Bilateral breast MR imaging: is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer?
Purchase on Springer.com
$39.95 / €34.95 / £29.95*
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.
Breast MR imaging has emerged as a highly sensitive modality for the imaging of breast tumors. However, there have been no reports concerning the usefulness of bilateral breast MRI to evaluate the contralateral breast in Japan. The purpose of this study was to examine the frequency of primary bilateral breast cancer, and to investigate the role of bilateral breast MRI in the detection of contralateral breast cancer.
A retrospective review was performed of 556 consecutive women who had undergone surgery for the primary breast cancer. MR imaging was performed on a 1.5-T system. Both the breasts were examined in the coronal plane on the first-, second-, and fourth-phase dynamic images, acquired at 30, 90 s, and 4.5 min, respectively. The affected single breast was sagittally examined on images obtained in the third phase at 3 min.
Twenty-four (4.3%) patients had bilateral breast cancer, 14 (2.5%) had synchronous cancer and 10 patients (1.8%) had metachronous cancer. In the 14 cases with synchronous cancer, bilateral breast malignancy was suspected at the time of the initial diagnosis in 6 cases. The detection rate of 18 contralateral breast cancer cases by only MMG, only US, MMG and US, and MRI were 50% (9/18), 67% (12/18), 78% (14/18) and 100% (17/17), respectively. For 8 of these cases with a second synchronous cancer, the corresponding rates were 75, 88, 100 and 100%, respectively. For the 10 cases with a second metachronous cancer, the rates were 30, 50, 60 and 100%, respectively.
Bilateral breast MRI is a more sensitive for the detection of contralateral breast cancers compared with conventional imaging methods. In particular, bilateral MRI also allows detection of metachronous contralateral cancers at an earlier stage during the postoperative follow-up period.
- Lehman CD, Kuhl CK, Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Hanna L, Peacock S, Smazal SF, Maki DD, Julian TB, Deperi ER, Bluemke DA, Schnall MD. MRI evaluation of the contralateral breast in women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. N Engl J Med. 2007;356:1295–303. CrossRef
- Lee SG, Orel SG, Woo IJ, Cruz-Jove E, Putt ME, Solin LJ, Czerniecki BJ, Schnall MD. MR imaging screening of the contralateral breast in patients with newly diagnosed breast cancer: preliminary results. Radiology. 2003;226:773–8. CrossRef
- Liberman L, Morris EA, Kim CM, Kaplan JB, Abramson AF, Menell JH, Van Zee KJ, Dershaw DD. MR imaging findings in the contralateral breast of women with recently diagnosed breast cancer. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:333–41.
- Viehweg P, Rotter K, Laniado M, Lampe D, Buchmann J, Kolbl H, Heywang-Kobrunner S. MR imaging of the contralateral breast in patients after breast-conserving therapy. Eur Radiol. 2004;14:402–8. CrossRef
- Friedman PD, Swaminathan SV, Herman K, Kalisher L, Breast MRI. The importance of bilateral imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006;187:345–9. CrossRef
- Kasumi F. Bilateral breast cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Surg Soc. 1985;86:266–79.
- Second edition of mammmography guideline, Japan Radiological Society/Japanese Society of Radiological Technology. Committee of mammography guideline/mammography committee editing; 2004.
- Breast sonography guideline, Japan Association of breast and thyroid Sonology editing; 2004.
- Orel SG, Schnall MD. MR imaging of the breast for the detection, diagnosis, and staging of breast cancer. Radiology. 2001;220:13–30.
- Heywang SH, Hahn D, Schmidt H, Krischke I, Eiermann W, Bassermann R, Lissner J. MR imaging of the breast using gadolinium-DTPA. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1986;10:199–204. CrossRef
- Kaiser WA, Zeitler E. MR imaging of the breast: fast imaging sequences with and without Gd-DTPA. Radiology. 1989;170:681–6.
- Harms SE, Flamig DP, Hesley KL, Meiches MD, Jensen RA. Evans WP, Savino DA,Wells RV. MR imaging of the breast with rotating delivery of excitation off resonance: clinical experience with pathologic correlation. Radiology. 1993;187:493–501.
