Outcomes considered most important by emergency physicians when determining disposition of patients with pulmonary embolism
Clinical decision rules for the disposition of patients with pulmonary embolism (PE) are typically validated against an outcome of 30-day mortality or disease recurrence. There is little justification for this time frame, nor is it clear whether this outcome reflects emergency department (ED) decision making.
To determine which outcomes emergency physicians (EP) consider most relevant to disposition decisions.
Survey of attending EPs in geographically diverse US states using acute PE as the diagnostic framework. Responses required single-answer multiple choice, a numerical percentage, rank-ordered responses, or a five-point Likert scale. We distributed the survey via e-mail to 608 EPs.
We received responses from 292 (48%) EPs: 88% board certified, 91% trained in emergency medicine, and 70% work in academics. Respondents reported discharging 1% of patients with PE from the ED, but 21% reported being asked to do so by an admitting service. EPs were more interested in knowing 5-day (in hospital) outcomes [192/265, 72% (95% exact CI = 66%–78%)] than 30-day outcomes [39/261, 15% (95% exact CI = 11%–20%)] or 90-day outcomes [29/263, 11% (95% exact CI = 8%–15%)]. On a Likert scale, 212/241 (88%, 95% exact CI = 83%–92%) agreed or strongly agreed that they considered 5-day (in hospital) clinical deterioration when making a decision to admit or discharge a patient from the ED compared to 184/242 (76%, 95% exact CI = 70%–81%) and 73/242 (30%, 95% exact CI = 24%–36%) for 30 and 90 days, respectively. A wide variety of clinical outcomes beyond death or recurrent PE were considered indicative of clinical deterioration.
Five-day (in hospital) outcomes that incorporate a variety of clinical deterioration events are of interest to EPs when determining the disposition of ED patients with PE. Researchers should consider this when developing and validating clinical decision rules.
- Fine MJ et al (1997) A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with community-acquired pneumonia. N Engl J Med 336(4):243–250 CrossRef
- Quinn J et al (2006) Prospective validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 47(5):448–454 CrossRef
- Quinn JV et al (2004) Derivation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule to predict patients with short-term serious outcomes. Ann Emerg Med 43(2):224–232 CrossRef
- Rothwell PM et al (2005) A simple score (ABCD) to identify individuals at high early risk of stroke after transient ischaemic attack. Lancet 366(9479):29–36 CrossRef
- Tsivgoulis G et al (2006) Validation of the ABCD score in identifying individuals at high early risk of stroke after a transient ischemic attack: a hospital-based case series study. Stroke 37(12):2892–2897 CrossRef
- Aujesky D et al (2005) Derivation and validation of a prognostic model for pulmonary embolism. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 172(8):1041–1046 CrossRef
- Aujesky D et al (2006) A prediction rule to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism. Arch Intern Med 166(2):169–175 CrossRef
- Runyon MS, Richman PB, Kline JA (2007) Emergency medicine practitioner knowledge and use of decision rules for the evaluation of patients with suspected pulmonary embolism: variations by practice setting and training level. Acad Emerg Med 14(1):53–57 CrossRef
- Hyers TM et al (2001) Antithrombotic therapy for venous thromboembolic disease. Chest 119(1 Suppl):176S–193S CrossRef
- Aujesky D et al (2008) Length of hospital stay and postdischarge mortality in patients with pulmonary embolism: a statewide perspective. Arch Intern Med 168(7):706–712 CrossRef
- Park B et al (2009) Recent trends in clinical outcomes and resource utilization for pulmonary embolism in the United States: findings from the nationwide inpatient sample. Chest 136(4):983–990 CrossRef
- Jimenez D et al (2007) Prognostic models for selecting patients with acute pulmonary embolism for initial outpatient therapy. Chest 132(1):24–30 CrossRef
- Aujesky D et al (2007) Validation of a clinical prognostic model to identify low-risk patients with pulmonary embolism. J Intern Med 261(6):597–604 CrossRef
- Nendaz MR et al (2004) Validation of a risk score identifying patients with acute pulmonary embolism, who are at low risk of clinical adverse outcome. Thromb Haemost 91(6):1232–1236
- Sun BC et al (2007) External validation of the San Francisco Syncope Rule. Ann Emerg Med 49(4):420–427, 427 e1-4 CrossRef
- Agterof MJ et al (2009) Risk stratification of patients with pulmonary embolism based on pulse rate and D-dimer concentration. Thromb Haemost 102(4):683–687
- Lobo JL et al (2009) D-dimer levels and 15-day outcome in acute pulmonary embolism. Findings from the RIETE registry. J Thromb Haemost
- Heit JA (2005) Venous thromboembolism: disease burden, outcomes and risk factors. J Thromb Haemost 3(8):1611–1617 CrossRef
- Silverstein MD et al (1998) Trends in the incidence of deep vein thrombosis and pulmonary embolism: a 25-year population-based study. Arch Intern Med 158(6):585–593 CrossRef
- Janjua M et al (2008) Treatment of acute pulmonary embolism as outpatients or following early discharge. A systematic review. Thromb Haemost 100(5):756–761
- Segal JB et al (2007) Management of venous thromboembolism: a systematic review for a practice guideline. Ann Intern Med 146(3):211–222
- Stein PD, et al (2009) Early discharge of patients with venous thromboembolism: implications regarding therapy. Clin Appl Thromb Hemost
- Yeager BF, Matheny SC (1999) Low-molecular-weight heparin in outpatient treatment of DVT. Am Fam Physician 59(4):945–952
- Cairns CB et al (1998) Development of new methods to assess the outcomes of emergency care. Acad Emerg Med 5(2):157–161 CrossRef
- Courtney DM et al (2009) Unique characteristics of emergency care research: scope, populations, and infrastructure. Acad Emerg Med 16(10):990–994 CrossRef
- Outcomes considered most important by emergency physicians when determining disposition of patients with pulmonary embolism
- Open Access
- Available under Open Access This content is freely available online to anyone, anywhere at any time.
International Journal of Emergency Medicine
Volume 3, Issue 4 , pp 239-264
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Additional Links
- Clinical decision rule
- Emergency department
- Pulmonary embolism
- Venous thromboembolism
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Zero Emerson Place, Suite 3B, Boston, MA, 02114, USA
- 2. Davidson College, Davidson, NC, USA
- 3. Internal Medicine Residency Program, Boston University Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA