred fifty stress/rest MPI studies in an academic practice and 150 at a VA hospital were retrospectively reviewed using the hierarchical approach published in the 2009 AUC.
Less than 1% of studies were unclassified. A higher percentage of MPI were requested for inappropriate reason at the VA, although this difference was not statistically significant (P = .248). In the VA, non-physicians requested significantly more inappropriate studies than physicians (26.8% vs 20.1%; P < .048). Within the academic practice non-cardiologists referred more patients for inappropriate indications than cardiologists (23.9% vs 10.1%; P = .001). Five most common inappropriate indications accounted for the vast majority of inappropriately requested MPI (77%).
The revised 2009 AUC allow for near complete categorization of appropriateness in testing. Differences between institutions and provider types were noted and areas for improved utilization were identified.
Hendel RC, et al. ACCF/ASNC/ACR/AHA/ASE/SCCT/SCMR/SNM 2009 Appropriate use criteria for cardiac radionuclide imaging: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation Appropriate Use Criteria Task Force, the American Society of Nuclear Cardiology, the American College of Radiology, the American Heart Association, the American Society of Echocardiography, the Society of Cardiovascular Computed Tomography, the Society for Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance, and the Society of Nuclear Medicine. Circulation 2009;199:e561-e587.
Mehta R, et al. Evaluation of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Society of Nuclear Cardiology appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging. J Nucl Cardiol 2008;15:337-44 (epub 2008 April 16).
Hooker RS. Physician assistants and nurse practitioners: The United States experience. Med J Aust 2006;185:4-7.PubMed
Appropriateness use criteria for radionuclide imaging for i-phones. http://www.astellasapps.com/. Accessed September 18, 2010.
Imaging in FOCUS: RNI Improvement Tool on Cardiosource. http://www.cardiosource.org/Science-And-Quality/Quality-Programs/Imaging-in-FOCUS/RNI-Decision-Support-Tool.aspx.
Hooker RS. A cost analysis of physician assistants in primary care. J Am Acad Phys Assist 2002;15:39-42.
Koh AS, Flores JL, Keng FY, et al. Evaluation of the ACCF/ASNC appropriateness criteria for SPECT myocardial perfusion imaging in an Asian tertiary cardiac center. J Nucl Cardiol 2011;18:324-30 (epub 2010 November 24).
- Utilization of radionuclide myocardial perfusion imaging in two health care systems: Assessment with the 2009 ACCF/ASNC/AHA appropriateness use criteria
Journal of Nuclear Cardiology
Volume 19, Issue 1 , pp 37-42
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- diagnostic and prognostic application
- Industry Sectors