Comparison of dose at an interventional reference point between the displayed estimated value and measured value
Rent the article at a discountRent now
* Final gross prices may vary according to local VAT.Get Access
Today, interventional radiology (IR) X-ray units are required for display of doses at an interventional reference point (IRP) for the operator (IR physician). The dose displayed at the IRP (the reference dose) of an X-ray unit has been reported to be helpful for characterizing patient exposure in real time. However, no detailed report has evaluated the accuracy of the reference doses displayed on X-ray equipment. Thus, in this study, we compared the displayed reference dose to the actual measured value in many IR X-ray systems. Although the displayed reference doses of many IR X-ray systems agreed with the measured actual values within approximately 15%, the doses of a few IR units were not close. Furthermore, some X-ray units made in Japan displayed reference doses quite different from the actual measured value, probably because the reference point of these units differs from the International Electrotechnical Commission standard. Thus, IR physicians should pay attention to the location of the IRP of the displayed reference dose in Japan. Furthermore, physicians should be aware of the accuracy of the displayed reference dose of the X-ray system that they use for IR. Thus, regular checks of the displayed reference dose of the X-ray system are important.
- International Commission on Radiological Protection. ICRP publication 85: avoidance of radiation injuries from medical interventional procedures. Ann ICRP 2001 (30/2:Publication 85).
- Hirshfeld JW, Balter S, Brinker JA, et al. ACCF/AHA/HRS/SCAI clinical competence statement on physician knowledge to optimize patient safety and image quality in fluoroscopically guided invasive cardiovascular procedures: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association American. College of Physicians Task Force on Clinical Competence and Training. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;44:2259–82. CrossRef
- Wong L, Rehm J. Images in clinical medicine: radiation injury from a fluoroscopic procedure. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:e23. CrossRef
- Chida K, Morishima Y, Katahira Y, Chiba H, Zuguchi M. Evaluation of additional lead shielding in protecting the physician from radiation during cardiac interventional procedures. Nippon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi. 2005;61:1632–7.
- Chida K, Kato M, Saito H, Ishibashi T, Takahashi S, Kohzuki M, et al. Optimizing patient radiation dose in intervention procedures. Acta Radiol. 2010;51:33–9. CrossRef
- Chida K, Kato M, Kagaya Y, Zuguchi M, Saito H, Ishibashi T, et al. Radiation dose and radiation protection for patients and physicians during interventional procedure. J Radiat Res. 2010;51:97–105. CrossRef
- Balter S, Hopewell JW, Miller DL, Wagner LK, Zelefsky MJ. Fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures: a review of radiation effects on patients’ skin and hair. Radiology. 2010;254:326–41. CrossRef
- Kato M, Chida K, Sato T, Oosaka H, Tosa T, Kadowaki K. Evaluating the maximum patient radiation dose in cardiac interventional procedures. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;143:69–73. CrossRef
- Chida K, Saito H, Zuguchi M, Shirotori K, Kumagai S, Nakayama H, et al. Does digital acquisition reduce patients’ skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures? An experimental study. Am J Roentgenol. 2004;183:1111–4.
- Chida K, Saito H, Otani H, Kohzuki M, Takahashi S, Yamada S, et al. Relationship between fluoroscopic time, dose-area product, body weight, and maximum radiation skin dose in cardiac interventional procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 2006;186:774–8. CrossRef
- Kim KP, Miller DL. Minimising radiation exposure to physicians performing fluoroscopically guided cardiac catheterisation procedures: a review. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2009;133:227–33. CrossRef
- Chida K, Inaba Y, Masuyama H, Yanagawa I, Mori I, Saito H, et al. Evaluating the performance of a MOSFET dosimeter at diagnostic X-ray energies for interventional radiology. Radiol Phys Technol. 2009;2:58–61. CrossRef
- Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from the American Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation. 2009;119:1056–65. CrossRef
- Chida K, Inaba Y, Saito H, Ishibashi T, Takahashi S, Kohzuki M, et al. Radiation dose of interventional radiology system using a flat-panel detector. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:1680–5. CrossRef
- Tsapaki V, Ahmed NA, AlSuwaidi JS, Beganovic A, Benider A, BenOmrane L, et al. Radiation exposure to patients during interventional procedures in 20 countries: initial IAEA project results. Am J Roentgenol. 2009;193:559–69. CrossRef
- Chida K, Ohno T, Kakizaki S, Takegawa M, Yuuki H, Nakada M, et al. Radiation dose to the pediatric cardiac catheterization and intervention patient. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;195:1175–9. CrossRef
- Inaba Y, Chida K, Shirotori K, Shimura H, Yanagawa I, Zuguchi M, et al. Comparison of the radiation dose in a cardiac IVR X-ray system. Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2011;143:74–80. CrossRef
- International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). Medical electrical equipment. Part 2–43. Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures. IEC 60601-2-43. Geneva, Switzerland: International Electrotechnical Commission; 2000.
- Chida K, Kagaya Y, Saito H, Takai Y, Takahashi S, Yamada S, et al. Total entrance skin dose: an effective indicator of the maximum radiation dose to a patient’s skin during percutaneous coronary intervention. Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:W224–7. CrossRef
- Japanese Industrial Standards (JIS). Medical electrical equipment, Particular requirements for the safety of X-ray equipment for interventional procedures, Z 4751-2-43, 2005.
- Chida K, Takahashi T, Ito D, Shimura H, Takeda K, Zuguchi M. Clarifying and visualizing sources of staff-received scattered radiation in interventional procedures. Am J Roentgenol. 2011 (in press).
- Comparison of dose at an interventional reference point between the displayed estimated value and measured value
Radiological Physics and Technology
Volume 4, Issue 2 , pp 189-193
- Cover Date
- Print ISSN
- Online ISSN
- Springer Japan
- Additional Links
- Interventional radiology
- Radiation injury
- Exposure dose
- Radiation dosimetry
- Interventional reference point (IRP)
- Radiation safety
- Author Affiliations
- 1. Department of Radiological Technology, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Medicine, Tohoku University, 2-1 Seiryo-machi, Aoba-ku, Sendai, 980-8575, Japan
- 2. Department of Radiology, Tohoku University Hospital, 1-1 Seiryo, Aoba, Sendai, 980-8574, Japan
- 3. Department of Radiology, Tohoku Employees’ Pension Welfare Hospital, 1-12-1 Fukumuro, Miyagino, Sendai, 983-8512, Japan