Rook Spring Seed Dispersal in the Agricultural Landscape – Frugivory, Granivory or Accidental Transport?
- First Online:
- Cite this article as:
- Czarnecka, J. & Kitowski, I. Folia Geobot (2013) 48: 55. doi:10.1007/s12224-012-9134-0
- 973 Downloads
Seed dispersal seems to be extremely important in agrocoenoses where suitable habitats (patches) are surrounded by an unfavourable environment (matrix). The role of the rook Corvus frugilegus, an omnivorous bird, in seed dispersal was studied in the agricultural landscape of Eastern Poland. We analyzed 739 pellets produced by regurgitation, which were collected under breeding colonies in April, May and June. Our goal was to i) assess the structure of the seed pool in pellets; ii) evaluate the temporal variation in the pellet seed pool on two different time scales; iii) compare the species composition of seeds in pellets and vegetation under the rook nests. Seeds were present in 18 % of pellets; 571 seeds were found, half of them belonging to dry-fruited species, without any obvious adaptations to endozoochory. These seeds could be an additional source of food, or they could have been accidentally swallowed during foraging for other food items. Taking into consideration the abundance of the rook population, we assessed the mean number of seeds transferred by one bird to be from 4 seeds per month in April and up to 160 seeds in June. The most important factor responsible for qualitative and quantitative structure of seed pool in pellets is the time when pellets were regurgitated. The type and availability of food determines the number and species structure of dispersed seeds. The comparison of the species structure of the seed pool in pellets and of the herb layer under the breeding colonies showed that the rook could effectively disperse seeds of weeds, meadow and ruderal species, that could germinate under the dense canopy of trees at the studied sites.
KeywordsEndozoochoryRegurgitation pelletsSecondary dispersalSeed predationWeeds
Plant nomenclature Mirek et al. (2002)
Species composition is a function of the availability of seeds and safe sites suitable for germination. Dispersal limitation is often crucial for local species composition and vegetation structure (Eriksson and Ehrlén 1992; Wang and Smith 2002; Ozinga et al. 2005). Plant movement is limited to the dispersal of seeds and pollen and it is usually mediated by animal agents, wind, water, gravity or caused by intrinsic explosive mechanisms (Wang and Smith 2002; Jordano et al. 2011). Many plants in most plant communities rely on animal-mediated mechanisms, with endozoochory being one of the most effective dispersal modes. Animals consuming fruits and seeds (frugivores and granivores) influence regeneration cycles of more than half of the plant species (Howe and Smallwood 1982; Wang and Smith 2002). Frugivory has been examined as a mutualistic interaction between animals and plants, while granivory has been viewed as an antagonistic interaction within the broader field of herbivory, but many vertebrates subsist on a diet of both fruits and seeds (Levey et al. 2002). Large herbivores can also contribute to the dispersal of some seeds while eating the foliage of parent plants (Janzen 1984). All these plant-animal interactions have been occurring for millions of years and some special traits of seeds and fruits were selected to attract animals, enhance survival in gut and increase edibility of the plant vegetation at the time of seed and fruit ripening (Janzen 1984; Pakeman et al. 2002).
Animals are often involved in complex dispersal systems (Nogales et al. 1998, 2007). They can be a vector in multi-step dispersal processes called diplochory or polichory, when seeds are dispersed in two or more phases. Combination of a few different mechanisms often provides greater benefits than do most single means. These benefits are mostly the extension of dispersal distance and moving seeds to safe germination sites (Vander Wall and Longland 2004). Animals can also play a role in secondary dispersal, when seeds that are on the ground are moved to other locations, and as a vector in non-standard dispersal, when a factor which cannot be linked to seed morphology is involved in seed spreading (Wang and Smith 2002; Higgins et al. 2003).
The role of birds in plant dispersal cannot be overestimated. Bird vectors may be the prime means of achieving larger seed dispersal distances and they play the dominant role in rapid migrations of plant species, even those without any adaptations to endozoochory (Wilkinson 1997). The awareness of the diverse ecological functions of birds increased significantly during the last few years – seed dispersal is one of the most important and least appreciated forms of birds’ contribution, enabling the colonization of marginal and isolated habitats (Sekercioglu 2006; Spiegel and Nathan 2007; Garcia et al. 2010). In the traditional man-shaped landscape most habitats are connected by dispersal processes (Poschold and Bonn 1998) and the probability of recolonization depends on the spatial relationship among landscape elements (patches, matrix and corridors), dispersal ability of organisms and temporal changes in landscape structure (Fahring and Merriam 1992). The increasing isolation of suitable habitats, called patches, leads to the growing importance of long-distance dispersal, and the latter becomes crucial for the persistence of species in a fragmented agricultural landscape (Ozinga et al. 2004; Trakhtenbrot et al. 2005), especially in the case of weed seeds, most of which have developed no dispersal mechanisms and their dispersal is limited (Benvenuti 2007).
Corvids are a group of birds strongly connected with man-shaped landscapes in Central Europe, and all of them are omnivorous species (Tryjanowski et al. 2009). Until now the role of this widely distributed and abundant group of birds in seed spreading has been poorly studied, although their diet and feeding behaviour has been examined carefully (e.g., Gromadzka 1980; Kasprzykowski 2003; Orłowski et al. 2009). They feed on a great variety of plant and animal material and usually rely on the easiest accessible food at the particular moment (Tryjanowski et al. 2009). Their feeding behaviour provides many species of different dispersal adaptations with a great opportunity of spreading. Frugivory mediated by corvids (the common raven Corvus corax, the magpie Pica pica and the carrion crow Corvus corone) was most frequently reported in the literature (Reebs and Boag 1987; Nogales et al. 1999; Jordano et al. 2007). The particular importance of this group of birds (the magpie, the rook and the jackdaw Corvus monedula) was also noticed because of their habit of cacheing food (Wilkinson 1997; Lenda and Skórka 2009; Lenda et al. 2012). Information on the internal transport of seeds of dry-fruited species, as a consequence of corvids’ granivory, is scattered and lacks quantitative character, e.g., the presence of weed seeds in stomach content was mentioned in a work concerning the rook diet (Gromadzka 1980).
We decided to check the potential role of the rook Corvus frugilegus L. in the process of seed dispersal in an agricultural landscape. Its diet has been studied carefully because of the bird’s reputation as a harmful grain-eater gained in the past. The main component of its plant diet is cereal grain. Fruits also constitute an important part of the diet, when this kind of food is available (Jabłoński 1979; Gromadzka 1980). The feeding behaviour of the species suggests that it can be an effective dispersal vector for many fleshy-fruited and dry-fruited plants on the landscape and regional scale. The rook-mediated dispersal events can mainly lead to the increase of biodiversity of patches in the agricultural landscape, where seeds from the other landscape elements (matrix, corridors and also the other patches) are placed.
The present study aims to evaluate the potential role of the rook in spring seed dispersal (April–July), by assessing the seed pool in regurgitation pellets. Spring was chosen because the ratio of bird (and hence pellet) concentration in one location (the rooks’ breeding colonies) to quantity of transported seeds is at its highest, as compared to winter (high pellet/low seed concentration) and summer/fall (low pellet because of scattered deposition/high seed concentration). The lowest number of transported seeds in spring was also observed during the studies of endozoochorous dispersal by large herbivores (Myers et al. 2004). We wanted to i) assess the structure of the seed pool in pellets; ii) evaluate the temporal variation in the regurgitation pellet seed pool in two different time scales; iii) compare the species composition of seeds in pellets and vegetation under the rook nests to assess if germination and establishment is possible under breeding colonies of the rook. We expected that two factors could be potentially responsible for the structure of the seed pool of pellets: the time of pellet formation and the structure of agricultural landscape that serves as a feeding place for the birds. We tested the germination ability of retrieved seeds and we assessed the possibility of post-dispersal establishment of seeds in habitats where pellets were located. We also discussed the effectiveness (sensu Shupp 1993) of seed dispersal, the importance of the rook in secondary dispersal, and the role of this bird in non-standard seed dispersal processes.
