Skip to main content
Log in

An evaluation of airport x-ray backscatter units based on image characteristics

Journal of Transportation Security Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little information exists on the performance of x-ray backscatter machines now being deployed through UK, US and other airports. We implement a Monte Carlo simulation using as input what is known about the x-ray spectra used for imaging, device specifications and available images to estimate penetration and exposure to the body from the x-ray beam, and sensitivity to dangerous contraband materials. We show that the body is exposed throughout to the incident x-rays, and that although images can be made at the exposure levels claimed (under 100 nanoGrey per view), detection of contraband can be foiled in these systems. Because front and back views are obtained, low Z materials can only be reliable detected if they are packed outside the sides of the body or with hard edges, while high Z materials are well seen when placed in front or back of the body, but not to the sides. Even if exposure were to be increased significantly, normal anatomy would make a dangerous amount of plastic explosive with tapered edges difficult if not impossible to detect.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Agostinelli S, Allison J, Amako K et al (2003) Geant4—a simulation toolkit. Nuclear instruments and methods in physics research section A: Accelerators, Spectrometers, Detectors and Associated Equipment 506(3):250–303. (http://geant4.cern.ch/)

  • Evans RD (1955) The atomic nucleus. McGraw-Hill Book Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiejo PV, Hoff G (2008) Geant4 validation on mammography applications. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record IEEE 3497–3498

  • Guatelli S, Mascialino B, Pia MG, Pokorski W (2006) Geant4 anthropomorphic pantoms. Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record IEEE 1359–1362

  • Kaufman L (2010) Letter to the Editor. Re: airport full body scanners. JACR 7(8):655

    Google Scholar 

  • National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2003a) Commentary No 16- Screening of humans for security purposes using ionizing radiation scanning systems. Bethesda, MD

  • National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (2003b) President report on radiation protection advice: screening of humans for security purposes using ionizing radiation scanning systems (SC 01-12,), Bethesda, MD

  • Operational Requirements Document (2006) Whole body imager aviation applications, USDHS, July, Version 1.9, Final Report. NTIS, Springfield, VA

  • Rose AA (1971) Vision: human and electronic, Chapter 1. Plenum, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Shosa DW, Kaufman L (1981) Methodology for evaluation of diagnostic imaging instrumentation. Phys Med Biol 26:101–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The authors are grateful for the valuable input provided by Professor Peter Rez of the Physics Department, Arizona State University.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph W. Carlson.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kaufman, L., Carlson, J.W. An evaluation of airport x-ray backscatter units based on image characteristics. J Transp Secur 4, 73–94 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-010-0059-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12198-010-0059-7

Keywords

Navigation