- Boetes C, Barentsz JO, Mus RD, van der Sluis RF, van Erning LJ, Hendriks JH, Holland R, Ruys SH. MR characterization of suspicious breast lesions with a gadolinium-enhanced TurboFLASH subtraction technique. Radiology. 1994;193:777–81.
- Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Viehweg P, Heinig A, Kuchler C. Contrast-enhanced MRI of the breast: accuracy, value, controversies, solutions. Eur Radiol. 1997;24:94–108. CrossRef
- Tozaki M. Interpretation of Breast MRI: correlation of kinetic and morphological parameters with pathological findings. Magn Reson Med Sci. 2004;3:189–97. CrossRef
- Sakamoto N, Tozaki M, Fukuma E, Higa K, Tsunoda Y, Abe S, Ogawa T, Ozaki S, Sakamoto M, Tsuruhara T, Narita M. The Role of Ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy in the management of MRI-detected lesions (in Japanese with English abstract). Jpn J Breast Cancer. 2007;22:275–9.
- Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Schaumloeffel-Schulze U, Viehweg P, Buchmann J, Lampe D, Spielmann R. MR-guided percutaneous excisional and incisional biopsy of breast lesions. Eur Radiol. 1999;9:1656–65. CrossRef
- Morris EA, Liberman L, Dershaw DD, Kaplan JB, LaTrenta LR, Abramson AF, Ballon DJ. Preoperative MR imaging-guided needle localization of breast lesions. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002;178:1211–20.
- Kuhl CK, Morakkabati N, Leutner CC, Schmiedel A, Wardelmann E, Schild HH. MR imaging-guided large-core (14-gauge) needle biopsy of small lesions visible at breast MR imaging alone. Radiology. 2001;220:31–9.
- Prat X, Sittek H, Baath L, Perlet C, Alberich T, Lamarque JM, Andersson I, Reiser M, Taourel P, Fischer H, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. European quadricentric evaluation of a breast MR biopsy and localization device: technical improvements based on phase-I evaluation. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1720–7. CrossRef
- Viehweg P, Heinig A, Amaya B, Alberich T, Laniado M, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. MR-guided interventional breast procedures considering vacuum biopsy in particular. Eur J Radiol. 2002;42:32–9. CrossRef
- Perlet C, Heinig A, Prat X, Casselman J, Baath L, Sittek H, Stets C, Lamarque J, Anderson I, Schneider P, Taourel P, Reiser M, Heywang-Kobrunner SH. Multicenter study for the evaluation of a dedicated biopsy device for MR-guided vacuum biopsy of the breast. Eur Radiol. 2002;12:1463–70. CrossRef
- Perlet C, Heywang-Kobrunner SH, Heinig A, Sittek H, Casselman J, Anderson I, Taourel P. Magnetic resonance-guided, vacuum-assisted breast biopsy: results from a European multicenter study of 538 lesions. Cancer. 2006;106:982–90. CrossRef
- LaTrenta LR, Menell JH, Morris EA, Abramson AF, Dershaw DD, Liberman L. Breast lesions detected with MR imaging: utility and histopathologic importance of identification with US. Radiology. 2003;227:856–61. CrossRef
- Sakota Y, Kohno N, Kanbara Y, Ishikawa Y, Sashikata T. A study of bilateral breast cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Surg Assoc. 1993;54:1439–44.
- Oshiro T, Kataoka T, Kadoya T, Sugi K, Takahashi M, Haruta R, Asahara T, Dohi K. Clicicopathological study of primary breast cancer (in Japanese with English abstract). J Jpn Surg Assoc. 2000;61:11–6.
- Bilateral breast MR imaging: is it superior to conventional methods for the detection of contralateral breast cancer?
Volume 15, Issue 2 , pp 169-174
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Japan
- Additional Links
- Contralateral breast cancer
- Bilateral imaging
- Industry Sectors
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Breast Center, Kameda Medical Center, 929 Higashi-cho, Kamogawa, Chiba, 296-8602, Japan
- 2. Kameda Makuhari Clinic, 1-3 Nakase, Mihamaku, Chiba, 261-8501, Japan