Material and Methods
The rook (Corvus frugilegus) is a forest-steppe species, currently one of the most numerous species in agroecosystems, but its population in Poland is difficult to estimate. Studies on a regional scale suggest that ca. 285,500 pairs (about 100 pairs/100 km2) presently live in Poland, and this number was even higher, reaching 400,000 pairs in the 1980s (Jakubiec 2005a; Tryjanowski et al. 2009). The rooks’ feeding range varies throughout the year. They feed from 0.5 − 2 km from the breeding colony (Patterson et al. 1971; Kasprzykowski 2003); in the case of wintering birds the distance can be higher as they forage even 10 − 40 km away from the winter roosts (Jadczyk and Jakubiec 2005). The mosaic of small fields is preferred by foraging birds, with meadows and pastures constituting the crucial type of foraging area for rooks. Spring cereals, winter crops, root plants, ploughed fields, maize and wastelands are also visited (Jakubiec 2005b). Preliminary studies of the content of the pellets produced by regurgitation showed that rooks can transport many seeds from foraging areas into breeding colonies and winter roosts (Czarnecka and Kitowski 2010), which are located almost exclusively in the close vicinity of man’s settlements, in various groups of trees, old parks and burial grounds (Jadczyk and Jakubiec 2005; Ptaszyk and Winiecki 2005). The rook’s diet contains plant (mainly the grain of cereals and smaller numbers of seeds of other plants) and animal items in nearly equal proportions throughout the year (Jabłoński 1979; Gromadzka 1980). One bird’s mean number of pellets ranges from 0.7 to 1.1 per day, and the maximum number observed in aviary conditions is 3 (Luniak 1977).
Study Area and Methods
Characteristics of the sites where pellets were collected; size of colony – number of pairs in 2009; time of pellet collection: IV – April, V – May; VI – June. Number of species in vegetation – herb layer only, trees in parks were planted
Code of colony
Site – local name
Size of colony
Total number of pellets
Number of seeds in pellets
Number of species
Time of collection (number of pellets in parentheses)
Park near the public hospital, mown, frequently visited
V (14), VI (17)
V (6), VI (23)
V (13), VI (17)
Park in the centre of town, mown, frequently visited
IV (33), V (13), VI (4)
IV (10), V (6), VI (11)
IV (19), V (8), VI (8)
Rural park surrounding a local small school, mown and spruce
IV (37), V (22)
IV (15), V (24)
Rural park surrounding a social welfare home, untidy but mown, moderately penetrated by people
IV (26), V (8)
IV (18), V (12)
Rural park with a few small ponds in neighbourhood, rarely mown
IV (22), V (23)
IV (19), V (37)
IV (14), V (11)
Rural park, completely abandoned and untidy with well-developed bushes, hardly penetrated by local people
IV (13), V (17)
IV (20), V (6)
IV (46), V (20)
Rural park surrounding restaurant, with a few ponds and golf course in the neighbourhood, mown
IV (12), V (7)
IV (26), V (12)
IV (10), V (16)
Pellets were dried, weighed and examined under the magnification 10×; all seeds and other items (fragments of cereal grains, stones, fragments of paper, plastic bags, aluminium foil, glass etc.) were separated and identified. When all the pellets were examined, all the separated seeds were sown into garden soil and put into the greenhouse in March 2010 to check their germination ability. Seeds separated earlier were stored dry in room temperature until sowing time, similarly to the pellets awaiting analysis. Storage conditions were the same for seeds present in pellets and those already extracted. We decided to sow all separated seeds at the same time to reduce the differences in germination ability caused by the differences in time and storage conditions. This enabled us to compare the germination test results among the different species and seeds separated from pellets at different times. The observation of germination was terminated after 100 days. To check the possibility of germination of species present in pellets all colonies were visited in July 2009. Vegetation under the colony was examined carefully, all species represented by established individuals were noted and their abundance was evaluated.
