Abstract
Three aerial photography inventories were used to examine change in submerged aquatic vegetation (SAV) in the tidal freshwater Hudson River over the interval 1997 to 2007. Overall, there was about a 30 % net decline in SAV coverage although there were also many individual areas of expansion. The invasive water chestnut (Trapa natans) did not change appreciably in net cover over the interval, and there was replacement of SAV by water chestnut along with slightly fewer cases of SAV replacing the exotic. A fine-scale (100 m by 100 m quadrats) analysis showed that about 30 % of quadrats that supported vegetation changed by more than 10 % in plant cover and overall SAV was quite dynamic. SAV in the Hudson is limited by light which is in turn controlled by suspended sediment. SAV was rarely found at depths >1 m below low water, and interannual differences in clarity affected the ability of SAV beds to maintain locally supersaturated levels of dissolved oxygen. We found that location within the River channel (proximity to shore) influenced the magnitude and variability in change in SAV between census periods. The physical nature of the adjacent shoreline also affected the magnitude of change with greater declines in cover in areas next to hard-engineered shore types. SAV in the Hudson is highly dynamic, apparently quite resilient, and the control of light by suspended sediment rather than phytoplankton growth offers a contrast to eutrophication-influenced changes in other estuaries. Management and protection of SAV habitat must recognize the highly variable nature of plant cover and that absence in any particular year does not preclude future appearance of submerged plants at that location.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bain, M.B. 1993. Assessing impacts of introduced aquatic species: grass carp in large systems. Environmental Management 17: 211–224.
Boylen, C.W., L.W. Eichler, and J.D. Madsen. 1999. Loss of native aquatic plant species in a community dominated by Eurasian watermilfoil. Hydrobiologia 415: 207–211.
Bull, J.C., E.J. Kenyon, and K.J. Cook. 2012. Wasting disease regulates long-term population dynamics in a threatened seagrass. Oecologia 169: 135–142. doi:10.1007/s00442-011-2187-6.
Caraco, N.F., J.J. Cole, and P.A. Raymond. 1997. Zebra mussel invasion in a large, turbid river: Phytoplankton response to increased grazing. Ecology 78: 588–602.
Caraco, N.F., and J.J. Cole. 2002. Contrasting impacts of a native and alien macrophyte on dissolved oxygen in a large river. Ecological Applications 12: 1496–1509. doi:10.2307/3099987.
Caraco, N.F., J.J. Cole, S.E.G. Findlay, D.T. Fischer, G.G. Lampman, M.L. Pace, and D.L. Strayer. 2000. Dissolved oxygen declines in the Hudson River associated with the invasion of the zebra mussel (Dreissena polymorpha). Environmental Science and Technology 34: 1204–1210.
Costello, C.T., and W.J. Kenworthy. 2011. Twelve-year mapping and change analysis of eelgrass (Zostera marina) areal abundance in Massachusetts (USA) identifies statewide declines. Estuaries and Coasts 34: 232–242.
Dennison, W.C., R.J. Orth, K.A. Moore, J.C. Stevenson, V. Carter, S. Kollar, P.W. Bergstrom, and R.A. Batiuk. 1993. Assessing water quality with submersed aquatic vegetation. Bioscience 43: 86–94.
Findlay, S., M. Pace, and D. Fischer. 1996. Spatial and temporal variability in the lower food web of the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Estuaries 19:866–873.
Findlay, S.E.G., W.C. Nieder, and D.T. Fischer. 2006a. Multi-scale controls on water quality effects of submerged aquatic vegetation in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Ecosystems 9: 84–96.
Findlay, S.E.G., C. Wigand, and W.C. Nieder. 2006b. Submersed macrophyte distribution and function in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. In The Hudson River ecosystem, ed. J. Levinton and J. Waldman, 230–241. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fonseca, M.S., and S.S. Bell. 1998. Influence of physical setting on seagrass landscapes near Beaufort, North Carolina, USA. Marine Ecology Progress Series 171: 109–121.
Fortin, M.-J., and M. Dale. 2005. Spatial analysis: a guide for ecologists. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Harley, M.T., and S. Findlay. 1994. Photosynthesis-irradiance relationships for three species of submersed macrophytes in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Estuaries 17: 200–205.
Hilt, S., J. Köhler, H.-P. Kozerski, E.H. van Nes, and M. Scheffer. 2011. Abrupt regime shifts in space and time along rivers and connected lake systems. Oikos 120: 766–775.
Hughes, A.R., S.L. Williams, C.M. Duarte, K.L. Heck, and M. Waycott. 2009. Associations of concern: declining seagrasses and threatened dependent species. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment 7: 242–246.
Hummel, M., and S. Findlay. 2006. Effects of water chestnut (Trapa natans) beds on water chemistry in the tidal freshwater Hudson River. Hydrobiologia 559: 169–181. doi:10.1007/s10750-005-9201-0.
Lampman, G.G., N.F. Caraco, and J.J. Cole. 1999. Spatial and temporal patterns of nutrient concentration and export in the tidal Hudson River. Estuaries 22: 285–296.
