Psychological Injury and Law

, Volume 2, Issue 1, pp 62-85

First online:

The MMPI-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) Is an Empirically Validated Measure of Overreporting in Personal Injury Litigants and Claimants: Reply to Butcher et al. (2008)

  • Yossef S. Ben-PorathAffiliated withKent State University Email author 
  • , Kevin W. GreveAffiliated withUniversity of New OrleansJefferson Neurobehavioral Group
  • , Kevin J. BianchiniAffiliated withUniversity of New OrleansJefferson Neurobehavioral Group
  • , Paul M. KaufmannAffiliated withUniversity of Nebraska

Rent the article at a discount

Rent now

* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.

Get Access


We address issues raised by Butcher et al. (Psychological Injury and the Law 1:191–209, 2008) in their critique of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory-2 Symptom Validity Scale (FBS) and show that their analyses and conclusions are based on faulty premises, a misunderstanding of basic concepts in the assessment of overreporting, a selective review of the literature and mischaracterization of the findings they do cite, problematic analyses of a dataset that had already been similarly analyzed, and a flawed analysis of a legal case they discuss. We complement the review of existing research with some new findings that provide further empirical support and clarification of current interpretive recommendations for proper use of the FBS in evaluations of personal injury litigants and claimants.