Because of the high proportion of pellets without any seeds (high proportion of zero values obtained) we could apply non-parametric tests (χ2 likelihood ratio, Kruskal-Wallis test, U Mann-Whitney test) and the Spearman rank correlation coefficient (rs). In some cases data were expressed as mean values per 100 pellets to enable comparisons between different data sets. The Detrended Components Analysis (DCA) was conducted to estimate the level of similarity among pellets of different sub-colonies collected in three subsequent months (Table 1, N = 43); it also helped to identify main factors responsible for the differences in the structure of seed pools of pellets. Two main assumptions had been made before the analysis was run: i) if time is the most important factor responsible for differences in pellet structure, then pellets collected in different months should form three distinct groups; ii) because we did not conduct a detailed survey of foraging preferences of birds from the studied colonies we assumed that birds nesting in one colony would forage at the same habitat types, where food is easily attainable. It is known that the food source within a 1-km radius of the rookery is the most important for the rook (Kasprzykowski 2003). If the habitat types present around the colony were the most important factor influencing the seed pool and structure of pellets, then pellets collected under the same colony (coming from three sub-colonies for each particular colony) should be much more similar to each other than to the pellets originating from other rookeries. The following features of pellets were taken into consideration when DCA was performed: total number of species, number of fleshy-fruited and dry-fruited species, frequency of fragments of cereal grains (the percentage of pellets that contained fragments of cereal grains), mean number of cereal grains per pellet, all groups of seeds, seeds of fleshy-fruited and dry-fruited species. To analyze seed pool data the MVSP (Kovach 2005) and Statistica.Pl software was used. This analysis was the only one in which data from subsequent sub-colonies were treated separately. In the other cases the seed pool of pellets collected at the same time (April, May, June) or under the same colony (codes A−G) was analyzed.
We assumed that seed persistence was a key feature that guaranteed successful post-dispersal establishment in the habitats under rook colonies. The longevity index (LI; in Table S1 in Electronic Supplementary Material) was calculated for all recorded species according to Thompson et al. (1998) on the basis of the data from Thompson et al. (1997). It varies between 0 and 1; higher values indicate that species create persistent seed banks.
To check if the intensity of seed dispersal mediated by the rook varies between years seed pools of pellets collected at the same site in two subsequent years (2008 and 2009) were compared. Published data from 2008, when pellets were collected in June (Czarnecka and Kitowski 2010) was then used. We could compare the structure of seed pools from four sites (A, C, D, F); pellets collected at the end of April 2009 were excluded from the analysis to make the data more comparable. Principal Components Analysis (PCA) was used to compare the seed pool in pellets (quantitative data were used). We also compared the share of three main groups of species (fleshy-fruited, dry-fruited and cereals) using χ2 likelihood ratio between the data from two subsequent years.
Mean values of variables characterizing seed pool in pellets. Differences analyzed with the Kruskal-Wallis test
April N = 384
May N = 275
June N = 80
Weight of pellet (g)
Number of seeds/100 pellets
Total number (cereal grains excluded)
Number of cereal grains/100 pellets
Structure of the seed pool of pellets of the rook Corvus frugilegus. Mean number of seeds calculated per 100 pellets, frequency of the occurrence of seeds (%) in parentheses. Dispersal mode in parentheses, classification based on external adaptations of diaspores: A – anemochory (diaspores with wings or plumes, also the smallest seeds with no dispersal adaptations); B – barochory (dispersed by gravity); Ep – epizoochory (diaspores with hooks, hairs or awns); M – myrmecochory (diaspores with elaiosomes)
Vicia sp. (B)
Setaria pumila (B)
Stellaria media (B)
Chenopodium sp. (B)
Taraxacum officinale (A)
Rumex acetosella (A)
Papaver rhoeas (A)
Viola odorata (M)
Ranunculus repens (B)
Erigeron annuus (A)
Lithospermum arvense (B)
Species with the number of seeds smaller than 1 per 100 pellets:
April – Avena fatua (Ep), Carex hirta (B), Carex sp., Echinochloa crus-galli (Ep), Phleum pratense (Ep), Polygonum aviculare (B), Polygonum minus (B), Setaria viridis (B), Trifolium pratense (B), Veronica persica (B)
May – Anagallis arvensis (B), Arrhenatherum elatius (Ep), Capsella bursa-pastoris (A), Daucus carota (Ep), Fallopia convolvulus (B), Galium aparine (Ep), Galium mollugo (B), Melandrium album (B), Myosotis arvensis (B), Phleum pratense (Ep), Veronica hederifolia (B)
Betula pendula (A)
Robinia pseudoacacia (B)
Species with the number of seeds smaller than 1 per 100 pellets: May – Acer negundo (A)
Species with the number of seeds smaller than 1 per 100 pellets: May – Zea mays