Li, X.Y., D.E. Weller, C.L. Gallegos, T.E. Jordant, and H.C. Kim. 2007. Effects of watershed and estuarine characteristics on the abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation in Chesapeake Bay subestuaries. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 840–854.
Miles, J.R., P.E. Russell, and D.A. Huntley. 2001. Field measurements of sediment dynamics in front of a seawall. Journal of Coastal Research 17: 195–206.
Moore, K.A., E.C. Shields, D.B. Parrish, and R.J. Orth. 2012. Eelgrass survival in two contrasting systems: role of turbidity and summer water temperatures. Marine Ecology Progress Series 448: 247–258.
Nieder, W.C., E. Barnaba, S.E.G. Findlay, S. Hoskins, N. Holochuck, and E.A. Blair. 2004. Distribution and abundance of submerged aquatic vegetation in the Hudson River Estuary. Journal of Coastal Research 45: 150–161.
Nieder, W.C., S. Hoskins, S.D. Smith, and S.E.G. Findlay. 2008. Distribution and spatial change of Hudson River Estuary submerged aquatic vegetation: implications for coastal management and natural resource protection. In Remote sensing and GIS for coastal ecosystem assessment and management: principles and applications, ed. X. Yang, 259–277. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Orth, R.J., T.J.B. Carruthers, W.C. Dennison, C.M. Duarte, J.W. Fourqurean, K.L. Heck, A.R. Hughes, G.A. Kendrick, W.J. Kenworthy, S. Olyarnik, F.T. Short, M. Waycott, and S.L. Williams. 2006. A global crisis for seagrass ecosystems. Bioscience 56: 987–996.
Orth, R.J., M.R. Williams, S.R. Marion, D.J. Wilcox, T.J.B. Carruthers, K.A. Moore, W.M. Kemp, W.C. Dennison, N. Rybicki, P. Bergstrom, and R.A. Batiuk. 2010. Long-term trends in submersed aquatic vegetation (SAV) in Chesapeake Bay, USA, related to water quality. Estuaries and Coasts 33(5): 1144–1163.
Rozas, L.P., and T.J. Minello. 2006. Nekton use of Vallisneria americana Michx. (wild celery) beds and adjacent habitats in coastal Louisiana. Estuaries and Coasts 29: 297–310.
Rybicki, N.B., and J.M. Landwehr. 2007. Long-term changes in abundance and diversity of macrophyte and waterfowl populations in an estuary with exotic macrophytes and improving water quality. Limnology and Oceanography 52: 1195–1207.
Santos, R.O., D. Lirman, and J.E. Serafy. 2011. Quantifying freshwater-induced fragmentation of submerged aquatic vegetation communities using a multi-scale landscape ecology approach. Marine Ecology Progress Series 427: 233–246.
Scheffer, M., S.H. Hosper, M.L. Meijer, B. Moss, and E. Jeppesen. 1993. Alternative equilibria in shallow lakes. Trends in Ecology & Evolution 8: 275–279.
Shields, E.C., K.A. Moore, and D.B. Parrish. 2012. Influence of salinity and light availability on abundance and distribution of tidal freshwater and oligohaline submersed vegetation. Estuaries ad Coasts 35:515–526.
Short, F.T., and D.M. Burdick. 1996. Quantifying eelgrass habitat loss in relation to housing development and nitrogen loading in Waquoit Bay, Massachusetts. Estuaries 19: 730–739.
Strayer, D.L., and H.M. Malcom. 2007. Submersed vegetation as habitat for invertebrates in the Hudson River estuary. Estuaries and Coasts 30: 253–264.
Strayer, D.L., C. Lutz, H.M. Malcom, K. Munger, and W.H. Shaw. 2003. Invertebrate communities associated with a native (Vallisneria americana) and an alien (Trapa natans) macrophyte in a large river. Freshwater Biology 48: 1938–1949.
Strayer, D.L., E.A. Blair, N.F. Caraco, J.J. Cole, S. Findlay, W.C. Nieder, and M.L. Pace. 2005. Interactions between alien species and restoration of large-river ecosystems. Archiv für Hydrobiologie Supplementband 155: 133–145.
Tall, L., N. Caraco, and R. Maranger. 2011. Denitrification hot spots: dominant role of invasive macrophyte Trapa natans in removing nitrogen from a tidal river. Ecological Applications 21: 3104–3114.
Townsend, E.C., and M.S. Fonseca. 1998. Bioturbation as a potential mechanism influencing spatial heterogeneity of North Carolina seagrass beds. Marine Ecology Progress Series 169: 123–132.
Acknowledgments
This work was supported by a grant from the Hudson River Foundation to SF and DLS.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Communicated by Marianne Holmer
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Findlay, S.E.G., Strayer, D.L., Smith, S.D. et al. Magnitude and Patterns of Change in Submerged Aquatic Vegetation of the Tidal Freshwater Hudson River. Estuaries and Coasts 37, 1233–1242 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9758-1
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12237-013-9758-1