χ2 likelihood ratio between data from the years 2008 and 2009 (percentage share in parentheses). The structure of the seed pool in 2008 was treated as the expected value; dry-fruited herbs and trees were put in one group for the analysis; d.f. = 2
Number of seeds (%)
72.93; P < 0.001
234.3; P < 0.001
87.06; P < 0.001
Seeds of 15 species germinated (Table S1 in Electronic Supplementary Material) in the greenhouse. Two aspects are worth underlining here: the informative value of this germination test is quite low because in most cases only one or a few seeds could be sown; thus it can only be said that at least in some cases seeds could be regurgitated alive and untouched. The taxa best represented in the seed pool (Viola odorata, the most abundant of dry-fruited species and Cerasus avium – a fleshy-fruited one), however, did not germinate.
Comparison of species composition of seed pool in pellets and herb layer under breeding colonies (N = 7). Data of pellets’ seed pool from April, May and June were put together for each colony and treated as potential seed influx. Differences were analyzed with the U Mann-Whitney test; standard deviation in parentheses
Mean number of species
5.5; P < 0.05
6.5; P < 0.05
1.0; P < 0.01
0.0; P < 0.01
0.0; P < 0.01
7.5; P < 0.05
Seed Predator or Seed Disperser
In the rook’s diet, animal food predominates during the breeding season. The most important plant material consumed is cereal grains (Gromadzka 1980). The number of grains and the frequency of fragments of grains in the analyzed pellets was highest in April (16.4 grains per 100 pellets; 95 % of pellets contained damaged cereal grains), whereas in May it was 3.3 grains per 100 pellets and 66 % of pellets contained damaged cereal grains and in June 7.5 and 39 %. Easily attainable fleshy fruits of Cerasus avium, Fragaria sp., Morus alba and Rubus sp. replaced the cereal grains in May and June. Analysis of gizzard content indicated invertebrates as the main food source between April and June (Gromadzka 1980). The main plant items then were cereal grains (frequency of occurrence between 96 % in April and 79 % in June); other items like weed seeds and underground plant parts were also present but their frequency was low. It is known that the results of diet analysis obtained with different methods vary strongly, and that the main source of a potential bias in methods can result from a different digestibility of food items (studies of the diet of the red-backed shrike Lanius collurio, Tryjanowski et al. 2003), but in our case the results coincided with the results other authors have obtained.
Weed seeds are an important food source for many bird species in agroecosystems (Wilson et al. 1999). Seeds are such a valuable food source because of their high energy content and the relatively high protein and nitrogen level in comparison to other plant material (Crawley 1997). The caloric value of weed seeds and grains is considerably high, which in practice means that shorter time is needed to sustain energy demands of birds feeding on seeds than on other plant items, which was studied in detail in the case of the grey partridge Perdix perdix (Potts 1970). We can only speculate about the reasons of the presence of intact seeds of dry-fruited species in the pellets of the rook collected under the breeding colonies. Small seeds of dry-fruited species (see Table S1 in Electronic Supplementary Material for details) can act as an additional food source for the bird but comparison of the number and mass of cereal grains and dry-fruited species clearly shows that the latter can only be an additional and insignificant source of food. It is known that birds that consume many seeds can also act as seed dispersers. The probability of seed dispersal by granivorous birds may be related to the large number of small seeds consumed, which is the function of seed density in the environment (Bruun and Poschlod 2006). This was observed in the case of the grey partridge consuming mainly seeds of Amaranthus retroflexus. Some swallowed seeds (0.3 %) passed through the gut of the bird undamaged and could germinate (Orłowski and Czarnecka 2009). It is also worth highlighting that much smaller granivores like the reed bunting Emberiza schoeniclus digested all the consumed seeds (Orłowski and Czarnecka 2007). Also in the case of birds occupying other habitats, e.g., shorebird species with many long-distance migrants among them, many species have been recorded as consuming and dispersing seeds. Saltmarsh seeds (mainly Chenopodiaceae) were found in 13 − 44 % of droppings and pellets of shorebird species wintering in Spain; seeds of 31 species (Poaceae and Chenopodiaceae among them) were present in droppings of plains-waders Pedionomus torquatus and diaspores of 122 genera were found in the stomach of the common snipe Gallinago gallinago (Green et al. 2002 and literature cited there). In droppings of the emu Dromaius novaehollandiae, an omnivorous, but mostly herbivorous bird, seeds of 77 plant species were found, 61 % of which were not adapted to endozoochory (Calviño-Cancela et al. 2006). Dry fruits of sedges and grasses and seeds without obvious adaptations to endozoochory were also found in droppings of Darwin’s finches Geospizinae (Guerrero and Tye 2009), and in pellets and faeces of waders (Sánches et al. 2006).
Presence of dry-fruited species can also be a result of unintentional swallowing during the foraging for other food items like cereal grains or animal food, and in this case it would be an example of secondary dispersal of seeds. The probability that small seeds or dry fruits occasionally escape the digestion is higher than in the case of bigger seeds, and the role of these infrequent dispersal events mediated by seed predators may be very important for the life cycle of plants that would not normally be considered bird-dispersed (Guerrero and Tye 2009). Analyses of the diet of the reed bunting and the grey partridge based on the presence of the remains of consumed food in droppings showed the presence of large amounts of crushed seed coats in faeces when weed seeds constituted the main food source (Orłowski and Czarnecka 2007, 2009). Analyzed pellet content from the rook also contained undigested remains of plant items, mainly cereal grain fragments. No seed coats or damaged seeds of any other dry-fruited species were found. This proves that the rook is rather a disperser than a seed predator of all small-seeded dry-fruited species other than cereals, although the number of dispersed seeds is low.
Post-Dispersal Fate of Seeds
According to Shupp (1993), the effectiveness of a disperser depends on the number of seeds dispersed (quantity) and the probability that the dispersed seed will produce a new reproductive adult (quality). The quantity of seeds dispersed by one particular rook is small and the probability of one dispersal event is quite low. One single bird could transfer from 4 seeds per month in April up to 160 seeds in June, but the dispersal efficiency is also the function of the density of disperser population (Herrera and Jordano 1981). We tried to evaluate the number of potentially transported seeds by all birds from the studied breeding colonies – and we assumed that it could be almost 550,000 seeds during the three-month breeding period (seeds of dry-fruited species constituted half of them).
The components of the quality of dispersal are the quality of seed treatment and deposition (Shupp 1993). Seed germination depends on where the seeds were placed and the behaviour of the disperser determines the pattern of deposition (Calviño-Cancela 2004). Endozoochorous plant species can be classified as specialists and generalists. Specialists selectively attract birds; seeds are transported by a few dispersers but they are usually placed in high-quality sites (safe germination sites). Generalists, in turn, attract many bird species that deposit their seeds in a large variety of habitat types (so-called “risk-spreading dispersal”; Ishaki et al. 1991). The rook, an omnivorous species, can be treated as a generalist disperser. It disperses seeds of species mostly connected with open habitats (arable fields, meadows and ruderal sites) and deposits them under the canopy of trees in rural parks. These sites cannot be assessed as safe germination sites but at least some of the species whose seeds were found in pellets could germinate there (Galium aparine, Polygonum aviculare, Taraxacum officinale and Stellaria media were observed in the herb layer in more than 50 % of studies sites, Table S1 in Electronic Supplementary Material). The rook is an important disperser of walnut seeds that it would hide in ploughed fields and in field margins. A significant number of seedlings was also found there especially when the field was abandoned later (Lenda et al. 2012). The only achievable data on the quality of seed deposition by other corvids concern the common raven and seeds of fleshy-fruited species: most of these seeds were regurgitated in microsites assessed as potentially suitable (Nogales et al. 1999). Seeds were also found in pellets of migratory waders but there are currently no data on the movement of diaspores transported by waders between suitable habitats (Sánches et al. 2006).
The spatial pattern of deposition is usually clumped, which is influenced by the pattern of distribution of perching or roosting sites and the deposition of seeds in clumps after defecation or pellet regurgitation (Debussche and Isenmann 1994; Jordano et al. 2007). The number of seeds in one dropping or pellet can be high, which is not an advantageous aspect of endozoochorous dispersal. The maximum number of seeds of one species in one rook pellet was 108 (Viola odorata); in the case of pellets formed by the common raven the observed number was much higher – even 980 seeds of Ficus carica were present in one particular pellet (Nogales et al. 1999). When the number of seeds per group increases, their germination success decreases. Clumped deposition increases the probability of suffering higher predation rate and influences seedling survival by the increase of inter- or intraspecific competition (Barnea et al. 1992; Pizo and Simão 2001; Paulsen and Högstedt 2002). But in the case of multi-seeded fleshy fruits the rook ingestion reduced the number of seeds in one group. The maximum number of Fragaria sp. seeds per pellet was only 19; usually we found only a few seeds of this species in one particular regurgitation pellet. The process of reducing the density of seeds of fleshy-fruited species by birds in pellets was also observed by Clergean (1992) and Barnea et al. (1992). Big seeds of Hedera helix and Prunus sp. were regurgitated alone one after another, small seeds regurgitated in groups were mixed with other indigested material (Clergean 1992). Additionally, seeds of the palm Enterpe edulis were much less clumped in regurgitation pellets than in bird faeces (Pizo and Simão 2001).
Viable seeds that did not germinate at the place of their deposition can enter the soil seed bank. In the case of rabbit endozoochory, 33 % of seeds entering the seed bank were dispersed within faeces (Pakeman et al. 1999). Small-seeded species are more likely to be dispersed by endozoochory (Janzen 1984), because the small size and round shape enable them to survive ingestion; these external features are also characteristic of the species creating the persistent soil seed bank (Pakeman et al 1999, 2002). Most dry-fruited species found in the rook’s regurgitation pellets were small-seeded and they created a persistent soil seed bank (Table S1 in Electronic Supplementary Material).
Chambers (1999) distinguished “vectors in spread”, which are the rook in our study, and “agencies of establishment”, affecting or altering local substrate and light conditions to make them suitable for germination and growth. For most species present in rook pellets, local disturbances could promote their germination. Tree fall and herb layer removal were responsible for promoting germination and establishment at two study sites in our preliminary studies of seed dispersal by the rook (Czarnecka and Kitowski 2010). A considerable number of weed and ruderal seeds was found in the soil seed bank of forest community (Turkey oak-sessile oak forest) adjacent to abandoned vineyard that served as a source of weed propagules. Their germination was hampered by high canopy cover but an increase of weed and ruderal herb cover was foreseen if canopy opened (Koncz et al. 2011). Searching for “agencies of establishment” seems to be another interesting aspect of the studies of dispersal mediated by the rook and other corvids connected with agricultural landscape of Central Europe.
Our study showed that the rook, an omnivorous bird species, can act as an important seed dispersal agent, especially for species of agricultural landscape without any obvious adaptation to endozoochory. Dry-fruited species found in the rook’s regurgitation pellets are mostly characteristic of open habitats: arable lands, ruderal sites and meadows. The most important factor responsible for the structure of the seed pool transported by the rook is the time when pellets were regurgitated. This means that the type and availability of food determines the number and species structure of dispersed seeds. Seeds are placed in microsites under the dense canopy, which is a disadvantageous aspect of the dispersal mediated by the rook, but some species found in pellets can germinate under the dense tree canopy (weeds, meadow and ruderal species) and most create persistent seed banks, thus increasing the possibility of potential seed germination and seedling establishment when environmental conditions change.
We thank three anonymous reviewers for discussion, comments and valuable remarks on this paper.
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.